Why is ultralight touring so unpopular?
#626
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: east bay area,CA
Posts: 335
Bikes: Salsa Fargo commuter,Litespeed Ocoee titanium mountain bike cannondale caad9 105 road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bullo Bill did not call anyone a wimp for using a pillow. I took his comment to mean that he would not use a pillow just because other people think that one is required. All the items that Psy has listed as being incompatible with lightweight touring are easily included in a gaer list of between 15 and 20lbs. I've read some of Buffalo Bills blog and he's doing some fun things and there are tourists with similar setups who have done long trips in perfect comfort. Obviously there are different opinions about comfortable touring so let's not throw stones.
And as for all the equipment I listed being compatible with an ultralight touring list, those were a very few examples off the top of my head of things often omitted from said lists, I can add more, like shower shoes, for example.i could go on but why?
The only thing I'm refuting here is that you have all the comforts and with less weight. That is simply not true. A slightly bigger shelter ( a smaller 2 man seems to be a sweet spot)is more comfortable for most people over a long tour. Period.
And that's what the op addressed, the reason ul isn't more popular, and it's because most people like a few more comforts along for the ride. Even for those of us who have done our homework and spent a fair amount of money on higher end gear, weight isn't the only criteria we consider. Comfort and durability rank high on my list as well.
#627
Senior Member
I think we may have an answer to why UL isn't more popular; people incorrectly believe that lightweight touring is uncomfortable and requires privation. A load of between 15lbs and 20lbs can deliver the same camping comfort as heavier loads.....tent, 30F sleeping bag, pad, cooking gear etc. and is far more comfortable when climbing a mountain. I would be less comfortable with a heavier load.
What this, and other threads have encouraged me to do is to borrow a digital scale for stuff up to 25lbs of so, and go all nerdy gram counter and actually weigh all my various doo dads and mark it all down.
Will be fun to actually see what weighs what and figure out what, if anything is worth changing.
The example of a tent is a good one, my 2 person tent is a very nice spacious place for me and my stuff, I've thought of perhaps getting a1 person tent, but who knows. Will still be nice to compare actual weights of things, but at the same time balance out what extras I will live with for a given bit of extra comfort, like a small travel pillow, bit of bulk but very light. Or a small tripod chair, which can mean a more comfortable back when no picnic tables are around--that sort of stuff, highly personal decisions.
#628
aka Timi
Why is ultralight touring so unpopular?
^^^ it's a slippery slidy slope djb! nah, just kidding!
#629
Senior Member
But if you need a two-man tent and bluetooth speakers and an iPad and a pan to be comfortable, well, that sounds just fine too. Not all of us feel that those items would add comfort. Rather they'd be an added burden.
#630
Banned.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,077
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well I stand by my original opinion of the tone of the comment, along with his comment about an iPad being too big to listen to music/navigate while on the bike....maybe you should re read that.
And as for all the equipment I listed being compatible with an ultralight touring list, those were a very few examples off the top of my head of things often omitted from said lists, I can add more, like shower shoes, for example.i could go on but why?
The only thing I'm refuting here is that you have all the comforts and with less weight. That is simply not true. A slightly bigger shelter ( a smaller 2 man seems to be a sweet spot)is more comfortable for most people over a long tour. Period.
And that's what the op addressed, the reason ul isn't more popular, and it's because most people like a few more comforts along for the ride. Even for those of us who have done our homework and spent a fair amount of money on higher end gear, weight isn't the only criteria we consider. Comfort and durability rank high on my list as well.
And as for all the equipment I listed being compatible with an ultralight touring list, those were a very few examples off the top of my head of things often omitted from said lists, I can add more, like shower shoes, for example.i could go on but why?
The only thing I'm refuting here is that you have all the comforts and with less weight. That is simply not true. A slightly bigger shelter ( a smaller 2 man seems to be a sweet spot)is more comfortable for most people over a long tour. Period.
