View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#2001
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
the situation isn't symmetrical, and we're constantly subjected to the "helpful" advice of those who cannot fathom why anyone would choose to ride without wearing a helmet.
Over the last 30 years or so, this kind of thing is one reason I ride mostly solo, or with a few among small circle. I also pass on organized rides because of their mandatory helmet rules.
The ultimate irony was this fall when I was almost T-boned by a car jumping a red as it was about changed, the collision only avoided with good reflexes and brakes. The driver rolled down his window and called out the classic, "what? no helmet?".
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#2002
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
To me that's the crux of the helmet controversy. Those of us who chose to ride without a helmet have no problem understanding why others prefer to wear one. However
the situation isn't symmetrical, and we're constantly subjected to the "helpful" advice of those who cannot fathom why anyone would choose to ride without wearing a helmet.
Over the last 30 years or so, this kind of thing is one reason I ride mostly solo, or with a few among small circle. I also pass on organized rides because of their mandatory helmet rules.
The ultimate irony was this fall when I was almost T-boned by a car jumping a red as it was about changed, the collision only avoided with good reflexes and brakes. The driver rolled down his window and called out the classic, "what? no helmet?".
the situation isn't symmetrical, and we're constantly subjected to the "helpful" advice of those who cannot fathom why anyone would choose to ride without wearing a helmet.
Over the last 30 years or so, this kind of thing is one reason I ride mostly solo, or with a few among small circle. I also pass on organized rides because of their mandatory helmet rules.
The ultimate irony was this fall when I was almost T-boned by a car jumping a red as it was about changed, the collision only avoided with good reflexes and brakes. The driver rolled down his window and called out the classic, "what? no helmet?".
#2004
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1662 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
131 Posts
It reminds me of the behavior of some reformed smokers. Typically the ones that aren't all that happy about the new situation, and try to reaffirm themselves by bashing random smokers. Perhaps deep down the more verbal helmeteers long for the feeling of the wind through their hair?
#2005
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588
Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Professor Hugh H. Hurt and Professor "Red" Lombard developed the basic modern helmet at the University of Southern California around 1960, perhaps a bit earlier. They were fulfilling a U.S. Navy contract aimed at reducing the number of deaths and severe head injuries to pilots crashing onto carrier decks.
They found that Styrofoam was the best material. It remains the best material. The essence of helmet performance is to reduce peak loads commonly expressed in "g"s; the higher the peak loading, the greater likelihood of lesions in brain tissue.
There was one study, involving cadaver heads, that found that a head with a half-inch of hair only needed a drop of 3.5 feet (as best I recall) onto a cement surface to produce a fractured skull and certain brain damage. If one were to fall over backwards on a sidewalk so that one's head hit first, he/she would never be the same again if, that is, they survived. Modern DOT helmets prevent such injuries with an eight foot drop. CPSC bicycle helmets do the same from a two meter drop. Helmets work, of that there is no doubt.
When Professor Lombard retired Hugh "Harry" Hurt became the professor of safety at USC. Though he was a most effective spokesman for the use of helmets, he privately did not support the compulsory use of helmets. He once told me that he was against such laws. I agree with that position. However, I do believe that the truth about helmet effectiveness ought to be widely known so that one can make an informed decision.
Jobst Brandt's error was believing that every event was foreseeable; he did not foresee that his frame might break in two. What was foreseeable were the possibilities and even likely consequences of such a failure. He disregarded those threats and shortened his life, and -- we lost a fine contributor to our sport.
Joe
A useful link: (Helmets: Bicycle Helmets)
They found that Styrofoam was the best material. It remains the best material. The essence of helmet performance is to reduce peak loads commonly expressed in "g"s; the higher the peak loading, the greater likelihood of lesions in brain tissue.
There was one study, involving cadaver heads, that found that a head with a half-inch of hair only needed a drop of 3.5 feet (as best I recall) onto a cement surface to produce a fractured skull and certain brain damage. If one were to fall over backwards on a sidewalk so that one's head hit first, he/she would never be the same again if, that is, they survived. Modern DOT helmets prevent such injuries with an eight foot drop. CPSC bicycle helmets do the same from a two meter drop. Helmets work, of that there is no doubt.
When Professor Lombard retired Hugh "Harry" Hurt became the professor of safety at USC. Though he was a most effective spokesman for the use of helmets, he privately did not support the compulsory use of helmets. He once told me that he was against such laws. I agree with that position. However, I do believe that the truth about helmet effectiveness ought to be widely known so that one can make an informed decision.
Jobst Brandt's error was believing that every event was foreseeable; he did not foresee that his frame might break in two. What was foreseeable were the possibilities and even likely consequences of such a failure. He disregarded those threats and shortened his life, and -- we lost a fine contributor to our sport.
Joe
A useful link: (Helmets: Bicycle Helmets)
Last edited by Joe Minton; 05-28-16 at 07:53 PM. Reason: added statement re CPSC helmets
#2006
Senior Member
so where is any indication that a
Brandt's stoke was caused by a head injury? me, i wear a helmet at times at times not. Your source warns against false claims on both side.
Oh yeah, DOT is for motorcycle helmets,not bicycle helmets
Brandt's stoke was caused by a head injury? me, i wear a helmet at times at times not. Your source warns against false claims on both side.
Oh yeah, DOT is for motorcycle helmets,not bicycle helmets
Last edited by howsteepisit; 05-09-16 at 11:50 AM.
#2007
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588
Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I was the technical editor for Bicycle Rider in 1986 and chose to research and write an article about bicycle helmets. This was a follow-on to the similar article I researched and we published when I was the tech editor at Motorcyclist magazine.
The research consisted of gathering a couple of dozen helmets, taking them to the helmet test lab at USC (University of Southern California) and drop testing them. The data we collected formed the content and conclusions I wrote into the article.
At the time, there was no governmental standard for bicycle helmet impact performance. We created our own standard (Harry, Dave and I). We decided that a reasonable drop height ought to be about the same as a bicycle rider’s head above the ground. To establish what that height ought to be, Dave took three rolls of film (108 pix total) of bicycle riders passing his carefully calibrated yard stick stuck in the sand next to the bike path on the beach near his home in Redondo Beach, CA. The average was 5’7”. So --- that was our drop height.
We tested using the already-established helmet test machinery:
There was one surprise (to me, not, I suspect, to Dave or Harry). I learned that it was possible to make a helmet that was more dangerous than not wearing one at all. One helmet used neoprene wet-suit foam and was rather popular. It was a disaster! It seems that the neoprene foam, when completely compressed, ‘kicks back’ and produces a very high but very short ‘g’ number. What the data clearly showed was that this particular helmet was dangerous to wear and that the best thing one could do when wearing said helmet was to throw it off when engaging an oncoming accident.
My article put that company (and 15 people) out of business. I regret that those folks lost their jobs. However, I do not regret telling the (verifiable) truth.
Joe
The research consisted of gathering a couple of dozen helmets, taking them to the helmet test lab at USC (University of Southern California) and drop testing them. The data we collected formed the content and conclusions I wrote into the article.
At the time, there was no governmental standard for bicycle helmet impact performance. We created our own standard (Harry, Dave and I). We decided that a reasonable drop height ought to be about the same as a bicycle rider’s head above the ground. To establish what that height ought to be, Dave took three rolls of film (108 pix total) of bicycle riders passing his carefully calibrated yard stick stuck in the sand next to the bike path on the beach near his home in Redondo Beach, CA. The average was 5’7”. So --- that was our drop height.
We tested using the already-established helmet test machinery:
- Flat anvil
- Hemi anvil
- Highly developed head forms
- etc
There was one surprise (to me, not, I suspect, to Dave or Harry). I learned that it was possible to make a helmet that was more dangerous than not wearing one at all. One helmet used neoprene wet-suit foam and was rather popular. It was a disaster! It seems that the neoprene foam, when completely compressed, ‘kicks back’ and produces a very high but very short ‘g’ number. What the data clearly showed was that this particular helmet was dangerous to wear and that the best thing one could do when wearing said helmet was to throw it off when engaging an oncoming accident.
