Assistance request re:chainline
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Building guns in the shadow of Appalachia
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Assistance request re:chainline
Greetings all.
I apologize for another chainline question, but my search turned up bupkis.
I just swapped the crankset on my 89 Fuji Saratoga (rebranded for the Backroads Co.) from the stock Suntour XCE 28-38-48 to a modern Alivio 22-32-42. I used the recommended 113mm BB, and stayed with (for now) the stock Suntour 12-28 cassette with 128.5 rear spacing.
The chainline is straight at two cogs outboard, ie: with the middle chainring, not the middle #4 cog, but the next to smallest #2 cog. I used the recommended 113mm BB to acheive this result. I swapped in a 107mm BB that I had out of another bike, and the 3mm gain helped, but not enough. I would just go to an even shorter spindle length, but the crankset is now within 1mm-ish of the BB, and I don't have the room.
I was planning to eventually set the rear to 135mm and change wheelsets, but not in the immediate future.
So short of major surgery and cash outlay, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
I apologize for another chainline question, but my search turned up bupkis.
I just swapped the crankset on my 89 Fuji Saratoga (rebranded for the Backroads Co.) from the stock Suntour XCE 28-38-48 to a modern Alivio 22-32-42. I used the recommended 113mm BB, and stayed with (for now) the stock Suntour 12-28 cassette with 128.5 rear spacing.
The chainline is straight at two cogs outboard, ie: with the middle chainring, not the middle #4 cog, but the next to smallest #2 cog. I used the recommended 113mm BB to acheive this result. I swapped in a 107mm BB that I had out of another bike, and the 3mm gain helped, but not enough. I would just go to an even shorter spindle length, but the crankset is now within 1mm-ish of the BB, and I don't have the room.
I was planning to eventually set the rear to 135mm and change wheelsets, but not in the immediate future.
So short of major surgery and cash outlay, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
Hardly anyone has a perfect chainline...
What's important is that you try to go with published specs - which usually gets it close - and then keep it that way. In other words - don't make it worse.
If on a 7-speed rear, the best you can do is the 3rd smallest cog - #3 in from the dropout - then that's good enough.
Best way to achieve this is:
1. With 7-speed cassette - freehub cassette stop to end of lock nut = 39.00mm - drive-side flange center to end of lock nut = approx. 45.0mm-46.0mm.
2. Install crankset with recommended BB - step down a few millimeters if necessary - but clear chain stays by at least 1/8-1/4 inch.
3. Of course, ensure wheel is properly dished (rim centered between lock nuts) and then install wheel itself centered between the chain stays.
On my Tommasini with Chorus and Daytona 10-speed, my chainline is right about cog #4 from the dropout - lower than the middle.
=8-)
What's important is that you try to go with published specs - which usually gets it close - and then keep it that way. In other words - don't make it worse.
If on a 7-speed rear, the best you can do is the 3rd smallest cog - #3 in from the dropout - then that's good enough.
Best way to achieve this is:
1. With 7-speed cassette - freehub cassette stop to end of lock nut = 39.00mm - drive-side flange center to end of lock nut = approx. 45.0mm-46.0mm.
2. Install crankset with recommended BB - step down a few millimeters if necessary - but clear chain stays by at least 1/8-1/4 inch.
3. Of course, ensure wheel is properly dished (rim centered between lock nuts) and then install wheel itself centered between the chain stays.
On my Tommasini with Chorus and Daytona 10-speed, my chainline is right about cog #4 from the dropout - lower than the middle.
=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#3
Mechanic/Tourist
This is the key - the "modern" crankset assumes a matching rear spacing. As you have found chainline is typically more controlled by the rear triangle and cassette/freewheel. I don't see any reason you cannot help the situation somewhat by getting a longer axle and adding spacers on the left side. That would actually allow you to reduce dish as well. I would think it best not to go all the way out, as you don't want to add too much cantilevered stress to the axle, but you should be able to at least gain a cog's worth that way.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Building guns in the shadow of Appalachia
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Many thanks. That's about what I figured.
I'll try the longer axle/spacer for the nonce, and plan on a new wheelset a little sooner than I expected. I'm gonna do a 700c conversion at the same time. Might as well.
Much appreciated.
I'll try the longer axle/spacer for the nonce, and plan on a new wheelset a little sooner than I expected. I'm gonna do a 700c conversion at the same time. Might as well.
Much appreciated.
#5
Really Old Senior Member
I would think with your gearing, you'd be spending a lot of time on the smallest cogs?
42T big ring & 12T smallest cog is only 3.5:1 gear ratio.
You may be better off with the 113mm BB and have a better chainline for the most used gears.
In any case, I wouldn't be overly concerned.
42T big ring & 12T smallest cog is only 3.5:1 gear ratio.
You may be better off with the 113mm BB and have a better chainline for the most used gears.
In any case, I wouldn't be overly concerned.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Building guns in the shadow of Appalachia
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would think with your gearing, you'd be spending a lot of time on the smallest cogs?
42T big ring & 12T smallest cog is only 3.5:1 gear ratio.
You may be better off with the 113mm BB and have a better chainline for the most used gears.
In any case, I wouldn't be overly concerned.
42T big ring & 12T smallest cog is only 3.5:1 gear ratio.
You may be better off with the 113mm BB and have a better chainline for the most used gears.
In any case, I wouldn't be overly concerned.
At the moment, I'm a pretty weaksauce rider with iffy knees, a lifelong smoker, just got out of Clyde territory, and we have plenty of hills 'round here that kick my butt. I tend to stay in the mid-range front and back and spin my little legs off. I actually swapped down to the mtn crank because the 28-38-48 that came on the bike was a little too tall for me at my present skill/conditioning level. Moderately embarassing to admit, but there you have it.
Also, this bike was bought with the express purpose of being a tourer, and I know I'll need the low range for that.
I'm currently re-building a Trek 728 with half-step plus granny (28-45-50) for a little "go faster" when I want it. Kinda have the hankering for a c&v road bike too, but that'll have to wait for the cash to equal the desire.
#7
Really Old Senior Member
I'm 65, have emphysema, a bad knee and back.
My 2008 Specialized Globe came with the 28-38-48 and an 11-32 cassette.
I now run 22-32-36T 165mm cranks with a 12-23 cassette. I don't use the 36 unless I have a tailwind!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
Good Lord!
I almost never use my large chainring on my Chorus double. My buddies will tease me, "Hey Shack, if you don't want it, I'll take it!"
And I'm ONLY 44...
=8-)
I almost never use my large chainring on my Chorus double. My buddies will tease me, "Hey Shack, if you don't want it, I'll take it!"
And I'm ONLY 44...
=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Building guns in the shadow of Appalachia
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts