Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Just started training with Power? Post your questions/comments here!

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Just started training with Power? Post your questions/comments here!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-11, 07:37 PM
  #3501  
dhale50
Senior Member
 
dhale50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 305

Bikes: Ridley Damocles, CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by echappist
dhale, i think you asked for how i did on my first stabs at SST's?

i just took a look at my file. My FTP at the time was 255, my LTHR is 173.

From the 3rd stab at it. 30x6x30. AP 218, NP 225, HR165 for first. AP 220, NP 228 HR 165 for second.
From the 5th time. 80 minutes. AP 217, NP 221, HR 165. I remember my right quads being sore 2-3 days after.

For a similar effort nowadays (intensity factor around 0.90), my HR is closer to 158-160.
Thanks. I guess my ultimate question boils down to this: If a test has been done to find FTP (MAP test in my case), and I can't complete SST intervals based on this figure, then my FTP may be set too high? I do realize, like you said, it could be fatigue from the test leftover.

If the answer is "yes, it could possible that the FTP is set too high", then what good did the test do? The numbers don't lie I suppose, since I was able to map 381 watts. Just don't understand why couldn't ride at SST. I will take a day or two of rest and try again.
dhale50 is offline  
Old 09-18-11, 08:15 PM
  #3502  
jsutkeepspining
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
Posts: 4,813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dhale50
Thanks. I guess my ultimate question boils down to this: If a test has been done to find FTP (MAP test in my case), and I can't complete SST intervals based on this figure, then my FTP may be set too high? I do realize, like you said, it could be fatigue from the test leftover.

If the answer is "yes, it could possible that the FTP is set too high", then what good did the test do? The numbers don't lie I suppose, since I was able to map 381 watts. Just don't understand why couldn't ride at SST. I will take a day or two of rest and try again.
also remember the .72 (i think thats the number) of you map test number is just a guesstamit. you may have a terrible aerobic system and be able to use your anaerobic system to get through most of the test.
jsutkeepspining is offline  
Old 09-18-11, 08:35 PM
  #3503  
echappist
fuggitivo solitario
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 9,107
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
if you are really unsure and don't trust the number, do a few easy days and redo the MAP test with 20W ramp.

Otherwise, wait a few days and try SST again. I don't think my AP was over 0.88 of FTP until the 7th or 8th session.

What's that number good for? It's a start. When i bought my ptap, i thought my FTP might be over 270. Yeah, right. I did one 20' session (no 5' before) and estimated 255 for FTP, probably overly high, but close enough. The next time i tested, i was aiming for 260 and got exactly just that.
echappist is offline  
Old 09-19-11, 07:05 PM
  #3504  
Skinny Fred
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kindablue
I thought that too until I got the package. Only the 500 was included (no HR). However, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the PT and Garmin can figure out cadence w/o the cadence sensor. I ended up ordering the premium HR monitor on Amazon (I've used the old pastic HR straps back in Grad school in my research lab, and found them pretty uncomfortable). The premium strap better be good for that price...
I edited my post above. The description at CC specifies computer only now, but I think that it used to describe the package. I examined the deal pretty carefully. People seem to be satisfied with the new (late 2010) premium strap.
Skinny Fred is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 08:24 AM
  #3505  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
I got a new laptop a while back, and rather than start off with WKO on it (and moving the license, etc.) I decided to try Golden Cheetah. I really like it. I haven't gotten it completely figured out yet, but it's really cool. Aerolab is a great toy, and I'm looking forward to trying it out with some low-wind tests in various road positons.

One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
waterrockets is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 08:52 AM
  #3506  
Creatre
These Guys Eat Oreos
 
Creatre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
I got a new laptop a while back, and rather than start off with WKO on it (and moving the license, etc.) I decided to try Golden Cheetah. I really like it. I haven't gotten it completely figured out yet, but it's really cool. Aerolab is a great toy, and I'm looking forward to trying it out with some low-wind tests in various road positons.

One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
What format are you bringing the data in with? Maybe has something to do with that?

I know when I was trying out Golden Cheetah a couple weeks ago it was finicky about which format I brought it in with.
Creatre is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 09:01 AM
  #3507  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Creatre
What format are you bringing the data in with? Maybe has something to do with that?

