A very informative discussion of CF as a bike material.
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Ha! FWIW, looking at his views and subs, this guy isn't making any youtube money, but yes - point taken. I'd add that, personally, when the someone touts "the truth" or that they "tells it like it is," more often then not, they're saying what their audience wants to hear rather than actually being objective.
Likes For WhyFi:
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
Rather than try and wade through the theory and science which the design engineers have already done.
Just look at the end result.
A light carbon frame is around 700gms and a light aluminium frame is at least 200gms more.
Both will use a carbon fork.
Just look at the end result.
A light carbon frame is around 700gms and a light aluminium frame is at least 200gms more.
Both will use a carbon fork.
Likes For Dean V:
#54
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,455
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3153 Post(s)
Liked 1,717 Times
in
1,036 Posts
Likes For chaadster:
#55
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,544
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3895 Post(s)
Liked 1,944 Times
in
1,389 Posts
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I didn't make the video, but just watched part of it. He seems to be saying that carbon fiber is stiffer than aluminum,
but it's not really as stiff as they say because they're measuring the CF composite but the resin doesn't add stiffness over the fibers themselves.
This is like saying that sand and gravel are stronger than concrete because the cement doesn't add anything.
My piece of CF is about .3mm, about the same thickness as three layers of aluminum foil. The foil is stiffer.
I think watching this video puts one in danger of being stupider at worst, and more ignorant at best.
#57
Fat n slow
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 4,302
Bikes: Cervelo R3, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3259 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times
in
979 Posts
Watched video, immediately threw both of my carbon bikes in the trash. I can’t believe I thought they were nice bikes!
Likes For phrantic09:
#58
Hear myself getting fat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Inland Northwest
Posts: 754
Bikes: Sir Velo A Sparrow
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times
in
134 Posts
I watched the full video from the OP finally, and it's not what I was expecting and certainly wasn't bagging on Carbon. I mean he rides carbon bikes anyway. But now I can tell who didn't watch the video by their crybaby comments lol.
Anyway I mentioned before that his other vids are pretty good. That one about crank length and how cool the modeling he used for that one super interesting.
I've shared his video on the Specialized SL7 release hype to all my club friends...that's a great one. My buddy in the UK didn't watch the full video on Titanium. Cause he's a *****, lol. I don't think it's as bad as he thinks.
It's weird how one guy says something you don't like about your preferred bike type or material and you throw a hissy fit?
Oh well, his other videos are interesting and I'll certainly watch those over the lame "paid promotion" GCN videos and that loud mouth Hambini guy.
Anyway I mentioned before that his other vids are pretty good. That one about crank length and how cool the modeling he used for that one super interesting.
I've shared his video on the Specialized SL7 release hype to all my club friends...that's a great one. My buddy in the UK didn't watch the full video on Titanium. Cause he's a *****, lol. I don't think it's as bad as he thinks.
It's weird how one guy says something you don't like about your preferred bike type or material and you throw a hissy fit?
Oh well, his other videos are interesting and I'll certainly watch those over the lame "paid promotion" GCN videos and that loud mouth Hambini guy.
Likes For aplcr0331:
#59
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I am watching his vid on aero positioning and he mentioned that he is a mechanical engineer.
Likes For bruce19:
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 702
Bikes: '23 Poseidon Redwood, '07 Specialized Roubaix Comp Triple, '12 Gravity Fixie, '21 Liv Rove 4, '06? Giant EB Spirit
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
151 Posts
I skimmed through most of it. The summary I got is builders need to know what they are doing to get the most out of carbon fiber. (That is true of any material btw).
he goes on to rant about generalities of carbon vs aluminum and how they are “rubbish”
I tend to think bike builders have learned a lot over the years in how to work various materials and do their best to get as much performance as they can if for no other reason than competition.
I look at bicycle frames like acoustic guitars. The builder who is skilled can use almost any material to make a great guitar/bike. The choice of material is complex and comes down to cost, performance, durability, consistency and sell ability.
I choose bikes based on which fit and feel the best within my price range. If the frame has a lifetime warranty and the builder a good reputation then I trust they know what they are doing. I don’t really care if it is CF or not.
having said that, in general I’ve found CF bikes to be more expensive and lighted than aluminum and my favorite bikes in my price range have been carbon fiber.
he goes on to rant about generalities of carbon vs aluminum and how they are “rubbish”
I tend to think bike builders have learned a lot over the years in how to work various materials and do their best to get as much performance as they can if for no other reason than competition.
I look at bicycle frames like acoustic guitars. The builder who is skilled can use almost any material to make a great guitar/bike. The choice of material is complex and comes down to cost, performance, durability, consistency and sell ability.
I choose bikes based on which fit and feel the best within my price range. If the frame has a lifetime warranty and the builder a good reputation then I trust they know what they are doing. I don’t really care if it is CF or not.
having said that, in general I’ve found CF bikes to be more expensive and lighted than aluminum and my favorite bikes in my price range have been carbon fiber.
#61
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,544
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3895 Post(s)
Liked 1,944 Times
in
1,389 Posts
I didn't make the video, but just watched part of it. He seems to be saying that carbon fiber is stiffer than aluminum,
but it's not really as stiff as they say because they're measuring the CF composite but the resin doesn't add stiffness over the fibers themselves.
This is like saying that sand and gravel are stronger than concrete because the cement doesn't add anything.
My piece of CF is about .3mm, about the same thickness as three layers of aluminum foil. The foil is stiffer.
I think watching this video puts one in danger of being stupider at worst, and more ignorant at best.
but it's not really as stiff as they say because they're measuring the CF composite but the resin doesn't add stiffness over the fibers themselves.
This is like saying that sand and gravel are stronger than concrete because the cement doesn't add anything.
