Upgrade
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Upgrade
have a Trek Madone 4.3 with 105 5700. Bike is well maintained and in great shape. I ride about 100-120 miles a week. I am thinking about buying a new bike simply to upgrade to disc brakes and 105 5800. I would just like to know of the money would be worth it or should I just keep roiing with the rim brakes? I am looking at an Emonda or Canyon Endurance with the 105 5800. Thanks
Thanks for the responses, all were helpful.. going with a Giant TCR Advanced with ultegra and discs. Decided to just go for it...: )
Thanks for the responses, all were helpful.. going with a Giant TCR Advanced with ultegra and discs. Decided to just go for it...: )
Last edited by Surfzup13; 10-29-20 at 06:21 PM.
#2
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
have a Trek Madone 4.3 with 105 5700. Bike is well maintained and in great shape. I ride about 100-120 miles a week. I am thinking about buying a new bike simply to upgrade to disc brakes and 105 5800. I would just like to know of the money would be worth it or should I just keep roiing with the rim brakes? I am looking at an Emonda or Canyon Endurance with the 105 5800. Thanks
I went from a Madone 4.6 (Sram Rival) to a Emonda SLR with Sram Red eTap and it was HUGE.
#3
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,429
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, Karate Monkey, Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,304 Times
in
651 Posts
I'f the upgrade is based only on moving to disc brakes I'd probably not spend the money, but if the new bike will fit better go for it
#4
Senior Member
have a Trek Madone 4.3 with 105 5700. Bike is well maintained and in great shape. I ride about 100-120 miles a week. I am thinking about buying a new bike simply to upgrade to disc brakes and 105 5800. I would just like to know of the money would be worth it or should I just keep roiing with the rim brakes? I am looking at an Emonda or Canyon Endurance with the 105 5800. Thanks
Don’t want any of the hassles and don’t need them.
Likes For Mulberry20:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,520
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1267 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
256 Posts
My DIY mount cable pull TRP Spyre has had ZERO problems. Locks on a dime every time I want.
It actually likes having a big gap. I have SA long pull levers. This is on my Rohloff14 steel heavyweight tour bike. Basically has been set and forget. Maybe adjust and clean when I have a flat tire.
I actually decided to try rotating the pads after 3,500 miles. It was soft for a day while it wore straighter and bedded in again. Good to go another 2,500 miles.
Previously I had BB5 1 side calipers there WERE a POS.
It actually likes having a big gap. I have SA long pull levers. This is on my Rohloff14 steel heavyweight tour bike. Basically has been set and forget. Maybe adjust and clean when I have a flat tire.
I actually decided to try rotating the pads after 3,500 miles. It was soft for a day while it wore straighter and bedded in again. Good to go another 2,500 miles.
Previously I had BB5 1 side calipers there WERE a POS.
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 10-25-20 at 03:00 PM.
#6
Full Member
That being said, I would not upgrade a road bike just to get disc brakes, but buying new I would only go with hydraulic disc brakes.
#7
Senior Member
Interesting. What disc brakes do you have on your bike that you have hassles? I have not had that experience. I have three bikes with disc brakes and a number with rim brakes and I spend less time adjusting the disc brakes and like the improved performance, especially when it is wet.
That being said, I would not upgrade a road bike just to get disc brakes, but buying new I would only go with hydraulic disc brakes.
That being said, I would not upgrade a road bike just to get disc brakes, but buying new I would only go with hydraulic disc brakes.
Several of my central park riding buddies have disk brakes and they actually don’t like them.
I have a Serotta with Campy and rim brakes and have never noticed any deficiency.
I am sure disk brakes have technical advantages but they don’t apply to me.
My new bike from Dave Kirk will be rim brakes.
#8
Very Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 1,211
Bikes: Giant Quasar & Fuji Roubaix
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times
in
244 Posts
If I had the bike you currently have-that would be an upgrade for me. With that said, there's a reason you're looking at new bikes. Kinda like the guy that has a beautiful GF and his head swivels every time something nice walks by. There's obviously something lacking with what he currently has. Just saying...
#9
Full Member
I don’t ride when it is raining. I don’t ride my bike to work, I take the subway.
Several of my central park riding buddies have disk brakes and they actually don’t like them.
I have a Serotta with Campy and rim brakes and have never noticed any deficiency.
I am sure disk brakes have technical advantages but they don’t apply to me.
