"Looks like your fork is bent."
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,994
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26476 Post(s)
Liked 10,440 Times
in
7,243 Posts
#52
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,535
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 4,441 Times
in
2,106 Posts
Likes For cudak888:
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,994
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26476 Post(s)
Liked 10,440 Times
in
7,243 Posts
.
,,,I find it difficult to understand all the hubbub on this topic. Surely the only people who really need to determine whether a fork/headtube on a bicycle is or is not bent are the owner ( who presumably might want to repair it ), or the buyer and the seller in a sales situation. I'm pretty sure all of those guys are going to have the bike to look at in person.
Arguing about whether or not you can determine the condition from a photo, or even several photos, is just a nonstarter for me. I'm pretty certain I can't do it reliably, unless the thing is pretty obviously whacked.
I guess not everyone dropping imaginary lines along a head tube down past the fork legs feels the same way, so by all means carry on.
,,,I find it difficult to understand all the hubbub on this topic. Surely the only people who really need to determine whether a fork/headtube on a bicycle is or is not bent are the owner ( who presumably might want to repair it ), or the buyer and the seller in a sales situation. I'm pretty sure all of those guys are going to have the bike to look at in person.
Arguing about whether or not you can determine the condition from a photo, or even several photos, is just a nonstarter for me. I'm pretty certain I can't do it reliably, unless the thing is pretty obviously whacked.
I guess not everyone dropping imaginary lines along a head tube down past the fork legs feels the same way, so by all means carry on.
#54
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,535
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 4,441 Times
in
2,106 Posts
Likes For cudak888:
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,994
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26476 Post(s)
Liked 10,440 Times
in
7,243 Posts
#56
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,638
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaņa pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 883 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
405 Posts
.
,,,I find it difficult to understand all the hubbub on this topic. Surely the only people who really need to determine whether a fork/headtube on a bicycle is or is not bent are the owner ( who presumably might want to repair it ), or the buyer and the seller in a sales situation. I'm pretty sure all of those guys are going to have the bike to look at in person.
Arguing about whether or not you can determine the condition from a photo, or even several photos, is just a nonstarter for me. I'm pretty certain I can't do it reliably, unless the thing is pretty obviously whacked.
I guess not everyone dropping imaginary lines along a head tube down past the fork legs feels the same way, so by all means carry on.
,,,I find it difficult to understand all the hubbub on this topic. Surely the only people who really need to determine whether a fork/headtube on a bicycle is or is not bent are the owner ( who presumably might want to repair it ), or the buyer and the seller in a sales situation. I'm pretty sure all of those guys are going to have the bike to look at in person.
Arguing about whether or not you can determine the condition from a photo, or even several photos, is just a nonstarter for me. I'm pretty certain I can't do it reliably, unless the thing is pretty obviously whacked.
I guess not everyone dropping imaginary lines along a head tube down past the fork legs feels the same way, so by all means carry on.
Likes For Happy Feet:
#59
Senior Member
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 708
Bikes: 1984 Bianchi Tipo Corsa, 1985 Cannondale SM600 (24/26)
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
192 Posts
The bike could have a Schrodinger fork which is simultaneously bent and straight until properly observed.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,994
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26476 Post(s)
Liked 10,440 Times
in
7,243 Posts
Likes For 3alarmer:
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,994
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26476 Post(s)
Liked 10,440 Times
in
7,243 Posts
Likes For 3alarmer:
Likes For Bianchi84:
#65
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,638
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaņa pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 883 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
405 Posts
No fork can be absolutely straight. What would be the limit to say it's bent?
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,994
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26476 Post(s)
Liked 10,440 Times
in
7,243 Posts
.
...I would propose an equation that would represent fork distortion, for any given bike, as approaching practical usability, as the limit of Bike Forum posts about it approaches zero.
...I would propose an equation that would represent fork distortion, for any given bike, as approaching practical usability, as the limit of Bike Forum posts about it approaches zero.