Doping
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Doping
My view on doping in professional cycling:
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
Last edited by Rajflyboy; 11-02-18 at 01:03 PM.
Likes For Rajflyboy:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 3,175
Bikes: Colnago Super, Basso Gap, Pogliaghi, Fabio Barecci, Torelli Pista, Miyata 1400A
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 316 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Well, innocent until proven guilty is the bedrock of Western society.
#5
Banned.
Thread Starter
Yes
but we all knew Postal was doping. It took a long time to prove it.
You also must realize how corrupt Europe and the UCI are compared to the US of A
but we all knew Postal was doping. It took a long time to prove it.
You also must realize how corrupt Europe and the UCI are compared to the US of A
#6
Heretic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,246
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2827 Post(s)
Liked 561 Times
in
429 Posts
The TdF is over for another year so the Nastycar and Podcast Guy's fans come out to play.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
10 Posts
I'd be willing to believe Froome is doping, if there was any proof.
For now I just go with the theory that he's simply better than anyone else at 3 week tours. He's not Superman though, he was (to me) clearly not "in shape" to win the TDF this year after a kick ass performance in the Giro.
But he did podium.
For now I just go with the theory that he's simply better than anyone else at 3 week tours. He's not Superman though, he was (to me) clearly not "in shape" to win the TDF this year after a kick ass performance in the Giro.
But he did podium.
#8
Banned.
Thread Starter
I'd be willing to believe Froome is doping, if there was any proof.
For now I just go with the theory that he's simply better than anyone else at 3 week tours. He's not Superman though, he was (to me) clearly not "in shape" to win the TDF this year after a kick ass performance in the Giro.
But he did podium.
For now I just go with the theory that he's simply better than anyone else at 3 week tours. He's not Superman though, he was (to me) clearly not "in shape" to win the TDF this year after a kick ass performance in the Giro.
But he did podium.
obviously he was a giant target for drug testing
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
10 Posts
Still, I give Froome the benefit of the doubt. It's only fair, as far as I'm concerned. I'm not a big fan of his but he's a great athlete.
He has a great team too - they're able to crush anyone on most climbing stages and until a team comes up with a way to beat them at their own game, Team Sky will continue to win.
#10
Senior Member
That LA is banned from cycling for life ... can't even complete in an Ironman event, pretty much tells you he's being punished for the sins of all pro cyclists-- apparently before and after.
Likes For McBTC:
#11
Banned.
Thread Starter
#13
☢
My view on doping in professional cycling...and ever other sport:
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
One more thing, fixed it for you.
#14
Banned.
Thread Starter
His podcasts are rather interesting (he gives details about the TDF that the average follower may not know.
I recommend listening to some some of them just for the learning the sport aspect of it.
I recommend listening to some some of them just for the learning the sport aspect of it.
Likes For Rajflyboy:
#16
☢
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
My view on doping in professional cycling:
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
I'd be willing to believe Froome is doping, if there was any proof.
For now I just go with the theory that he's simply better than anyone else at 3 week tours. He's not Superman though, he was (to me) clearly not "in shape" to win the TDF this year after a kick ass performance in the Giro.
But he did podium.
For now I just go with the theory that he's simply better than anyone else at 3 week tours. He's not Superman though, he was (to me) clearly not "in shape" to win the TDF this year after a kick ass performance in the Giro.
But he did podium.
I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to find out Froome is doping but it isn't blatantly obvious as it was with Armstrong.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,476
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3377 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Do we have more than 2 TDF winners (yellow in Paris) that were not using PEDs in the last 25 years?
Note - I did not say cheaters. These were PED users, sometimes legally, sometimes not.
Froome - yup
Wiggins - yup
Contador - yup
Lance - yep
Ullrich - yep
Indurain - yep
Evans, Sastre - no evidence.
Merckx - yep
Thevenet - yep
Lemond - likely due to being shot and skin evidence.
When 9/10 used PEDs on record, I think it is true they are generally used by the winners.
Note - I did not say cheaters. These were PED users, sometimes legally, sometimes not.
Froome - yup
Wiggins - yup
Contador - yup
Lance - yep
Ullrich - yep
Indurain - yep
Evans, Sastre - no evidence.
Merckx - yep
Thevenet - yep
Lemond - likely due to being shot and skin evidence.
When 9/10 used PEDs on record, I think it is true they are generally used by the winners.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
My view on doping in professional cycling:
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
Team Sky and the majority of the other teams are still doping. Nothing has changed.
And because of this Lance should have his TDF wins re Instated. I’m not even a big Lance person. But let’s quit fooling each other. Doping still exists.
That's an odd sense of justice you have there.
#22
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,530
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,059 Times
in
633 Posts
Do we have more than 2 TDF winners (yellow in Paris) that were not using PEDs in the last 25 years?
Note - I did not say cheaters. These were PED users, sometimes legally, sometimes not.
Froome - yup
Wiggins - yup
Contador - yup
Lance - yep
Ullrich - yep
Indurain - yep
Evans, Sastre - no evidence.
Merckx - yep
Thevenet - yep
Lemond - likely due to being shot and skin evidence.
When 9/10 used PEDs on record, I think it is true they are generally used by the winners.
Note - I did not say cheaters. These were PED users, sometimes legally, sometimes not.
Froome - yup
Wiggins - yup
Contador - yup
Lance - yep
Ullrich - yep
Indurain - yep
Evans, Sastre - no evidence.
Merckx - yep
Thevenet - yep
Lemond - likely due to being shot and skin evidence.
When 9/10 used PEDs on record, I think it is true they are generally used by the winners.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,476
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3377 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
It certainly isn't odd - at least in CA.
#25
Banned.
Thread Starter
It was the uci that also is caught up in this mess. They should crack down harder.