Tubeless gurus
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Tubeless gurus
Hi All,
I have some new wheels coming in the next week or so and they are tubeless compatible. I wasn't ever really entertaining the idea of going tubeless, but after two flats this morning and 4 in the last 3 days, now I am.
For all the tubeless peeps, what are your feelings about it? Is it better than running tubes? Which tires do you recommend? Sealant?
Thanks in advance.
Brandon
I have some new wheels coming in the next week or so and they are tubeless compatible. I wasn't ever really entertaining the idea of going tubeless, but after two flats this morning and 4 in the last 3 days, now I am.
For all the tubeless peeps, what are your feelings about it? Is it better than running tubes? Which tires do you recommend? Sealant?
Thanks in advance.
Brandon
#2
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
I'm using Schwalbe pro one tubeless and use stans sealant. They stay sealed on November Rails after the first ride. Initially the tires were losing air when I first installed them and the next couple of nights of them just sitting but after the first ride they have stayed properly sealed up.
I like them and find the ride is pretty darn nice. Installing them took a bit of a learning curve but once I knew how to do it everything went well. The tires out of the package were very tight, so you have to make sure that the bead is seated in the shallowest portion of the rim during installation.
I have not had a flat with them yet, so that is good.
I like them and find the ride is pretty darn nice. Installing them took a bit of a learning curve but once I knew how to do it everything went well. The tires out of the package were very tight, so you have to make sure that the bead is seated in the shallowest portion of the rim during installation.
I have not had a flat with them yet, so that is good.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Like RJM, I too am running Schwalbe Pro one tubeless tires on November 52 Rails (cheers RJM They are no harder to mount than regular clincher tires though a bit tight as some clinchers can be. Once mounted, pinch the outer walls into the inner channel and then use a CO2 cartridge to get the beads set. Let the air out, take the valve stem out, put in (I use Stans also) the sealant, put the valve stem back in and pump up with tire pump. They ride great, I've not had any problems in over 1k so far. Take the plunge and give it a try, I think you'll like it.
#4
Senior Member
Hutchinson Sectors on HED Belgium+ rims with Orange sealant. Very happy with this combo, had it a little over a year and the tires are my daily driver. I wore the anodizing and then some off the DA brakes (the tires measure 31.2 at 90 PSI) but they've held up like a champ. Got about 800 on the rear and about 1300 on the front before I needed to replace them.
#5
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,561
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3239 Post(s)
Liked 1,798 Times
in
1,082 Posts
I'm three years on tubeless now, with two different bikes, and yeah, it has been awesome. I have no thought of ever going back to tubes.
I've only run Schwalbe One, Pro One, and S-One, but can recommend them as excellent performance tires. High mileage they ain't.
I've used Stans, Orange Seal, and Joe's Eco, and really only the Joe's was lacklustre. I've actually not punctured with Orange that I'm aware of, so I can't comment on that stuff, but it looks better on paper.
I've only run Schwalbe One, Pro One, and S-One, but can recommend them as excellent performance tires. High mileage they ain't.
I've used Stans, Orange Seal, and Joe's Eco, and really only the Joe's was lacklustre. I've actually not punctured with Orange that I'm aware of, so I can't comment on that stuff, but it looks better on paper.
#6
Senior Member
Just switched to tubeless.
Schwalbe Pro 1 Evos with Velocity a23 rims. Had an issue when I tried cheapo tape, but with Velotape no issues at all. Just bought a compressor though as I could not get the tyres to seat with a floor pump.
They feel much much nicer than any other tyre I have ridden. Got the 25mms but they measure 28 on the wide a23 rims. Pressure I have is 90 or so.
Mounting the tyres? Reputedly hard, but with these, it takes 10 seconds a tyre.
Schwalbe Pro 1 Evos with Velocity a23 rims. Had an issue when I tried cheapo tape, but with Velotape no issues at all. Just bought a compressor though as I could not get the tyres to seat with a floor pump.