My new bike from Dave Kirk will be rim brakes.
Several of my central park riding buddies have disk brakes and they actually don’t like them.
I have a Serotta with Campy and rim brakes and have never noticed any deficiency.
I am sure disk brakes have technical advantages but they don’t apply to me.
My new bike from Dave Kirk will be rim brakes.
#10
Senior Member
I have, several times. Especially my friends Emonda SLR. Great bike, fantastic bike, fantastic brakes but I don’t need them. I test drove 2021 Domane in the summer. The Trek store let me take it to the park. Did 12 miles and thoroughly enjoyed the bike but honestly the brakes didn’t do much for me.
#11
Senior Member
I'm light and never ride in the wet, so I get all the braking I need with rim brakes. I can ride 4000 miles in the mountains and never adjust the brakes. My brake pads last for years. That said, manufacturers are forcing disc brakes onto customers, with no rim brakes being offered on most or all frames. I decided to try discs and tubless tires with my latest build of a Cinelli superstar with SRAM force axs. I got the frame for $1055. It's cheaper and lighter than an Emonda SL. Total build cost will be about $2000 less than the Emonda SL with SRAM force. I will be trying mechanical/hydraulic brake calipers. I had thought about TRP Spyre SLC mechanical calipers, but Juin-Tech F1 calipers may be more powerful. Time will tell. I chose fulcrum racing 3 wheels that don't require rim tape to run tubeless and I'm trying michelin's new tubeless tires. I like to buy my personal choice for every part that goes on the bike. No prebuilt bikes for me.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,693
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7733 Post(s)
Liked 3,668 Times
in
1,936 Posts
Same brakes on my rain/work/errands bike. Great brakes. On par with Ultegra rim brakes in the dry .... always. Added bonus is, if something goes wrong, I can buy a cable at Walmart and fix it.
That said, I have hydro discs on my MTB and I see no issue with having them on any bike ... except a real distance tourer, where being able to rig a repair could be really important.
I mean, MTB riders beat the snot out of their bikes and I have never seen or heard of a brake failure on the trail. And locking up on dirt is easier than locking up on pavement ... so that isn't an issue either, as far as I can tell.
I don't think discs are a global parts manufacture conspiracy, either .... Any more than they were when they were introduced on MTBs ... and as I recall it was DIY riders who started the US MTB movement and they took disc breaks --and suspension---from scooters and tiny motorcycles. not all dreamed up in board rooms in sky scrapers to keep the cyclist down.
I really don't care who like disc brakes, though. And some people really like to have things to hate.
That said, I have hydro discs on my MTB and I see no issue with having them on any bike ... except a real distance tourer, where being able to rig a repair could be really important.
I mean, MTB riders beat the snot out of their bikes and I have never seen or heard of a brake failure on the trail. And locking up on dirt is easier than locking up on pavement ... so that isn't an issue either, as far as I can tell.
I don't think discs are a global parts manufacture conspiracy, either .... Any more than they were when they were introduced on MTBs ... and as I recall it was DIY riders who started the US MTB movement and they took disc breaks --and suspension---from scooters and tiny motorcycles. not all dreamed up in board rooms in sky scrapers to keep the cyclist down.
I really don't care who like disc brakes, though. And some people really like to have things to hate.
#14
Senior Member
This question is directed to me, and me alone. If you are really interested in whether or not to buy a new bike, the answer is YES, buy a new bike. The advantages of disc brakes or anything else are not relevant, though I definitely recommend disc brakes. But more over, a new bike is an exciting addition to your life. Don't pass up the opportunity. I promise you won't regret it, unless you are thinking about the inheritance your children may receive. Screw them. You need a new bike...
#15
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,855
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3618 Post(s)
Liked 3,458 Times
in
1,963 Posts
Not simply to "upgrade" to disk brakes. Disk brakes won't make you go any faster; like all brakes, all they do is slow you down.
#16
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,228
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2769 Post(s)
Liked 2,556 Times
in
1,440 Posts
Just for disc and a newer 105? Definitely not worth it.
But if there are other differences, like the ability to run larger tires, and you plan to take advantage of that... yeah, that would change the calculation.
But if there are other differences, like the ability to run larger tires, and you plan to take advantage of that... yeah, that would change the calculation.
Likes For Kapusta:
#17
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
Sounds like you never road a bike with disc brakes.
I have one of each, my road bike has rim brakes and is only ridden on nice days. My CX bike is my foul weather and winter bike and has hydro disc. Different tool for different jobs. Same reason i have 5 different hammers and 4 different torque wrenches.
Likes For GlennR:
#18
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,228
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2769 Post(s)
Liked 2,556 Times
in
1,440 Posts
Nonetheless, I still run hydros on my primary “A Game” MTB.
Last edited by Kapusta; 10-27-20 at 02:18 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,693
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7733 Post(s)
Liked 3,668 Times
in
1,936 Posts
If a brake line rips free .... that same accident could have ripped loose a cable. And a caliper can snap as well as any other component could ... The implication of prior posts were (IMO) that hydro disk brakes were more finicky, harder to live with, and less durable, compared to any cable-actuated brake system.
I have been hit by cars while riding on the road. Given the results of some of those collisions ... I could say that steel frames were weak and feeble and as a genre insufficient for use by cyclists .... and nobody would even bother to laugh, because the absurdity would be too huge to be humorous.
I see the carping about disc brakes so be similar.
#20
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,228
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2769 Post(s)
Liked 2,556 Times
in
1,440 Posts
Were the brake failures specifically due to the fact that the brakes were hydraulic discs? Obviously,, every any and every component on a bike can fail if it is used beyond design capacity ... but I don't hear people demanding a return to rigid forks when a seal blows.
If a brake line rips free .... that same accident could have ripped loose a cable. And a caliper can snap as well as any other component could ... The implication of prior posts were (IMO) that hydro disk brakes were more finicky, harder to live with, and less durable, compared to any cable-actuated brake system.
I have been hit by cars while riding on the road. Given the results of some of those collisions ... I could say that steel frames were weak and feeble and as a genre insufficient for use by cyclists .... and nobody would even bother to laugh, because the absurdity would be too huge to be humorous.
I see the carping about disc brakes so be similar.
If a brake line rips free .... that same accident could have ripped loose a cable. And a caliper can snap as well as any other component could ... The implication of prior posts were (IMO) that hydro disk brakes were more finicky, harder to live with, and less durable, compared to any cable-actuated brake system.
I have been hit by cars while riding on the road. Given the results of some of those collisions ... I could say that steel frames were weak and feeble and as a genre insufficient for use by cyclists .... and nobody would even bother to laugh, because the absurdity would be too huge to be humorous.
I see the carping about disc brakes so be similar.
The point I was addressing was whether hydro brakes ever fail, not whether we should ditch them. That should be obvious by the fact that I said I am still using them on one bike.
But since you asked: Yes, the problems I ran into were hydaulic-specific, involving either air getting in or fluid getting out.
As far as reliability compared to mechs, in my experience, mechs do win out there.
In terms of top performance.... hydros for sure.
EDIT: shoot, I got sidetracked with the MTB discussion. OP is talking road. For that, I think hydro definitely makes more sense if you have the option. Performance differential between mechs and hydro is greater on road bikes, and there is not the abuse involved as compared to MTB.
Last edited by Kapusta; 10-28-20 at 06:32 AM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,897
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1467 Post(s)
Liked 1,495 Times
in
876 Posts
have a Trek Madone 4.3 with 105 5700. Bike is well maintained and in great shape. I ride about 100-120 miles a week. I am thinking about buying a new bike simply to upgrade to disc brakes and 105 5800. I would just like to know of the money would be worth it or should I just keep roiing with the rim brakes? I am looking at an Emonda or Canyon Endurance with the 105 5800. Thanks
New bikes are cool, but I wouldn't expect 5800/discs to feel like a significant upgrade over 5700/rim. There are some differences between the Madone and Emonda that you might find more or less to your liking, including slightly different geometry. I'd say that is a bigger factor than the rim/disc or 10sp/11sp.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,585
Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
85 Posts
have a Trek Madone 4.3 with 105 5700. Bike is well maintained and in great shape. I ride about 100-120 miles a week. I am thinking about buying a new bike simply to upgrade to disc brakes and 105 5800. I would just like to know of the money would be worth it or should I just keep roiing with the rim brakes? I am looking at an Emonda or Canyon Endurance with the 105 5800. Thanks
__________________
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,223
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 583 Post(s)
Liked 1,030 Times
in
498 Posts
For drop bars, the biggest benefit of hydraulic disc brakes is superb friction-free braking from the hoods.