I know when I was trying out Golden Cheetah a couple weeks ago it was finicky about which format I brought it in with.
I'm not sure. I just pull it in with the defaults.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 09:02 AM
  #3508  
echappist
fuggitivo solitario
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 9,107
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
I got a new laptop a while back, and rather than start off with WKO on it (and moving the license, etc.) I decided to try Golden Cheetah. I really like it. I haven't gotten it completely figured out yet, but it's really cool. Aerolab is a great toy, and I'm looking forward to trying it out with some low-wind tests in various road positons.

One question: why does it show my rides like 18 hours in the past? WKO was fine with the time stamps on my PT data. I might have to crack open the source...
get the latest development version. Earlier versions had troubles with timestamps, but not the current one.

if you can extract out the *.bin file from your LYC, even better
echappist is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 09:06 AM
  #3509  
shovelhd
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
I might have to crack open the source...
Give yourself ten gigawatts.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 09:23 AM
  #3510  
shovelhd
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I know it's vaporware, but if that Brim power meter makes it to market and it works, that's the one I'll drop the big coin for.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 09:54 AM
  #3511  
carpediemracing 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
If it comes in at $1000 then it's not as much big coin.

I have some philosophies on equipment and future stuff. The show and some other stuff made me think about future direction etc. I'll be posting shortly on some of that stuff.

Also I found what I think is my new favorite chainring. Bought two sets, will be installing/reviewing.
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 10:39 AM
  #3512  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by shovelhd
I know it's vaporware, but if that Brim power meter makes it to market and it works, that's the one I'll drop the big coin for.
I like that when I googled it, I ended up with a zecanon article
waterrockets is offline  
Old 09-20-11, 01:50 PM
  #3513  
JohnKScott
Senior Member
 
JohnKScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 3,385

Bikes: It has two wheels

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Si

found that cool
JohnKScott is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 11:12 AM
  #3514  
Smallguy
Senior Member
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just started with WKO and loaded in a few workouts ( My quarq is a few weeks old and I have not done formal testing yet)

so I am beginning to look at my wattage numbers.

I did 7 "longer" hill (750 meters) repeats the other night and made the separate laps for the climb and decent.

So I was able to look at the numbers for each climb and my time to complete the climb and get a better idea of what power range I should aim for when climbing those hills next week so I do not start at say 500 watts and then finish the climb at 200 cause I blow up.

we also did a few short punchy climbs which were fun to do after the "longer" repeats. I seem to be able to climb the short climbs a lot fast and with quite bit more power.... my peak was 1040 watts up on of the hills.

is this fine for initial analysis or am I looking at this the wrong way?

so far it seems I'm better at short hard efforts than longer durations but I'm also out of shape and a newbie
Smallguy is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 11:32 AM
  #3515  
shovelhd
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You're getting some numbers here and there but they're not really telling you much. You need to start a structured training program, designed to get you to peak for your next A race. That may be many months from now, so you can use it to stay within a base range until you start the real training ramp-up. Get the book. Read it a few times, then design a plan for yourself.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 12:43 PM
  #3516  
tombailey
awaiting uci approval
 
tombailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 961

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix RC 06

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
People are always very keen to start looking at numbers right away. But I try and get my guys to ride for a month w/o paying any attention to very much. Do a variety of rides and workouts like you currently are, then start looking at the data, assessing areas for improvement, and structuring training for next season.
tombailey is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 12:52 PM
  #3517  
Smallguy
Senior Member
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks guys

I admit I do like to look at the numbers and make assumptions or trying to anyway. I'm not planning on starting anything structure right now I just want to ride for a bit with out a plan in mind then do formal testing in say November.

if the weather hold our I'm going to try and complete a century this weekend because it's something I've always wanted to ride in and just have not had the time before.. I'm also interested to see the data from it.

Shovelhd

I understand what you are saying I do not plan to peak till next summer. The advice I've received before was to just ride look at your data but do not worry about it.

Tom

can you explain what you mean by "w/o paying any attention to very much"?

