Courtesy on the bike paths....
#151
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,072
Bikes: my precious steel boys
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 438 Post(s)
Liked 603 Times
in
359 Posts
I really wish the bike map in this city differentiated between protected bike lanes and MUPs, because I definitely prefer riding in the former. That said, you still have to pass safely in PBLs as well. Just not pedestrians (usually)
#152
Virgo
Edit: yeah, I think I agree that it would have been better had I placed the hyphen after ass, but it wasn't wrong to not have a hyphen. Again, the problem isn't with the joke construction. It was a decent joke. You're grading the joke on too harsh a scale. It wasn't that bad, and it wasn't intended to be great in the first place. Low hanging fruit. I appreciate "weak-ass curve". That made me chuckle.
Last edited by Phamilton; 08-29-19 at 10:22 AM.
#153
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Mentioning smell would have been necessary to make the joke understandable to children or people with weak English skills. Clever folks, like "marginal gains" don't need the extra cues.
Edit: yeah, I think I agree that it would have been better had I placed the hyphen after ass, but it wasn't wrong to not have a hyphen. Again, the problem isn't with the joke construction. It was a decent joke. You're grading the joke on too harsh a scale. It wasn't that bad, and it wasn't intended to be great in the first place. Low hanging fruit. I appreciate "weak-ass curve". That made me chuckle.
Edit: yeah, I think I agree that it would have been better had I placed the hyphen after ass, but it wasn't wrong to not have a hyphen. Again, the problem isn't with the joke construction. It was a decent joke. You're grading the joke on too harsh a scale. It wasn't that bad, and it wasn't intended to be great in the first place. Low hanging fruit. I appreciate "weak-ass curve". That made me chuckle.
#154
Virgo
That's not a pro tip or a secret. I'm here for my own amusement. If anybody else catches it, I'm flattered. You seem to be pretty interesting, anyway. Doesn't matter to me if nobody reads my posts. I'm not Hemingway this week. I don't even look at usernames most of the time, except for people I already know here. I remember yours now anyway. Cheers.
#155
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
That's not a pro tip or a secret. I'm here for my own amusement. If anybody else catches it, I'm flattered. You seem to be pretty interesting, anyway. Doesn't matter to me if nobody reads my posts. I'm not Hemingway this week. I don't even look at usernames most of the time, except for people I already know here. I remember yours now anyway. Cheers.
You're actually a pretty good poster when it comes to substance, the friendly put-down banter just isn't in your wheelhouse.
Likes For livedarklions:
#156
Virgo
If that's the case, just knock it off with the "you missed the joke" and "you're outclassed" kind of comments. Maybe you really don't realize you've done that to me four times now. If that's the case, you must be doing it to a lot of people, and it doesn't make you seem clever, just insecure.
You're actually a pretty good poster when it comes to substance, the friendly put-down banter just isn't in your wheelhouse.
You're actually a pretty good poster when it comes to substance, the friendly put-down banter just isn't in your wheelhouse.
#157
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#158
Member
Passing on a path
If one is riding in a bike marathon using "on your left" is well understood by all but I agree with livedarklions that adding a verb would help the less informed person.
Likes For Oldbikeride:
#159
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Madiganistan (formerly known as Illinois)
Posts: 113
Bikes: Lightning P-38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times
in
26 Posts
The more serious or dedicated riders who participate in cycling events understand, and "on your left" is fairly intuitive, but the verb conveys a complete thought, where as "on your left" could mean anything to the casual rider or pedestrian, causing the immediate thought, and confusion, of "What's on my left?"
#160
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
The more serious or dedicated riders who participate in cycling events understand, and "on your left" is fairly intuitive, but the verb conveys a complete thought, where as "on your left" could mean anything to the casual rider or pedestrian, causing the immediate thought, and confusion, of "What's on my left?"
#161
Full Member
You are assuming everyone knows their left from right or behave as such. In my neck-of-the-woods, American River Bike Trail, passing without announcing is generally safer. I tend to give notice if the person in front seem seasoned especially on a group ride (generally we just call out traffic for the safety of the group).
Likes For kcjc:
#162
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 759
Bikes: 1969 Peugeot PX10, 1992 Della Santa, Linus Roadster 8, Biria 700C ST-8
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 794 Post(s)
Liked 508 Times
in
322 Posts
I’ve heard “passing on your left”. And that makes perfect sense, at least to me.
