View Single Post
Old 02-18-15, 09:35 AM
  #21  
Brian Ratliff
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
I really have experienced smaller chainring/cog combos feeling like smaller gears.

People say it's a myth. But, perception is reality in many respects.

Just like some people can't tell if their cleats are twisted or if their saddle is 1 inch lower, other people can.
I'm actually with you. People, underestimate just how sensitive the human body is. Apparently we can detect texture differences in the nanometer range.

And, I still hold that a small-small combo is going to be more responsive and more lossy due to the smaller diameter of the chain path (less inertia-more responsive, shorter bend radius-more lossy) and the higher tension on the chain (less backlash-more responsive, higher link friction-more lossy).

I would like to see someone come out to a world class sprint meet sporting a 58/15 combo sometime...
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline