Most overthought bikefitting measurements?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Most overthought bikefitting measurements?
Interested in people's thoughts.
For me it is standover (important if you spend lots of time standing over your top tube, but not for much else) and saddle width (for me saddle comfort is much more important than width).
People seem to focus on these 2 aspects of fit at the expense of getting saddle height, saddle fore and aft, and bar height correct, and I see lots of people on bikes that are way too small for them (and with long seatposts and raised bars as a result) on the basis that they need more standover than a bigger bike can provide.
I know on my horizontal top tube bike I have very little standover, but my sloping top tube bikes I have a little more.
My SMP Composit saddles are both quite narrow, but they are comfortable.
For me it is standover (important if you spend lots of time standing over your top tube, but not for much else) and saddle width (for me saddle comfort is much more important than width).
People seem to focus on these 2 aspects of fit at the expense of getting saddle height, saddle fore and aft, and bar height correct, and I see lots of people on bikes that are way too small for them (and with long seatposts and raised bars as a result) on the basis that they need more standover than a bigger bike can provide.
I know on my horizontal top tube bike I have very little standover, but my sloping top tube bikes I have a little more.
My SMP Composit saddles are both quite narrow, but they are comfortable.
Likes For sumgy:
#2
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,618
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3919 Post(s)
Liked 1,982 Times
in
1,414 Posts
I'd say that saddle comfort can't be overthought. It's probably the most asked question: "How can I keep my butt (balls, dick, scrotum), upper thighs, seat bones, etc., etc., from hurting or getting sore or going numb or falling off, or whatever." Saddle width is frequently a component of their issue. Unable to sit on the saddle for very long is a show stopper. Everything else can be put up with as long as it isn't dangerous.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
I'd say that saddle comfort can't be overthought. It's probably the most asked question: "How can I keep my butt (balls, dick, scrotum), upper thighs, seat bones, etc., etc., from hurting or getting sore or going numb or falling off, or whatever." Saddle width is frequently a component of their issue. Unable to sit on the saddle for very long is a show stopper. Everything else can be put up with as long as it isn't dangerous.
But I am unsure that saddle width is the reason for discomfort any more than saddle tilt/setup is.
People seem to be jumping at saddle width being the problem currently.
Saddle design is also another reason for saddle discomfort.
I cannot sit for more than a few minutes on Fizik saddles for example.
#4
Lifelong wheel gazer ...
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lower US 48
Posts: 346
Bikes: All garage sale finds...
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
26 Posts
Saddle comfort is my non-negotiable. After that, my tolerance for nuances of geometry, stem length, stand over, and other factors are all flexible.
__________________
Current bikes: Unknown year Specialized (rigid F & R) Hardrock, '80's era Cannondale police bike; '03 Schwinn mongrel MTB; '03 Specialized Hard Rock (the wife's)
Gone away: '97 Diamondback Topanga SE, '97 Giant ATX 840 project bike; '01 Giant TCR1 SL; and a truckload of miscellaneous bikes used up by the kids and grand-kids
Status quo is the mental bastion of the intellectually lethargic...
Current bikes: Unknown year Specialized (rigid F & R) Hardrock, '80's era Cannondale police bike; '03 Schwinn mongrel MTB; '03 Specialized Hard Rock (the wife's)
Gone away: '97 Diamondback Topanga SE, '97 Giant ATX 840 project bike; '01 Giant TCR1 SL; and a truckload of miscellaneous bikes used up by the kids and grand-kids
Status quo is the mental bastion of the intellectually lethargic...
Likes For BookFinder:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
Seems like you like a large frame for your physical size and a relaxed riding position. I am the opposite of you, I see a lot of people riding a too large frame with their seat slammed and the bars/stem jacked up too high. I like a smaller frame and an aggressive or at least a semi-aggressive position on the bicycle.