They feel much much nicer than any other tyre I have ridden. Got the 25mms but they measure 28 on the wide a23 rims. Pressure I have is 90 or so.
Mounting the tyres? Reputedly hard, but with these, it takes 10 seconds a tyre.
#7
Senior Member
I'm three years on tubeless now, with two different bikes, and yeah, it has been awesome. I have no thought of ever going back to tubes.
I've only run Schwalbe One, Pro One, and S-One, but can recommend them as excellent performance tires. High mileage they ain't.
I've used Stans, Orange Seal, and Joe's Eco, and really only the Joe's was lacklustre. I've actually not punctured with Orange that I'm aware of, so I can't comment on that stuff, but it looks better on paper.
I've only run Schwalbe One, Pro One, and S-One, but can recommend them as excellent performance tires. High mileage they ain't.
I've used Stans, Orange Seal, and Joe's Eco, and really only the Joe's was lacklustre. I've actually not punctured with Orange that I'm aware of, so I can't comment on that stuff, but it looks better on paper.
#8
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
i switched from tubed One to tubeless Pro One. same marked width, same rims. Pro One are easily wider - you can just tell by comparing the flattened width of both.
sealant is Schwalbe's Doc Blue, made by Stans. pressure retention is every bit as good as the tubed set on my other 2 700c bikes.
at the same pressure, the Pro One *seems* a bit more solid and substantial. that isnt meant in a good way. its as if im rolling on a solid block of rubber, rather than a thin sheet of silk (as tubulars are often romanticized). as far as grip probably they have a touch more grip. but honestly thats an unreliable, mentally magnified attempt at resolving the differences. like trying to count peas by feel through a mattress.
unless i swap the 2 pairs back to back to back to back for multiple rides i couldnt make a real VS assessment. if you handed me a pair of wheels blindly i wouldnt think twice about which tires between these 2 they were rolling on. much like people trying to nitpick between frame material and handlebar stiffnesses its forum-fodder hogwash. the real life, real world, practical conclusion for me about tubeless is that i dont pinch flat and thats a nice thing.
sealant is Schwalbe's Doc Blue, made by Stans. pressure retention is every bit as good as the tubed set on my other 2 700c bikes.
at the same pressure, the Pro One *seems* a bit more solid and substantial. that isnt meant in a good way. its as if im rolling on a solid block of rubber, rather than a thin sheet of silk (as tubulars are often romanticized). as far as grip probably they have a touch more grip. but honestly thats an unreliable, mentally magnified attempt at resolving the differences. like trying to count peas by feel through a mattress.
unless i swap the 2 pairs back to back to back to back for multiple rides i couldnt make a real VS assessment. if you handed me a pair of wheels blindly i wouldnt think twice about which tires between these 2 they were rolling on. much like people trying to nitpick between frame material and handlebar stiffnesses its forum-fodder hogwash. the real life, real world, practical conclusion for me about tubeless is that i dont pinch flat and thats a nice thing.
#9
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
I have two bikes set up with tubeless - one has Ultegra 6800 wheels and 25mm IRC Tubeless Roadlites, the other has Hed Ardennes + wheels and 24mm S-Works tubeless. Tire width comes to ~27mm on both bikes. I like them both, but don't see a performance difference between them and good tubed clinchers. With tubes, I usually got about two flats/year, haven't flatted on either set of tubeless yet.
I can't imagine getting 800 miles from a rear tire. That's about a month's riding for me.
I can't imagine getting 800 miles from a rear tire. That's about a month's riding for me.
__________________
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
#10
Senior Member
BigPoser, give tubeless a shot, I've been riding tubeless for around three years and see no reason to switch back to tubed at this point. A lot of people will try to scare you away from it saying its messy, hard to mount, no real difference in ride, etc... but the reality is its just different and some here just simply don't like change. Tubeless tires have come a long way since their inception years ago, they are lighter, easier to mount, and a bit cheaper too.
