Zencranks???
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 393 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
Zencranks???
What do you think about Zencranks?
https://www.zencranks.com/index.php?o...&id=2&Itemid=1
If I understand it, the advantage is that at the top of the stroke, say from 10 o'clock to 2 o'clock, the crank is effectively very long - 200 mm for example - giving you extra leverage. But at the bottom of the stroke, the crank is effectively normal length - 175 mm for example - so you do not lose cornering clearance.
Leonard Zinn reviewed them very positively, after a year's use. That carries some weight with me.
But I do not really understand why they work. If you have 200 mm cranks and I have 175 mm cranks, can't I just shift to a cog two teeth bigger, to get the same gain ratio?
https://www.zencranks.com/index.php?o...&id=2&Itemid=1
If I understand it, the advantage is that at the top of the stroke, say from 10 o'clock to 2 o'clock, the crank is effectively very long - 200 mm for example - giving you extra leverage. But at the bottom of the stroke, the crank is effectively normal length - 175 mm for example - so you do not lose cornering clearance.
Leonard Zinn reviewed them very positively, after a year's use. That carries some weight with me.
But I do not really understand why they work. If you have 200 mm cranks and I have 175 mm cranks, can't I just shift to a cog two teeth bigger, to get the same gain ratio?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
It's not gain ratio, it is leverage. A longer lever makes it physically easier to turn a higher gear.*
*im not making a comment about the crankset, only the theory behind them
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,167
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4239 Post(s)
Liked 3,973 Times
in
2,363 Posts
There is a history of over a hundred years of claims of devices that "add power" that always end up not being so. I fail to see how these cranks increase my (repeat MY) power output. Andy.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,097 Times
in
743 Posts
+1 I read the Zinn review and they didn't work any better than his own longer cranks. P.T. Barnum had it right; "There is no free lunch."
#7
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hi,
But as Zinn pointed out they worked better than standard length
cranks for someone that suits longer than standard cranks,
without the cornering clearance issues of fitting longer cranks.
The fact that they will always hang upside down I assume
means they will always be a pain to clip into and that
might be a deal breaker for someone considering them.
The extra leg movement and the leverage it gives is not
the same as changing the gain ratio by changing gears.
rgds, sreten.
But as Zinn pointed out they worked better than standard length
cranks for someone that suits longer than standard cranks,
without the cornering clearance issues of fitting longer cranks.
The fact that they will always hang upside down I assume
means they will always be a pain to clip into and that
might be a deal breaker for someone considering them.
The extra leg movement and the leverage it gives is not
the same as changing the gain ratio by changing gears.
rgds, sreten.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
In don't understand the function, is there some internal gearing making the short arm rotate in synch with the crank?
Or is it free to swing between two positions?
The whole way round?
Is it fixed at an angle to the longer arm?
Or is it free to swing between two positions?
The whole way round?
Is it fixed at an angle to the longer arm?
#9
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,640
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times
in
1,581 Posts
I think someone else said that, unless you're obliquely referencing his other famous quote.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
The arm is fixed to the pedal and rotates at the crank. Nothing else. It's just a very high stack. You can achieve the same thing by putting a block under your cleat to lift the shoe off the pedal a like amount.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
If you were to ride with your foot held perfectly flat it'd just be like having the bb a tad higher.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,097 Times
in
743 Posts
Well, Barnum gets credit for a lot of things he probably didn't say. The reference wasn't intended to be oblique but here is a Barnum original that you probably thought of: "There's a sucker born every minute."
#13
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Only if also at the same time for both cases you only apply force vertically on
the pedal pivot, as it is the same vectors but lifted, which of course you can't.
rgds, sreten.
You could easily modify cage pedals and toeclips to be exactly the same.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,054
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5971 Post(s)
Liked 2,878 Times
in
1,602 Posts
I must be missing something, but to me it looks like they have everything bass ackwards.
It appears that functionally this is no different than a pedal with blocks or a thick deck, which keeps the foot higher off the spindle center.