Likes For Joe Bikerider:
#163
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Madiganistan (formerly known as Illinois)
Posts: 113
Bikes: Lightning P-38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times
in
26 Posts
You are assuming everyone knows their left from right or behave as such. In my neck-of-the-woods, American River Bike Trail, passing without announcing is generally safer. I tend to give notice if the person in front seem seasoned especially on a group ride (generally we just call out traffic for the safety of the group).
Don't assume that anyone has normal hearing, especially in an urban or suburban environment. Even if they do, the ambient noise levels are significant, especially anywhere there is even moderate traffic. The trail I ride the most parallels a moderately busy two land road. Even when walking next to each other, two people walking have to raise their voices to be heard and understood. Consider also how much noise wind makes. On a calm day, at anything around 10 mph and up, the wind noise in your ears, and their ears, can drown out a normal or even elevated voice.
Another assumption one should never make is that if you can see their mirror(s) they have seen you.
Lots of cyclists seem to think that waiting until you are on top of someone to say anything is acceptable. It is not. The reason is the surprise factor and the startled jerk reaction—that's why you believe it's safer not to announce. However, the real problem is not giving them enough advance notice. At 15 mph, you are closing with them at 22 fps if they are stationary. That means you should announce your pass an absolute minimum of 44 feet away, though I think 66 would be better. If they are walking, your closure rate is then about 17.6 fps., meaning your announcement should be not less than 35 feet away. "Just do the math."
In a peloton or any group, a slightly elevated voice as your front wheel is about to begin the actual pass is fine. This is the only time not announcing your pass might be okay. Your closure rate is no more than a few feet per seconcd, and they are unlikely to be startled. I would announce anyway: not because I'm polite, but because it costs me nothing and may spare both parties a lot of pain and frustration—two things with which I am all too familiar.
#164
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Madiganistan (formerly known as Illinois)
Posts: 113
Bikes: Lightning P-38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times
in
26 Posts
For some reason, I think some people are interpreting "on your left" to be "go to your left" instead of "don't go left". My sense is that occurs because it isn't clear whether it's supposed to be an instruction to them or a statement of the passer's position, so they hear it as "go on your left".
#165
Full Member
At 15 mph, you are closing with them at 22 fps if they are stationary. That means you should announce your pass an absolute minimum of 44 feet away, though I think 66 would be better. If they are walking, your closure rate is then about 17.6 fps., meaning your announcement should be not less than 35 feet away. "Just do the math."
#166
Member
People with even slight ambidexterity tend to have varying degrees of trouble differentiating right from left. Not all of them get trained out of it as children. I can never agree that passing without an announcement is safer. If you announce your intent at a sufficient distance that their reaction, right or wrong, will not trouble you. A barely audible gasp of "passing on your left" when ten feet away, at 15 to 20 mph, is dangerous at all times to anyone not moving at close to your speed, and therefore dangerous to you. Even if you have the wind to raise your voice or shout, other factors apply.
Don't assume that anyone has normal hearing, especially in an urban or suburban environment. Even if they do, the ambient noise levels are significant, especially anywhere there is even moderate traffic. The trail I ride the most parallels a moderately busy two land road. Even when walking next to each other, two people walking have to raise their voices to be heard and understood. Consider also how much noise wind makes. On a calm day, at anything around 10 mph and up, the wind noise in your ears, and their ears, can drown out a normal or even elevated voice.
Another assumption one should never make is that if you can see their mirror(s) they have seen you.
Lots of cyclists seem to think that waiting until you are on top of someone to say anything is acceptable. It is not. The reason is the surprise factor and the startled jerk reaction—that's why you believe it's safer not to announce. However, the real problem is not giving them enough advance notice. At 15 mph, you are closing with them at 22 fps if they are stationary. That means you should announce your pass an absolute minimum of 44 feet away, though I think 66 would be better. If they are walking, your closure rate is then about 17.6 fps., meaning your announcement should be not less than 35 feet away. "Just do the math."
In a peloton or any group, a slightly elevated voice as your front wheel is about to begin the actual pass is fine. This is the only time not announcing your pass might be okay. Your closure rate is no more than a few feet per seconcd, and they are unlikely to be startled. I would announce anyway: not because I'm polite, but because it costs me nothing and may spare both parties a lot of pain and frustration—two things with which I am all too familiar.
