Rear Free Wheel with Quick Release Safe?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rear Free Wheel with Quick Release Safe?
A bike shop I used in the past recently me told me this, "Having a rear free wheel set on a quick release is sketchy, un-safe practice and is something we wouldn't risk our reputation on." What do you guys think?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,923 Times
in
2,552 Posts
With rim brakes and horizontal dropouts and a poor quality or design quick-release or poor attention to detail, yes. Following basic good practice and using a reputable quick-release with an internal cam and steel skewer, not an issue. Been done for 90 years and millions of miles.
Ben
Ben
#3
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
As above, BITD when bikes had horizontal rear dropouts to account for poor alignment, QRs could allow the wheel to slip if something went wrong. Almost all modern bikes have vertical dropouts and the force from the chain pushes the wheel's axle into a solid part of the frame.
There are a few cases I can think of where the rear wheel slipped during riding. It is much more likely on cheap bikes that have been converted to QR as the dropouot thickness is too little for the QR to squeeze on before it bottoms out against the end of the axle. If doing this conversion you must cut the NDS of the axle down by a few mms. It generally slows or stops the bike, but is not a catastrophic failure.
If the QR on the front wheel lets go, the results are generally much more severe.
So what bikes does this shop sell that have no QRs on their rear wheels? Do they disassemble the hub on every bike and install a nutted axle? Because every adult bike from almost every bike brand comes from the factory with F&R QRs. Only bikes with internally geared hubs, and single speeds, come with nutted axles.
There are a few cases I can think of where the rear wheel slipped during riding. It is much more likely on cheap bikes that have been converted to QR as the dropouot thickness is too little for the QR to squeeze on before it bottoms out against the end of the axle. If doing this conversion you must cut the NDS of the axle down by a few mms. It generally slows or stops the bike, but is not a catastrophic failure.
If the QR on the front wheel lets go, the results are generally much more severe.
So what bikes does this shop sell that have no QRs on their rear wheels? Do they disassemble the hub on every bike and install a nutted axle? Because every adult bike from almost every bike brand comes from the factory with F&R QRs. Only bikes with internally geared hubs, and single speeds, come with nutted axles.
#4
~>~
Perhaps you or they meant "fixed gear" instead?
If so, I've ridden for years on a FG/QR set-up with zero problems.
That being said, get a proper track style hub for FG riding w/ track nuts and have at it.
Choosing and properly operating a QR as @79pmooney notes is SOP.
edit: Is this some shop shilling the "danger" of QR to sell a bike w/ disc brakes and through axles as the "safe" alternative?
If so, don't go back there.
-Bandera
Last edited by Bandera; 06-28-19 at 02:28 PM.
#5
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,113
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 853 Post(s)
Liked 1,434 Times
in
816 Posts
IMO, sounds like they are trying to sell you a more expensive bike. I have been road biking for 45+ years. All of it with quick release skewers. Never had a problem not due to my not tightening the skewer enough. Look at some video to get the correct way to use the QRs.
#6
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,015
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
391 Posts
I ride older bikes and expect a certain level of knowledge to have slipped through the cracks over the years.
But that? I'd be looking for another bike shop. If that's not an option I'd seek out a better-informed person within the shop at the very least.
But that? I'd be looking for another bike shop. If that's not an option I'd seek out a better-informed person within the shop at the very least.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
#7
Senior Member
Quick releases require a certain minimal level of mechanical competence. More and more products are being designed on principle that entire population of users are complete morons. Designing for the dimwitted prevents legal problems. Also limits choices and degrades performance.
Most common error with quick releases is using them as wingnuts. Any who would even attempt doing that fail the test and should not do anything mechanical to a bike ever. That is probably a third or a quarter of all quick releases ever made. Past 30 years there has been an endless stream of external cam quick releases. Basically not safe, sell like hotcakes. Used on majority? of higher priced QR-equipped bikes for years now. So the pendulum swings and we go from dismal performing external cams to through axles.
