Can we talk Tire clearance for a minute?
#1
Can we talk Tire clearance for a minute?
For Xmas I bought my 1983 720 a set of new wheels. Since I bought the frame only I feel I can take a little liberty in blinging it out. So my question is: what’s the biggest tire you reckon will fit comfortably and safely? Please see pics
#2
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,763
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Liked 1,789 Times
in
986 Posts
First- shoot a message to Bill about getting the title changed from fire to tire.
Second... I know it's apples and oranges and stuff, but I have 700x35 tires on my 1985 720 along with SKS fenders.
How else are you planning on blinging it out?
Second... I know it's apples and oranges and stuff, but I have 700x35 tires on my 1985 720 along with SKS fenders.
How else are you planning on blinging it out?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#3
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,602
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Liked 4,537 Times
in
2,142 Posts
https://www.renehersecycles.com/shop...ire-fit-gauge/
The answer to all tire sizing questions...
-Kurt
The answer to all tire sizing questions...
-Kurt
Likes For cudak888:
#4
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,973
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Liked 1,472 Times
in
912 Posts
For those of us who live in California, "fire clearance" has a definite meaning.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#5
Whooops. Mad California Love to y’all & sorry for the typo
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,670
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Liked 2,600 Times
in
1,593 Posts
Hahn's gauge is pretty sweet. I'm tempted to order one, even though I don't have any builds/conversions on the horizon.
In the meantime, my tried-and-true method is to throw on a tire, measure its actual width, and then use allen wrenches as feeler gauges to determine how much more room I have above and to either side of the tire. For example, if you have a 25mm tire, 5mm clearance to the chainstays, but only about 4mm clearance upward to the brake caliper, you're limited to a 28ish tire.
In the meantime, my tried-and-true method is to throw on a tire, measure its actual width, and then use allen wrenches as feeler gauges to determine how much more room I have above and to either side of the tire. For example, if you have a 25mm tire, 5mm clearance to the chainstays, but only about 4mm clearance upward to the brake caliper, you're limited to a 28ish tire.
#7
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,153
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy Viscount Aerospace Pro Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Thread titled fixed
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,995
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,458 Times
in
7,255 Posts
...if you already know all this, I apologize, but "generally" the bigger you go in tyre size, the heavier your rotating weight gets. So there's a point at which the comfort and stability provided by a larger, fatter tyre starts to act a cross purposes to riding pleasure. For me, that's usually in the 700x28-32 range as a practical maximum, and I do have some wheels I built with newer lightweight rims that roll OK with Panaracer 27x1 1/4 tyres on them.
I have my most pleasing results with tyres like the old Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy, or some of the newer versions of them (also made by Panaracer). They're relatively puncture resistant, capable of holding high pressures with a modern hook bead rim, and mostly average in the 28-32 mm widths I prefer. they seem to do pretty well in the rolling resistance department. Anyway, this has been my experience after a lot of experimentation.
I have my most pleasing results with tyres like the old Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy, or some of the newer versions of them (also made by Panaracer). They're relatively puncture resistant, capable of holding high pressures with a modern hook bead rim, and mostly average in the 28-32 mm widths I prefer. they seem to do pretty well in the rolling resistance department. Anyway, this has been my experience after a lot of experimentation.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,612
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Liked 372 Times
in
221 Posts
...if you already know all this, I apologize, but "generally" the bigger you go in tyre size, the heavier your rotating weight gets. So there's a point at which the comfort and stability provided by a larger, fatter tyre starts to act a cross purposes to riding pleasure. For me, that's usually in the 700x28-32 range as a practical maximum, and I do have some wheels I built with newer lightweight rims that roll OK with Panaracer 27x1 1/4 tyres on them.
I have my most pleasing results with tyres like the old Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy, or some of the newer versions of them (also made by Panaracer). They're relatively puncture resistant, capable of holding high pressures with a modern hook bead rim, and mostly average in the 28-32 mm widths I prefer. they seem to do pretty well in the rolling resistance department. Anyway, this has been my experience after a lot of experimentation.