I like a good bit of saddle to bar drop, goodly amount of seat post extension and a tight frame. My most important consideration is top tube C/C. Standover is important, I like to see at least some. With the cycling shoes on, there should be ideally approximately 1.5 inches between ground and hard contact.
Frame size labeling is obsessed over, it does not matter what the stated frame size is, measure the dang (effective) top tube.
I like a good bit of saddle to bar drop, goodly amount of seat post extension and a tight frame. My most important consideration is top tube C/C. Standover is important, I like to see at least some. With the cycling shoes on, there should be ideally approximately 1.5 inches between ground and hard contact.
Frame size labeling is obsessed over, it does not matter what the stated frame size is, measure the dang (effective) top tube.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,174
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1087 Post(s)
Liked 1,349 Times
in
777 Posts
Agree that saddle comfort is VERY important.
But I am unsure that saddle width is the reason for discomfort any more than saddle tilt/setup is.
People seem to be jumping at saddle width being the problem currently.
Saddle design is also another reason for saddle discomfort.
I cannot sit for more than a few minutes on Fizik saddles for example.
But I am unsure that saddle width is the reason for discomfort any more than saddle tilt/setup is.
People seem to be jumping at saddle width being the problem currently.
Saddle design is also another reason for saddle discomfort.
I cannot sit for more than a few minutes on Fizik saddles for example.
Likes For phughes:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Seems like you like a large frame for your physical size and a relaxed riding position. I am the opposite of you, I see a lot of people riding a too large frame with their seat slammed and the bars/stem jacked up too high. I like a smaller frame and an aggressive or at least a semi-aggressive position on the bicycle.
I like a good bit of saddle to bar drop, goodly amount of seat post extension and a tight frame. My most important consideration is top tube C/C. Standover is important, I like to see at least some. With the cycling shoes on, there should be ideally approximately 1.5 inches between ground and hard contact.
Frame size labeling is obsessed over, it does not matter what the stated frame size is, measure the dang (effective) top tube.
I like a good bit of saddle to bar drop, goodly amount of seat post extension and a tight frame. My most important consideration is top tube C/C. Standover is important, I like to see at least some. With the cycling shoes on, there should be ideally approximately 1.5 inches between ground and hard contact.
Frame size labeling is obsessed over, it does not matter what the stated frame size is, measure the dang (effective) top tube.
I am 6'2", and both of those are 58cm frames with 120mm stems and traditional drop bars.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
Early in my cycling career, maybe 9 years ago, I had great difficulty finding saddle comfort. It was so bad I contemplated giving up the bike. At that time I remembered that as a boy, a few farmers in my rural town were still working their fields with horse drawn equipment. That type of machinery had an iron seat that was wider than the farmer so that weight was distributed over a wide area and a farmer could work all day, day after day on such a seat. So I theorized that a bike saddle most likely should be as wide as possible. This approach has worked for me with a modification for my personal geometry. Whether a wider saddle would also work for you no one can say in advance but be prepared to experiment.
Occasionally we see old farm implements as decoration on lawns. If you see such a machine on your rides, stop and see if the home owner would sell the iron seat, cheap.
Occasionally we see old farm implements as decoration on lawns. If you see such a machine on your rides, stop and see if the home owner would sell the iron seat, cheap.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
Early in my cycling career, maybe 9 years ago, I had great difficulty finding saddle comfort. It was so bad I contemplated giving up the bike. At that time I remembered that as a boy, a few farmers in my rural town were still working their fields with horse drawn equipment. That type of machinery had an iron seat that was wider than the farmer so that weight was distributed over a wide area and a farmer could work all day, day after day on such a seat. So I theorized that a bike saddle most likely should be as wide as possible. This approach has worked for me with a modification for my personal geometry. Whether a wider saddle would also work for you no one can say in advance but be prepared to experiment.
Occasionally we see old farm implements as decoration on lawns. If you see such a machine on your rides, stop and see if the home owner would sell the iron seat, cheap.
