Anyone try out the CarBack?
#26
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,872
Liked 4,042 Times
in
2,753 Posts
Can I interest you two in a tutorial about how to put someone on your ignore list?
Likes For unterhausen:
#27
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,803
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,162 Posts
Boy, the CarBack is not an attractive unit to my eye. Not that Varia, Gardia, or Magene are either; I guess I’m hoping an Italian gets in the game and designs something elegant. Varia looks like a pawpaw dangling out the back. I know there’s not a lot of leeway to work with, but one can dream.
That CarBack is USB-C is the most attractive thing about it. Just last weekend I forgot to pack out the USB mini (or whatever) for the Varia— well, it was a case of cable misidentification— and was saved only because my clubmate brought this huge power block tower contraption and a tangle of cables. It would be great to be able to eliminate a cable. It would be cheaper just to buy that Trek charging box, though…
That CarBack is USB-C is the most attractive thing about it. Just last weekend I forgot to pack out the USB mini (or whatever) for the Varia— well, it was a case of cable misidentification— and was saved only because my clubmate brought this huge power block tower contraption and a tangle of cables. It would be great to be able to eliminate a cable. It would be cheaper just to buy that Trek charging box, though…
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Anyway, no, the Garmin radar device doesn’t have “more things to show”.
These (changes for “colors and distance alerts”) would be features of the head unit. Not the radar device. The radar device certainly isn’t transmitting what color to use on the head unit (which could be monochrome). It seems the only display option Garmin head units provide is which side to display the dots (regardless of what company’s radar unit you are using).
The different radar devices provide the same standard data, which is how they all work with Wahoo and Garmin head units.
The Trek device provides additional data about lateral position but no head unit can display that data (at present).
It might be possible to write an app for the Garmin head units to show the extra data. Garmin is the only company that allows for custom apps. (Hammerhead/Karoo allow for custom apps (since it’s Android) but not officially (AFAIK).)
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-24-24 at 08:58 AM.
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
This is confusing. You call the radar device a “display” but it’s not a display. The head unit is the display.
Anyway, no, the Garmin radar device doesn’t have “more things to show”.
These (changes for “colors and distance alerts”) would be features of the head unit. Not the radar device. The radar device certainly isn’t transmitting what color to use on the head unit (which could be monochrome). It seems the only display option Garmin head units provide is which side to display the dots (regardless of what company’s radar unit you are using).
The different radar devices provide the same standard data, which is how they all work with Wahoo and Garmin head units.
The Trek device provides additional data about lateral position but no head unit can display that data (at present).
It might be possible to write an app for the Garmin head units to show the extra data. Garmin is the only company that allows for custom apps. (Hammerhead/Karoo allow for custom apps (since it’s Android) but not officially (AFAIK).)
Anyway, no, the Garmin radar device doesn’t have “more things to show”.
These (changes for “colors and distance alerts”) would be features of the head unit. Not the radar device. The radar device certainly isn’t transmitting what color to use on the head unit (which could be monochrome). It seems the only display option Garmin head units provide is which side to display the dots (regardless of what company’s radar unit you are using).
The different radar devices provide the same standard data, which is how they all work with Wahoo and Garmin head units.
The Trek device provides additional data about lateral position but no head unit can display that data (at present).
It might be possible to write an app for the Garmin head units to show the extra data. Garmin is the only company that allows for custom apps. (Hammerhead/Karoo allow for custom apps (since it’s Android) but not officially (AFAIK).)
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Again, display options are options on the head unit.
All the different radar devices are providing the same data. That’s why you can mix-and-match head units and radar devices. (Manufacturers of these are not going to be able to ask head unit manufacturers to make programming changes.)
Garmin head units don’t provide many display options. The only thing appears to be on which side of the screen the “cars” are displayed.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
Yes, I got that. It’s not the right way to refer to the radar device. “Projecting” isn’t a great word to use either.
Again, display options are options on the head unit.
All the different radar devices are providing the same data. That’s why you can mix-and-match head units and radar devices. (Manufacturers of these are not going to be able to ask head unit manufacturers to make programming changes.)
Garmin head units don’t provide many display options. The only thing appears to be on which side of the screen the “cars” are displayed.
Again, display options are options on the head unit.
All the different radar devices are providing the same data. That’s why you can mix-and-match head units and radar devices. (Manufacturers of these are not going to be able to ask head unit manufacturers to make programming changes.)
Garmin head units don’t provide many display options. The only thing appears to be on which side of the screen the “cars” are displayed.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
#34
Senior Member
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
that statement is inaccurate, see post # 11. Not sure why you have to create an unnecessary argumentative situation.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#37
Senior Member
Aside from the obvious factors -- longer battery life and longer range -- I can't think of much that I'd want added to my Varia's capabilities -- though that could just reflect my lack of imagination. It'd be great if there were some way for a radar unit to tell me not just that a vehicle is approaching, but also whether it is going to hit me, but I don't think this is technically possible as it would require a path prediction (which is difficult) or even a video feed to the head unit (which is difficult and would destroy battery life). And as njkayaker and I have already pointed out, anything involving the display configuration would be done on the head unit -- not on the radar unit.
Regardless, Trek's entry to the market is promising, as it is a much larger player than Bryton and hence represents real competition which might push Garmin to improve Varia somehow.
Boy, the CarBack is not an attractive unit to my eye. Not that Varia, Gardia, or Magene are either; I guess I’m hoping an Italian gets in the game and designs something elegant. Varia looks like a pawpaw dangling out the back. I know there’s not a lot of leeway to work with, but one can dream.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Other people might have some interest in how these things actually work even if you aren't. (You also went on about not being wrong.)
The competition won't do anything (for a while anyway). (No one would have been able to guess that this was your "main interest".) Being clear/correct about how these work is kind of important in any discussion of competition.
The Garmin Varia is the same price. The distinctive advantage the Trek device has is the lateral position but that's only viewable on the phone app. I think most of the people using these are not using phones. It's not clear how useful this will be in the real world (most passes don't include full lane changes). It's not clear that the Trek device is better than the Varia.
While Garmin and others might lose a few sales to Trek, it's not clear it would be worth the effort of accelerating development of a replacement device with significantly compelling improvements.
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-24-24 at 11:30 AM.
#39
Senior Member
So, you care but don't care.
Other people might have some interest in how these things actually work even if you aren't. (You also went on about not being wrong.)
The competition won't do anything (for a while anyway). (No one would have been able to guess that this was your "main interest".)
The Garmin Varia is the same price. The distinctive advantage the Trek device has is the lateral position but that's only viewable on the phone app. I think most of the people using these are not using phones. It's not clear how useful this will be in the real world (most passes don't include full lane changes). It's not clear that the Trek device is better than the Varia.
Other people might have some interest in how these things actually work even if you aren't. (You also went on about not being wrong.)
The competition won't do anything (for a while anyway). (No one would have been able to guess that this was your "main interest".)
The Garmin Varia is the same price. The distinctive advantage the Trek device has is the lateral position but that's only viewable on the phone app. I think most of the people using these are not using phones. It's not clear how useful this will be in the real world (most passes don't include full lane changes). It's not clear that the Trek device is better than the Varia.
#40
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
Yes, this. It almost seems as if Trek got this to market, and then realized that it adds nothing beyond Varia's capabilities -- so they fudged the detection distance (according to the first few brief reviews) and added a phone app that will be used by very few customers. (I mean, who buys a $200 radar tail light when they don't already own a head unit?)
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
Likes For Troul:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Yes, this. It almost seems as if Trek got this to market, and then realized that it adds nothing beyond Varia's capabilities -- so they fudged the detection distance (according to the first few brief reviews) and added a phone app that will be used by very few customers. (I mean, who buys a $200 radar tail light when they don't already own a head unit?)