I have my most pleasing results with tyres like the old Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy, or some of the newer versions of them (also made by Panaracer). They're relatively puncture resistant, capable of holding high pressures with a modern hook bead rim, and mostly average in the 28-32 mm widths I prefer. they seem to do pretty well in the rolling resistance department. Anyway, this has been my experience after a lot of experimentation.
Mine has 27" rims with 1 1/4 rubber and that fits under fenders and feels very planted on crushed stone MUP paths. 28mm do a very nice job but on an all day ride I like the extra volume of a 32.
Without fenders I bet you could fit 35's without any drama, but I think that's the practical limit.
OP, Are your wheels 700 or 27"?
Likes For Chr0m0ly:
#11
Senior Member
It would have originally been set up for 27 z 1 1/4", the touring standard of the time. There weren't fatter tires around then, which seems to surprise people. First touring bike that I recall with slightly fatter tires was the original Specialized expedition, which came out a year or so later.
Anyway, as others have said, with fenders you're realistically looking at 1 1/4" or 32. 35mm probably possible w/ no fenders. Going to 700 may give you a bit of a hassle WRT brake adjustment, but it's usually doable in bikes of this era.
There's really no substitute for actual measurement.
Anyway, as others have said, with fenders you're realistically looking at 1 1/4" or 32. 35mm probably possible w/ no fenders. Going to 700 may give you a bit of a hassle WRT brake adjustment, but it's usually doable in bikes of this era.
There's really no substitute for actual measurement.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#12
Full Member
Unless the wheels and tires are fancy-light, 700x32c is about the upper limit for me.... bigger than that and the rotating weight of the tires starts to feel pretty sluggish. Even then, tire choice can make a difference: I had 700x32xc Continental Gatorskins on my Centurion Semi-Pro and the bike felt _terrible_ to ride..... then I switched to 700x32c Panaracer Gravel King slicks and they feel great..... a little bit less weight, a bit more "souplesse" in the sidewall, and the feel of the ride was totally transformed.
I wonder how much of how our bikes feel really comes down to wheels and tires....
I wonder how much of how our bikes feel really comes down to wheels and tires....
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,321
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,331 Times
in
2,788 Posts
Adequate tire clearance in general terms - there is no set answer. If you keep you wheels true and are willing to replace tires sooner as they stretch, you can run them very close to hitting the chainstays, fork blades, brake caliper'brake bridge and fork fork crown. Granted, there is more risk of something sticking to your tire and hitting/wedging itself into those close spaces and possibly causing a crash. If you do not want to have to keep a close eye on your tires and/or you wnat moer security and/or you want freedom to break a spoke and still ride home, you need more clearance.
This is completely a judgement call and the criteria is what is acceptable to you. I've done rides on gravel roads pushing the limit with very close clearances and brand new tires knowing full well that was not a long-term solution. I rode a couple of winters on a frame that was pure early '80s race (think very, very close) with 25c tires and cut up fenders. Got tired of that and put the parts on a Schwinn LeTour and enjoyed the huge clearance sail.
As a long term solution, I am a fan of using bikes that were designed to handle the tires I want to ride. For many years, this meant for me that my commuters were generally sport bikes designed to 27" wheels on which I would run 700c. I've had 5 frames custom built around the tires I specified.
Ben
This is completely a judgement call and the criteria is what is acceptable to you. I've done rides on gravel roads pushing the limit with very close clearances and brand new tires knowing full well that was not a long-term solution. I rode a couple of winters on a frame that was pure early '80s race (think very, very close) with 25c tires and cut up fenders. Got tired of that and put the parts on a Schwinn LeTour and enjoyed the huge clearance sail.
As a long term solution, I am a fan of using bikes that were designed to handle the tires I want to ride. For many years, this meant for me that my commuters were generally sport bikes designed to 27" wheels on which I would run 700c. I've had 5 frames custom built around the tires I specified.
Ben
#14
Senior Member
Measure the width of the chainstays/seatstays/fork, subtract 8mm (4mm for each side), and you will have your max tire width.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
Likes For shoota:
#17
Senior Member
It's us with two lenses that have the problems.