My piece of CF is about .3mm, about the same thickness as three layers of aluminum foil. The foil is stiffer.
I think watching this video puts one in danger of being stupider at worst, and more ignorant at best.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
The problem is that you didn't go to engineering school and take materials science and statics. Think about the concepts of tension and compression while holding a toilet paper or paper towel tube in your hands. Try to bend it without collapsing it. The tube is extremely light yet not that easy to bend. Holding it in front of you and trying to bend the ends down, the top is in tension and the bottom is in compression. That's a frame tube, hard to bend, i.e. stiff. Materials which are hard to stretch and compress like carbon fiber/epoxy laminate make a very stiff frame tube. Plus you get to vary the stiffness by the thickness of the laminate. Plus it's not carbon cloth like in the photo. It's "tows" of unidirectional fibers running lengthwise, but at some slight angle to the long dimension of the tube. Thus the tube is also stiff rotationally. Plus you can vary the rotational stiffness vs. the longitudinal stiffness just by changing the angle of the carbon tows. Carbon fiber structural design is not a simple thing, not at all. With metal, the builder is limited to what is made commercially, diameter, wall thickness, and alloy. Not so with carbon/epoxy. Pretty easy to see why carbon is such a popular material.
Thanks for the tutorial. I do have a working understanding of this stuff in spite of not having gone to engineering school.
The guy in the video seemed to be talking about the stiffness of CF independent of it being made into a structural composite, so I was commenting on that.
Personally, I think carbon fiber bike frames are good, but my current bike count is 1 CF, 4 aluminum, for whatever that's worth.
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,956
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3958 Post(s)
Liked 7,312 Times
in
2,951 Posts
This video seems to be mostly about the host being annoyed that some people are really enamored with carbon fiber as a material, and some now use it in applications where it's cosmetic, not structural. He argues that carbon fiber isn't as stiff as everyone thinks, yet concludes that a carbon frame that's designed to be as stiff as an aluminum frame can be much lighter. Yeah, that's kind of the point dude.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#64
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,544
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3895 Post(s)
Liked 1,944 Times
in
1,389 Posts
Thanks for the tutorial. I do have a working understanding of this stuff in spite of not having gone to engineering school.
The guy in the video seemed to be talking about the stiffness of CF independent of it being made into a structural composite, so I was commenting on that.
Personally, I think carbon fiber bike frames are good, but my current bike count is 1 CF, 4 aluminum, for whatever that's worth.
The guy in the video seemed to be talking about the stiffness of CF independent of it being made into a structural composite, so I was commenting on that.
Personally, I think carbon fiber bike frames are good, but my current bike count is 1 CF, 4 aluminum, for whatever that's worth.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Why would anyone go looking for informative on some random dude's youtube?
Likes For colnago62:
#68
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
What makes the different grades of CF different? And, does it get down to the point where a "lower" level of CF frame is less desirable than say a good AL frame? From a materials science perspective.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,384
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2490 Post(s)
Liked 2,961 Times
in
1,682 Posts
#70
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,544
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3895 Post(s)
Liked 1,944 Times
in
1,389 Posts
Different grades of CF have different yield strengths and other properties. Better costs more. Stronger CF of course means you can use less of it, and more importantly, less resin, thus a part of the same strength and stiffness is lighter, not much, but lighter. There may be other variables with the resin and layup of which I'm unaware. I'm not an expert on carbon frames! I'm just familiar with the technology and have used it a little.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#71
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a degree in materials engineering and a Professional Engineering license in metallurgical engineering. For what it's worth, my road and gravel bikes are titanium frames. There is confusion between stiffness (modulus) and yield or tensile strength. At the end of the day, you ride what you prefer, not something to impress other people.
Fred
Fred
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
I have a degree in materials engineering and a Professional Engineering license in metallurgical engineering. For what it's worth, my road and gravel bikes are titanium frames. There is confusion between stiffness (modulus) and yield or tensile strength. At the end of the day, you ride what you prefer, not something to impress other people.
Fred
Fred
#73
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I have a degree in materials engineering and a Professional Engineering license in metallurgical engineering. For what it's worth, my road and gravel bikes are titanium frames. There is confusion between stiffness (modulus) and yield or tensile strength. At the end of the day, you ride what you prefer, not something to impress other people.
Fred
Fred
#74
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am new to this forum so this is a bit of a hot take but I thought this was all thrashed out back when people were comparing steel, aluminum, and titanium.
I commented on the original video a while ago because he seemed to only be interested in stiffness as if that is the only important thing. Stiffness is irrelevant unless you include strength and weight. A carpet fiber epoxy matrix might not be as stiff as the original fibers but geometry can makeup whatever loss occurred. I can make a bike of any stiffness with any material as long as you don't mind how safe or heavy it is. Sure, CF has directional strength different from steel/alu/tit but all the same arguments still apply. It's always some kind of compromise.
Whatever happened to beryllium?
And, after all, everybody also compromises on style and cost so which one is really best?
I commented on the original video a while ago because he seemed to only be interested in stiffness as if that is the only important thing. Stiffness is irrelevant unless you include strength and weight. A carpet fiber epoxy matrix might not be as stiff as the original fibers but geometry can makeup whatever loss occurred. I can make a bike of any stiffness with any material as long as you don't mind how safe or heavy it is. Sure, CF has directional strength different from steel/alu/tit but all the same arguments still apply. It's always some kind of compromise.
Whatever happened to beryllium?
And, after all, everybody also compromises on style and cost so which one is really best?
#75
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My road rides are endurance rides of 100km and 200km mostly over chip seal roads. I like the vibration attenuation associated with titanium. I do have an aluminum frame bike which I use on my trainer. I have limited riding experience on carbon frame bikes, mostly rentals.
Fred
Fred