Would a self driving car world make it safe for cyclists?
11-08-17, 08:42 PM
#476
Full Member
bike recognition problem already solved
Since the thread has lately been sidelined about taxis, I should note that in many parts of (possibly most) states, ther are forty mile gaps between taxis. No mass transit. AND.... half of american drivers would give up their guns before giving up their POV cars.
Anyway the issue of a free app or tiny signal devices to bikes (or other hard to recognize things in traffic) which send or receive an identity signal for autodrive cars to read and recognize already exists. The electric and water companies use something like that to "drive by" read meters already. Keeps it simpler than trying to make a car do all the work. Just a reflector mounted signal that when read by the car says "I am a bike" or "blind pedestrian" or "loose dog with a collar".
Anyway the issue of a free app or tiny signal devices to bikes (or other hard to recognize things in traffic) which send or receive an identity signal for autodrive cars to read and recognize already exists. The electric and water companies use something like that to "drive by" read meters already. Keeps it simpler than trying to make a car do all the work. Just a reflector mounted signal that when read by the car says "I am a bike" or "blind pedestrian" or "loose dog with a collar".
11-08-17, 08:59 PM
#477
Senior Member
Since the thread has lately been sidelined about taxis, I should note that in many parts of (possibly most) states, ther are forty mile gaps between taxis. No mass transit. AND.... half of american drivers would give up their guns before giving up their POV cars.
Anyway the issue of a free app or tiny signal devices to bikes (or other hard to recognize things in traffic) which send or receive an identity signal for autodrive cars to read and recognize already exists. The electric and water companies use something like that to "drive by" read meters already. Keeps it simpler than trying to make a car do all the work. Just a reflector mounted signal that when read by the car says "I am a bike" or "blind pedestrian" or "loose dog with a collar".
Anyway the issue of a free app or tiny signal devices to bikes (or other hard to recognize things in traffic) which send or receive an identity signal for autodrive cars to read and recognize already exists. The electric and water companies use something like that to "drive by" read meters already. Keeps it simpler than trying to make a car do all the work. Just a reflector mounted signal that when read by the car says "I am a bike" or "blind pedestrian" or "loose dog with a collar".
11-08-17, 10:31 PM
#478
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,076
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Maybe. I obviously don't think so.
All the technology already exists for driverless taxis - they're just refining the software. Most new cars can be developed in 18 months; I see no reason why this can't happen with driverless taxis. And there are companies already working on this. Some in the general public might be getting rides in such taxis this year (yeah, within 7 weeks).
All the technology already exists for driverless taxis - they're just refining the software. Most new cars can be developed in 18 months; I see no reason why this can't happen with driverless taxis. And there are companies already working on this. Some in the general public might be getting rides in such taxis this year (yeah, within 7 weeks).
11-09-17, 10:19 AM
#480
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Since the thread has lately been sidelined about taxis, I should note that in many parts of (possibly most) states, ther are forty mile gaps between taxis. No mass transit. AND.... half of american drivers would give up their guns before giving up their POV cars.
Anyway the issue of a free app or tiny signal devices to bikes (or other hard to recognize things in traffic) which send or receive an identity signal for autodrive cars to read and recognize already exists. The electric and water companies use something like that to "drive by" read meters already. Keeps it simpler than trying to make a car do all the work. Just a reflector mounted signal that when read by the car says "I am a bike" or "blind pedestrian" or "loose dog with a collar".
Anyway the issue of a free app or tiny signal devices to bikes (or other hard to recognize things in traffic) which send or receive an identity signal for autodrive cars to read and recognize already exists. The electric and water companies use something like that to "drive by" read meters already. Keeps it simpler than trying to make a car do all the work. Just a reflector mounted signal that when read by the car says "I am a bike" or "blind pedestrian" or "loose dog with a collar".
11-09-17, 10:30 AM
#481
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That is because pretty well ALL driverless vehicles/cars WILL, be "taxis"... Who would actually want to own a driverless car...? Well, the wealthy I guess would own one, but most of us, will just phone up a "taxi" and go from A to B and not own our own transport,,, I would Suggest. JMO...
It's going to be a no-brainer for most people, just as it already is for people who already gave up their cars and rely on Uber/Lyft/public/bike/walk.
11-09-17, 10:34 AM
#482
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Take out the human driver, lower the ride cost and price dramatically, and suddenly they make great business sense. There is a compounding effect too. Because of the low availability, high cost and general inconvenience few uses taxes (demand is low). When the price drops and availability increases, so does demand, which increases supply and improves availability, making them make even more sense.