I would recommend if you decide to give it a try to practice mounting the tires several times before you put the sealant in so you have confidence out on the road in the event of a flat. My first attempt was dreadful to say the least and I didn't think the tire would ever go on the rim but after actually listening to the proper mounting instructions and taking my time, I can now mount any tubeless tire without tools confidently. The key is keeping the tire beads wet with water and in the center channel of the rim during the whole process of mounting the tire starting opposite of where the valve stem is on the rim. Once on the rim be sure the tire is between the rim and stem, not sitting on top of it. Out on the road if you flat just treat it like its a std clincher setup using your usual flat kit with a tube, lever, and pump.
Good Luck, and let us know what you decide to do and how you made out. If you need any advice feel free to post back or pm any of us who have actual experience with tubeless.
#11
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,561
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3239 Post(s)
Liked 1,798 Times
in
1,082 Posts
#12
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
i fit relatively good clinchers on all my bikes (i.e., not 500g gator-dillos), so unless its my 23mm set pumped to 100psi-120psi, which will obviously feel bouncy and (perceived) 'fast'....... i couldnt honestly ascertain if the rubber beneath me is gp4k, pro4, turbo cotton, whathaveyou......
#14
Senior Member
Tubeless offers no real benefit and a lot of hassles. I think this is one case where no real advantage exists other than telling your friends you went "tubeless". You have a host of new things to worry about for no gain in anything.
It reminds me of people that feed their dog raw food. They spend all this money on things like a scale and endless hours finding chicken necks for no benefit.
It reminds me of people that feed their dog raw food. They spend all this money on things like a scale and endless hours finding chicken necks for no benefit.
#15
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,561
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3239 Post(s)
Liked 1,798 Times
in
1,082 Posts
Tubeless offers no real benefit and a lot of hassles. I think this is one case where no real advantage exists other than telling your friends you went "tubeless". You have a host of new things to worry about for no gain in anything.
It reminds me of people that feed their dog raw food. They spend all this money on things like a scale and endless hours finding chicken necks for no benefit.
It reminds me of people that feed their dog raw food. They spend all this money on things like a scale and endless hours finding chicken necks for no benefit.
#16
Senior Member
My local very high shop told me about 75% of people go back to traditional tires. In the process they have wasted a lot of money and time on this folly.
#18
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,561
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3239 Post(s)
Liked 1,798 Times
in
1,082 Posts
#19
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Hi All,
I have some new wheels coming in the next week or so and they are tubeless compatible. I wasn't ever really entertaining the idea of going tubeless, but after two flats this morning and 4 in the last 3 days, now I am.
For all the tubeless peeps, what are your feelings about it? Is it better than running tubes? Which tires do you recommend? Sealant?
Thanks in advance.
Brandon
I have some new wheels coming in the next week or so and they are tubeless compatible. I wasn't ever really entertaining the idea of going tubeless, but after two flats this morning and 4 in the last 3 days, now I am.
For all the tubeless peeps, what are your feelings about it? Is it better than running tubes? Which tires do you recommend? Sealant?
Thanks in advance.
Brandon
Try it, live it, love it....
Get a flat in the middle of nowhere that won't self seal and hold air....
Go back to tubes. There are some very nice riding standard clinchers out there. Most people are not so lucky that punctures are of the microscopic self-sealing variety. And carrying a bead jack gets old to mount tubeless tires after prying them off to get a tube in there. Just not worth it for self-supporting riders.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 613
Bikes: Niner RLT 9 4 Star, Kona Splice, Nashbar Carbon road bike
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Try it, live it, love it....
Get a flat in the middle of nowhere that won't self seal and hold air....
Go back to tubes. There are some very nice riding standard clinchers out there. Most people are not so lucky that punctures are of the microscopic self-sealing variety. And carrying a bead jack gets old to mount tubeless tires after prying them off to get a tube in there. Just not worth it for self-supporting riders.
Get a flat in the middle of nowhere that won't self seal and hold air....
Go back to tubes. There are some very nice riding standard clinchers out there. Most people are not so lucky that punctures are of the microscopic self-sealing variety. And carrying a bead jack gets old to mount tubeless tires after prying them off to get a tube in there. Just not worth it for self-supporting riders.
