Strava Flybys feature is fun but creepy at the same time
#26
smelling the roses
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Posts: 15,320
Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7081 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times
in
612 Posts
Well, no.. you set up a radius around your abode in the "Privacy Zone" section; selection of up to about 1km radius.
I'm intrigued though by the 2nd implication of a cycling stalker that might wait for you somewhere along one of your typical routes. It's pretty sad if this is a thing.
I'm intrigued though by the 2nd implication of a cycling stalker that might wait for you somewhere along one of your typical routes. It's pretty sad if this is a thing.
Last edited by seedsbelize; 06-08-20 at 08:13 AM.
#27
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,981 Times
in
1,617 Posts
There was a recent bank robbery in Mexico city. The thieves studied one female employee, to get her routine down. They stopped her on her way to work, locked a remotely activated explosive belt around her waist and sent her on her way. I don't remember the rest of the details, but they made off with quite a haul.
Likes For DiabloScott:
#28
Senior Member
People are terrible at determining risk, actual statistical risk vs perceived risk is often way off. Part of it is the numbers, 2 people having something happening seems the same mentally as a 100 or 1000 even though one is potentially 500x more times. We mostly just see, "It happened", not the amount. Someone will drive in a car everyday or use their cell phone while driving or smoke cigarettes and not think anything of it but not use Strava flyby because of that one person who was stalked and had a bomb strapped to them.
Last edited by u235; 06-08-20 at 10:40 AM.
Likes For u235:
#29
Full Member
Thread Starter
People are terrible at determining risk, actual statistical risk vs perceived risk is often way off. Part of it is the numbers, 2 people having something happening seems the same mentally as a 100 or 1000 even though one is potentially 500x more times. We mostly just see, "It happened", not the amount. Someone will drive in a car everyday or use their cell phone while driving or smoke cigarettes and not think anything of it but not use Strava flyby because of that one person who was stalked and had a bomb strapped to them.
really well explained by Daniel Kahneman in Thinking Fast and Slow book.
just the “it happened” scenario is waking the lizard brain and human brain doesn’t handle statistic and probabilities well at all