#18
This past year I ran Vittoria Zafirro 32’s on a similar vintage 620. They fit with good clearance and these are wider than you would expect for 32’s.
They provide good comfort but when riding a hilly century I noticed the extra mass. I am going to run 28’s next year.
They provide good comfort but when riding a hilly century I noticed the extra mass. I am going to run 28’s next year.
#19
Go to local hardware store, buy cheap plastic vernier caliper (about 5 bucks) and measure distance between stays where tire passes through them. Allow 3mm each side for tire clearance for a total of 6mm and subtract this from the caliper measurement. This will be the absolute max tire width for that frame.
#20
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,763
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Liked 1,789 Times
in
986 Posts
...if you already know all this, I apologize, but "generally" the bigger you go in tyre size, the heavier your rotating weight gets. So there's a point at which the comfort and stability provided by a larger, fatter tyre starts to act a cross purposes to riding pleasure. For me, that's usually in the 700x28-32 range as a practical maximum, and I do have some wheels I built with newer lightweight rims that roll OK with Panaracer 27x1 1/4 tyres on them.
I have my most pleasing results with tyres like the old Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy, or some of the newer versions of them (also made by Panaracer). They're relatively puncture resistant, capable of holding high pressures with a modern hook bead rim, and mostly average in the 28-32 mm widths I prefer. they seem to do pretty well in the rolling resistance department. Anyway, this has been my experience after a lot of experimentation.
I have my most pleasing results with tyres like the old Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy, or some of the newer versions of them (also made by Panaracer). They're relatively puncture resistant, capable of holding high pressures with a modern hook bead rim, and mostly average in the 28-32 mm widths I prefer. they seem to do pretty well in the rolling resistance department. Anyway, this has been my experience after a lot of experimentation.
Unless the wheels and tires are fancy-light, 700x32c is about the upper limit for me.... bigger than that and the rotating weight of the tires starts to feel pretty sluggish. Even then, tire choice can make a difference: I had 700x32xc Continental Gatorskins on my Centurion Semi-Pro and the bike felt _terrible_ to ride..... then I switched to 700x32c Panaracer Gravel King slicks and they feel great..... a little bit less weight, a bit more "souplesse" in the sidewall, and the feel of the ride was totally transformed.
I wonder how much of how our bikes feel really comes down to wheels and tires....
I wonder how much of how our bikes feel really comes down to wheels and tires....
My 1985 Trek 620 is currently wearing Sand Canyon 27 x 1 3/8" tires, but that bike doesn't have fenders. I do have plans to change this bike over to 700c x 35 tires with Honjo fenders- I'm fairly confident it'll all fit safely.
Again, my 1985 Trek 720 is currently wearing 700 x 35 Compass Bon Jon Pass tires with SKS Chromoplastic fenders.
IMG_1724 by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
Additionally, to get the full benefit of higher volume tires- one would not be riding them at high pressures- When someone suggested that I run the Compass tires at 35, I thought they were joking- or on crack. But sure enough, they rolled really nice at 35- I usually ride both the Compass and Sand Canyons somewhere south of 50PSI- and I'm more comfortable at running the Compass tires lower. This has also carried over onto the Paselas I use on my other bikes where I'm running 1 1/8" and 28mm tires- I'm cool with running them around 80 or so- whereas I used to feel I needed to be within 10PSI of the limit.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For crank_addict:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Liked 1,000 Times
in
765 Posts
With my (limited) experience with fitting much wider tyres to a 70's roadster, I'd say use the ETRTO sizes. I don't know how precise those are exactly, but they are the actual size in mm's and it corresponds with your own measurements of the frame. I went for maximum width and ended up with 1-2 mm space between the front tyre and the fender stays, which is going to be a bit of a problem if the wheel gets out of true on a long ride. Plan B was to replace the fender stays with ones that go round the outside, and plan C to return the tyres and order a size narrower. But it fits because ETRO sizes were precise enough, at leat in this case.