Strava vs. RideWithGPS
#26
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,698
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4795 Post(s)
Liked 1,547 Times
in
1,014 Posts
Can anyone explain how the elevation info is so bad in RWGPS though?
Not sure anyone's familiar with the GFNY ride here in NYC, but the ride publishes the stats as approx 8500 ft. My Garmin came back with 8,340 ft. Strava said the same as Garmin. However, GFNY used RWGPS itself to provide their route to its participants. The route (linked below) shows 7,680 ft. Call it off by 10%. ok.. BUT, the same route actually ridden, uploaded to RWGPS via Connect, for my ride shows me the per the snipshot below (over 10k feet). Does make you feel better.. but really, I don't get it.
https://ridewithgps.com/routes/10596674
.
Not sure anyone's familiar with the GFNY ride here in NYC, but the ride publishes the stats as approx 8500 ft. My Garmin came back with 8,340 ft. Strava said the same as Garmin. However, GFNY used RWGPS itself to provide their route to its participants. The route (linked below) shows 7,680 ft. Call it off by 10%. ok.. BUT, the same route actually ridden, uploaded to RWGPS via Connect, for my ride shows me the per the snipshot below (over 10k feet). Does make you feel better.. but really, I don't get it.
https://ridewithgps.com/routes/10596674
.
#27
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,274
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6345 Post(s)
Liked 4,948 Times
in
3,408 Posts
#28
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,274
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6345 Post(s)
Liked 4,948 Times
in
3,408 Posts
Elevations taken from map data will always be way off from your device. So if the GFNY didn't actually ride the route and just built a course, then there you go. Apples and oranges.
Different sites handle elevation data from your device differently. So there you go. Apples and oranges.
Different devices have different accuracy for their ways the determine elevation. So....
Different sites handle elevation data from your device differently. So there you go. Apples and oranges.
Different devices have different accuracy for their ways the determine elevation. So....
#29
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,698
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4795 Post(s)
Liked 1,547 Times
in
1,014 Posts
Elevations taken from map data will always be way off from your device. So if the GFNY didn't actually ride the route and just built a course, then there you go. Apples and oranges.
Different sites handle elevation data from your device differently. So there you go. Apples and oranges.
Different devices have different accuracy for their ways the determine elevation. So....
Different sites handle elevation data from your device differently. So there you go. Apples and oranges.
Different devices have different accuracy for their ways the determine elevation. So....
Garmin and Strava seem to agree on the 8340 ft.
What doesn't make any sense, is that RWGPS apparently chooses to disregard the GPS, and more curiously, chooses to disregard its OWN elevation data from map data it used when creating the route. So what the heck did RWGPS use to determine this ride's elevation?
#30
Hack
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,283
Bikes: TrueNorth CX bike, 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), Yess World Cup race BMX, Pure Cruiser race BMX, RSD Mayor v3 Fatbike
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 199 Times
in
136 Posts
Actually, I started using Strava when the city subscribed to the aggregate data service. Figured I might as well get counted for the usage stats.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Vermont
Posts: 308
Bikes: Trek Domane SL5, Raleigh Venture 4.0, Ross Gran Tour II
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One of several searches I did: https://www.bikeforums.net/search.php?searchid=2112527
Currently shows THIS thread, but nothing else apparent on the first two pages that is helpful.
The search function is almost worthless unless you are looking for a single esoteric term.
2) They're both find programs, they're both free, and they aren't mutually exclusive. You can run both of them and see for yourself. For free.
3) Strava has all the tracking features of RWGPS, but also has the social features that basically make it Facebook for cyclists. If you don't care about that. it really doesn't mater which one you use.
3) Strava has all the tracking features of RWGPS, but also has the social features that basically make it Facebook for cyclists. If you don't care about that. it really doesn't mater which one you use.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,549
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18442 Post(s)
Liked 4,551 Times
in
3,382 Posts
RWGPS also has a real-time cumulative elevation option that one can enable.
I find it is 2x or 3x my actual climbing from post-ride analysis. So, it must be taken with a grain of salt.
One of the problems is the GPS is relatively accurate for North/South planes, but is relatively inaccurate for the vertical axis. I've been riding along, doing say a 1% climb, and noticed the RWGPS elevation jumping all around, from climbing to descending. So, using that data creates a mess to clean up and give any type of meaningful climbing data.
I presume with post-ride analysis, they can average data from hundreds of rides over the same course, and get a fairly accurate location, even without using actual mapping survey data.
Map & static elevation data can also have issues with bridges that a person may be crossing a bridge, but the map data shows the elevation at the river level.