Don't assume that anyone has normal hearing, especially in an urban or suburban environment. Even if they do, the ambient noise levels are significant, especially anywhere there is even moderate traffic. The trail I ride the most parallels a moderately busy two land road. Even when walking next to each other, two people walking have to raise their voices to be heard and understood. Consider also how much noise wind makes. On a calm day, at anything around 10 mph and up, the wind noise in your ears, and their ears, can drown out a normal or even elevated voice.
Another assumption one should never make is that if you can see their mirror(s) they have seen you.
Lots of cyclists seem to think that waiting until you are on top of someone to say anything is acceptable. It is not. The reason is the surprise factor and the startled jerk reaction—that's why you believe it's safer not to announce. However, the real problem is not giving them enough advance notice. At 15 mph, you are closing with them at 22 fps if they are stationary. That means you should announce your pass an absolute minimum of 44 feet away, though I think 66 would be better. If they are walking, your closure rate is then about 17.6 fps., meaning your announcement should be not less than 35 feet away. "Just do the math."
In a peloton or any group, a slightly elevated voice as your front wheel is about to begin the actual pass is fine. This is the only time not announcing your pass might be okay. Your closure rate is no more than a few feet per seconcd, and they are unlikely to be startled. I would announce anyway: not because I'm polite, but because it costs me nothing and may spare both parties a lot of pain and frustration—two things with which I am all too familiar.
#168
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Madiganistan (formerly known as Illinois)
Posts: 113
Bikes: Lightning P-38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times
in
26 Posts
Please try to remember that even on a dedicated bike path, riding isn't a right, it's a responsibility. You are moving faster than they, it is therefore your responsibility to warn them of your approach. If you can't deal with responsibility for your own actions, don't ride.
#169
Let's Ride!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Triad, NC USA
Posts: 2,569
Bikes: --2010 Jamis 650b1-- 2016 Cervelo R2-- 2018 Salsa Journeyman 650B
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times
in
24 Posts
i usually ring my bell twice and as i get closer say "coming up behind you" I have found that to be less confusing and I scare less people unless they have their headphones in. Then all bets are off. I am usually prepared to ride in the grass off the side of the trail around people.
#170
Full Member
Kettle black
A fan favorite
You should step up and take full responsibility of everyone's actions. What BS. If you can't hold your wheel, don't ride.
if it's that crowded, you shouldn't be riding fast enough for it to matter. There is also this, for the weak or tired of lung: https://amazon.com/gp/product/B000AC...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Please try to remember that even on a dedicated bike path, riding isn't a right, it's a responsibility. You are moving faster than they, it is therefore your responsibility to warn them of your approach. If you can't deal with responsibility for your own actions, don't ride.
#172
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Madiganistan (formerly known as Illinois)
Posts: 113
Bikes: Lightning P-38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times
in
26 Posts
i usually ring my bell twice and as i get closer say "coming up behind you" I have found that to be less confusing and I scare less people unless they have their headphones in. Then all bets are off. I am usually prepared to ride in the grass off the side of the trail around people.
#174
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
Late to the party, but the OP demonstrates in his opening post why not announcing is appropriate when he says:
"...like if I turned my head at the moment of their passing, I might get hit by a shoulder".
There is no way for ones head to stick out past ones shoulder (let alone mtn bike bars) without veering, so if you announce and he looks,
it's a problem.
"...like if I turned my head at the moment of their passing, I might get hit by a shoulder".
There is no way for ones head to stick out past ones shoulder (let alone mtn bike bars) without veering, so if you announce and he looks,
it's a problem.
#175
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Madiganistan (formerly known as Illinois)
Posts: 113
Bikes: Lightning P-38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times
in
26 Posts
Late to the party, but the OP demonstrates in his opening post why not announcing is appropriate when he says:
"...like if I turned my head at the moment of their passing, I might get hit by a shoulder".
There is no way for ones head to stick out past ones shoulder (let alone mtn bike bars) without veering, so if you announce and he looks,
it's a problem.
"...like if I turned my head at the moment of their passing, I might get hit by a shoulder".
There is no way for ones head to stick out past ones shoulder (let alone mtn bike bars) without veering, so if you announce and he looks,
it's a problem.