I don't think I like physically separated bike lanes.
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
If you talk to your kids, they will tell you, "You gotta keep um separated."
I apologize. It was just there. I tried to resist posting it, but it overpowered me. Please forgive me.
I apologize. It was just there. I tried to resist posting it, but it overpowered me. Please forgive me.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
@colnago62 they upgraded Dexter since the last time I rode, don't take it going south. Bike lane between the sidewalk and a line of parked cars, as you come down the hill, and tons of people standing around smoking cigarettes.
#54
Senior Member
At least around here, without barriers in urban areas the bike lanes just become de facto lyft/uber/ups parking. We can argue about left or ride side but protected bike lanes provide added benefit and protection that increases use by riders who are less comfortable mixing it up with traffic. They aren't really meant for the avg roadie
the problem is the roads are not wide enough to accommodate both dedicated bike lanes and parking but no one wants fewer parking spots.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
But the ones they are building here are not safer. They provide a false sense security to inexperienced riders who are afraid of traffic, akin to an Ostrich sticking its head in the sand. Being less visible, having no bail out options, and not being able to see what traffic is doing as you approach intersections are all bad design features of the kind of separated bike lanes they are putting in. I agree that they get more people riding but that is not a good thing if they are not safe. I am an experienced road cyclists.I stay out of those lanes not because I cant ride as fast as I might like but because I don't feel safe. That less experience rider do feel safer is bad because they are not.
the problem is the roads are not wide enough to accommodate both dedicated bike lanes and parking but no one wants fewer parking spots.
the problem is the roads are not wide enough to accommodate both dedicated bike lanes and parking but no one wants fewer parking spots.
#56
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
OTOH going north they are the only thing preventing some cars from constantly parking and waiting in them and they still find a way into them. Going south at like 9am i still think they are useful for the mom headed to work on the cruiser at 15mph braking the whole way whereas I take the lane at 30mph+ and keep up with cars. Just gotta calibrate to the purpose like we discussed with MUPs
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
Plenty of people live and work along that corridor, that used to be my daily commute route so I'd see all types of cyclists riding it including moms with e-cargo bikes and kids. I still take that route semiregularly if I need to pass through greenwood or along aurora for groceries at central market on the way home up north. For the most part I don't think hills stop a lot of riders in seattle especially with the e-lime and e-jump bikes that make hills less of a problem.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
I agree with redlude, separated lanes are infrastructure that encourages more riding by people who perceive riding in urban environments to be dangerous. I'm also in the camp that having more biking leads to more safety and awareness by drivers and pedestrians, which is why I'm fine with the trade-off of more people riding bikes over the annoyance of dockless bike share bad behavior. Behavior can be corrected over time, but what other methods realistically can get more people out riding? I'm pretty sure the stats on the 2nd Ave bike lane usage are positive, something like over 30% more trips YoY when the lane was installed.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
I agree with redlude, separated lanes are infrastructure that encourages more riding by people who perceive riding in urban environments to be dangerous. I'm also in the camp that having more biking leads to more safety and awareness by drivers and pedestrians, which is why I'm fine with the trade-off of more people riding bikes over the annoyance of dockless bike share bad behavior. Behavior can be corrected over time, but what other methods realistically can get more people out riding? I'm pretty sure the stats on the 2nd Ave bike lane usage are positive, something like over 30% more trips YoY when the lane was installed.
Likes For redlude97:
#60
Senior Member
Thats a fair point, I wish I had data. The county recently did survey about what type of bike lanes folks wanted on a particular stretch of road, advocating the kind of separated lanes I have concerns about. I asked if they could provide data that they were safer but none was available. So absent that, I am basing my concerns not on feeling but on visibility. Being visible, having a wide field of view on roads and trails free of obstructions are, I think, established and recognized characteristics of safe riding conditions that are inarguably absent when riding these tunnel like bike lanes. But there is no doubt that inexperienced riders feel safer riding concealed by parked cars they cant see over so the county is achieving the goal of getting more people riding. I will be happy to admit that the narrow concealed lanes my county is building are better if ever the county shows me the data. Until then, I will chose sight.
#61
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Plenty of people live and work along that corridor, that used to be my daily commute route so I'd see all types of cyclists riding it including moms with e-cargo bikes and kids. I still take that route semiregularly if I need to pass through greenwood or along aurora for groceries at central market on the way home up north. For the most part I don't think hills stop a lot of riders in seattle especially with the e-lime and e-jump bikes that make hills less of a problem.
E bikes seem to have really taken off here in the last year, maybe year and a half. They built bike lanes on Dexter several years ago. They make more sense now with the lime e bikes, and the jump ones too.
#62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Also, IMO the only thing that will legitimately change how safe cycling is, in Seattle at least, is driver's attitudes, more bike lanes and advocacy won't really if drivers continue to break laws and not be courteous to cyclists. You know who isn't going to be the one to change driver's opinions of cyclists? Me, the roadie in lycra. You know how might? The driver's neighbor who finally decided to try a bikeshare because there is finally enough infrastructure to get somewhere in a somewhat safe manner. The number of cyclists out in normal clothes, without helmets(gasp) with a smile on their face that look more like the normal PNWer the better for us all.