One of my bikes in regular rotation is equipped with pre-war FB/Campagnolo QRs. Over 80 years old. Probably among the first few thousand ever made. No problems.
Most common error with quick releases is using them as wingnuts. Any who would even attempt doing that fail the test and should not do anything mechanical to a bike ever. That is probably a third or a quarter of all quick releases ever made. Past 30 years there has been an endless stream of external cam quick releases. Basically not safe, sell like hotcakes. Used on majority? of higher priced QR-equipped bikes for years now. So the pendulum swings and we go from dismal performing external cams to through axles.
One of my bikes in regular rotation is equipped with pre-war FB/Campagnolo QRs. Over 80 years old. Probably among the first few thousand ever made. No problems.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 166
Bikes: 1970's Piasentin Super Vitus 971, 1979 Carlton Professional, 2005 Trek 5000, 2011 Niner EMD, 2018 Argon 18 XRoad, 1990 Diamondback Master TG Centurion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times
in
55 Posts
The only kind of bike I would not use a rear quick release on would be one with fixed gear (track or fixie).
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times
in
421 Posts
In 55 years of racing, commuting, touring and just cruising around with QR freewheel bikes, I can count on one hand how many times the wheel has slipped in the dropouts. The momentum of the bike will carry you along if the tire tire contacts the frame. Usually you hear it, and have time to stop and reset the wheel in the frame and adjust the QR. The most recent instance of this happening was on a friend's carbon bike with QR and modern cassette. He stood up to finish a hill, the wheel shifted, locked up, and he went over the bars cracking his helmet and his one piece carbon bar/stem combo. Stuff happens. You could also get struck by lightning. Find another shop.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
How not safe? External cam QRs are fine in the right application ie. when used with vertical dropouts, which are found on the vast majority of modern bicycles. The only place I would require an internal-cam QR or a solid axle with nuts would be with horizontal dropouts
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
What sort of bike were you looking at? Because the statement is an odd one, and doesn't really make sense to me in isolation.
#12
Le savonnier
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,422
Bikes: I can count 'em on one hand
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 729 Post(s)
Liked 602 Times
in
274 Posts
I remember a discussion at work a few years ago that went something like this:
Co-worker: "Make it idiot-proof so anyone can do it."
Boss: "Oh, you don't want to do that, they'll just make a better idiot."
Anyway, as others have said, it's time to find a different bike shop. I've been riding QR rear wheels for decades without issues.
Co-worker: "Make it idiot-proof so anyone can do it."
Boss: "Oh, you don't want to do that, they'll just make a better idiot."
Anyway, as others have said, it's time to find a different bike shop. I've been riding QR rear wheels for decades without issues.
Likes For johnnyace:
#13
Banned
QR lever has to be really tight* and the axle rnd has to bite into the metal ..
* internal cam type can exert more force ..
as you close the lever, the resistant force, it should leave a mark on the palm of your hand with the lever.. 'that' tight..
...
* internal cam type can exert more force ..
as you close the lever, the resistant force, it should leave a mark on the palm of your hand with the lever.. 'that' tight..
...
Last edited by fietsbob; 07-04-19 at 02:13 PM.
Likes For fietsbob:
#14
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,634
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
The correct amount of force/clamping power can be achieved with either an external or internal-cam design QR. The internal cam design just allows you to get that same force more easily. IOW they're probably better suited to the frail and weak.
#15
~>~
OP, if you haven't gone missing in your own thread, read this:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/skewers.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/skewers.html
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,833
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 604 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
535 Posts
I guess 6 of my 7 bikes are unsafe, better update my will. What a hack!