And that's what the op addressed, the reason ul isn't more popular, and it's because most people like a few more comforts along for the ride. Even for those of us who have done our homework and spent a fair amount of money on higher end gear, weight isn't the only criteria we consider. Comfort and durability rank high on my list as well.
May the lightness be upon you!
#631
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: mars
Posts: 759
Bikes: 2015 synapse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
hatchet or and axe seems pretty excessive to me. I typically don't have fires when touring or backpacking all that often anymore, but back when I did I didn't usually burn anything big enough that I couldn't process it by breaking it without tools other than maybe a fork in a tree. If I did take something for that purpose it would be a saw, but I leave that home too.
#632
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: mars
Posts: 759
Bikes: 2015 synapse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So really your touring experience might be a bit limited if your big trip was two weeks long. I've done the pacific coast twice ( I use this as an example because of its popularity/number of tourists) and live in the Bay Area, so on weekend trips I'll tend to see a lot of tourists coming down the coast as well. I see quite a few tourists with 2 panniers throughout the summer every year...so I think a lot of people travel lighter than you think.
And as to your snarky comment about "only people like me" needing a pillow, this is very typical of ul evangelists. You say you have everything I have and then when it comes to an item you actually don't have you play the only a wimp would need that card. Lol.
And as to your snarky comment about "only people like me" needing a pillow, this is very typical of ul evangelists. You say you have everything I have and then when it comes to an item you actually don't have you play the only a wimp would need that card. Lol.
I never called you a wimp. I said that for me, a pillow is dead weight / space, because I sleep just as soundly on a rolled up jacket. All I said was that I could bring one and still have 15lbs or less of gear, but the only purpose bringing it would serve is so that I could tell people like you that I brought one. It wasn't meant to be an attack on you or anyone else.
#633
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: mars
Posts: 759
Bikes: 2015 synapse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The only thing I'm refuting here is that you have all the comforts and with less weight. That is simply not true.
I don't understand your point. We don't want to carry the same things. That doesn't mean I can't have all the comforts you can with less weight. I can carry all the comforts you've listed so far and hit my target weight, but I don't want those things with me. That doesn't invalidate my approach, your approach, or UL touring in general. I fail to see how any of this is not true, and am waiting on you to demonstrate it.
Last edited by Buffalo Buff; 11-28-15 at 04:41 PM.
#634
aka Timi
Why is ultralight touring so unpopular?
edited: I'm posting too much - in bed with the flu
Last edited by imi; 11-28-15 at 04:51 PM.
#635
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times
in
2,079 Posts
#636
aka Timi
Why is ultralight touring so unpopular?
Hah! Thanks Bikemig! Yeah, some years we call summer the day it didn't rain here :/
#637
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
The problem is you haven't successfully refuted the fact that those people who tour with UL loads are uncomfortable. In fact those UL people keep claiming that they're perfectly comfortable and happy during tours. Some arbitrary thing like minimum shelter size cannot determine whether a certain person will be comfortable...
I really don't care either way but I bet many ask why go to all the extra trouble if you're already comfortable?
#638
~>~
Here's a pic of my Touring Rig:
Equipped to proceed on a day long ride in challenging terrain to the best of light-weight touring accommodations: a fine old hotel with an excellent chef and a good wine cellar.
We all have our priorities.......Enjoy.
-Bandera
Equipped to proceed on a day long ride in challenging terrain to the best of light-weight touring accommodations: a fine old hotel with an excellent chef and a good wine cellar.
We all have our priorities.......Enjoy.
-Bandera
#639
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: east bay area,CA
Posts: 335
Bikes: Salsa Fargo commuter,Litespeed Ocoee titanium mountain bike cannondale caad9 105 road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The problem is you haven't successfully refuted the fact that those people who tour with UL loads are uncomfortable. In fact those UL people keep claiming that they're perfectly comfortable and happy during tours. Some arbitrary thing like minimum shelter size cannot determine whether a certain person will be comfortable.
But if you need a two-man tent and bluetooth speakers and an iPad and a pan to be comfortable, well, that sounds just fine too. Not all of us feel that those items would add comfort. Rather they'd be an added burden.
