Just started training with Power? Post your questions/comments here!
#3501
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 305
Bikes: Ridley Damocles, CAAD10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
dhale, i think you asked for how i did on my first stabs at SST's?
i just took a look at my file. My FTP at the time was 255, my LTHR is 173.
From the 3rd stab at it. 30x6x30. AP 218, NP 225, HR165 for first. AP 220, NP 228 HR 165 for second.
From the 5th time. 80 minutes. AP 217, NP 221, HR 165. I remember my right quads being sore 2-3 days after.
For a similar effort nowadays (intensity factor around 0.90), my HR is closer to 158-160.
i just took a look at my file. My FTP at the time was 255, my LTHR is 173.
From the 3rd stab at it. 30x6x30. AP 218, NP 225, HR165 for first. AP 220, NP 228 HR 165 for second.
From the 5th time. 80 minutes. AP 217, NP 221, HR 165. I remember my right quads being sore 2-3 days after.
For a similar effort nowadays (intensity factor around 0.90), my HR is closer to 158-160.
If the answer is "yes, it could possible that the FTP is set too high", then what good did the test do? The numbers don't lie I suppose, since I was able to map 381 watts. Just don't understand why couldn't ride at SST. I will take a day or two of rest and try again.
#3502
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
Posts: 4,813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thanks. I guess my ultimate question boils down to this: If a test has been done to find FTP (MAP test in my case), and I can't complete SST intervals based on this figure, then my FTP may be set too high? I do realize, like you said, it could be fatigue from the test leftover.
If the answer is "yes, it could possible that the FTP is set too high", then what good did the test do? The numbers don't lie I suppose, since I was able to map 381 watts. Just don't understand why couldn't ride at SST. I will take a day or two of rest and try again.
If the answer is "yes, it could possible that the FTP is set too high", then what good did the test do? The numbers don't lie I suppose, since I was able to map 381 watts. Just don't understand why couldn't ride at SST. I will take a day or two of rest and try again.
#3503
fuggitivo solitario
if you are really unsure and don't trust the number, do a few easy days and redo the MAP test with 20W ramp.
Otherwise, wait a few days and try SST again. I don't think my AP was over 0.88 of FTP until the 7th or 8th session.
What's that number good for? It's a start. When i bought my ptap, i thought my FTP might be over 270. Yeah, right. I did one 20' session (no 5' before) and estimated 255 for FTP, probably overly high, but close enough. The next time i tested, i was aiming for 260 and got exactly just that.
Otherwise, wait a few days and try SST again. I don't think my AP was over 0.88 of FTP until the 7th or 8th session.
What's that number good for? It's a start. When i bought my ptap, i thought my FTP might be over 270. Yeah, right. I did one 20' session (no 5' before) and estimated 255 for FTP, probably overly high, but close enough. The next time i tested, i was aiming for 260 and got exactly just that.
#3504
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought that too until I got the package. Only the 500 was included (no HR). However, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the PT and Garmin can figure out cadence w/o the cadence sensor. I ended up ordering the premium HR monitor on Amazon (I've used the old pastic HR straps back in Grad school in my research lab, and found them pretty uncomfortable). The premium strap better be good for that price...
#3505
Making a kilometer blurry
I got a new laptop a while back, and rather than start off with WKO on it (and moving the license, etc.) I decided to try Golden Cheetah. I really like it. I haven't gotten it completely figured out yet, but it's really cool. Aerolab is a great toy, and I'm looking forward to trying it out with some low-wind tests in various road positons.
One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
#3506
These Guys Eat Oreos
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got a new laptop a while back, and rather than start off with WKO on it (and moving the license, etc.) I decided to try Golden Cheetah. I really like it. I haven't gotten it completely figured out yet, but it's really cool. Aerolab is a great toy, and I'm looking forward to trying it out with some low-wind tests in various road positons.
One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
I know when I was trying out Golden Cheetah a couple weeks ago it was finicky about which format I brought it in with.
#3507
Making a kilometer blurry
#3508
fuggitivo solitario
I got a new laptop a while back, and rather than start off with WKO on it (and moving the license, etc.) I decided to try Golden Cheetah. I really like it. I haven't gotten it completely figured out yet, but it's really cool. Aerolab is a great toy, and I'm looking forward to trying it out with some low-wind tests in various road positons.
One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
if you can extract out the *.bin file from your LYC, even better
#3509
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#3510
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I know it's vaporware, but if that Brim power meter makes it to market and it works, that's the one I'll drop the big coin for.
#3511
Senior Member
If it comes in at $1000 then it's not as much big coin.
I have some philosophies on equipment and future stuff. The show and some other stuff made me think about future direction etc. I'll be posting shortly on some of that stuff.
Also I found what I think is my new favorite chainring. Bought two sets, will be installing/reviewing.
I have some philosophies on equipment and future stuff. The show and some other stuff made me think about future direction etc. I'll be posting shortly on some of that stuff.
Also I found what I think is my new favorite chainring. Bought two sets, will be installing/reviewing.
#3512
Making a kilometer blurry
#3514
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just started with WKO and loaded in a few workouts ( My quarq is a few weeks old and I have not done formal testing yet)
so I am beginning to look at my wattage numbers.
I did 7 "longer" hill (750 meters) repeats the other night and made the separate laps for the climb and decent.
So I was able to look at the numbers for each climb and my time to complete the climb and get a better idea of what power range I should aim for when climbing those hills next week so I do not start at say 500 watts and then finish the climb at 200 cause I blow up.
we also did a few short punchy climbs which were fun to do after the "longer" repeats. I seem to be able to climb the short climbs a lot fast and with quite bit more power.... my peak was 1040 watts up on of the hills.
is this fine for initial analysis or am I looking at this the wrong way?
so far it seems I'm better at short hard efforts than longer durations but I'm also out of shape and a newbie
so I am beginning to look at my wattage numbers.
I did 7 "longer" hill (750 meters) repeats the other night and made the separate laps for the climb and decent.
So I was able to look at the numbers for each climb and my time to complete the climb and get a better idea of what power range I should aim for when climbing those hills next week so I do not start at say 500 watts and then finish the climb at 200 cause I blow up.
we also did a few short punchy climbs which were fun to do after the "longer" repeats. I seem to be able to climb the short climbs a lot fast and with quite bit more power.... my peak was 1040 watts up on of the hills.
is this fine for initial analysis or am I looking at this the wrong way?
so far it seems I'm better at short hard efforts than longer durations but I'm also out of shape and a newbie
#3515
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're getting some numbers here and there but they're not really telling you much. You need to start a structured training program, designed to get you to peak for your next A race. That may be many months from now, so you can use it to stay within a base range until you start the real training ramp-up. Get the book. Read it a few times, then design a plan for yourself.
#3516
awaiting uci approval
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 961
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix RC 06
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
People are always very keen to start looking at numbers right away. But I try and get my guys to ride for a month w/o paying any attention to very much. Do a variety of rides and workouts like you currently are, then start looking at the data, assessing areas for improvement, and structuring training for next season.
#3517
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks guys
I admit I do like to look at the numbers and make assumptions or trying to anyway. I'm not planning on starting anything structure right now I just want to ride for a bit with out a plan in mind then do formal testing in say November.
if the weather hold our I'm going to try and complete a century this weekend because it's something I've always wanted to ride in and just have not had the time before.. I'm also interested to see the data from it.
Shovelhd
I understand what you are saying I do not plan to peak till next summer. The advice I've received before was to just ride look at your data but do not worry about it.
Tom
can you explain what you mean by "w/o paying any attention to very much"?
I admit I do like to look at the numbers and make assumptions or trying to anyway. I'm not planning on starting anything structure right now I just want to ride for a bit with out a plan in mind then do formal testing in say November.
if the weather hold our I'm going to try and complete a century this weekend because it's something I've always wanted to ride in and just have not had the time before.. I'm also interested to see the data from it.
Shovelhd
I understand what you are saying I do not plan to peak till next summer. The advice I've received before was to just ride look at your data but do not worry about it.
Tom
can you explain what you mean by "w/o paying any attention to very much"?