My article put that company (and 15 people) out of business. I regret that those folks lost their jobs. However, I do not regret telling the (verifiable) truth.
Joe
Last edited by Joe Minton; 05-10-16 at 05:09 PM.
#2008
Senior Member
I really do not understand why the hate about bicycle helmets. You can buy a cheap one for 20$ or an expensive one for 200+$ they get tested to the same standards. Also with the state that USA healthcare is in with this "Obamacare" thing (I am in Canada so don't understand it) wearing a helmet is probably cheaper than whatever co-pay option you guys do when in a hospital.
#2009
Senior Member
This:
...combined with this:
...is a contradictory statement. Do you care whether people wear a helmet or not, or do you care that your taxes go to pay for hospital care of the infinitesimally small percentage of cyclists who crash, without a helmet, and need hospital care?
You can't have it both ways...
...combined with this:
You can't have it both ways...
#2010
Senior Member
Here, I will make a counterclaim with as much to back it up: Had Jobst Brandt been wearing a helmet and considering the circumstances of the crash he suffered, he still would have suffered serious TBI and died as a result of complications from it.
#2011
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588
Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The Christmas turkey: paraphrasing Bertrand Russell:
A turkey concludes that it will always be fed in the early morning based on its 300+ days of experience. However, the evening before Christmas, someone cuts its throat.
The black swan:
All Swans are white, until, that is, you go to South Africa where there are black ones.
Helmets are not necessary ---- until they are.
You make your choice; you take your chance.
I simply don't want you to make a choice in ignorance or through misdirection.
Joe
A turkey concludes that it will always be fed in the early morning based on its 300+ days of experience. However, the evening before Christmas, someone cuts its throat.
The black swan:
All Swans are white, until, that is, you go to South Africa where there are black ones.
Helmets are not necessary ---- until they are.
You make your choice; you take your chance.
I simply don't want you to make a choice in ignorance or through misdirection.
Joe
#2012
Senior Member
Buy the ticket, take the ride.
You do what you want; I wear a helmet, not because it will save my life, but because helmets are way cool and it might save me from minor injury which would still be a total inconvenience any given day.
What I don't do is tell others how they should live their lives or oversell the safety/protective capabilities of bicycle helmets.
You do what you want; I wear a helmet, not because it will save my life, but because helmets are way cool and it might save me from minor injury which would still be a total inconvenience any given day.
What I don't do is tell others how they should live their lives or oversell the safety/protective capabilities of bicycle helmets.
#2013
Senior Member
By what process did you determine that a standard bicycle helmet strikes this perfect balance to which you allude? To be more specific, why not a helmet offering a higher degree of protection such as a full face helmet?
#2014
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
To me that's the crux of the helmet controversy. Those of us who chose to ride without a helmet have no problem understanding why others prefer to wear one. However
the situation isn't symmetrical, and we're constantly subjected to the "helpful" advice of those who cannot fathom why anyone would choose to ride without wearing a helmet.
Over the last 30 years or so, this kind of thing is one reason I ride mostly solo, or with a few among small circle. I also pass on organized rides because of their mandatory helmet rules.
The ultimate irony was this fall when I was almost T-boned by a car jumping a red as it was about changed, the collision only avoided with good reflexes and brakes. The driver rolled down his window and called out the classic, "what? no helmet?".
the situation isn't symmetrical, and we're constantly subjected to the "helpful" advice of those who cannot fathom why anyone would choose to ride without wearing a helmet.
Over the last 30 years or so, this kind of thing is one reason I ride mostly solo, or with a few among small circle. I also pass on organized rides because of their mandatory helmet rules.
The ultimate irony was this fall when I was almost T-boned by a car jumping a red as it was about changed, the collision only avoided with good reflexes and brakes. The driver rolled down his window and called out the classic, "what? no helmet?".
#2015
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 339
Bikes: Motobecane Century Pro Ti Disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My goodness where in the post you quoted did FBinNY make a statement that he is "so anti helmet"??? Where has the reading comprehension gone??? Like he says, us non helmet users can easily tolerate helmet users, however helmet users have a hissy with anyone doesn't believe in helmet use.
#2016
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here is the winning argument: Let the millions of miles of hard asphalt out there drive the argument home and knock some sense into reticent heads. It is far more persuasive that anything you or I can write.
Do continue...
#2017
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,509
Bikes: 3 good used ones
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Buy the ticket, take the ride.
You do what you want; I wear a helmet, not because it will save my life, but because helmets are way cool and it might save me from minor injury which would still be a total inconvenience any given day.
What I don't do is tell others how they should live their lives or oversell the safety/protective capabilities of bicycle helmets.
You do what you want; I wear a helmet, not because it will save my life, but because helmets are way cool and it might save me from minor injury which would still be a total inconvenience any given day.
What I don't do is tell others how they should live their lives or oversell the safety/protective capabilities of bicycle helmets.
Good enough for me.
Safety? Shrug. Sure. It's probably a little safer to wear a helmet than it is to ride without one.
#2018
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 339
Bikes: Motobecane Century Pro Ti Disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow! I have to admire your staying power, and that of njkayaker. I check a year later and you are still holding out against the usual suspects: the fake statistician, the guy straining to make the Dutch experience relevant to America, and the regular trolls.
Here is the winning argument: Let the millions of miles of hard asphalt out there drive the argument home and knock some sense into reticent heads. It is far more persuasive that anything you or I can write.
Do continue...
Here is the winning argument: Let the millions of miles of hard asphalt out there drive the argument home and knock some sense into reticent heads. It is far more persuasive that anything you or I can write.
Do continue...
#2020
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
It's been about 40,000 miles since the last time that's happened. Not a big deal to me what opinion some random ill-informed person has, but he was wearing the jersey of the local group, or the sponsoring shop! Roswell Bikes. I'm not sure if I'll be joining, depending on what the community relations director has to say.
To me that's the crux of the helmet controversy. Those of us who chose to ride without a helmet have no problem understanding why others prefer to wear one. However
the situation isn't symmetrical, and we're constantly subjected to the "helpful" advice of those who cannot fathom why anyone would choose to ride without wearing a helmet.
...
The ultimate irony was this fall when I was almost T-boned by a car jumping a red as it was about changed, the collision only avoided with good reflexes and brakes. The driver rolled down his window and called out the classic, "what? no helmet?".
the situation isn't symmetrical, and we're constantly subjected to the "helpful" advice of those who cannot fathom why anyone would choose to ride without wearing a helmet.
...
The ultimate irony was this fall when I was almost T-boned by a car jumping a red as it was about changed, the collision only avoided with good reflexes and brakes. The driver rolled down his window and called out the classic, "what? no helmet?".
It seems likely that many of the people complaining about cyclists not wearing helmets don't ever cycle. Many of those people would likely rather you not ride at all (making the helmet issue moot).
Last edited by njkayaker; 05-10-16 at 01:56 PM.
#2022
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 339
Bikes: Motobecane Century Pro Ti Disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was just playing the same game the pro helmet wearers play, basing my own conjecture not facts. I am finding most pro helmet wearers are more faith based than fact base. It feels good to to give my guesses as fact, I now understand why so many pro helmet users do it.
#2023
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
Many people who wear helmets don't really care that other people don't. There's many years of "anti helmet" faith based stuff in this and earlier threads too.
#2024
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I don't care if any or all of the members are fanatical about helmets, or have any other opinion about it. On the other hand, if it's normal or even expected for their members to act that way, I don't want to be associated with it.
#2025
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
I'm not sure if fanaticism is normal or expected. There are drivers who don't cycle who are pretty fanatical about helmets. Certainly, you are free to associate with or without anybody you choose.