But if you need a two-man tent and bluetooth speakers and an iPad and a pan to be comfortable, well, that sounds just fine too. Not all of us feel that those items would add comfort. Rather they'd be an added burden.
all I ever said was I have things That I like that are not on your ul list. Not that you aren't carrying enough. and yet again another response with a description of how my gear is a burden. Lol
i do both ul tours and more heavily loaded tours, my arguments are purely based
why ultralight touring isn't more popular.
Last edited by psy; 11-28-15 at 07:07 PM.
#640
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Sweet; I've been thinking of getting a carradice bag as well.
#641
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: east bay area,CA
Posts: 335
Bikes: Salsa Fargo commuter,Litespeed Ocoee titanium mountain bike cannondale caad9 105 road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
An ipad would be more unwieldy to use for navigation while riding at 20mph than a smart phone. I think that's a fairly objective assertion myself.
It would appear to me that you are trying to say that certain people have an invalid gear list because they do not want every comfort you do. You want a pillow and shower shoes? Great! I don't! Could I put together a 15lb gear set that includes them? Without a doubt.
I don't understand your point. We don't want to carry the same things. That doesn't mean I can't have all the comforts you can with less weight. I can carry all the comforts you've listed so far and hit my target weight, but I don't want those things with me. That doesn't invalidate my approach, your approach, or UL touring in general. I fail to see how any of this is not true, and am waiting on you to demonstrate it.
It would appear to me that you are trying to say that certain people have an invalid gear list because they do not want every comfort you do. You want a pillow and shower shoes? Great! I don't! Could I put together a 15lb gear set that includes them? Without a doubt.
I don't understand your point. We don't want to carry the same things. That doesn't mean I can't have all the comforts you can with less weight. I can carry all the comforts you've listed so far and hit my target weight, but I don't want those things with me. That doesn't invalidate my approach, your approach, or UL touring in general. I fail to see how any of this is not true, and am waiting on you to demonstrate it.
And you might want to rethink the shower shoes if you use public showers of any kind..
Last edited by psy; 11-28-15 at 07:21 PM.
#642
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
i like to read to someone before i turn in... not sure about her weight though. says 200 grams, but. you know women, they always lie about their weight.
BTW, that's not really me on the left. i'm not that good looking.
#643
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What's your point? Someone traveling UL will very likely have all they need to be sheltered from the weather, stay warm, stay hydrated and whatever else they want to do... But they may or may not carry the same gear as someone who was traveling with a heavier load.
UL and L is a mindset and a method as much it is about carrying specific things.
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
#644
Senior Member
Well I stand by my original opinion of the tone of the comment, along with his comment about an iPad being too big to listen to music/navigate while on the bike....maybe you should re read that.
And as for all the equipment I listed being compatible with an ultralight touring list, those were a very few examples off the top of my head of things often omitted from said lists, I can add more, like shower shoes, for example.i could go on but why?
The only thing I'm refuting here is that you have all the comforts and with less weight. That is simply not true. A slightly bigger shelter ( a smaller 2 man seems to be a sweet spot)is more comfortable for most people over a long tour. Period.
And that's what the op addressed, the reason ul isn't more popular, and it's because most people like a few more comforts along for the ride. Even for those of us who have done our homework and spent a fair amount of money on higher end gear, weight isn't the only criteria we consider. Comfort and durability rank high on my list as well.
And as for all the equipment I listed being compatible with an ultralight touring list, those were a very few examples off the top of my head of things often omitted from said lists, I can add more, like shower shoes, for example.i could go on but why?
The only thing I'm refuting here is that you have all the comforts and with less weight. That is simply not true. A slightly bigger shelter ( a smaller 2 man seems to be a sweet spot)is more comfortable for most people over a long tour. Period.
And that's what the op addressed, the reason ul isn't more popular, and it's because most people like a few more comforts along for the ride. Even for those of us who have done our homework and spent a fair amount of money on higher end gear, weight isn't the only criteria we consider. Comfort and durability rank high on my list as well.