I find it is 2x or 3x my actual climbing from post-ride analysis. So, it must be taken with a grain of salt.
One of the problems is the GPS is relatively accurate for North/South planes, but is relatively inaccurate for the vertical axis. I've been riding along, doing say a 1% climb, and noticed the RWGPS elevation jumping all around, from climbing to descending. So, using that data creates a mess to clean up and give any type of meaningful climbing data.
I presume with post-ride analysis, they can average data from hundreds of rides over the same course, and get a fairly accurate location, even without using actual mapping survey data.
Map & static elevation data can also have issues with bridges that a person may be crossing a bridge, but the map data shows the elevation at the river level.
#33
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,590
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 513 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7397 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,498 Posts
@CliffordK what is the real time map function you are speaking of that you say is unavailable on rwgps?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Vienna, AT
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As others have said, the route-planning tools in RWGPS are way ahead of Strava (EXCEPT for Strava's global heatmap). RWGPS also allows you to import routes that lack timestamp data, such as from biroto.eu. This was a significant factor for me.
#35
Senior Member
Am i the only person in the world that uses Runtastic RoadBike? I think I might be lol.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
I used to use that. If you don't care about Strava it's fine (although I think it also isn't compatible with a power meter). Now I use Cyclemeter (which costs 12.99 per year) which has all of the same features plus works with Strava.
#37
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 348
Bikes: 2015 Surly Ogre
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I signed up for free accounts at Strava and RWGPS, so all of my rides get automatically uploaded from Garmin to them. At first, Strava was interesting as I could try for new PRs on different segments (not KOMs!), but after a year or so all my PRs are with 20-40 mph tailwinds. Thus, only the global and my personal heat maps from Strava are of any interest for me. In addition to creating routes with RWGPS, I like that it gives moving average speed (e.g., subtracting the stopped time for lunch), as well as min, max, and average cadence.
#38
Senior Member
Power meters and KOM ruins cycling for me. I just want to ride and keep track of where I went without it being a competition. I pedal hard when I want and slack off when I want lol. Roadbike is simple and works great for that.
#39
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,433
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 339 Times
in
208 Posts
Uhhhh, I did.
One of several searches I did: https://www.bikeforums.net/search.php?searchid=2112527
Currently shows THIS thread, but nothing else apparent on the first two pages that is helpful.
The search function is almost worthless unless you are looking for a single esoteric term.
Yup. That's why I participate in forums. So that I can just rely on my own superior smarts. No slight intended on that majority who gave actual advice.
One of several searches I did: https://www.bikeforums.net/search.php?searchid=2112527
Currently shows THIS thread, but nothing else apparent on the first two pages that is helpful.
The search function is almost worthless unless you are looking for a single esoteric term.
Yup. That's why I participate in forums. So that I can just rely on my own superior smarts. No slight intended on that majority who gave actual advice.
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
#40
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Vermont
Posts: 308
Bikes: Trek Domane SL5, Raleigh Venture 4.0, Ross Gran Tour II
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I wish you could do Boolean searches. Or at least "exact phrase"...
Yes, you can Google site:bikeforums.net "exact phrase" but that's a real pain and you can't limit it to a certain forum.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston Roads
Posts: 976
Bikes: 2012 Canondale Synapse 105, 2017 REI Co-Op ADV 3.1
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 507 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
133 Posts
I haven't checked Strava in a while, but my club chose RWGPS for club route maps because:
1. you can create route maps with complete turn-by-turn cue sheets and elevation profiles for free with RWGPS
2. other people can view your routes and cue sheets and elevation profiles on RWGPS without having to create accounts
3. you can download the routes and cue sheets from RWGPS to Garmin bicycle computers without having a RWGPS account
4. RWGPS maps are accurate enough for us and their elevation profiles are a lot better than the used to be (probably as good as any other free online mapping service)
Strava is good for recording your rides and times, but no one has ever shared a turn-by-turn cue sheet from Strava with me.
1. you can create route maps with complete turn-by-turn cue sheets and elevation profiles for free with RWGPS
2. other people can view your routes and cue sheets and elevation profiles on RWGPS without having to create accounts
3. you can download the routes and cue sheets from RWGPS to Garmin bicycle computers without having a RWGPS account
4. RWGPS maps are accurate enough for us and their elevation profiles are a lot better than the used to be (probably as good as any other free online mapping service)
Strava is good for recording your rides and times, but no one has ever shared a turn-by-turn cue sheet from Strava with me.
Strava has the fly-by option as well, which is very cool. Also, some of my friends started running and are now on Strava, so we can virtually high-five each other for our workouts.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,420
Bikes: 2017 Ridley Fenix SL, 2008 Trek 1500, 1998 Diamondback Apex
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#43
Senior Member
Strava excels at being for those in life who are '4 touchdown Bundys' and those who are motivated by competing against others for meaningless recognition.
Its a social platform first and an actual useful tracking app second.
...i have to use it because my GPS computer auto uploads to it. If i had a chose of what app i could upload to, itd be mapmyride or ridewithgps.
Its a social platform first and an actual useful tracking app second.
...i have to use it because my GPS computer auto uploads to it. If i had a chose of what app i could upload to, itd be mapmyride or ridewithgps.
I could just as easily say that Strava is for outgoing folks who wouldn't mind meeting other people to ride with, and use something else if you're a loner/hermit type who just wants to ride by yourself and never get to know or interact with anyone else.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 855
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ribble Nero Corsa, Surly Karate Monkey, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Cannondale MT800, Evil Insurgent
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I plan my rides with Strava's "My Routes" function. Sometimes I go on organized rides where I will download a .tcx file from RideWithGPS and dump it into my Garmin, but I don't think I have an account there and I don't use the RideWithGPS website for anything other than downloading rides from others. In fact, I'm not really sure why there's so much institutional inertia to use RideWithGPS, because Strava offers the same thing.
#45
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,728
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11065 Post(s)
Liked 7,630 Times
in
4,254 Posts
Having a social platform isnt inherently a bad thing, and as you lay out, it can actually be good. Totally agree there. When I said its a social platform first, i was saying that in a good and bad way. Your examples are the good.
People driving to get KOMs or riding totally random places to 'achieve' recognition is the bad.
#46
Senior Member
For sure, you could say that- i get the flipside of how i phrased my earlier comments.
Having a social platform isnt inherently a bad thing, and as you lay out, it can actually be good. Totally agree there. When I said its a social platform first, i was saying that in a good and bad way. Your examples are the good.
People driving to get KOMs or riding totally random places to 'achieve' recognition is the bad.
Having a social platform isnt inherently a bad thing, and as you lay out, it can actually be good. Totally agree there. When I said its a social platform first, i was saying that in a good and bad way. Your examples are the good.
People driving to get KOMs or riding totally random places to 'achieve' recognition is the bad.
I see where you're coming from. Honestly I don't have an opinion on most of the other services out there simply because I've been using Strava since around 2011 or 2012 or so, and just haven't seen the need to use everything else. Pretty much everyone I've done group rides with or gotten to meet in some way is on Strava, so there hasn't been some compelling reason for me to switch.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,420
Bikes: 2017 Ridley Fenix SL, 2008 Trek 1500, 1998 Diamondback Apex
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think dismissing Strava segments as just some sort of dick-measuring contest misses a lot of what makes them appealing for so many people. Or at least appealing for those (the majority, I think) who aren't jerks.
Last edited by TXCiclista; 11-15-17 at 02:07 PM.
#48
Senior Member
Maybe. I think I could see your point if the idea was to get KOM only so that your name was first on the list (though, that's still similar to winning a race so you can stand 6" inches higher than the next person, and a lot of people consider that meaningful), but I can see a LOT of good. I'm second on one of the segments I ride, and only by 6s. That 6s has motivated me to start training (before, I was just riding for fitness). I'm not doing it because I want to be top of the list in Strava, but because I can see that there's a "next level" I can reach, so it's an EXCELLENT motivator for me.
I think dismissing Strava segments as just some sort of dick-measuring contest misses a lot of what makes them appealing for so many people. Or at least appealing for those (the majority, I think) who aren't jerks.
I think dismissing Strava segments as just some sort of dick-measuring contest misses a lot of what makes them appealing for so many people. Or at least appealing for those (the majority, I think) who aren't jerks.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,420
Bikes: 2017 Ridley Fenix SL, 2008 Trek 1500, 1998 Diamondback Apex
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll see a fairly well-traveled segment where I'm like 50/750 on the list, and look up at the times above me and think hmm, I'm improving, building up my speed and efficiency, let's see what it'll take to get up to 30/750, or even crack the top ten. I agree that it can be motivational. But there are folks who will go out of their way to take low-hanging fruit KOMs that don't have a lot of traffic because someone defined them for themselves on some out of the way route. Just because they can, and to get all in the face of whoever created it. I'm sure we've all seen it.
#50
Senior Member
Yeah, though most of my "private" segments have been ridden by me with friends of mine or others in my local neighborhood, and it's nice to see those results up. It's actually surprising to me that some segments that one might have considered small, out of hte way, low-traffic places end up getting 30 or 40 people after a while.