Am I at elite level? Break down my data/ power data
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Am I at elite level? Break down my data/ power data
Sup everyone. I completed a century ride the other day. I've been going over my data and I wanted some data junkies to breakdown my numbers and tell me what they think. Tear it apart if you will, I'm looking for honest feedback if I should be pacing better, taking it easier on my climbs etc. A little bit about the route... It was mainly climbing and rolling hills. Looking forward to building a conversation around this. Let me know if you need more info.
#2
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,634
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Liked 9,565 Times
in
4,422 Posts
#3
So it is
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 21,860
Bikes: Luzerne, 684, Boreas, Wheelhouse, Alize©®, Bayamo, Cayo
Liked 5,269 Times
in
3,006 Posts
Not close to elite, but a good ride, nonetheless. TSS 800+? You need to do an FTP test, set your zones properly, and then the data will let you know how you did.
Likes For LAJ:
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#6
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Liked 3,685 Times
in
2,028 Posts
Yeah, not elite but not bad. FWIW, your power peak is above anything I've ever done. That's not really part of y training though.
Note how your power declined throughout the event; you have more total speed available if you pace/ hydrate/ fuel better.
And actually that TSS is not just crazy high but impossible - you can't accumulate more than 100 TSS in an hour, by definition (and if you do 100 in an hour, you should be borderline collapsing at the end, not finishing a century). Based on your calculated IF, it seems to think your FTP is 200, which is a common default but inaccurate in your case. Yours is likely not far under 300, if I read correctly that you did 228 for 1:15 during a century.
Note how your power declined throughout the event; you have more total speed available if you pace/ hydrate/ fuel better.
And actually that TSS is not just crazy high but impossible - you can't accumulate more than 100 TSS in an hour, by definition (and if you do 100 in an hour, you should be borderline collapsing at the end, not finishing a century). Based on your calculated IF, it seems to think your FTP is 200, which is a common default but inaccurate in your case. Yours is likely not far under 300, if I read correctly that you did 228 for 1:15 during a century.
#7
longtime noob
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 140
Bikes: 2018 Trek Domane SL 6 // 1999 Trek 5000 // Burley Encore X
Liked 63 Times
in
28 Posts
Looks like you were at about 1.9 watts per kilogram for that ride. I believe most Cat 1/2 riders (is that the right barometer for "elite"?) can put out about 4+ w/kg for sustained periods of time. While a leisurely century is not the best benchmark, I'd guess that you have a ways to go before being "elite".
Out of curiosity, what kind of power meter were you using?
Out of curiosity, what kind of power meter were you using?
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Looks like you were at about 1.9 watts per kilogram for that ride. I believe most Cat 1/2 riders (is that the right barometer for "elite"?) can put out about 4+ w/kg for sustained periods of time. While a leisurely century is not the best benchmark, I'd guess that you have a ways to go before being "elite".
Out of curiosity, what kind of power meter were you using?
Out of curiosity, what kind of power meter were you using?
#9
Senior Member
If you aren't used to pushing along for something like that distance you will fade regardless of pace, hydration, or fuel. Unless you make the pace very slow.
Likes For Dean V:
#10
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Liked 3,685 Times
in
2,028 Posts
True. However, anyone not trained for that distance will likely also need improvement on one or all of those other three factors.
Likes For znomit:
#12
Senior Member
My FTP last time I checked was 289 and I'd be able to comfortably do 170 Watts for 6.5 hours of riding. My back would give out, but my legs would be fine
So... do an FTP test and I wouldn't be surprised if you were around 280. I'm 5'10" and about 195 (and 46). Compared to the people on this forum it's just okay, but many casual cyclists will be in awe.
I'm in the Navy and we can do a 12 minute cycling test on an exercise bike for the cardio portion of our fitness test and I'm the best at our command of the 600 people who ride the bike.
So... do an FTP test and I wouldn't be surprised if you were around 280. I'm 5'10" and about 195 (and 46). Compared to the people on this forum it's just okay, but many casual cyclists will be in awe.
I'm in the Navy and we can do a 12 minute cycling test on an exercise bike for the cardio portion of our fitness test and I'm the best at our command of the 600 people who ride the bike.
#13
Banned
Max cadence 247 rpm. That is some serious spinning
Likes For shelbyfv:
#14
How do you define "elite" ?
At 200 lbs for 6.1, your FTP would need to be over 3.5-4W/kg to make you an elite cyclist which puts you at an FTP of 360W. And let me tell you from my personal experience. Going from 150W to 250W is a lot easier than going from 250 to 350W of FTP at the same weight.
Much easier to lose 30-40 lbs to reduce "tonnage" as they say. At 72kg, FTP of 280W would put you at a highly competitive level.
Regardless, great ride, I hope you enjoyed it. Remember to hydrate and fuel at least every 30 minutes. Calories in, calories out.
At 200 lbs for 6.1, your FTP would need to be over 3.5-4W/kg to make you an elite cyclist which puts you at an FTP of 360W. And let me tell you from my personal experience. Going from 150W to 250W is a lot easier than going from 250 to 350W of FTP at the same weight.
Much easier to lose 30-40 lbs to reduce "tonnage" as they say. At 72kg, FTP of 280W would put you at a highly competitive level.
Regardless, great ride, I hope you enjoyed it. Remember to hydrate and fuel at least every 30 minutes. Calories in, calories out.
Likes For fstshrk:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
I gotta say. There are lot of weird things about this thread.
a) what does “elite” mean? The only definition I know is to become a pro or category 1 cyclist according USAC. Maybe category 2 if we’re being generous. Your power data is irrelevant. Just look at your license.
b) OK, maybe you’re asking if your power data indicates that you’re riding at similar level to elite riders. I gotta ask... why? If we said yes, would you go around telling people you’re an elite rider? Would you stop training as hard because you made it as an elite rider? Did your SO say you cannot buy a new bike until you’re elite? If it’s the latter, I will mail you a hand signed certificate stating that you are henceforth to be known as an elite rider.
c) looking at the wahoo data from one ride is not even close to enough for anyone to judge you as a rider. How would anyone tell you how to pace your climbs better from this? A segment analysis from strava would be better. A few power tests, as some have mentioned, would be even better.
d) Please do not take the following as bashing or whatever... I’m just answering your question. I have a friend who races cat 1, weighs 135lbs, has a 1250W sprint and a 260W+ FTP. Doesn’t sound like much but he did 160W+ for 11+ hours the other day. He has a very long and flat power curve relative to most cat 1s. At 200lbs, you’d have to blast some chain-breaking watts to keep up with a cat 1 field, especially if there are hills or accelerations... which there usually are.
I’m very curious about your motivation for this post. If you want training tips, we’re happy to help. But this post just confuses me.
a) what does “elite” mean? The only definition I know is to become a pro or category 1 cyclist according USAC. Maybe category 2 if we’re being generous. Your power data is irrelevant. Just look at your license.
b) OK, maybe you’re asking if your power data indicates that you’re riding at similar level to elite riders. I gotta ask... why? If we said yes, would you go around telling people you’re an elite rider? Would you stop training as hard because you made it as an elite rider? Did your SO say you cannot buy a new bike until you’re elite? If it’s the latter, I will mail you a hand signed certificate stating that you are henceforth to be known as an elite rider.
c) looking at the wahoo data from one ride is not even close to enough for anyone to judge you as a rider. How would anyone tell you how to pace your climbs better from this? A segment analysis from strava would be better. A few power tests, as some have mentioned, would be even better.
d) Please do not take the following as bashing or whatever... I’m just answering your question. I have a friend who races cat 1, weighs 135lbs, has a 1250W sprint and a 260W+ FTP. Doesn’t sound like much but he did 160W+ for 11+ hours the other day. He has a very long and flat power curve relative to most cat 1s. At 200lbs, you’d have to blast some chain-breaking watts to keep up with a cat 1 field, especially if there are hills or accelerations... which there usually are.
I’m very curious about your motivation for this post. If you want training tips, we’re happy to help. But this post just confuses me.
Last edited by smashndash; 05-23-20 at 09:44 PM.
Likes For smashndash:
#17
Senior Member
What would those numbers need to be for the OP to be an elite level track cyclist? Just curious.
#18
Non omnino gravis
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
For a 180-200lb pure sprinter, something over 2000W for 1 second would definitely be elite. 1 minute, probably closer to 1000W. Justin williams isn’t even a track cyclist (though I think he used to be) and can probably get close. But he’s effectively a pro.
I’m sure OP could do more than what is indicated in the data. A hilly century isn’t conducive to setting power records.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,521
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Liked 9,462 Times
in
4,673 Posts
Yeah, a bit of this.
He seems like an enthusiastic guy that's asking because he doesn't know what he doesn't know.
He seems like an enthusiastic guy that's asking because he doesn't know what he doesn't know.
Likes For WhyFi:
#22
VFL For Life
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 52,249
Bikes: Velo Volmobile
Liked 2,064 Times
in
1,444 Posts
Likes For Velo Vol:
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#24
Banned
Likes For shelbyfv:
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I gotta say. There are lot of weird things about this thread.
a) what does “elite” mean? The only definition I know is to become a pro or category 1 cyclist according USAC. Maybe category 2 if we’re being generous. Your power data is irrelevant. Just look at your license.
b) OK, maybe you’re asking if your power data indicates that you’re riding at similar level to elite riders. I gotta ask... why? If we said yes, would you go around telling people you’re an elite rider? Would you stop training as hard because you made it as an elite rider? Did your SO say you cannot buy a new bike until you’re elite? If it’s the latter, I will mail you a hand signed certificate stating that you are henceforth to be known as an elite rider.
c) looking at the wahoo data from one ride is not even close to enough for anyone to judge you as a rider. How would anyone tell you how to pace your climbs better from this? A segment analysis from strava would be better. A few power tests, as some have mentioned, would be even better.
d) Please do not take the following as bashing or whatever... I’m just answering your question. I have a friend who races cat 1, weighs 135lbs, has a 1250W sprint and a 260W+ FTP. Doesn’t sound like much but he did 160W+ for 11+ hours the other day. He has a very long and flat power curve relative to most cat 1s. At 200lbs, you’d have to blast some chain-breaking watts to keep up with a cat 1 field, especially if there are hills or accelerations... which there usually are.
I’m very curious about your motivation for this post. If you want training tips, we’re happy to help. But this post just confuses me.
a) what does “elite” mean? The only definition I know is to become a pro or category 1 cyclist according USAC. Maybe category 2 if we’re being generous. Your power data is irrelevant. Just look at your license.
b) OK, maybe you’re asking if your power data indicates that you’re riding at similar level to elite riders. I gotta ask... why? If we said yes, would you go around telling people you’re an elite rider? Would you stop training as hard because you made it as an elite rider? Did your SO say you cannot buy a new bike until you’re elite? If it’s the latter, I will mail you a hand signed certificate stating that you are henceforth to be known as an elite rider.
c) looking at the wahoo data from one ride is not even close to enough for anyone to judge you as a rider. How would anyone tell you how to pace your climbs better from this? A segment analysis from strava would be better. A few power tests, as some have mentioned, would be even better.
d) Please do not take the following as bashing or whatever... I’m just answering your question. I have a friend who races cat 1, weighs 135lbs, has a 1250W sprint and a 260W+ FTP. Doesn’t sound like much but he did 160W+ for 11+ hours the other day. He has a very long and flat power curve relative to most cat 1s. At 200lbs, you’d have to blast some chain-breaking watts to keep up with a cat 1 field, especially if there are hills or accelerations... which there usually are.
I’m very curious about your motivation for this post. If you want training tips, we’re happy to help. But this post just confuses me.
No hard feelings, it's all good. Was just looking for some insight and being transparent with my data. I watched a 1 hour video on how to become an elite cyclist and wanted to have a few people help crunch some numbers from a ride. I know 1 ride won't cut it but I figured I put my numbers out there. I also haven't been riding as much due to the pandemic here, I also don't ride indoors because I don't own a Zwift. I've been putting in 100 to 130-mile weeks. I'm looking to increase that to 200 soon.
Likes For illjustride: