Time to rethink?
#1
Tragically Ignorant
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Time to rethink?
Provocative article:
https://www.citylab.com/transportati...e-lane/559934/
I can't help but make the obvious cheap shot that Vision Zero means total blindness. In terms of working the politics, I think that might actually be the case.
https://www.citylab.com/transportati...e-lane/559934/
I can't help but make the obvious cheap shot that Vision Zero means total blindness. In terms of working the politics, I think that might actually be the case.
Likes For livedarklions:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
The way this traffic proposal was handled sounds to me like another failure of leadership. We can only withstand so many such failures before the unerlying social structures collapse.
#3
Senior Member
Ask a bunch of motorists "Do you ever...sacrifice safety just to keep your momentum going?" and you'll get a chorus of "Yes".
But it doesn't look like the opposition to bicycle infrastructure is any different from anywhere else.
But it doesn't look like the opposition to bicycle infrastructure is any different from anywhere else.
#4
Senior Member
This is not new here is SoCal. Back in 1976 traffic planners re-purposed a general use lane on the Santa Monica freeway to be a carpool lane. It was a public relations disaster and lasted just 21 weeks. It even spawned a parody song "Driving in the Lane with Diamonds" sung to "Lucy in the Sky" which got quite a bit of play on the old Dr. Demento radio show.
Driving In The Lane With Diamonds by Big Daddy
Since then all carpool lanes were built as new additional lanes with much less opposition.
The road diet implemented in LA got the mayor nicknamed "Gridlock Garcetti". Bottom line, proposals that involve taking away existing auto lanes are political losers. Having to drive in SoCal, I understand the feeling even though I ride bikes. Right, wrong or otherwise, IMO these road diets damage the cycling cause, making us the target of drivers' wrath.
Driving In The Lane With Diamonds by Big Daddy
Since then all carpool lanes were built as new additional lanes with much less opposition.
The road diet implemented in LA got the mayor nicknamed "Gridlock Garcetti". Bottom line, proposals that involve taking away existing auto lanes are political losers. Having to drive in SoCal, I understand the feeling even though I ride bikes. Right, wrong or otherwise, IMO these road diets damage the cycling cause, making us the target of drivers' wrath.
Likes For jimincalif:
#5
Tragically Ignorant
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
This is not new here is SoCal. Back in 1976 traffic planners re-purposed a general use lane on the Santa Monica freeway to be a carpool lane. It was a public relations disaster and lasted just 21 weeks. It even spawned a parody song "Driving in the Lane with Diamonds" sung to "Lucy in the Sky" which got quite a bit of play on the old Dr. Demento radio show.
Driving In The Lane With Diamonds by Big Daddy
Since then all carpool lanes were built as new additional lanes with much less opposition.
The road diet implemented in LA got the mayor nicknamed "Gridlock Garcetti". Bottom line, proposals that involve taking away existing auto lanes are political losers. Having to drive in SoCal, I understand the feeling even though I ride bikes. Right, wrong or otherwise, IMO these road diets damage the cycling cause, making us the target of drivers' wrath.
Driving In The Lane With Diamonds by Big Daddy
Since then all carpool lanes were built as new additional lanes with much less opposition.
The road diet implemented in LA got the mayor nicknamed "Gridlock Garcetti". Bottom line, proposals that involve taking away existing auto lanes are political losers. Having to drive in SoCal, I understand the feeling even though I ride bikes. Right, wrong or otherwise, IMO these road diets damage the cycling cause, making us the target of drivers' wrath.
#6
Senior Member
There are other ways without having to redesign the road and take away parking.
One is to keep the road as it is but introduce extremely strict traffic enforcement and penalties that will allow bicycles to drive as part of traffic.
One is to keep the road as it is but introduce extremely strict traffic enforcement and penalties that will allow bicycles to drive as part of traffic.
#7
Tragically Ignorant
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
I'm very fond of the sharrows in Boston. I do find drivers more accepting when they get "real" proof that taking the lane is not only legal, but expected.
#9
Tragically Ignorant
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
I'll ask you all what the Santa Monica Freeway diamond lane has to do with bicycles, but that would be a *gasp* strawman.
This isn't a strawman.
You want provocative? These must die.
-mr. bill
This isn't a strawman.
You want provocative? These must die.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 08-23-19 at 11:33 AM.
#12
Tragically Ignorant
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
I'll ask you all what the Santa Monica Freeway diamond lane has to do with bicycles, but that would be a *gasp* strawman.
This isn't a strawman.
You want provocative? These must die.
-mr. bill
This isn't a strawman.
You want provocative? These must die.
-mr. bill
You enjoy talking down to people which you do by taking things out of context and intentionally missing the point of what they have to say. Have fun doing it, but discussion with you on that basis is pointless, and is convincing to no one but yourself.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
I never said anything about Santa Monica Freeway other than to note how inappropriate sharrows would be.
FWIW, there is always some guy (always a guy) with a bicycle helmet (always) and hi viz (not always) who comes up to the microphone who explains why they OPPOSE this bicycle facility.
Joining him (it’s always a him) are lots of folks who want a parking space.
-mr. bill
FWIW, there is always some guy (always a guy) with a bicycle helmet (always) and hi viz (not always) who comes up to the microphone who explains why they OPPOSE this bicycle facility.
Joining him (it’s always a him) are lots of folks who want a parking space.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 08-23-19 at 07:33 PM.
#14
Senior Member
That will only result in more deaths. "vehicular cycling" is what we have had for the last 50+ years and it's proven to be highly dangerous. Look at the Netherlands which has taken the opposite approach. They are now the safest country to ride in. In many cities over 50% of daily trips are by bike. You simply will never get that in a city that treats a bicycle as a car.
#16
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
That's a really classic example of interest group politics. The problem with the road diet politically is there's huge numbers of people who've organized their lives around the status quo, and you're quite literally taking away lanes from their use, so it's entirely predictable that their opposition to such projects is going to be intense. There's definitely more drivers than cyclists in SoCal, so beating an intense majority is going to be damn near impossible.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#17
Senior Member
That will only result in more deaths. "vehicular cycling" is what we have had for the last 50+ years and it's proven to be highly dangerous. Look at the Netherlands which has taken the opposite approach. They are now the safest country to ride in. In many cities over 50% of daily trips are by bike. You simply will never get that in a city that treats a bicycle as a car.
#18
Tragically Ignorant
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Strict enforcement? Where are all these traffic cops going to come from? It's a pipe dream.
#19
Senior Member
There are already many threads where posters state that enforcement and punishment are too lenient.
And in many countries where traffic laws are strict, they don't have the same road death rates as we have in North America.
Everything's a pipedream until something actually gets done.
Who would have thunk that the city of Rob Ford, our most anti-cycling mayor, now has protected or separated bike lanes all over downtown and slowly expanding to the suburbs.
Last edited by Daniel4; 08-24-19 at 01:49 PM.
#20
Tragically Ignorant
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
So give the residences a choice: removal of parking for protected bike lanes or increase taxes for dedicated strict traffic enforcement allowing for bicycles and car to drive together.
There are already many threads where posters state that enforcement and punishment are too lenient.
And in many countries where traffic laws are strict, they don't have the same road death rates as we have in North America.
Everything's a pipedream until something actually gets done.
Who would have thunk that the city of Rob Ford, our most anti-cycling mayor, now has protected or separated bike lanes all over downtown and slowly expanding to the suburbs.
There are already many threads where posters state that enforcement and punishment are too lenient.
And in many countries where traffic laws are strict, they don't have the same road death rates as we have in North America.
Everything's a pipedream until something actually gets done.
Who would have thunk that the city of Rob Ford, our most anti-cycling mayor, now has protected or separated bike lanes all over downtown and slowly expanding to the suburbs.
I'm trying to imagine anywhere in the US where people are going to choose both paying higher taxes and having a huge number of traffic cops everywhere. Might work in a country where one of the national symbols is a cop in a red suit, but not so much here.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Time to rethink?
Jalopnik of all places, tagline “Drive free or die.”
Vision Zero Is The Wrong Goal
I never knew an op-ed could be so stupid.
“There have been 578 crashes on that stretch of road [Coney Island Avenue] in the last year, or an average of one and a half per day (elected officials have urged the Department of Transportation to expedite a safety study of that corridor).”
