Just started training with Power? Post your questions/comments here!
#5901
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
didn't know that the license stayed with the computer; that is news to me.
#5903
Ninny
There is some gray area around what makes a computer "the same". Sameness is defined not as the plastic box, not the MB, not the HD, it's some combination of all of the components. If the hardware changes in a nontrivial way -- like, if you change the HD and graphics card on the original computer -- Windows will think it's on a different machine and fail to validate. That's the legit reason to call to do the manual phone validation process.
In my experience, you get one phone validation for free, even if you change all of the hardware (ahem). I have never had a phone validation fail if it's only the first time that particular OS license has had to be re-validated. The second re-validation will fail the semi-automated phone process even if it's completely legitimate (like, you changed the HD and graphics card again, but it really is still the OEM box).
In my experience, you get one phone validation for free, even if you change all of the hardware (ahem). I have never had a phone validation fail if it's only the first time that particular OS license has had to be re-validated. The second re-validation will fail the semi-automated phone process even if it's completely legitimate (like, you changed the HD and graphics card again, but it really is still the OEM box).
#5904
Fly on the wall
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 981
Bikes: a few
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
SRM Question:
Anyone else experience the display blanking out on you? My PC7 occasionally drops out all together, all reading goes to "0" or to "--." This happened about 5x during my 60 minutes of trainer workout tonight. Happens on the road too.
I thought I calibrated it correctly...
Its only a few months old.
Any suggestions?
Edit: Went to the SRM FAQ section, and this includes speed and HR. I don't think its the cadence magnet.
Anyone else experience the display blanking out on you? My PC7 occasionally drops out all together, all reading goes to "0" or to "--." This happened about 5x during my 60 minutes of trainer workout tonight. Happens on the road too.
I thought I calibrated it correctly...
Its only a few months old.
Any suggestions?
Edit: Went to the SRM FAQ section, and this includes speed and HR. I don't think its the cadence magnet.
#5907
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
Posts: 4,813
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
SRM Question:
Anyone else experience the display blanking out on you? My PC7 occasionally drops out all together, all reading goes to "0" or to "--." This happened about 5x during my 60 minutes of trainer workout tonight. Happens on the road too.
I thought I calibrated it correctly...
Its only a few months old.
Any suggestions?
Edit: Went to the SRM FAQ section, and this includes speed and HR. I don't think its the cadence magnet.
Anyone else experience the display blanking out on you? My PC7 occasionally drops out all together, all reading goes to "0" or to "--." This happened about 5x during my 60 minutes of trainer workout tonight. Happens on the road too.
I thought I calibrated it correctly...
Its only a few months old.
Any suggestions?
Edit: Went to the SRM FAQ section, and this includes speed and HR. I don't think its the cadence magnet.
#5908
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 35
Bikes: 2006 CAAD 8 (R5000), 2002 Bianchi Giro bad weather bike/ghetto TT setup, very ugly 2001 GT ZRX CX bike, bianchi Brava trainer slave
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So I've been doing my training rides by moonlight this last week, and my bike has been making occasional funky sounds - squealing, tapping, other stuff. I've been really cramped for time so I haven't had a chance to do more than a cursory inspection and didn't find anything. No training scheduled for last night, so I took the time to check it more thoroughly. It turns out that the rear wheel can be pushed from brake pad to brake pad with no resistance, and I keep the rear brake pretty wide. The skewer was tight.
Dead bearings? Other stuff to check? The hub has 10k+ miles on it.
Threshold intervals again next week...by HR.
Dead bearings? Other stuff to check? The hub has 10k+ miles on it.
Threshold intervals again next week...by HR.
#5909
my pt does this sometimes - you just need to tighten the nuts(?) on either side of the hub, with a cone wrench i think.
#5910
Making a kilometer blurry
That will depend on hub model. Mine was upgraded to the axle-ends version. I can pull my whole freehub off as it's only held on by o-ring grease. It no longer has the Allen bits on the ends. Just FYI.
#5911
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
I brought it in to my LBS, they weren't able to fix it and contacted Saris who said that it wasn't repairable. I sent it in and they replaced the internals with G3 parts for $350. Not the cheapest fix, but it beats going without power.