I don't have any data on this, but I started riding because it's fun, I stuck with it because it's fun, and I take my bike instead of my car whenever possible because it's fun, and parking isn't.
But there's obviously a great deal of benefit to all of us from more people riding. And this infrastructure does help new cyclists feel safer, and cover ground most of them probably wouldn't otherwise.
#65
Senior Member
These are the types of lanes they are putting in where I live...Washington DC and Arlington, VA...and if they looked like the ones in the pic from LA, I would have far fewer concerns about lack of visibility and safety. But they don't. We don’t have the wide hashed lane with bollards as a buffer between bike lane and parked cars, just narrow lane between curb and cars, which creates a tunnel effect that is very unpleasant. The one in LA look quite nice in the pics.
#66
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
What's a bike lane? I exit my house and bike about 60 km in a perfectly straight line to the next town, which has about 300 people.
My Stava rides are nothing but lines and squares lol
My Stava rides are nothing but lines and squares lol
#67
Portland Fred
Where I live, we have some separated infrastructure and a lot of bike lanes. If I ride in the hills on a weekend day, I'll encounter more cyclists on 40+mph two lane curvy roads with no shoulders than I do on major cycling corridors during rush hour where the lights are timed at 15mph or less.
A year or two ago, a map was published containing cyclist provided data about how safe they felt particular roads were -- the idea was to see where to build more cycling infrastructure. One pattern that I emerged that some of the roads that had the highest anxiety indexes were greenways, painted bike lanes, and other infrastructure in close proximity with ordinary roads which often had moderate anxiety numbers. In other words, some of the easiest roads with the slowest traffic and decent infrastructure were labeled as terrifying while "regular" roads looked fine.
Fear of traffic is a major deterrent for people to start cycling. But the focus needs to be on helping people understand what they're up against so they can manage situations so they can overcome that fear rather than provoking it further.
What passes for an "advocate" out here vehemently insists that the cycling is a dangerous battle and that the drivers. Words like "victimized" and "vulnerable" get tossed around. The mantra is all about repeating the worst aspects of cycling with the bonus that you're completely at the mercy of awful drivers. The entire premise that full separation is necessary is that cyclists don't belong on the roads -- it's hard to come up with a more anticycling message. Then they wonder why no one rides.
If I believed the garbage the advocates push out, there's no way I'd ride.
Likes For banerjek:
#68
Senior Member
I'm not convinced it encourages anything other than recreational cycling in confined areas.
Where I live, we have some separated infrastructure and a lot of bike lanes. If I ride in the hills on a weekend day, I'll encounter more cyclists on 40+mph two lane curvy roads with no shoulders than I do on major cycling corridors during rush hour where the lights are timed at 15mph or less.
A year or two ago, a map was published containing cyclist provided data about how safe they felt particular roads were -- the idea was to see where to build more cycling infrastructure. One pattern that I emerged that some of the roads that had the highest anxiety indexes were greenways, painted bike lanes, and other infrastructure in close proximity with ordinary roads which often had moderate anxiety numbers. In other words, some of the easiest roads with the slowest traffic and decent infrastructure were labeled as terrifying while "regular" roads looked fine.
Fear of traffic is a major deterrent for people to start cycling. But the focus needs to be on helping people understand what they're up against so they can manage situations so they can overcome that fear rather than provoking it further.
What passes for an "advocate" out here vehemently insists that the cycling is a dangerous battle and that the drivers. Words like "victimized" and "vulnerable" get tossed around. The mantra is all about repeating the worst aspects of cycling with the bonus that you're completely at the mercy of awful drivers. The entire premise that full separation is necessary is that cyclists don't belong on the roads -- it's hard to come up with a more anticycling message. Then they wonder why no one rides.
If I believed the garbage the advocates push out, there's no way I'd ride.
Where I live, we have some separated infrastructure and a lot of bike lanes. If I ride in the hills on a weekend day, I'll encounter more cyclists on 40+mph two lane curvy roads with no shoulders than I do on major cycling corridors during rush hour where the lights are timed at 15mph or less.
A year or two ago, a map was published containing cyclist provided data about how safe they felt particular roads were -- the idea was to see where to build more cycling infrastructure. One pattern that I emerged that some of the roads that had the highest anxiety indexes were greenways, painted bike lanes, and other infrastructure in close proximity with ordinary roads which often had moderate anxiety numbers. In other words, some of the easiest roads with the slowest traffic and decent infrastructure were labeled as terrifying while "regular" roads looked fine.
Fear of traffic is a major deterrent for people to start cycling. But the focus needs to be on helping people understand what they're up against so they can manage situations so they can overcome that fear rather than provoking it further.
What passes for an "advocate" out here vehemently insists that the cycling is a dangerous battle and that the drivers. Words like "victimized" and "vulnerable" get tossed around. The mantra is all about repeating the worst aspects of cycling with the bonus that you're completely at the mercy of awful drivers. The entire premise that full separation is necessary is that cyclists don't belong on the roads -- it's hard to come up with a more anticycling message. Then they wonder why no one rides.
If I believed the garbage the advocates push out, there's no way I'd ride.
When I lived in Seattle back in the 80s there were no bike lanes, only the Burke-Gilman trail and a few others. When I went back in 2012 with the intent of just riding, I saw all kinds of bike lanes, and I just thought it was crazy and not safe. And this is from someone that lives and rides in NYC. I need to go back to Seattle to recreate this vacation, maybe in the fall as I'm retiring in a few weeks! (I'll bring my Davidson this time too.)
NYC has its quirks for sure, and I'm sure a lot of people would be scared schitteless riding there, but it really is pretty good now. If only they could figure out the left turn problem...
#69
Sprockets away!
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sidney, BC, Canada
Posts: 83
Bikes: 2021 Prior Prime 105 Disc, 2015 Cannondale Synapse 105 Disc, 1996 Brodie Quantum, 1984 Norco Monterey (SRAM automatix two-speed), 198x Cramerotti Campagnolo Chorus (restored)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
Separated bike lanes are a great idea... For people driving cars. They let drivers completely forget that there are bikes around, which means every place where bikes and cars *must* interact, it comes as a surprise to the drivers, and inevitably the drivers are all p*ssed off about the "crazy cyclists that come out of nowhere." And when you elect to avoid them and just ride on the road, you're constantly honked at and waved at by drivers trying to direct you into the segregated bike lane. Sorry, but a 1.5m wide bike lane isn't wide enough for the range of cycling abilities one sees on a daily commute.
The only dedicated bike routes I like are completely separate MUPs that don't follow the roads at all. One that runs along a former railway line, for example, away from cars and mostly flat or gentle grades. Sure, you have to stop at crossings, but where I am at least those are well marked for both cars and bikes in each direction.
The only dedicated bike routes I like are completely separate MUPs that don't follow the roads at all. One that runs along a former railway line, for example, away from cars and mostly flat or gentle grades. Sure, you have to stop at crossings, but where I am at least those are well marked for both cars and bikes in each direction.
Likes For Snowflake6:
#70
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,945
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6173 Post(s)
Liked 4,790 Times
in
3,305 Posts
The dedicated MUP's that are completely separate except for crossings are great. However many here are saying that because I like to ride fast when it's safe, I shouldn't be on a MUP. So I have nowhere to go but the road. So all this money being spent for leisure time cyclists that don't want to interact with motor vehicles and fast cyclist. What is being spent for me?
I suppose with the same reasoning, there should be separated roads made for motor vehicle drivers that are afraid to interact with faster motor vehicles or fast cyclists.
I still don't care for the physically separate paths described by the OP. They require too much awareness of others at every driveway, street and access point they cross. By the way my MUP doesn't have a published speed limit. It's just asked that everyone use it responsibly around others.
I suppose with the same reasoning, there should be separated roads made for motor vehicle drivers that are afraid to interact with faster motor vehicles or fast cyclists.
I still don't care for the physically separate paths described by the OP. They require too much awareness of others at every driveway, street and access point they cross. By the way my MUP doesn't have a published speed limit. It's just asked that everyone use it responsibly around others.
#71
Senior Member
I'm also not a fan of physically separate bike lanes.
- They're like riding on the sidewalk:
- Vehicle drivers never expect to interact with you, so as vehicles enter or leave the roadway via driveways or cross streets they often don't even notice the cyclist in one of these separated lanes. You are not part of their world, until you suddenly are.
#72
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 492
Bikes: Historical: Schwinn Speedster; Schwinn Collegiate; 1981 Ross Gran Tour; 1981 Dawes Atlantis; 1991 Specialized Rockhopper. Current: 1987 Ritchey Ultra; 1987 Centurion Ironman Dave Scott Master; 1992 Specialized Stumpjumper FS
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Liked 178 Times
in
111 Posts
I liked the lanes separated by parking spots the first time I came across one in Chicago. Then they started putting them in downtown LA, and I changed my mind. I especially like the idea that they're really not about us, but about keeping motorists from having to interact with us.
And, if I understand it all correctly, those plastic bollards in the photos of LA up above will eventually be turned into concrete curbs.
And, if I understand it all correctly, those plastic bollards in the photos of LA up above will eventually be turned into concrete curbs.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
The dedicated MUP's that are completely separate except for crossings are great. However many here are saying that because I like to ride fast when it's safe, I shouldn't be on a MUP. So I have nowhere to go but the road. So all this money being spent for leisure time cyclists that don't want to interact with motor vehicles and fast cyclist. What is being spent for me?
#74
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
This a new one on 1st Ave North in Lower Queen Anne. Plastic barrier, forces you up and down on the left. There's some debris next to the homeless encampment near where the used CD store used to be, otherwise they're isn't much to complain about except waiting for a red light to make a right turn.
#75
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,945
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6173 Post(s)
Liked 4,790 Times
in
3,305 Posts
I certainly don't want the blocked off roads or thousands of miles with no stop sign. I just want some of the money spent on education of both drivers and cyclists for how to share the road. I ride the roads with heavy motor traffic quite a bit and generally have no problems on the roads. I just think with all the bike "sidewalks" being put up along our streets that the motorist will forget about those of us that can't use the bike sidewalks.