I’m with gearhead.
-mr. bill
Jalopnik of all places, tagline “Drive free or die.”
Vision Zero Is The Wrong Goal
I never knew an op-ed could be so stupid.
“There have been 578 crashes on that stretch of road [Coney Island Avenue] in the last year, or an average of one and a half per day (elected officials have urged the Department of Transportation to expedite a safety study of that corridor).”
I’m with gearhead.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 08-25-19 at 11:36 AM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Rethink?
Will America’s ‘Least Sustainable City’ vote to kill rail transit?
Nothing to do with bicycles.
But then again, it never is about bicycles, is it?
It’s about the lash.
-mr. bill
Will America’s ‘Least Sustainable City’ vote to kill rail transit?
Nothing to do with bicycles.
But then again, it never is about bicycles, is it?
It’s about the lash.
-mr. bill
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,501 Times
in
3,346 Posts
A number of issues...
We have a road here in Eugene that was put on a "Road Diet".
2x2 (4 lane) road converted to Bike + 1 + Center + 1 + Bike.
At first I thought that it was absolutely preposterous. How could the city possibly think that a 4-lane road could be effectively replaced by a 2-lane road?
However, the reality is that people who made left turns effectively snarled traffic, so it never was truly 4 lanes of flowing traffic. There is at least 1 major shopping center interchange along that section of road which was always a mess. By reducing it to one lane of flowing traffic + a center turn lane / merge lane (merging is legal in Oregon), it may actually make it easier to get in and out of driveways, and the overall traffic flow might be better, or at least not any worse.
The other thing about that road is that there is a semi-parallel road about 2 blocks away with bike lanes, and an off-street bike path. None of the roads go straight through that section of town. But, there would be benefits of encouraging cyclists to hop off the main roads onto side roads.
As a young bike commuter, I rode on the same roads that everyone else drove on. A bit of exploring, but I had struggled with that 4 lane road above.
As an older bike commuter, I don't ride through that section of town as frequently, but I'm also learning all the bike friendly alternatives.
One thing the communities need to do is to encourage cyclists to find the more bike friendly alternative routes.
I don't see cars hopping off the main thoroughfares to go screaming along residential routes. One of the reasons is the cars inevitably get tripped up by stop signs and left turns (which in some cases may be easier for bikes).
We have a road here in Eugene that was put on a "Road Diet".
2x2 (4 lane) road converted to Bike + 1 + Center + 1 + Bike.
At first I thought that it was absolutely preposterous. How could the city possibly think that a 4-lane road could be effectively replaced by a 2-lane road?
However, the reality is that people who made left turns effectively snarled traffic, so it never was truly 4 lanes of flowing traffic. There is at least 1 major shopping center interchange along that section of road which was always a mess. By reducing it to one lane of flowing traffic + a center turn lane / merge lane (merging is legal in Oregon), it may actually make it easier to get in and out of driveways, and the overall traffic flow might be better, or at least not any worse.
The other thing about that road is that there is a semi-parallel road about 2 blocks away with bike lanes, and an off-street bike path. None of the roads go straight through that section of town. But, there would be benefits of encouraging cyclists to hop off the main roads onto side roads.
As a young bike commuter, I rode on the same roads that everyone else drove on. A bit of exploring, but I had struggled with that 4 lane road above.
As an older bike commuter, I don't ride through that section of town as frequently, but I'm also learning all the bike friendly alternatives.
One thing the communities need to do is to encourage cyclists to find the more bike friendly alternative routes.
I don't see cars hopping off the main thoroughfares to go screaming along residential routes. One of the reasons is the cars inevitably get tripped up by stop signs and left turns (which in some cases may be easier for bikes).
Likes For CliffordK:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
At first I thought that it was absolutely preposterous. How could the city possibly think that a 4-lane road could be effectively replaced by a 2-lane road?
However, the reality is that people who made left turns effectively snarled traffic, so it never was truly 4 lanes of flowing traffic.
However, the reality is that people who made left turns effectively snarled traffic, so it never was truly 4 lanes of flowing traffic.
Isn’t this a place to re-unthink?
-mr. bill