11-09-17, 10:37 AM
#483
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13659 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Expire? What kind vehicles have you owned? There are 90+ year old vehicles still being enjoyed by their owners, how long until they "expire"?
I fail to see a majority of the general population give up their vehicles. For the most part, public transportation is a failure in getting the masses out of their cars. And, I don't see Legislation happening.
I fail to see a majority of the general population give up their vehicles. For the most part, public transportation is a failure in getting the masses out of their cars. And, I don't see Legislation happening.
11-09-17, 10:44 AM
#484
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nor do they need to stay within the friendly confines of certain selected Google approved/selected routes in the Phoenix, AZ area in order to avoid challenging an inability to operate safely with no one at the wheel in the dark, rain, snow, slippery roads, dense urban traffic or any/every other scenario that doesn't match the sunny day environment selected for these demonstrations.
I suppose the only drivers the overwrought motorist-bashers/Google car fan bois/day dreamers would have are whatever Phase driver is equivalent to a vehicle that stops by the side of the road whenever the sun goes down, or approaches a tunnel, bridge or anything else not meeting the sunny weather, carefully selected Google-friendly dry clean routes of Phoenix, and doesn't budge until road conditions change to meet the severely limited safe operating parameters of the current breed of driver-less motor vehicles.
I suppose the only drivers the overwrought motorist-bashers/Google car fan bois/day dreamers would have are whatever Phase driver is equivalent to a vehicle that stops by the side of the road whenever the sun goes down, or approaches a tunnel, bridge or anything else not meeting the sunny weather, carefully selected Google-friendly dry clean routes of Phoenix, and doesn't budge until road conditions change to meet the severely limited safe operating parameters of the current breed of driver-less motor vehicles.
Anyone who has visited San Francisco knows driving here is kind of ridiculous. Our vehicles encounter challenging (and often absurd) situations up to 46 times more often than other places self-driving cars are tested. Perhaps for this reason, nobody else is regularly testing self-driving cars in SF. And while we’re generally drawn to tough problems, we test in SF only because we have to. We believe it’s the fastest path toward deploying self-driving cars at scale.
...
Self-driving cars must be able to read traffic lights, even in bad lighting conditions, but sometimes the lights don’t even work. Our vehicles have to reason about these kinds of situations and determine how to proceed. We encountered a six-way intersection in the Castro neighborhood of San Francisco with flashing red lights in all directions and successfully navigated through it.
...
Cyclists are tough to predict. They’re small, can reach speeds of 30mph or higher, sometimes break traffic laws, may or may not use bike lanes, split lanes and weave between cars, and can change direction far more quickly than vehicles. Our vehicles encounter cyclists 16x as often in SF than in suburbs, so we’ve invested considerably in the behavior of our vehicles when a cyclist is nearby. In the video below, we narrowly avoided a cyclist in all black. He made a sharp left turn across traffic without having the right of way.
...
Self-driving cars must be able to read traffic lights, even in bad lighting conditions, but sometimes the lights don’t even work. Our vehicles have to reason about these kinds of situations and determine how to proceed. We encountered a six-way intersection in the Castro neighborhood of San Francisco with flashing red lights in all directions and successfully navigated through it.
...
Cyclists are tough to predict. They’re small, can reach speeds of 30mph or higher, sometimes break traffic laws, may or may not use bike lanes, split lanes and weave between cars, and can change direction far more quickly than vehicles. Our vehicles encounter cyclists 16x as often in SF than in suburbs, so we’ve invested considerably in the behavior of our vehicles when a cyclist is nearby. In the video below, we narrowly avoided a cyclist in all black. He made a sharp left turn across traffic without having the right of way.
11-09-17, 10:56 AM
#485
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First and foremost, driverless taxis are a door-to-door service. To use public transport you have to get to it from your starting point, and then get to your destination once you arrive at the nearest station or stop. Driverless taxis pick you up at your front door, and take you to the entrance of your destination, which is even better than driving yourself, having to find parking, and walking from your parking spot.
Secondly, driverless taxis are on-demand. Public transport works on a schedule. You have to accommodate your schedule to their schedule. Even with human drivers in them I can summon an Uber or Lyft for a spontaneous trip to arrive within a few minutes. But most trips are planned and can be scheduled for the car to arrive at a precise time. This will become even more efficient and reliable with driverless taxis which will cost practically nothing to just sit there and wait for a trip request (so keeping an ample supply to meet peak demand will be economically viable),
People might not give up their vehicles immediately, but the path of least resistance will be to take a driverless taxi. Most families will quickly shed their vehicles to be down to one. Then, if your spouse has the car you go driverless taxi. Suddenly they'll realize they both went driverless taxi every day for the last two weeks and the car has just been sitting there, unused. You won't have to be a wizard accountant to figure out continuing to own the car makes no sense.
11-09-17, 10:57 AM
#486
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,076
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Taxis that have to pay people to drive them don't make business sense in sparsely populated areas.
Take out the human driver, lower the ride cost and price dramatically, and suddenly they make great business sense. There is a compounding effect too. Because of the low availability, high cost and general inconvenience few uses taxes (demand is low). When the price drops and availability increases, so does demand, which increases supply and improves availability, making them make even more sense.
Take out the human driver, lower the ride cost and price dramatically, and suddenly they make great business sense. There is a compounding effect too. Because of the low availability, high cost and general inconvenience few uses taxes (demand is low). When the price drops and availability increases, so does demand, which increases supply and improves availability, making them make even more sense.
Last edited by tyrion; 11-09-17 at 11:04 AM.
11-09-17, 11:08 AM
#487
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13659 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Pretty interesting... and yeah, it shows that testing is not just happening in the wide open spaces of the suburbs of Phoenix.
How their self-driving cars see the world. The predicted future path and multiple possible interactions of every person, car, and cyclist are calculated 10 times per second.
I have to wonder just how that compares to the typical human driver. "Glance and go..."
Humans controlling traffic near construction. All driving completed autonomously. Do note that the car responded to the signal from the human directing traffic.
Hmmmm can't get the images to show for some reason... but really worth the effort to look at that page and see what they are doing.
https://medium.com/kylevogt/why-test...y-77dbe8345927
How their self-driving cars see the world. The predicted future path and multiple possible interactions of every person, car, and cyclist are calculated 10 times per second.
I have to wonder just how that compares to the typical human driver. "Glance and go..."
Humans controlling traffic near construction. All driving completed autonomously. Do note that the car responded to the signal from the human directing traffic.
Hmmmm can't get the images to show for some reason... but really worth the effort to look at that page and see what they are doing.
https://medium.com/kylevogt/why-test...y-77dbe8345927
Last edited by genec; 11-09-17 at 11:16 AM.
11-09-17, 11:11 AM
#488
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,995
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times
in
1,052 Posts
More grist for the speculation fan-boies at the latest NYT Times Magazine special issue The Tech & Design Issue: Life After Driving https://www.nytimes.com/section/magazine
11-09-17, 11:25 AM
#489
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13659 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Everything is allegedly being "addressed". Addressing problems and issues with press releases, public relations activities, speculation and imaginative theorizing are not necessarily issues and problems getting any closer to being solved despite the most ardent wishful thinking.
More grist for the speculation fan-boies at the latest NYT Times Magazine special issue The Tech & Design Issue: Life After Driving https://www.nytimes.com/section/magazine
More grist for the speculation fan-boies at the latest NYT Times Magazine special issue The Tech & Design Issue: Life After Driving https://www.nytimes.com/section/magazine
How are those buggy whip sales going? There IS still a market... Buggy Whip Sales, Vintage Replicas, Sizing For Miniature Horses, Jedediah’s Buggy Whip Repair, Wolbach, NE
I notice you are on that high tech thingy called the "internets..." Amazing for a someone so tech adverse as yourself. Do you have your assistant print out each page for you to view, while you write out your latest reply in longhand?
BTW, supposedly we've launched satellites into space and sent robots to visit other planets... just in case you aren't up on the latest news.
11-09-17, 11:37 AM
#490
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,995
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times
in
1,052 Posts
Hey, not everyone lives in the back woods eating dried venison in a one room cabin heated by hand split logs...
How are those buggy whip sales going? There IS still a market... Buggy Whip Sales, Vintage Replicas, Sizing For Miniature Horses, Jedediah’s Buggy Whip Repair, Wolbach, NE
I notice you are on that high tech thingy called the "internets..." Amazing for a someone so tech adverse as yourself. Do you have your assistant print out each page for you to view, while you write out your latest reply in longhand?
BTW, supposedly we've launched satellites into space and sent robots to visit other planets... just in case you aren't up on the latest news.
How are those buggy whip sales going? There IS still a market... Buggy Whip Sales, Vintage Replicas, Sizing For Miniature Horses, Jedediah’s Buggy Whip Repair, Wolbach, NE
I notice you are on that high tech thingy called the "internets..." Amazing for a someone so tech adverse as yourself. Do you have your assistant print out each page for you to view, while you write out your latest reply in longhand?
BTW, supposedly we've launched satellites into space and sent robots to visit other planets... just in case you aren't up on the latest news.
11-09-17, 11:57 AM
#491
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13659 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Here, I'll throw you a bone to gnaw on... I'm sure you'll just love this one.
Self Driving Bus Crashes in Vegas
This collision, like 90 percent of traffic incidents on our roads, was the result of human error. The truck driver got a ticket from the Las Vegas police. We could see his mirrors the whole time and he should have seen us. But I don’t want to be too harsh on the guy – driving a big truck in Las Vegas is a tough job, and he’s only human. His error could have happened to anyone.
On the other side, the shuttle did exactly what it was programmed to do, and that’s a critical point. The self-driving program didn’t account for the vehicle in front unexpectedly backing up. We had about 20 feet of empty street behind us (I looked) and most human drivers would have thrown the car into reverse and used some of that space to get away from the truck. Or at least leaned on the horn and made our presence harder to miss. The shuttle didn’t have those responses in its program.
On the other side, the shuttle did exactly what it was programmed to do, and that’s a critical point. The self-driving program didn’t account for the vehicle in front unexpectedly backing up. We had about 20 feet of empty street behind us (I looked) and most human drivers would have thrown the car into reverse and used some of that space to get away from the truck. Or at least leaned on the horn and made our presence harder to miss. The shuttle didn’t have those responses in its program.
11-09-17, 12:45 PM
#492
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The problem with taxis in sparsely populated areas is that the taxis will be spread out causing long wait times. People aren't going to give up car ownership if they might have to wait an hour for a taxi. This can be addressed by throwing taxis at the problem, but that doesn't make business sense.
Besides, most trips are planned and taxi pickups can be scheduled. No waiting.
11-09-17, 12:52 PM
#493
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nah, I just got really tired of all your negativity... as if nothing real is happening...
Here, I'll throw you a bone to gnaw on... I'm sure you'll just love this one.
Self Driving Bus Crashes in Vegas
https://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/s...vegas-account/
Here, I'll throw you a bone to gnaw on... I'm sure you'll just love this one.
Self Driving Bus Crashes in Vegas
This collision, like 90 percent of traffic incidents on our roads, was the result of human error. The truck driver got a ticket from the Las Vegas police. We could see his mirrors the whole time and he should have seen us. But I don’t want to be too harsh on the guy – driving a big truck in Las Vegas is a tough job, and he’s only human. His error could have happened to anyone.
On the other side, the shuttle did exactly what it was programmed to do, and that’s a critical point. The self-driving program didn’t account for the vehicle in front unexpectedly backing up. We had about 20 feet of empty street behind us (I looked) and most human drivers would have thrown the car into reverse and used some of that space to get away from the truck. Or at least leaned on the horn and made our presence harder to miss. The shuttle didn’t have those responses in its program.
On the other side, the shuttle did exactly what it was programmed to do, and that’s a critical point. The self-driving program didn’t account for the vehicle in front unexpectedly backing up. We had about 20 feet of empty street behind us (I looked) and most human drivers would have thrown the car into reverse and used some of that space to get away from the truck. Or at least leaned on the horn and made our presence harder to miss. The shuttle didn’t have those responses in its program.
Any bets on how soon it, and all AVs, will have those responses in their programs? A matter of weeks or a few months?
11-09-17, 01:08 PM
#494
Senior Member
Humans are the only drivers capable to respond to changing situations...
11-09-17, 01:12 PM
#495
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,995
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times
in
1,052 Posts
It is unfortunate that you are only able to describe as "negativity" the well deserved/well earned skepticism of the dreamy cheerleading on this bicycle forum about the imminent adaption and success of the driverless car as predicted on this thread and elsewhere.
11-09-17, 01:13 PM
#496
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,977
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1638 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
495 Posts
So, we have gone from "older vehicles" to "daily drivers"?
The point is, comments have been made that human operated vehicles will get Legislated out of existence (not ever going to happen), to vehicles expiring, gas stations going away, among other things to remove them from the road. With proper care a vehicle can last indefinitely.