Smallguy is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 01:11 PM
  #3518  
shovelhd
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
There's no problem with just looking at the numbers. I was referring to how you drew conclusions from them without gathering enough data or within a structured program or racing season. That's more than just looking at them. There's no middle ground here unless you want to join an ewang contest. The numbers don't mean a lot until you have enough of them and something to wrap around them. Like I said before, right now I think the best thing for you to do is to do an FTP test, get a number, and use that number to keep your power within the base region until you are ready to start a training program.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 01:17 PM
  #3519  
ericm979
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
+1, do a test (or two). You need to test periodically anyhow because your FTP will change.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 09:12 PM
  #3520  
aham23
grilled cheesus
 
aham23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 8675309
Posts: 6,957

Bikes: 2010 CAAD9 Custom, 06 Giant TCR C2 & 05 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
its ok to pay attention to the numbers now, but they dont mean crap. you need, at least, a couple months of data for it to mean anything to you. later.
__________________
aham23 is offline  
Old 09-23-11, 07:13 AM
  #3521  
Creatre
These Guys Eat Oreos
 
Creatre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How do you guys utilize TSS when training on the trainer. Do you input a separate Trainer FTP everytime you are on the trainer to make it a more realistic TSS? Or do you guys throw on some extra TSS on the side after you are done and look at the numbers compared to a normal ride of the same distance?

I'm trying to help my mom train a bit, and she is getting like .6 IF rides from the trainer which is giving her next to no TSS even at longer time periods.
Creatre is offline  
Old 09-23-11, 07:29 AM
  #3522  
aham23
grilled cheesus
 
aham23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 8675309
Posts: 6,957

Bikes: 2010 CAAD9 Custom, 06 Giant TCR C2 & 05 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
^^^^ so you are saying her Perceived Effort is high and the numbers dont seem to match. that is typical for trainer rides for numerous reasons. those numbers may very well be correct.

she needs to do a FTP test on the trainer to establish her FTP. i only do mine on the trainer and its the same routine every time. be consistent with the testing. the difference between indoor and outdoor numbers shouldnt be great enough to significantly skew her data. i do not adjust my FTP based on the location of my efforts.

good luck. later.
__________________
aham23 is offline  
Old 09-23-11, 07:31 AM
  #3523  
tombailey
awaiting uci approval
 
tombailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 961

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix RC 06

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallguy
thanks guys

I admit I do like to look at the numbers and make assumptions or trying to anyway. I'm not planning on starting anything structure right now I just want to ride for a bit with out a plan in mind then do formal testing in say November.

if the weather hold our I'm going to try and complete a century this weekend because it's something I've always wanted to ride in and just have not had the time before.. I'm also interested to see the data from it.

Shovelhd

I understand what you are saying I do not plan to peak till next summer. The advice I've received before was to just ride look at your data but do not worry about it.

Tom

can you explain what you mean by "w/o paying any attention to very much"?

Don't base assessments of strengths/weaknesses or use the data to build your training until you have enough data that it's somewhat meaningful. Shovel is right - there's no harm in looking at the numbers. They just don't mean that much in isolation.
tombailey is offline  
Old 09-23-11, 07:33 AM
  #3524  
Creatre
These Guys Eat Oreos
 
Creatre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aham23
^^^^ so you are saying her Perceived Effort is high and the numbers dont seem to match. that is typical for trainer rides for numerous reasons. those numbers may very well be correct.

she needs to do a FTP test on the trainer to establish her FTP. i only do mine on the trainer and its the same routine every time. be consistent with the testing. the difference between indoor and outdoor numbers shouldnt be great enough to significantly skew her data. i do not adjust my FTP based on the location of my efforts.

good luck. later.
Thanks for the response.

I'll have her do a MAP test on the trainer and hopefully we'll have a better FTP that will work with indoors and outdoors.
Creatre is offline  
Old 09-25-11, 06:24 AM
  #3525  
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
I have a question about zeroing a powertap when using with a 705. In the past I always zeroed my wired version while coasting. That doesn't seem to work with the setup I have now. Does it have to be zeroed while not moving? That seems to be the only way mine will do it.

I know my quarq has to be done that way but I assumed the pt had to be done while moving.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.