Ask a child what it's like pedaling with blocks, or watch how their feet slip off with the pedal spinning. Of course step-in cleats make a difference but the basic issue is the same, and contrary to 100 years of trying to keep the foot closer to the spindle, or even as Shimano did sometime back below the spindle line.
Again, I might be missing something, but this just seems like another perpetual motion machine.
It appears that functionally this is no different than a pedal with blocks or a thick deck, which keeps the foot higher off the spindle center.
Ask a child what it's like pedaling with blocks, or watch how their feet slip off with the pedal spinning. Of course step-in cleats make a difference but the basic issue is the same, and contrary to 100 years of trying to keep the foot closer to the spindle, or even as Shimano did sometime back below the spindle line.
Again, I might be missing something, but this just seems like another perpetual motion machine.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#15
Senior Member
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,054
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5971 Post(s)
Liked 2,878 Times
in
1,602 Posts
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
I must be missing something, but to me it looks like they have everything bass ackwards.
It appears that functionally this is no different than a pedal with blocks or a thick deck, which keeps the foot higher off the spindle center......Again, I might be missing something, but this just seems like another perpetual motion machine.
It appears that functionally this is no different than a pedal with blocks or a thick deck, which keeps the foot higher off the spindle center......Again, I might be missing something, but this just seems like another perpetual motion machine.
I missed it at first too, but the "claim to fame" comes from including a forward tilt of the foot into the equation, which creates the effect of a longer crank on the downstroke.
A more interesting way of doing things would have been to add a gear arrangement to the pedal/crank interface, allowing the pedal axle to walk around on a (small) circle at the end of the crank. Get the tooth count right, and you'd have the effect of a longer crank at both downstroke and upstroke.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
It IS pretty much the same.
I missed it at first too, but the "claim to fame" comes from including a forward tilt of the foot into the equation, which creates the effect of a longer crank on the downstroke.
A more interesting way of doing things would have been to add a gear arrangement to the pedal/crank interface, allowing the pedal axle to walk around on a (small) circle at the end of the crank. Get the tooth count right, and you'd have the effect of a longer crank at both downstroke and upstroke.
I missed it at first too, but the "claim to fame" comes from including a forward tilt of the foot into the equation, which creates the effect of a longer crank on the downstroke.
A more interesting way of doing things would have been to add a gear arrangement to the pedal/crank interface, allowing the pedal axle to walk around on a (small) circle at the end of the crank. Get the tooth count right, and you'd have the effect of a longer crank at both downstroke and upstroke.
ive got no interest in this product as a performance gain, but it might be an interesting way to lower the bottom bracket on things like touring bikes or folders with smaller wheels.
Last edited by thirdgenbird; 09-07-13 at 09:51 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,054
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5971 Post(s)
Liked 2,878 Times
in
1,602 Posts
A more interesting way of doing things would have been to add a gear arrangement to the pedal/crank interface, allowing the pedal axle to walk around on a (small) circle at the end of the crank. Get the tooth count right, and you'd have the effect of a longer crank at both downstroke and upstroke.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,054
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5971 Post(s)
Liked 2,878 Times
in
1,602 Posts
The maker's claim that length changes because the foot is angled seems more complex, because there's a compound lever, but essentially is the same. However it has a major drawback of creating a pedal torque which increases stress on the foot and ankle. This is probably minor if the foot stays level and above the bearing, but increases as the foot is angled and the force is applied forward of top-dead-center.
No matter how you slice it, this is another L-shaped crank, and insults previous attempts to improve the bio-mechanics, such bio-pace, power cm and others which at least had some merit.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 09-07-13 at 11:07 AM.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Not true. If the foot and pedal stay horizontal throughout the stroke it doesn't in any ay change effective crank length which is fixed by the distance separating the bearings. What it does is raise the foot position at all places in the circle, exactly the way children's pedal blocks do.
The maker's claim that length changes because the foot is angled seems more complex, because there's a compound lever, but essentially is the same. However it has a major drawback of creating a pedal torque which increases stress on the foot and ankle. This is probably minor if the foot stays level and above the bearing, but increases as the foot is angled and the force is applied forward of top-dead-center.
No matter how you slice it, this is another L-shaped crank, and insults previous attempts to improve the bio-mechanics, such bio-pace, power cm and others which at least had some merit.
The maker's claim that length changes because the foot is angled seems more complex, because there's a compound lever, but essentially is the same. However it has a major drawback of creating a pedal torque which increases stress on the foot and ankle. This is probably minor if the foot stays level and above the bearing, but increases as the foot is angled and the force is applied forward of top-dead-center.
No matter how you slice it, this is another L-shaped crank, and insults previous attempts to improve the bio-mechanics, such bio-pace, power cm and others which at least had some merit.
with the foot horizontal it doesn't change the crank lenght (190mm) on the front of the stroke at all. This is exactly what their own diagram shows. The effective crank lenght is 190mm and the actual crank lenght is 190mm...
at the bottom of the pedal stroke (foot horizontal) the block reduces the crank length. See math on diagram.
the only "complex angle" they suggest is at the back of the stroke where it again reduces the crank lenght from 190 to about 175mm
the only difference between this, and pedal blocks is increased pedal clearance. It isn't a performance enhancer, it is a way to use longer arms 190 vs 175 without pedal strike concerns. Anything more is a gross over complication.
it shares nothing with L shaped cranks. The bb spindle to pedal distance (effective lever) is constant with an L shaped crank. These have a variable lever lenght. It matches the crank lenght on the power stroke, and it shrinks it for pedal clearance at the bottom.
Last edited by thirdgenbird; 09-07-13 at 11:07 AM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,054
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5971 Post(s)
Liked 2,878 Times
in
1,602 Posts
I meant to and forgot to parse the quote down to the one sentence that wasn't true, the statement that it would act similar to a 190mm crank, albeit offset higher. (since fixed). No matter how you slice it, this will still perform as a 175mm crank since the pedaling force is applied at the 175mm mark, and not beyond. I describe it as a 175mm crank with pedal blocks, nothing more or less.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
You're right, and I apologize. Basically we agree.
I meant to and forgot to parse the quote down to the one sentence that wasn't true, the statement that it would act similar to a 190mm crank, albeit offset higher. (since fixed). No matter how you slice it, this will still perform as a 175mm crank since the pedaling force is applied at the 175mm mark, and not beyond. I describe it as a 175mm crank with pedal blocks, nothing more or less.
I meant to and forgot to parse the quote down to the one sentence that wasn't true, the statement that it would act similar to a 190mm crank, albeit offset higher. (since fixed). No matter how you slice it, this will still perform as a 175mm crank since the pedaling force is applied at the 175mm mark, and not beyond. I describe it as a 175mm crank with pedal blocks, nothing more or less.
Actually, it is a 190mm crank with a pedal block. The light blue is a traditional crank*, the dark blue is a Zenn crank.
Here is lennord Zenn's comments from his review of the longer (200mm version)
"At first blush, it may look to you like a 200mm Zencranks arm is equivalent to putting a block between your shoe and your cleat equal to the length of the little link attached to the pedal shaft (in this case, 20mm, although future versions for 200mm and 195mm will be 15mm) and using a 200mm crank. This is true, except for the fact that you get 20mm higher cornering clearance with the Zencranks."
* a standard crankset has a similar egg shaped pedal stroke due to the stack height of the pedal.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,054
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5971 Post(s)
Liked 2,878 Times
in
1,602 Posts
The effective length of a crank is set by the distance from the center of rotation to where the driving force is applied. As long as the offset pedal is still attached to a bearing at 175mm from the center of rotation, it's a 175mm crank. Putting blocks on the pedal doesn't change that. The key is where the bearing is located and the line of force applied through that bearing.
If you consider this to act like a 190mm crank (with or without blocks) you've accepted the seller's premise, something which I don't. Think about this a while, and maybe you'll be the one to come around this time.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.