Bicycle rim questions
#1
The dropped
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
Bicycle rim questions
I 'need' to build a wheelset for a FG/SS conversion sometime in the near future. The bicycle's intended use is pavement and light gravel, with occasional light commuting. You know, for fun.
That means I'm shopping around for 27" (bicycle's spec'ed wheel size) or 700c rims. The hubs and spokes would be the same regardless of rim used with 32 or 36 spokes. The end goal is to build an adequately-strong wheelset as light and as cheaply as possible.
I know that double wall is stronger than single wall, and that 'aero' and triangular cross section rims are stronger than box section rims. I also noticed that the high profile rims are slightly heavier than a traditional profile rims (because more material).
Is strength a criteria I should prioritize for my intended use, over weight? Is there a compelling reason beyond the known strength differences and aesthetics that many prebuilt FG/SS wheelsets use "aero" profile rims? Would you consider single-wall rims for any benefits beyond lower cost?
That means I'm shopping around for 27" (bicycle's spec'ed wheel size) or 700c rims. The hubs and spokes would be the same regardless of rim used with 32 or 36 spokes. The end goal is to build an adequately-strong wheelset as light and as cheaply as possible.
I know that double wall is stronger than single wall, and that 'aero' and triangular cross section rims are stronger than box section rims. I also noticed that the high profile rims are slightly heavier than a traditional profile rims (because more material).
Is strength a criteria I should prioritize for my intended use, over weight? Is there a compelling reason beyond the known strength differences and aesthetics that many prebuilt FG/SS wheelsets use "aero" profile rims? Would you consider single-wall rims for any benefits beyond lower cost?
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I think looks are the main reason why so many people want deep aero wheels on their SS/FG bikes. They’re imitating developments in the track world from the 1990s.
I’ve used single-wall rims on my FG since I first built it up. They’ve held up fine. I persist with them because they offer a lot of internal width at a low weight (and price.)
I’ve used single-wall rims on my FG since I first built it up. They’ve held up fine. I persist with them because they offer a lot of internal width at a low weight (and price.)
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Are you deadset to build them yourself? You could get a prebuilt set like this: https://www.velomine.com/index.php?m...r86qar96o1p712
My kid races SSCX on these. True out of the box and have remained so all season.
My kid races SSCX on these. True out of the box and have remained so all season.
Likes For caloso:
#4
The dropped
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
Are you deadset to build them yourself? You could get a prebuilt set like this: https://www.velomine.com/index.php?m...r86qar96o1p712
My kid races SSCX on these. True out of the box and have remained so all season.
My kid races SSCX on these. True out of the box and have remained so all season.
There are also plenty of wheels (TOO MANY WHEELS) at the co-op that I can recycle too. I'm only committed to rebuilding a rear wheel that way. Many of them came from low end bikes and are thus single wall, though there are enough double wall rims in the mix. The co-op does not have many deep section rims though, of any sort. Building could let me use a better than OEM rim though.
Likes For Unca_Sam:
#5
The dropped
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
I think looks are the main reason why so many people want deep aero wheels on their SS/FG bikes. They’re imitating developments in the track world from the 1990s.
I’ve used single-wall rims on my FG since I first built it up. They’ve held up fine. I persist with them because they offer a lot of internal width at a low weight (and price.)
I’ve used single-wall rims on my FG since I first built it up. They’ve held up fine. I persist with them because they offer a lot of internal width at a low weight (and price.)
I have a bike I use for heavier commuting and loaded tours/kid trailer duty that could use a more robust rim, and I'm mostly resigned to spending more money there for 36 spokes and triangular cross-sections for the additional strength.
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Some single-wall rims are flimsy, but not all are. The Weinmann concave rim on the back of my FG is pretty bulletproof. I don’t know if I could break it, even if I wanted to!
#7
The dropped
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
#8
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Yep! Now just imagine it about 27mm wide and in 26" wheel form: https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...107&AbsPos=314