Show Off your Track Training and Racing Bikes (2014+)
#651
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Qc,Canada
Posts: 159
Bikes: Felt TK FRD
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First time I have seen someone with a Fibre-lyte Track chainring. Mostly seen them on TT bikes. Does the total aero setup make it harder to swap ?
#652
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I do want to write a full length review at the end of the season because there really isn't a lot said about them either way on the net. So far, Bobby is great to deal with and helped ensure the dinner plates would fit. The layup itself looked good from what I could see prior to building it up. I have about 2mm of clearance between the chainstay and chainring and locked in to the trainer or on the track in a full sprint I can't make them knock. The track ends have a lot of material and are quite long.
It takes more thought than without, but it is not difficult or extra time consuming. I thought they would be more fairing like, instead they are the full thickness of the chainring which is pretty sweet. I opted for the 4mm thick ones with 2x2 twill, they look nice.
#653
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 398 Times
in
194 Posts
New bar/stem setup. Same bar I use on my road bike, just a narrower width (40 instead of 42). Kinda wish they made it in 38, but 40 feels fine.
#656
Senior Member
Needs a new saddle, stem and handlebars but starting to take shape.
Will get a prettier picture once it's done, this was just outside the bike shop after getting a hand removing the old campag BB
#658
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 606
Bikes: Trek Madone, Blue Triad SL, Dixie Flyer BTB
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just finished the initial build today. I was conservative with the initial cut of the steerer tube, and the stem is an old take-off that I had laying around from and old road bike. Hoping to take it to the track in the AM if it doesn't rain.
#661
Senior Member
#663
Lapped 3x
Carleton, did you ever think about having Mr. Snyder to a dropped top tube for your bike (forward downslope)? Or did you leave it level for aesthetics/packability?
When I was a wee little Junior, I had a custom frame built by a local builder who used to build for Pinarello before he crossed the Atlantic, and he did this for me. 2cm drop from seat lug to the head tube. He said it resulted in stiffer/stronger frames that weren't as likely to fail because of the long lever arm of the seatpost.
When I was a wee little Junior, I had a custom frame built by a local builder who used to build for Pinarello before he crossed the Atlantic, and he did this for me. 2cm drop from seat lug to the head tube. He said it resulted in stiffer/stronger frames that weren't as likely to fail because of the long lever arm of the seatpost.
#664
Senior Member
The dropped top tube would make for a less stiff frame actually given materials are the same. Consider the strongest stiffest frames of the cycling world being MTB trials to dirt jump and BMX actually have very very small triangles, and even in the MTB trials world no triangle at all from some makers. The Cinelli Mash was widely condemned as a track option for that very reason
#665
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Carleton, did you ever think about having Mr. Snyder to a dropped top tube for your bike (forward downslope)? Or did you leave it level for aesthetics/packability?
When I was a wee little Junior, I had a custom frame built by a local builder who used to build for Pinarello before he crossed the Atlantic, and he did this for me. 2cm drop from seat lug to the head tube. He said it resulted in stiffer/stronger frames that weren't as likely to fail because of the long lever arm of the seatpost.
When I was a wee little Junior, I had a custom frame built by a local builder who used to build for Pinarello before he crossed the Atlantic, and he did this for me. 2cm drop from seat lug to the head tube. He said it resulted in stiffer/stronger frames that weren't as likely to fail because of the long lever arm of the seatpost.
That being said, here's Hoy's DF3 (and that seatpost is carbon). All of the DF3s had short head tubes and parallel top tubes also making the long lever:
My DF3:
With the taller top tube, the lever is slightly shorter at least.
I hope that I don't have problems with it. @theblackbullet rode a similarly sized Snyder for a couple of seasons on our bumpy track. I can't recall if anything broke in that area.
If I were to make a v2 of this frame, I'd:
- Switch from 27.2 to a bigger one. Not sure what the most common bigger round seatpost is these days. But whatever that is.
- Use a bigger head tube with an internal headset. This will allow for a bigger down tube and the downtube would have more connection with the bottom bracket, all while using slightly thinner tubing to keep the weight the same. Theoretically making it stiffer for the same weight.
- Experiment with paint (not giving away my idea just yet )
- Improve the dropout design. I haven't had any issues (knock wood). But I want to incorporate titanium. Pick a good tensioner system (for optional reassurance. Never needed or used tensioners with Tiemeyer dropouts.)
- Maybe go from 74 to 75 deg seat tube.
- Keep the other angles.
- Keep the Chris King and Thomson bits.
All of these are relatively minor changes except for the dropouts. Basically, making a serviceable (literally re-weldable), Brick House, No Excuses, sprint bike that can handle 2,500W and ask for more. (I don't make 2,500W, but top sprinters do.)
With custom geometry all for around $1,300 USD
Yeah, it's not aero and it's certainly not sexy. But, I'd sacrifice the marginal aero gains that you get with aero tubes to avoid:
- Slipping seatposts (Serenity, DF4, Old TK1).
- Dipping seatpost toppers (Serenity, Old TK1).
- Mushy, squeeky stems (TK1)
- Propriety stems that you must get from the manufacturer (if they still have them) and not a LBS (TK1, 496)
- Proprietary seatposts that you must get from the manufacturer (if they still have them) and not a LBS (TK1, 496, DF4, BT Edge, Serenity, Fuji ...)
- Slipping dropouts (Serenity, DF3). The DF3 saw 3 different dropout designs.
- Spreading dropouts (DF4).
- Flexy rear triangle (DF3, Planet X)
It's rare that a heavy/strong sprinter that's tough on their bike hasn't encountered at least one of those issues on their $3,000 - $10,000 bike. (Seriously...I literally COULD NOT BUY a seatpost from LOOK USA or LOOK FR for my 496. This blew my mind. I was lucky to call around and a Team USA mechanic had one in the back of a parts bin and sold it to me.)
I know it sounds like I'm so in love with this bike. I'm just happy with it (see my wish list above for v2). I'm just happy to have a reliable bike. It's like having a Mercedes S600, Porsche 911, and BMW M3 and they all had expensive issues all the time and you go to a Honda Accord and it simply runs well, has leather, and regular maintenance is cheap. No, it's not sexy, at all. No one takes pics of this bike as it's hanging from the bike rack in the infield
The dropped top tube would make for a less stiff frame actually given materials are the same. Consider the strongest stiffest frames of the cycling world being MTB trials to dirt jump and BMX actually have very very small triangles, and even in the MTB trials world no triangle at all from some makers. The Cinelli Mash was widely condemned as a track option for that very reason
Last edited by carleton; 07-10-17 at 08:58 PM.
#666
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 748
Bikes: I don't even
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
77 Posts
I hope that I don't have problems with it. @theblackbullet rode a similarly sized Snyder for a couple of seasons on our bumpy track. I can't recall if anything broke in that area.
Improve the dropout design. I haven't had any issues (knock wood). But I want to incorporate titanium. Pick a good tensioner system (for optional reassurance. Never needed or used tensioners with Tiemeyer dropouts.)
Yeah, it's not aero and it's certainly not sexy. But, I'd sacrifice the marginal aero gains that you get with aero tubes to avoid:
This is essentially the only reason I'm not actively racing the Snyder. ughhh! Searching for marginal gains isn't always fun, but I finally feel like I'm at the point where I've gotta do it.
#667
Senior Member
- Use a bigger head tube with an internal headset. This will allow for a bigger down tube and the downtube would have more connection with the bottom bracket, all while using slightly thinner tubing to keep the weight the same. Theoretically making it stiffer for the same weight.
Hydroformed tubes are where it's at I think. The flaring out of the bottom of the down and seat tubes on my bike give a nice chunky interface to the BB that I'm sure adds stiffness, without the expense of big chunky tube profiles. I was really hesitant about going alloy but I'm absolutely blown away by how stiff my bike is and how it handles in comparison to my previous carbon bike. Especially given the sheer size of the thing and associated tube lengths. The only thing I am lacking is the standard round seat tube but I'm happy with the alloy one. It hasn't budged under my fat butt!
People take pictures of my bike and look, not because it's sexy but because it looks like something out of a freak show!
#668
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I'll ask about aero vs round aerodynamics in the Small Questions thread. I don't want to derail over here.
But don't forget this round-tubed (carbon) bike:
Lakatosh won 3rd in the Keirin and Team Sprint at US Elites in 2011 using it...round can't be all bad
Last edited by carleton; 07-11-17 at 01:01 AM.
#669
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
track training bike for road use
Hi all,
The picture here is not one meant for the fixie forum - it's a backup track bike I set up for doing some track training away from the track. It's a BLB (from Scrod) on which I have put brakes that are easy to pull off when I ride the track - It's just a matter of undoing the top tube clips and brakes, putting on a different stem/bar, and adding race wheels. Flip/flop hub with 17 and 14 cogs; 47 chainring here.
I have to do the bulk of my "track training" on a wide traffickless (and safe) road; my "good" track bike is not drilled for brakes, so I got this as a second. A couple of days a week, I ride my 47/17 to that training place, then flip the wheel and get to it in a 47/14.
For those of you not lucky enough to live near a track (such as all you Arizona cyclists, or Divebrian, who mentioned living many hours from the nearest track), what are you using when training for track on the road? Curious what ideas you've come up with. Also added a picture of a keirin pro, Fushimi, who has a dedicated road training bike. Is this common? Advice or warnings appreciated.
The picture here is not one meant for the fixie forum - it's a backup track bike I set up for doing some track training away from the track. It's a BLB (from Scrod) on which I have put brakes that are easy to pull off when I ride the track - It's just a matter of undoing the top tube clips and brakes, putting on a different stem/bar, and adding race wheels. Flip/flop hub with 17 and 14 cogs; 47 chainring here.
I have to do the bulk of my "track training" on a wide traffickless (and safe) road; my "good" track bike is not drilled for brakes, so I got this as a second. A couple of days a week, I ride my 47/17 to that training place, then flip the wheel and get to it in a 47/14.
For those of you not lucky enough to live near a track (such as all you Arizona cyclists, or Divebrian, who mentioned living many hours from the nearest track), what are you using when training for track on the road? Curious what ideas you've come up with. Also added a picture of a keirin pro, Fushimi, who has a dedicated road training bike. Is this common? Advice or warnings appreciated.
#670
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Carleton, did you ever think about having Mr. Snyder to a dropped top tube for your bike (forward downslope)? Or did you leave it level for aesthetics/packability?
When I was a wee little Junior, I had a custom frame built by a local builder who used to build for Pinarello before he crossed the Atlantic, and he did this for me. 2cm drop from seat lug to the head tube. He said it resulted in stiffer/stronger frames that weren't as likely to fail because of the long lever arm of the seatpost.
When I was a wee little Junior, I had a custom frame built by a local builder who used to build for Pinarello before he crossed the Atlantic, and he did this for me. 2cm drop from seat lug to the head tube. He said it resulted in stiffer/stronger frames that weren't as likely to fail because of the long lever arm of the seatpost.
Horizontal is best from an aero perspective. The steel track frame I built has a slope but that was mostly for looks and because it worked better with the lug angles
#671
Full Member
Not a new bike of mine, but something interesting for my fellow "old" guys: https://www.raleighusa.com/cheetah-replica#
#672
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 748
Bikes: I don't even
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
77 Posts
Not a new bike of mine, but something interesting for my fellow "old" guys: https://www.raleighusa.com/cheetah-replica#
#673
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
pretty bike! but the pricing is frustrating. Looking at the cost of the components at msrp, it would appear as though they are valuing the frame at over $4k. At this price, I'd just go full custom with a builder of my choice . I would also build with dura-ace instead of the phil wood and likely come out a bit cheaper...
$6,500 is A LOT for any bike. I bet one of Nelson's actual bikes could be purchased for less than that
The timing of this offering is also interesting. The vintage fixed-gear craze has long gone. Neither hipster nor racers would be drooling over this even at a more accessible price.
#674
Lapped 3x
I think it has more to do with Nelson himself and the partnerships he's pursued over the last few years. He does a lot of motivational speaking and PR appearances. His name still has some cache among the people who grew up watching him race, and I think capitalizes on this as much as he can in his new career. For Raleigh it's a win. At most, the frames aren't all that expensive to produce, and only need to be built up as ordered. They'll be making an 800% profit on each frame whenever a Nelson Fan buys one.