#3518
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There's no problem with just looking at the numbers. I was referring to how you drew conclusions from them without gathering enough data or within a structured program or racing season. That's more than just looking at them. There's no middle ground here unless you want to join an ewang contest. The numbers don't mean a lot until you have enough of them and something to wrap around them. Like I said before, right now I think the best thing for you to do is to do an FTP test, get a number, and use that number to keep your power within the base region until you are ready to start a training program.
#3520
grilled cheesus
its ok to pay attention to the numbers now, but they dont mean crap. you need, at least, a couple months of data for it to mean anything to you. later.
__________________
#3521
These Guys Eat Oreos
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How do you guys utilize TSS when training on the trainer. Do you input a separate Trainer FTP everytime you are on the trainer to make it a more realistic TSS? Or do you guys throw on some extra TSS on the side after you are done and look at the numbers compared to a normal ride of the same distance?
I'm trying to help my mom train a bit, and she is getting like .6 IF rides from the trainer which is giving her next to no TSS even at longer time periods.
I'm trying to help my mom train a bit, and she is getting like .6 IF rides from the trainer which is giving her next to no TSS even at longer time periods.
#3522
grilled cheesus
^^^^ so you are saying her Perceived Effort is high and the numbers dont seem to match. that is typical for trainer rides for numerous reasons. those numbers may very well be correct.
she needs to do a FTP test on the trainer to establish her FTP. i only do mine on the trainer and its the same routine every time. be consistent with the testing. the difference between indoor and outdoor numbers shouldnt be great enough to significantly skew her data. i do not adjust my FTP based on the location of my efforts.
good luck. later.
she needs to do a FTP test on the trainer to establish her FTP. i only do mine on the trainer and its the same routine every time. be consistent with the testing. the difference between indoor and outdoor numbers shouldnt be great enough to significantly skew her data. i do not adjust my FTP based on the location of my efforts.
good luck. later.
__________________
#3523
awaiting uci approval
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 961
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix RC 06
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks guys
I admit I do like to look at the numbers and make assumptions or trying to anyway. I'm not planning on starting anything structure right now I just want to ride for a bit with out a plan in mind then do formal testing in say November.
if the weather hold our I'm going to try and complete a century this weekend because it's something I've always wanted to ride in and just have not had the time before.. I'm also interested to see the data from it.
Shovelhd
I understand what you are saying I do not plan to peak till next summer. The advice I've received before was to just ride look at your data but do not worry about it.
Tom
can you explain what you mean by "w/o paying any attention to very much"?
I admit I do like to look at the numbers and make assumptions or trying to anyway. I'm not planning on starting anything structure right now I just want to ride for a bit with out a plan in mind then do formal testing in say November.
if the weather hold our I'm going to try and complete a century this weekend because it's something I've always wanted to ride in and just have not had the time before.. I'm also interested to see the data from it.
Shovelhd
I understand what you are saying I do not plan to peak till next summer. The advice I've received before was to just ride look at your data but do not worry about it.
Tom
can you explain what you mean by "w/o paying any attention to very much"?
#3524
These Guys Eat Oreos
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^^^^ so you are saying her Perceived Effort is high and the numbers dont seem to match. that is typical for trainer rides for numerous reasons. those numbers may very well be correct.
she needs to do a FTP test on the trainer to establish her FTP. i only do mine on the trainer and its the same routine every time. be consistent with the testing. the difference between indoor and outdoor numbers shouldnt be great enough to significantly skew her data. i do not adjust my FTP based on the location of my efforts.
good luck. later.
she needs to do a FTP test on the trainer to establish her FTP. i only do mine on the trainer and its the same routine every time. be consistent with the testing. the difference between indoor and outdoor numbers shouldnt be great enough to significantly skew her data. i do not adjust my FTP based on the location of my efforts.
good luck. later.
I'll have her do a MAP test on the trainer and hopefully we'll have a better FTP that will work with indoors and outdoors.
#3525
Throw the stick!!!!
I have a question about zeroing a powertap when using with a 705. In the past I always zeroed my wired version while coasting. That doesn't seem to work with the setup I have now. Does it have to be zeroed while not moving? That seems to be the only way mine will do it.
I know my quarq has to be done that way but I assumed the pt had to be done while moving.
I know my quarq has to be done that way but I assumed the pt had to be done while moving.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.