Should I try a longer stem?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 551
Bikes: 1985 Cannondale SR500, 1990 Cannondale ST600, 1993 Cannondale M700
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
108 Posts
Should I try a longer stem?
I just got my first road bike, a Jamis Satellite Sport, 51cm. I went for my first longer ride this morning, and have a couple observations. I feel really comfortable on the bike, with one exception. My butt wants to slide back behind the saddle. It is slightly higher than the handlebars and is level. It is as far back on the rails as possible. I feel like if my hands were maybe one inch further forward that would help. I measured the stem from center of bolt to center of handlebars and I got 92mm. The top of the stem says 31.8 5-6Nm H1202D.
Should I try a longer stem? What size do you recommend?
Thanks!
Oh, maybe I should add that I'm 5'8", 30" inseam, thin, and have kind of longish arms. I wear a medium size in everything, but the sleeves are always too short. I have about 1" inch clearance when I stand over the frame.
Should I try a longer stem? What size do you recommend?
Thanks!
Oh, maybe I should add that I'm 5'8", 30" inseam, thin, and have kind of longish arms. I wear a medium size in everything, but the sleeves are always too short. I have about 1" inch clearance when I stand over the frame.
Last edited by riverdrifter; 05-05-19 at 01:16 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
Hi Drifter. We are the same approximate size overall but I have longer legs. You did not say what the length of your top tube is. This is measured horizontally from the point where the fork intersects the top tube to the centerline of the seat tube ( regardless of where a sloping top tube may actually intersect). This is a key fitting measurement and on my bike it is 54cm and I use a 90 mm stem. Those measurements may help your evaluation. In any case, I would try that longer stem as that is not very expensive and since it does not cost anything, tip the saddle down a bit. YOu can always move it back. Good luck.
Likes For berner:
#3
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
A longer stem and/or a seatpost with more setback could help. The frame might be a bit small, but that is one way to make it work.
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 551
Bikes: 1985 Cannondale SR500, 1990 Cannondale ST600, 1993 Cannondale M700
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
108 Posts
Hi Drifter. We are the same approximate size overall but I have longer legs. You did not say what the length of your top tube is. This is measured horizontally from the point where the fork intersects the top tube to the centerline of the seat tube ( regardless of where a sloping top tube may actually intersect). This is a key fitting measurement and on my bike it is 54cm and I use a 90 mm stem. Those measurements may help your evaluation. In any case, I would try that longer stem as that is not very expensive and since it does not cost anything, tip the saddle down a bit. YOu can always move it back. Good luck.
That number on stamped on my stem, H1202D? I'm wondering if that maybe means it is a 120 mm stem? I measured from the center of the handlebars to the stem bolt and came up with about 90 mm. Is that where I should be measuring?
#5
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
I think you are measuring correctly. H1202D could be anything. 120 is almost freakishly long.
cf: https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-m...em-length.html
cf: https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-m...em-length.html
Last edited by Cyclist0108; 05-05-19 at 08:11 PM.
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#6
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,521
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3880 Post(s)
Liked 1,932 Times
in
1,379 Posts
No idea without seeing photos taken from the side:
Hands on hoods, forearms horizontal, cranks level
Hands on hoods, normal riding position, cranks vertical
Hands on hoods, forearms horizontal, cranks level
Hands on hoods, normal riding position, cranks vertical
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#8
Senior Member
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,931
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6163 Post(s)
Liked 4,782 Times
in
3,300 Posts
Did you buy this from a local dealer new? If so did they set you on it and adjust the saddle height and position? The tilt and height of your saddle might also be somewhat a factor. Since any reasonable LBS will want you to have a good experience with what they sold you, they will usually go fairly far with accommodating any issues you are having with your bike whether mechanical or fit. It's possible you might need a larger frame, or a frame for the opposite sex. Male and female frames can have differing geometries and tube lengths. They are made for the dimensions of what the company expects the median bike buyer will be for each sex. If you are not that median person, then the frame for the other sex might be better for you in the same size.
I personally see no reason for manufacturers to continue sexing bikes. I'd rather just see frames that spec the reach as well as the seat tube length.
I personally see no reason for manufacturers to continue sexing bikes. I'd rather just see frames that spec the reach as well as the seat tube length.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 551
Bikes: 1985 Cannondale SR500, 1990 Cannondale ST600, 1993 Cannondale M700
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
108 Posts
Thanks everyone, for the input. I have continued riding the bike daily and making small adjustments. It feels perfect now, and I've kept it the same for about a month. I ended up flipping the stem. I know that should make the reach shorter, but it seems to be exactly what I needed.