Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

The price of C&V membership

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

The price of C&V membership

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-22, 10:08 AM
  #101  
RandolphCarter
PeopleCode delaminator
 
RandolphCarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Round Lake. NY
Posts: 377

Bikes: 1986 Trek 310 Elance, 1997 Schwinn HydraGlide, 1987 Trek Antelope 800, 2003 Haro F4, 198? Allsop Offroad Climber

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Liked 153 Times in 67 Posts
Price of C&V membership?

Being able to use the phrase "It’s a complete bike but it needs everything" and expecting people will know what you mean.
RandolphCarter is offline  
Likes For RandolphCarter:
Old 03-10-22, 10:59 AM
  #102  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
Originally Posted by non-fixie
..., the Pletscher rack:

These racks are sooo bad. They always looked good in the stores and were sold everywhere, it's just that they sukd. Note how the frame clamp has slipped down and destroyed the paint. I wonder how many millions of frames were damaged by this crappy mounting method. Note how the rack is now interfering with proper operation of the rear brake. They also weigh a ton because of the steel, spring loaded clamp. That clamp never held anything tight enough, so you still needed bungee cords, or squished it down thru the rack onto the rear tire where it was damaged.

Jim Blackburn racks came out much later, after a decade of damaged frame paint by Pletscher, but they were such an improvement Blackburn racks were the obvious way to go.

My advice - get rid of the rack; get rid of the spoke protector; consider getting rid of the chainring protector.

Last edited by Bad Lag; 03-10-22 at 11:05 AM.
Bad Lag is offline  
Old 03-10-22, 12:29 PM
  #103  
non-fixie 
Shifting is fun!
Thread Starter
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,007

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 280 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2198 Post(s)
Liked 4,611 Times in 1,765 Posts
Originally Posted by Bad Lag
These racks are sooo bad. They always looked good in the stores and were sold everywhere, it's just that they sukd. Note how the frame clamp has slipped down and destroyed the paint. I wonder how many millions of frames were damaged by this crappy mounting method. Note how the rack is now interfering with proper operation of the rear brake. They also weigh a ton because of the steel, spring loaded clamp. That clamp never held anything tight enough, so you still needed bungee cords, or squished it down thru the rack onto the rear tire where it was damaged.

Jim Blackburn racks came out much later, after a decade of damaged frame paint by Pletscher, but they were such an improvement Blackburn racks were the obvious way to go.

My advice - get rid of the rack; get rid of the spoke protector; consider getting rid of the chainring protector.
We are on the same page here. Rack and dork disk have been disposed of long ago. The chainring protector I have kept. Because it a nice aluminum Stronglight item, and it might come in handy if I am ever going to build a city bike I want to be able to ride in a three-piece suit.
__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is offline  
Old 03-11-22, 08:26 PM
  #104  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
Originally Posted by non-fixie
We are on the same page here. Rack and dork disk have been disposed of long ago. The chainring protector I have kept. Because it a nice aluminum Stronglight item, and it might come in handy if I am ever going to build a city bike I want to be able to ride in a three-piece suit.
Yes, we are on the same page, including your keeping the chainring protector. Many people like them and they are a bit iconic. While I don't care for them and would remove it, I would not throw it away. I would dispose of the spoke protector, as you did.
Bad Lag is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.