Crabon bikes are fast!
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Hello, fellow BFers.
Lately, I have been riding my steel pedalbike a lot. It is a nice ride. Steel frame of unknown provenance, Dura Ace 10-speed groupset with downtube shifters, Ambrosio Crono wheels with Vittoria Corsa tubulars (23mm.) Solid ride all around.
Today, I took out my crabon bike out for a spin, after a year laying dormant. Focus Cayo, Force groupset, Psimet crabon tubulars. I followed the same route I rode on my trusty steelstead last week and lo and behold, I went over 2 mph faster on the crabon bike!
For the nonbelievers, I shall present evidence.
Exhibit 1, ride on the steel bike:
Note the average speed (shall not be confused with cruising speed.)
Exhibit 2, same ride on the crabon bike:
That's like a 15% gain in speed!
So, is crabon faster? Discuss.
Lately, I have been riding my steel pedalbike a lot. It is a nice ride. Steel frame of unknown provenance, Dura Ace 10-speed groupset with downtube shifters, Ambrosio Crono wheels with Vittoria Corsa tubulars (23mm.) Solid ride all around.
Today, I took out my crabon bike out for a spin, after a year laying dormant. Focus Cayo, Force groupset, Psimet crabon tubulars. I followed the same route I rode on my trusty steelstead last week and lo and behold, I went over 2 mph faster on the crabon bike!
For the nonbelievers, I shall present evidence.
Exhibit 1, ride on the steel bike:
Note the average speed (shall not be confused with cruising speed.)
Exhibit 2, same ride on the crabon bike:
That's like a 15% gain in speed!
So, is crabon faster? Discuss.
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Both have power meters, an old SRM on the steel bike (that doesn't play with Strava, plus it needs to be sent to Colorado for a battery replacement) and C1 chainrings for the Focus.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
I routinely swap between steel, aluminium, and carbon bikes.
Have never noticed any speed difference.
Not tried to make a proper study of it but I certainly would of noticed a 2mph difference.
Have never noticed any speed difference.
Not tried to make a proper study of it but I certainly would of noticed a 2mph difference.
Likes For Stratocaster:
Likes For TimothyH:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,235
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18411 Post(s)
Liked 15,531 Times
in
7,327 Posts
#35
Senior Member
It's hard to draw any conclusion with the data being presented: 1. huge difference in average powers, measured by two different methods: power meters and strava estimates based velocity and weight.
A more fair side-by-side comparison would require a pedal-based power meter, which you would use on both bikes, and a AeroPod that measures wind speed and drag coefficient. Without the equipment, maybe you should just focus on comparing the climb (~1.4 mi x 600 ft elev gain) in you ride.
A more fair side-by-side comparison would require a pedal-based power meter, which you would use on both bikes, and a AeroPod that measures wind speed and drag coefficient. Without the equipment, maybe you should just focus on comparing the climb (~1.4 mi x 600 ft elev gain) in you ride.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
It's hard to draw any conclusion with the data being presented: 1. huge difference in average powers, measured by two different methods: power meters and strava estimates based velocity and weight.
A more fair side-by-side comparison would require a pedal-based power meter, which you would use on both bikes, and a AeroPod that measures wind speed and drag coefficient. Without the equipment, maybe you should just focus on comparing the climb (~1.4 mi x 600 ft elev gain) in you ride.
A more fair side-by-side comparison would require a pedal-based power meter, which you would use on both bikes, and a AeroPod that measures wind speed and drag coefficient. Without the equipment, maybe you should just focus on comparing the climb (~1.4 mi x 600 ft elev gain) in you ride.
It's not, just lower your standards.
#37
Senior Member
Not a single traffic light along the way. Wind? Maybe, don't recall it being windy either day. The crabon wheels are indeed 50/60 mm deep, but Psimet said on that other thread that it doesn't matter.
Someone pointed out something important on another thread though: In the moving process, I lost one of the screws that fixes the stem in place on the carbon bike.
Someone pointed out something important on another thread though: In the moving process, I lost one of the screws that fixes the stem in place on the carbon bike.
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Apologies, I can see how I might have cause some confusion. Fixed it for you:
Not a single traffic light along the way. Wind? Maybe, don't recall it being windy either day. The crabon wheels are indeed 50/60 mm deep, but Psimet said on that other thread that it doesn't matter.
Someone pointed out something important on another thread though: In the moving process, I lost one of the screws that fixes the stem in place on the crabon bike.
Someone pointed out something important on another thread though: In the moving process, I lost one of the screws that fixes the stem in place on the crabon bike.
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#40
Senior Member
Not sure if this matters but how fast is your shifting on those downtube shifters? I was pretty inefficient on my old Miyata.
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 774
Bikes: Trek 970, Bianchi Volpe,Casati
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 357 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
87 Posts
Sorry but this has little relevance. You don't even know what kind of steel bike??? Wheels come into play, weight , etc,
#44
Senior Member
So, assuming you eliminated all other variables (I'm in serious doubt here) the difference in climb times should be purely down to weight. The steel time is 13.9% longer than the crabon one. I have no idea how heavy you are so I'll use my weight of 85kg and assume the crabon bike is the 6.8kg UCI weight limit. That would put the steel bike at 19.6kg or 43.1 lbs. Not an impossibly high number but I don't think anybody would be surprised that someone is faster on a 7kg bike than a 20kg one.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,634
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,034 Times
in
1,428 Posts
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,235
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18411 Post(s)
Liked 15,531 Times
in
7,327 Posts
Likes For indyfabz:
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,235
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18411 Post(s)
Liked 15,531 Times
in
7,327 Posts
#49
Senior Member
BTW, I have an Evo and a CAAD 12 with very similar geometry. The EVO is 3 lbs lighter, with its components worth three times as much as the CAAD 12. I've never done any comparison based on numbers. But I could testify the difference is day and night.