Tim
Tim
#17
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you all for your input. To give you more context, I visited this bike shop about 3 years ago to get a new rear wheel for my 1994 Trek 800. Without my permission, they installed a solid axle wheel instead of quick release one that came with my bike. Although the new wheel has performed well, recently, I have needed to remove the wheel, and I greatly miss the convenience of the quick release system. So I posted a negative Google review for that bike shop, and part of the owner's reply to my review was the warning of the safety issues of using quick release on a rear free wheel.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,833
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 604 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
535 Posts
Tim
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central Io-way
Posts: 2,673
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1221 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times
in
472 Posts
Thank you all for your input. To give you more context, I visited this bike shop about 3 years ago to get a new rear wheel for my 1994 Trek 800. Without my permission, they installed a solid axle wheel instead of quick release one that came with my bike. Although the new wheel has performed well, recently, I have needed to remove the wheel, and I greatly miss the convenience of the quick release system. So I posted a negative Google review for that bike shop, and part of the owner's reply to my review was the warning of the safety issues of using quick release on a rear free wheel.
#20
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
In fact, up until the 1970s, Campagnolo offered quick releases as an option on their track hubs:
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 166
Bikes: 1970's Piasentin Super Vitus 971, 1979 Carlton Professional, 2005 Trek 5000, 2011 Niner EMD, 2018 Argon 18 XRoad, 1990 Diamondback Master TG Centurion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times
in
55 Posts
The only reason you don't see quick releases on track wheels is because track regulations often forbid them out of concern that a closely-following rider's front wheel could disengage the lead rider's quick release. Unless you're riding on a track in a pursuit event, a quick release track wheel is not a concern.
In fact, up until the 1970s, Campagnolo offered quick releases as an option on their track hubs:
In fact, up until the 1970s, Campagnolo offered quick releases as an option on their track hubs:
But your explanation makes far more sense.
#22
Banned
One issue common, multi-speed freewheel rear axles had*, was metal fatigue breakage..
a solid axle stronger than a hollow QR type .. But the QR still held the 2 parts together
after the axle broke..
* because the right axle bearings were closer to the bike center line than the axle end
so axle flexed a little, often.. as you rode..
.....
a solid axle stronger than a hollow QR type .. But the QR still held the 2 parts together
after the axle broke..
* because the right axle bearings were closer to the bike center line than the axle end
so axle flexed a little, often.. as you rode..
.....
#23
vespertine member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Land of Angora, Turkey
Posts: 2,476
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 687 Post(s)
Liked 220 Times
in
163 Posts
Generally, I'd expect a shop (of any kind) to ask permission before doing work I did not ask for or substituting a different product. This at least gives the customer the option of going elsewhere. I understand that bike shops may refuse to perform some services due to liability issues, but it's not a good excuse for substituting something different without consulting the customer.
As you can see from this thread, most riders have no issues with QR rear wheels. Same here: the only time I ever had an issue was with a very cheap MTB single speed wheel with equally cheap QR skewers, in a very beat up MTB with horizontal dropouts (it was a low-budget winter build). On one occasion, the wheel slipped, causing me to stop and get grease on my hands on the way to work. After replacing the cheap QR skewer with a better one, no issues.
#24
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,956
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times
in
527 Posts
Maybe you misunderstood the shop person. Their statement as you have relayed it is strange. The only time in 40 years I've had a properly mounted QR wheel slip in horizontal dropouts is ... never.
And the only time I've had a properly mounted QR front wheel fall out of non-lawyer-lip fork ends is again ... never.
And the only time I've had a properly mounted QR front wheel fall out of non-lawyer-lip fork ends is again ... never.
#25
Cycleway town
Thank you all for your input. To give you more context, I visited this bike shop about 3 years ago to get a new rear wheel for my 1994 Trek 800. Without my permission, they installed a solid axle wheel instead of quick release one that came with my bike. Although the new wheel has performed well, recently, I have needed to remove the wheel, and I greatly miss the convenience of the quick release system. So I posted a negative Google review for that bike shop, and part of the owner's reply to my review was the warning of the safety issues of using quick release on a rear free wheel.