__________________
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
#5912
I've been using Golden Cheetah for a while now and this year I decided to add some weight training into my schedule. Is there any way to capture the "training stress" of a weight training workout in GC? Maybe estimate a TSS score and enter it manually? I'm trying to keep my ATL and CTL curves closer to reality. Currently, my weight training days show up as zero TSS (because I don't enter anything into GC) so ATL goes down when in reality it should go up a notch.
#5913
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my 237 pages of reading, it seems that the CTL/TSS is a record of bicycling effort.
Most/all suggestions are that weight to mix in weight training (or swimming/running) is a bad idea.
Most/all suggestions are that weight to mix in weight training (or swimming/running) is a bad idea.
#5914
Ninny
For non-cycling workouts (like XC skiing), I calculate a TSS-like number based on HR (I'm happy to provide the calculation if anyone cares).
I then take some percentage off that number, and personally would take something off any TSS calculation derived from anything other than cycling, because IMO the purpose of a performance manager is to track my cycling-specific fitness, not overall fitness. If I did nothing but arm workouts and never rode my bike, I wouldn't consider myself to be in very good cycling shape, so I wouldn't want that to equate to a high CTL.
Also, people have pretty varied opinions of how perceived effort and training load are related, for weights and other non-cycling activities.
#5915
Making a kilometer blurry
^^^ Yeah, that's how I've handled a day full of hauling stone in wheelbarrows or other weekend activities that are similarly draining.
#5916
Yes, I would only estimate TSS for weight workouts that caused training load to major cycling-specific muscles groups. Sounds like it's not totally uncommon to estimate TSS with a "manually-entered pseudo-activity" to capture some training load form the weight workout.
#5917
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is some gray area around what makes a computer "the same". Sameness is defined not as the plastic box, not the MB, not the HD, it's some combination of all of the components. If the hardware changes in a nontrivial way -- like, if you change the HD and graphics card on the original computer -- Windows will think it's on a different machine and fail to validate. That's the legit reason to call to do the manual phone validation process.
In my experience, you get one phone validation for free, even if you change all of the hardware (ahem). I have never had a phone validation fail if it's only the first time that particular OS license has had to be re-validated. The second re-validation will fail the semi-automated phone process even if it's completely legitimate (like, you changed the HD and graphics card again, but it really is still the OEM box).
In my experience, you get one phone validation for free, even if you change all of the hardware (ahem). I have never had a phone validation fail if it's only the first time that particular OS license has had to be re-validated. The second re-validation will fail the semi-automated phone process even if it's completely legitimate (like, you changed the HD and graphics card again, but it really is still the OEM box).
was no problem (just a bit annoying due to the # of digits to enter and the slooooooow way they are read out) to repeatedly do the phone validation.
ps thanks shovel--i falsely assumed that the copy of XP that came on my thinkpad in the early 200s was mine to use anywhere i chose after the machine was retired. didn't know that!
#5918
Senior Member
@tetonrider, I'm sure you'll do the right thing and notify microsoft of the mistake!
Does anyone here have a stronger non dominant leg? My last few rides there's been an 8% difference, with my non dominant leg being the strongest. I'm wondering if after solid training if this will flop back to the dominant leg or not...
Does anyone here have a stronger non dominant leg? My last few rides there's been an 8% difference, with my non dominant leg being the strongest. I'm wondering if after solid training if this will flop back to the dominant leg or not...
#5919
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
actually, i mis-spoke earlier. i realized the testing i was doing was with a VM running Win7. it's licensed...but i did buy the system-builder version off of amazon.
the xp-from-oem VM is running on a different laptop.
#5920
Making a kilometer blurry
If you're talking about all-out sprints, or maybe 3-5' VO2Max stuff, then it might be a real issue. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're getting this off the power meter on zone 2-4 rides, then I don't think it matters at all unless the stronger leg feels out of sorts at the end of a race (compared to the other). For threshold and under, you're not limited by strength -- you're limited by heart, lungs, and fuel. So, in those zones, if you see more power coming out of one leg, it's more likely that you just use it more than the other leg, and it may not actually be any stronger. You're so far beneath your strength limit that it shouldn't be related.
I know strength is still part of the equation at threshold, but I'm not convinced that seeing a power difference between sides is conclusive evidence of a strength issue. I'll go further and suspect that evening the legs out won't have any real impact on race performance either, unless that leg really is slightly more fatigued at the end of the race -- but it would seem that the "stronger" leg wouldn't fatigue as fast anyway, if it actually had more capacity for strength...
#5921
Senior Member
How are you measuring this?
If you're talking about all-out sprints, or maybe 3-5' VO2Max stuff, then it might be a real issue. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're getting this off the power meter on zone 2-4 rides, then I don't think it matters at all unless the stronger leg feels out of sorts at the end of a race (compared to the other). For threshold and under, you're not limited by strength -- you're limited by heart, lungs, and fuel. So, in those zones, if you see more power coming out of one leg, it's more likely that you just use it more than the other leg, and it may not actually be any stronger. You're so far beneath your strength limit that it shouldn't be related.
I know strength is still part of the equation at threshold, but I'm not convinced that seeing a power difference between sides is conclusive evidence of a strength issue. I'll go further and suspect that evening the legs out won't have any real impact on race performance either, unless that leg really is slightly more fatigued at the end of the race -- but it would seem that the "stronger" leg wouldn't fatigue as fast anyway, if it actually had more capacity for strength...
If you're talking about all-out sprints, or maybe 3-5' VO2Max stuff, then it might be a real issue. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're getting this off the power meter on zone 2-4 rides, then I don't think it matters at all unless the stronger leg feels out of sorts at the end of a race (compared to the other). For threshold and under, you're not limited by strength -- you're limited by heart, lungs, and fuel. So, in those zones, if you see more power coming out of one leg, it's more likely that you just use it more than the other leg, and it may not actually be any stronger. You're so far beneath your strength limit that it shouldn't be related.
I know strength is still part of the equation at threshold, but I'm not convinced that seeing a power difference between sides is conclusive evidence of a strength issue. I'll go further and suspect that evening the legs out won't have any real impact on race performance either, unless that leg really is slightly more fatigued at the end of the race -- but it would seem that the "stronger" leg wouldn't fatigue as fast anyway, if it actually had more capacity for strength...
I'm measuring it via my Garmin Vectors using Garmin Connect.
Good point in differentiating the types; yes this is after z2-z4 rides. The left leg (the weaker one) is always fatigued after anything over 150 TSS, the right is okay until 250ish. I haven't checked specifically on sprints, but I will now and see if there is a major difference. In the gym my right leg is roughly 20% stronger than my left. I'm hoping that when / if it does equalize that will help with my power.
#5922
Making a kilometer blurry
Yeah, sounds like it would be good to focus on evening them out if you're seeing different fatigue rates. Could bump your match book a bit. There should be plenty to read regarding that sort of training.
Forgive me if I missed it, but what's the cause of the difference?
Forgive me if I missed it, but what's the cause of the difference?
#5923
Senior Member
Yeah, sounds like it would be good to focus on evening them out if you're seeing different fatigue rates. Could bump your match book a bit. There should be plenty to read regarding that sort of training.
Forgive me if I missed it, but what's the cause of the difference?
Forgive me if I missed it, but what's the cause of the difference?
2009 - Torn Achilles Tendon (running in 110 heat)
2010 - Torn Achilles Tendon (coming back too early, thanks coach!)
2012 - Torn Peroneus (I couldn't even walk for a few months)
2013 - Surgery and 6 months immobility
(This is why I am no longer a runner)
I just looked at my last 2 interval sessions and its 6-10% off when I start my 5s or 1m sprints.
Its not all bad, I've hit my yearly goal for FTP on March 2. Now I just have to work on the short stuff.
#5924
Powered by Borscht
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 8,342
Bikes: Russian Vodka
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A collection of injuries on the left leg:
2009 - Torn Achilles Tendon (running in 110 heat)
2010 - Torn Achilles Tendon (coming back too early, thanks coach!)
2012 - Torn Peroneus (I couldn't even walk for a few months)
2013 - Surgery and 6 months immobility
(This is why I am no longer a runner)
I just looked at my last 2 interval sessions and its 6-10% off when I start my 5s or 1m sprints.
Its not all bad, I've hit my yearly goal for FTP on March 2. Now I just have to work on the short stuff.
2009 - Torn Achilles Tendon (running in 110 heat)
2010 - Torn Achilles Tendon (coming back too early, thanks coach!)
2012 - Torn Peroneus (I couldn't even walk for a few months)
2013 - Surgery and 6 months immobility
(This is why I am no longer a runner)
I just looked at my last 2 interval sessions and its 6-10% off when I start my 5s or 1m sprints.
Its not all bad, I've hit my yearly goal for FTP on March 2. Now I just have to work on the short stuff.