Last edited by nun; 11-28-15 at 07:48 PM.
#646
~>~
They are extremely functional and time tested, very good kit.
Although I've done my share of fully loaded touring over the years the British club rider's model of the last century has more appeal to me now.
Carrying enough kit and no more for a brisk self supported ride on secondary roads in interesting terrain with a good meal and comfortable accommodations in a pub/hotel at the end of the day is how I "tour" now.
It is good to know the terrain and the Inn-keeper/Chef from repeated visits in the Spring and Fall and to arrange for a party of friends to book accommodations for the weekend as well.
Why have all the fun by yourself?
-Bandera
Although I've done my share of fully loaded touring over the years the British club rider's model of the last century has more appeal to me now.
Carrying enough kit and no more for a brisk self supported ride on secondary roads in interesting terrain with a good meal and comfortable accommodations in a pub/hotel at the end of the day is how I "tour" now.
It is good to know the terrain and the Inn-keeper/Chef from repeated visits in the Spring and Fall and to arrange for a party of friends to book accommodations for the weekend as well.
Why have all the fun by yourself?
-Bandera
#647
Senior Member
#648
Senior Member
They are extremely functional and time tested, very good kit.
Although I've done my share of fully loaded touring over the years the British club rider's model of the last century has more appeal to me now.
Carrying enough kit and no more for a brisk self supported ride on secondary roads in interesting terrain with a good meal and comfortable accommodations in a pub/hotel at the end of the day is how I "tour" now.
It is good to know the terrain and the Inn-keeper/Chef from repeated visits in the Spring and Fall and to arrange for a party of friends to book accommodations for the weekend as well.
Why have all the fun by yourself?
-Bandera
Although I've done my share of fully loaded touring over the years the British club rider's model of the last century has more appeal to me now.
Carrying enough kit and no more for a brisk self supported ride on secondary roads in interesting terrain with a good meal and comfortable accommodations in a pub/hotel at the end of the day is how I "tour" now.
It is good to know the terrain and the Inn-keeper/Chef from repeated visits in the Spring and Fall and to arrange for a party of friends to book accommodations for the weekend as well.
Why have all the fun by yourself?
-Bandera
#649
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times
in
2,079 Posts
To my mind, that's the real question as well. If you're running revelate bags, for example, you're talking 14 liters in the rear and 18 or so up front with a large roll. So call it 32 liters plus a bit more if running a frame bag. You can add a bit more capacity with various bags that attach to the fork. My guess is that 40 liters and some change is about the max you are going to get.
There's a huge advantage to going with just soft bags which is you save the not inconsiderable weight of the racks. But the flip side is that you are probably limited to around 40 liters and some change of total capacity.
You can add to the carrying capacity by using a carradice longflap camper which holds 24 liters (10 more liters than the revelate rear bag); that will get you to right around 50 liters total.
Or you could just go with a rear rack and 2 small panniers; that will easily get you 50 liters plus you have the top of the rack if you need it.
To my mind, those are the trade offs you face if you want to go with just soft bags and no racks.
There's a huge advantage to going with just soft bags which is you save the not inconsiderable weight of the racks. But the flip side is that you are probably limited to around 40 liters and some change of total capacity.
You can add to the carrying capacity by using a carradice longflap camper which holds 24 liters (10 more liters than the revelate rear bag); that will get you to right around 50 liters total.
Or you could just go with a rear rack and 2 small panniers; that will easily get you 50 liters plus you have the top of the rack if you need it.
To my mind, those are the trade offs you face if you want to go with just soft bags and no racks.
Last edited by bikemig; 11-28-15 at 08:26 PM.
#650
Banned.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,077
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
im not invalidating anyone's gear list, I'm invalidating the notion that you can travel ul, and have all the gear and comforts that someone with more gear does. Not that you need it, not that you're wrong for not having it, but just THAT YOU DONT HAVE IT.
And you might want to rethink the shower shoes if you use public showers of any kind..
And you might want to rethink the shower shoes if you use public showers of any kind..