I admit that I don't know enough about this case to make a judgment, but I do know that you can't just ignore court orders. I am not a lawyer, but when a judge issues a court order prohibiting you from doing something, even if the ruling infringes upon your rights, if you violate the court order then you're guilty of contempt of court and can be thrown in jail. The best thing for him would have been to hire a lawyer to fight it if it's a bad ruling rather than to take the law into his own hands and risk even more jail time.
I have a feeling that since he thinks he can ignore a judge's order then this goes way beyond the "innocent bicyclist harassed by corrupt court restricting his rights" narrative I'm sure he's pushing.