Using phones is becoming more common (maybe, more so for less experienced cyclists). Having a phone app makes it possible to sell the radar to people who don't even know what a head unit is. The phone app makes it easier to sell than having to say "well, you also need to buy a $300 head unit for this to be useful".
The components that one would use in a recently-designed unit might be better than what was available to Garmin when they designed the Varia so "long ago". So, things like changes and range might just come along for the ride. It wouldn't be surprising to play-up those improvements (even if marginal) for marketing.
#42
Senior Member
Oh, yes, definitely a good business move for Trek. The typical Garmin cycling item has only a 25% (or so) markup from wholesale to retail -- e.g., a $600 1040 Edge computer probably cost the dealer around $480. That's a pretty thin margin. An LBS would probably prefer to sell the Trek radar unit (esp if it performs as well as Garmin) just for the likely larger margin.
Likes For Koyote:
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Oh, yes, definitely a good business move for Trek. The typical Garmin cycling item has only a 25% (or so) markup from wholesale to retail -- e.g., a $600 1040 Edge computer probably cost the dealer around $480. That's a pretty thin margin. An LBS would probably prefer to sell the Trek radar unit (esp if it performs as well as Garmin) just for the likely larger margin.
Note that Garmin has a phone app for the Varia.
https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/716691
Likes For njkayaker:
#44
Senior Member
It might be a somewhat easy sale to people "afraid of cars" (but who wouldn't necessarily want to spend $$ on an head unit they might not understand, especially, against familiar smartphone apps).
Note that Garmin has a phone app for the Varia.
https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/716691
Note that Garmin has a phone app for the Varia.
https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/716691
So it looks like the Trek unit adds nothing to the marketplace.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
I knew about it, forgot about it, and remembered it for this thread.
Might be kind of clever since it opens up the radar to people who don't want to buy an "expensive" head unit.
It doesn't have to (that might not even be the intention) beyond shifting money from Garmin to Trek and its sellers.
I wonder if these are all using the same sensor. It seems likely Garmin is using an "off the shelf" component like it does for the GPS chips it uses in its head units.
Trek's product might cause the prices of these to drop a bit.
Might be kind of clever since it opens up the radar to people who don't want to buy an "expensive" head unit.
It doesn't have to (that might not even be the intention) beyond shifting money from Garmin to Trek and its sellers.
I wonder if these are all using the same sensor. It seems likely Garmin is using an "off the shelf" component like it does for the GPS chips it uses in its head units.
Trek's product might cause the prices of these to drop a bit.
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-24-24 at 03:22 PM.
Likes For njkayaker:
#46
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,872
Liked 4,042 Times
in
2,753 Posts
I looked up what the sensor on the varia looks like, and it's hard to believe it's a standard sensor. I wish I could find a picture that's good enough to determine which chip they are using.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
The antennas are different.
https://www.mtbr.com/attachments/p4080497-jpg.1251210/
https://device.report/m/d4c2a107e007...05bb321ba5.pdf
#48
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Looks like it was sold as a package (the display and the radar). It would cost more than just the radar. It’s possible that people using phones on their bikes are more interested in the radar. Maybe, casual cyclists not using their phones weren’t interested (the package could have been more than they wanted to spend).
https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/518151c
Didn't know about it.
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-24-24 at 07:20 PM.
#50
"Had". It appears they don't sell it any more.
Looks like it was sold as a package (the display and the radar). It would cost more than just the radar. It’s possible that people using phones on their bikes are more interested in the radar. Maybe, casual cyclists not using their phones weren’t interested (the package could have been more than they wanted to spend).
https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/518151c
Didn't know about it.
Looks like it was sold as a package (the display and the radar). It would cost more than just the radar. It’s possible that people using phones on their bikes are more interested in the radar. Maybe, casual cyclists not using their phones weren’t interested (the package could have been more than they wanted to spend).
https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/518151c
Didn't know about it.