Panaracer Tubeless Tire Puncture Repair Kit
#21
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 2,220 Times
in
1,492 Posts
It's amazing how much talk there is about pinched flats. I don't understand it. In 30 years of riding I had it happen once and that's when I took a bike out with under inflated tires. Are people rountinely running low pressure?
#22
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
That is one of the benefits of tubeless; you can run lower pressures without developing pinch flats. Lower pressures allow for greater comfort which actually translates into faster speeds.
#23
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,561
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3239 Post(s)
Liked 1,798 Times
in
1,082 Posts
Try it, live it, love it....
Get a flat in the middle of nowhere that won't self seal and hold air....
Go back to tubes. There are some very nice riding standard clinchers out there. Most people are not so lucky that punctures are of the microscopic self-sealing variety. And carrying a bead jack gets old to mount tubeless tires after prying them off to get a tube in there. Just not worth it for self-supporting riders.
Get a flat in the middle of nowhere that won't self seal and hold air....
Go back to tubes. There are some very nice riding standard clinchers out there. Most people are not so lucky that punctures are of the microscopic self-sealing variety. And carrying a bead jack gets old to mount tubeless tires after prying them off to get a tube in there. Just not worth it for self-supporting riders.
I'll also remind you that bead jacks existed before tubeless tires. Do you know what that means? It means tight beads are not the exclusive province of tubeless, and plenty of tubed clinchers are a total pain to mount, too. Of course, I think most tubeless users, myself included, have been able to mount them without any tools, not even a tire lever.
#24
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
Try it, live it, love it....
Get a flat in the middle of nowhere that won't self seal and hold air....
Go back to tubes. There are some very nice riding standard clinchers out there. Most people are not so lucky that punctures are of the microscopic self-sealing variety. And carrying a bead jack gets old to mount tubeless tires after prying them off to get a tube in there. Just not worth it for self-supporting riders.
Get a flat in the middle of nowhere that won't self seal and hold air....
Go back to tubes. There are some very nice riding standard clinchers out there. Most people are not so lucky that punctures are of the microscopic self-sealing variety. And carrying a bead jack gets old to mount tubeless tires after prying them off to get a tube in there. Just not worth it for self-supporting riders.
#25
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
If it won't hold air because of a puncture a tube can be installed. Not anymore difficult than changing the tube in a regular clincher. If a large gash happens that won't seal, repairing it would be as much of a problem as repairing a large gash on a regular clincher too. In that respect I don't see any advantage to riding tubes.
I used to sing the gospel of roadie tubeless too (everything from 23mm Hutchinsons to 28mm Schwalbes). Then after several non-self-sealing punctures on long rides away from civilization, I saw the silliness for what it was. A ton of effort, lots of engineering, lots of hassle/mess, for not a whole lot in return.
Quality high TPI clinchers Just Work (tm). Less mess, less fuss. And you're carrying a tube in your pocket anyway because the damn tire probably won't self seal in the event of puncture anyway.
The sane, stable, cool-headed rider would just put a tube in it like they would any standard clincher flat. It's no big deal, believe me, as I've been there and done that.
I'll also remind you that bead jacks existed before tubeless tires. Do you know what that means? It means tight beads are not the exclusive province of tubeless, and plenty of tubed clinchers are a total pain to mount, too. Of course, I think most tubeless users, myself included, have been able to mount them without any tools, not even a tire lever.
I'll also remind you that bead jacks existed before tubeless tires. Do you know what that means? It means tight beads are not the exclusive province of tubeless, and plenty of tubed clinchers are a total pain to mount, too. Of course, I think most tubeless users, myself included, have been able to mount them without any tools, not even a tire lever.
B) Most reg clinchers don't require a bead jack, they make it a ton easier but don't require it. Properly sealing tubeless are wicked tight on the rim.
Last edited by Marcus_Ti; 07-08-16 at 11:24 AM.