The point is, comments have been made that human operated vehicles will get Legislated out of existence (not ever going to happen), to vehicles expiring, gas stations going away, among other things to remove them from the road. With proper care a vehicle can last indefinitely.
__________________
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
11-09-17, 01:34 PM
#497
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,977
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1638 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
495 Posts
Driverless taxis addresses all the major drawbacks of public transportation that is at the root of its failure.
First and foremost, driverless taxis are a door-to-door service. To use public transport you have to get to it from your starting point, and then get to your destination once you arrive at the nearest station or stop. Driverless taxis pick you up at your front door, and take you to the entrance of your destination, which is even better than driving yourself, having to find parking, and walking from your parking spot.
Secondly, driverless taxis are on-demand. Public transport works on a schedule. You have to accommodate your schedule to their schedule. Even with human drivers in them I can summon an Uber or Lyft for a spontaneous trip to arrive within a few minutes. But most trips are planned and can be scheduled for the car to arrive at a precise time. This will become even more efficient and reliable with driverless taxis which will cost practically nothing to just sit there and wait for a trip request (so keeping an ample supply to meet peak demand will be economically viable),
People might not give up their vehicles immediately, but the path of least resistance will be to take a driverless taxi. Most families will quickly shed their vehicles to be down to one. Then, if your spouse has the car you go driverless taxi. Suddenly they'll realize they both went driverless taxi every day for the last two weeks and the car has just been sitting there, unused. You won't have to be a wizard accountant to figure out continuing to own the car makes no sense.
First and foremost, driverless taxis are a door-to-door service. To use public transport you have to get to it from your starting point, and then get to your destination once you arrive at the nearest station or stop. Driverless taxis pick you up at your front door, and take you to the entrance of your destination, which is even better than driving yourself, having to find parking, and walking from your parking spot.
Secondly, driverless taxis are on-demand. Public transport works on a schedule. You have to accommodate your schedule to their schedule. Even with human drivers in them I can summon an Uber or Lyft for a spontaneous trip to arrive within a few minutes. But most trips are planned and can be scheduled for the car to arrive at a precise time. This will become even more efficient and reliable with driverless taxis which will cost practically nothing to just sit there and wait for a trip request (so keeping an ample supply to meet peak demand will be economically viable),
People might not give up their vehicles immediately, but the path of least resistance will be to take a driverless taxi. Most families will quickly shed their vehicles to be down to one. Then, if your spouse has the car you go driverless taxi. Suddenly they'll realize they both went driverless taxi every day for the last two weeks and the car has just been sitting there, unused. You won't have to be a wizard accountant to figure out continuing to own the car makes no sense.
Instead of going on and on with the fantasy, answer my question about the required "Lyft System" infrastructure. .
__________________
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
11-09-17, 01:40 PM
#498
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13659 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
So, we have gone from "older vehicles" to "daily drivers"?
The point is, comments have been made that human operated vehicles will get Legislated out of existence (not ever going to happen), to vehicles expiring, gas stations going away, among other things to remove them from the road. With proper care a vehicle can last indefinitely.
The point is, comments have been made that human operated vehicles will get Legislated out of existence (not ever going to happen), to vehicles expiring, gas stations going away, among other things to remove them from the road. With proper care a vehicle can last indefinitely.
We are talking cars that are used to get people to and from work and for all their other regular transportation needs... not 90 year old "classics" like a 1927 Hupmobile.
Oh no doubt those old classics will remain around, somewhere... showing up at some show from time to time... just like the much younger only 51 year old '66 Mustang.
11-09-17, 01:49 PM
#499
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news...our/ar-BBEK5m9
The driver was cited and had no idea the bus had no driver. So the answer is gee, that didn't work. And AAA's logo was all over that shuttle.
Las Vegas doesn't sound all that busy, you'd think it's just a gambling town, but it's a big city like every other and lots of people live there and work...it has a lot of traffic.
The driver was cited and had no idea the bus had no driver. So the answer is gee, that didn't work. And AAA's logo was all over that shuttle.
Las Vegas doesn't sound all that busy, you'd think it's just a gambling town, but it's a big city like every other and lots of people live there and work...it has a lot of traffic.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
11-09-17, 01:52 PM
#500
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,076
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Yes, it does make sense to throw taxis at the problem. It's the same business sense as rental companies having surplus rental cars. The cost to keep them idle some significant percentage of the time is warranted by the increased business you get due to being able to meet demand quickly and efficiently.