Occasionally we see old farm implements as decoration on lawns. If you see such a machine on your rides, stop and see if the home owner would sell the iron seat, cheap.
Farmers do not pedal their tractors, modeling your bicycle seat after a farm implement might not work so well.
Likes For Loose Chain:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
And, particularly with the new sloped tube TT bikes, standover has become irrelevant. And it was never big with me, though on a MTB (and a cycle cross bike) you better have plenty of room, on a road bike as long as you do not have to tilt the bike to the side to get SO, you are good, if the bike fits and works otherwise, so I am agreeing with you really.
Last edited by Loose Chain; 09-01-19 at 02:58 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
I think your bike looks well set up and I am not really disagreeing with you, I think we have come to similar results from points of reference 180 degrees apart. Unless you go putting a tractor seat on that beauty!
And, particularly with the new sloped tube TT bikes, standover has become irrelevant. And it was never big with me, though on a MTB (and a cycle cross bike) you better have plenty of room, on a road bike as long as you do not have to tilt the bike to the side to get SO, you are good, if the bike fits and works otherwise, so I am agreeing with you really.
And, particularly with the new sloped tube TT bikes, standover has become irrelevant. And it was never big with me, though on a MTB (and a cycle cross bike) you better have plenty of room, on a road bike as long as you do not have to tilt the bike to the side to get SO, you are good, if the bike fits and works otherwise, so I am agreeing with you really.
In 20 odd years of MTBing, I have NEVER managed to crash or emergency stop where I landed with both feet on the ground on perfectly flat ground on my MTB's.
Not saying to get a MTB with no standover at all, but it is not a measurement I even look at (MTB or road).
But I see so many people who think it is vitally important, including a post I was just reading where the poster said it was the most important measurement for them as they could easily adjust their saddle height, tilt, fore-aft, stem length etc.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Usually I can tell by the fact that their hips are rocking, or they are reaching with one leg or the other (or both).
I am in the low saddle height camp, with a 76cm saddle to BB drop and cycling inseam of 35".
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
I don't even believe it makes that much sense on a MTB.
In 20 odd years of MTBing, I have NEVER managed to crash or emergency stop where I landed with both feet on the ground on perfectly flat ground on my MTB's.
Not saying to get a MTB with no standover at all, but it is not a measurement I even look at (MTB or road).
But I see so many people who think it is vitally important, including a post I was just reading where the poster said it was the most important measurement for them as they could easily adjust their saddle height, tilt, fore-aft, stem length etc.
In 20 odd years of MTBing, I have NEVER managed to crash or emergency stop where I landed with both feet on the ground on perfectly flat ground on my MTB's.
Not saying to get a MTB with no standover at all, but it is not a measurement I even look at (MTB or road).
But I see so many people who think it is vitally important, including a post I was just reading where the poster said it was the most important measurement for them as they could easily adjust their saddle height, tilt, fore-aft, stem length etc.
Funny thing, I just bought a new Bianchi Pista SS/Fixie and the owners manual boldly and specifically states that if you do not have standover do not even attempt to ride the bicycle, so Bianchi (the world's oldest existing bicycle company, 134 years) must consider it important or their lawyers do, one or other. Good thing, I have about 1.5 inches and the TT is my (for me) magic 56cm. My Surly Cross Check 54cm, 56cm TT, has a ton of standover considering it's cycle cross DNA and my new Pista not so much. These two bikes, the Surly 10 years ago and my new Pista a few weeks ago are the only two new bicycles I have bought since 1996. But I have rescued quite a few over those years.
Likes For Loose Chain:
Likes For Tulok:
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
And it is completely useless for transferring from some MTB's to another regardless of whether they are flat bar or not.
#16
Full Member
Good point on the mtb!
#17
Recreational Commuter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,024
Bikes: One brand-less build-up, and a Connondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra Disc. A nicer bike than I need, but it was a good deal, so... ;-)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Saddle width is a part of saddle comfort, so I don't see the point in distinguishing between them. If the saddle is either too wide or too narrow, it won't be comfortable. Standover matters because you have to stop sometime. Basically, it shouldn't be a negative number.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Well I kind of agree, but I buy bikes to ride, not to stand over. I see so many comments here where huge amounts of standover seems to be prioritised over fit, leading to people on bikes that are very obviously too small.
Likes For sumgy:
#19
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,809
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 585 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 575 Times
in
340 Posts
Standover is a quick and dirty measurement that gets a rider to approximately the right size bike frame. If you can't stand over the top tube, the bike is definitely too big for you. If you can just barely stand over it, the bike is probably still too big. Once you get into the neighborhood of the right frame size, you still want to play with saddle height, bar height, crank arm length, whatever, to get the riding position right. That's where the important fitting is done.
I've discussed sit bone width elsewhere. It's not completely irrelevant; but it depends a great deal on the rider's position on the bike, especially the angle of the pelvis relative to the saddle. Until you determine that angle, talk of saddle width is just noise.
I've discussed sit bone width elsewhere. It's not completely irrelevant; but it depends a great deal on the rider's position on the bike, especially the angle of the pelvis relative to the saddle. Until you determine that angle, talk of saddle width is just noise.
Likes For rhm:
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Standover is a quick and dirty measurement that gets a rider to approximately the right size bike frame. If you can't stand over the top tube, the bike is definitely too big for you. If you can just barely stand over it, the bike is probably still too big. Once you get into the neighborhood of the right frame size, you still want to play with saddle height, bar height, crank arm length, whatever, to get the riding position right. That's where the important fitting is done.
I've discussed sit bone width elsewhere. It's not completely irrelevant; but it depends a great deal on the rider's position on the bike, especially the angle of the pelvis relative to the saddle. Until you determine that angle, talk of saddle width is just noise.
I've discussed sit bone width elsewhere. It's not completely irrelevant; but it depends a great deal on the rider's position on the bike, especially the angle of the pelvis relative to the saddle. Until you determine that angle, talk of saddle width is just noise.
#21
Senior Member
For me it is standover (important if you spend lots of time standing over your top tube, but not for much else)....
and saddle width (for me saddle comfort is much more important than width).
People seem to focus on these 2 aspects of fit at the expense of getting saddle height, saddle fore and aft, and bar height correct....
...I see lots of people on bikes that are way too small for them (and with long seatposts and raised bars as a result) on the basis that they need more standover than a bigger bike can provide.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
I have never managed to crash any bike and land with both feet flat on the ground. I just don't have this level of control while crashing.
It could be both, but many of the poorly fitted (too small) bikes I have seen are not race bikes.
#23
Senior Member
Do you not ever stop in an emergency? That's when I appreciate an inch of space between me and the TT.
One of the prevailing thoughts about purchasing a bike is to pick the smaller, if you're between sizes. Ads show off race bikes. Conventional wisdom is that lighter is better in bikes. I think marketing has more than a bit of influence on how bikes are set up.
And that's without considering the fact that one usually doesn't see enough with one's own eyes to support much in the way of generalizations.
...many of the poorly fitted (too small) bikes I have seen are not race bikes.
And that's without considering the fact that one usually doesn't see enough with one's own eyes to support much in the way of generalizations.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
One of the prevailing thoughts about purchasing a bike is to pick the smaller, if you're between sizes. Ads show off race bikes. Conventional wisdom is that lighter is better in bikes. I think marketing has more than a bit of influence on how bikes are set up.
And that's without considering the fact that one usually doesn't see enough with one's own eyes to support much in the way of generalizations.
And that's without considering the fact that one usually doesn't see enough with one's own eyes to support much in the way of generalizations.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I'm with you, as long as I can stand up over it I care zip about any specific clearance.
But to take it more literally, I think people take the most unnecessary time and trouble on their saddle height.
But to take it more literally, I think people take the most unnecessary time and trouble on their saddle height.
Likes For wphamilton: