1x versus 2x for old 26" MTB build
#26
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I think the weight savings being quoted here are way too optomistic if comparing similar levels of components. Lets look at XT 2x10 and 1x11
You will gain weight in the cassettes:
---11-36 10sp ~330g
---11-46 11 sp ~439g
So you gain ~ 110g there
You will lose weight at the crank:
---FC-M7100-1 (32t, 175mm): 631g
---FC-M7100-2 (26-36t, 175mm): 674g
You lose 43g there
Things that go away:
---XT front der: 146g
---XT front shifter 122g
---Cable and housing: guessing ~70g
So you lose 338g of stuff
So this has you netting a ~271g weight loss. So this back-of-the-napkin estimate is around 0.6 lbs.
These weights are taken from a variety of sources that I have not completely vetted. If someone has better number to plug in here, have at.
You will gain weight in the cassettes:
---11-36 10sp ~330g
---11-46 11 sp ~439g
So you gain ~ 110g there
You will lose weight at the crank:
---FC-M7100-1 (32t, 175mm): 631g
---FC-M7100-2 (26-36t, 175mm): 674g
You lose 43g there
Things that go away:
---XT front der: 146g
---XT front shifter 122g
---Cable and housing: guessing ~70g
So you lose 338g of stuff
So this has you netting a ~271g weight loss. So this back-of-the-napkin estimate is around 0.6 lbs.
These weights are taken from a variety of sources that I have not completely vetted. If someone has better number to plug in here, have at.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,181 Times
in
771 Posts
As far as weight savings...wheels are where you'll notice the weight savings. Eating one less bag of chips per week will be the same as tossing a 2x or 3x system.
Last edited by prj71; 02-25-21 at 04:08 PM.
#28
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
It will be a lot worse than this at a lower price point than XT. I know I'm repeating myself but the weight of the cheap cassettes is astonishing. M6100 is 596g, SX is 615g! So, a wash or worse. The cheapest 1x groupsets also have solid spindles while the most expensive ones have carbon arms. That's the other major weight difference. Between SX and XO1 there's -9 ounces in the cassette and -17 ounces in the crankset+BB. The shifters and chains are about the same, there's a few ounces in the RD.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#29
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
It will be a lot worse than this at a lower price point than XT. I know I'm repeating myself but the weight of the cheap cassettes is astonishing. M6100 is 596g, SX is 615g! So, a wash or worse. The cheapest 1x groupsets also have solid spindles while the most expensive ones have carbon arms. That's the other major weight difference. Between SX and XO1 there's -9 ounces in the cassette and -17 ounces in the crankset+BB. The shifters and chains are about the same, there's a few ounces in the RD.
#30
Senior Member
The real reason to do 1x11 or 12, the reason it so quickly gained popularity and SRAM beat out Shimano for a few years, is that front shifting sucks. There are other reasons too that have to do with rear suspension but that's not relevant to conversions. The premium 1x systems are lighter but they depend on very clever and expensive cassettes to get there, and you need a different rear hub. In the "refurbishing old MTB" price range, the cassettes weigh well north of a pound, pretty much eating any weight savings, and you need the right chain ring too so you are looking at approaching $200 range to convert if you buy all new parts. I'm not saying no! I put 1x on my old tandem and it makes me very happy. But not for weight.
If you really want weight savings from the drivetrain, 1x1. If you can tolerate a pretty short gear range for your 1x, I think you can still get XT 10 speed 11-36 cassettes and Zee shifty bits, but I think the lightweight 9 speed cassettes are gone
If you really want weight savings from the drivetrain, 1x1. If you can tolerate a pretty short gear range for your 1x, I think you can still get XT 10 speed 11-36 cassettes and Zee shifty bits, but I think the lightweight 9 speed cassettes are gone
That being said, I don't agree about front shifting sucking, and I have several unresolved minor issues with my "new" 12sp bike that a 3x didn't have. Mainly, bad gear spacing on higher gears and lack of range.
I rode a road bike with a Microshift R8 triple drivetrain and it was harsh when shifting and the paddle and brake feeling was mediocre, but it worked well for 7000km with no significant issues. Considering the bike cost me 399€ new, I can only say good things about it.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Since he is talking about high end, I think it is the 10-12-14 gapping of 12 speed cassettes and not the 11-12-14 that is found on 9/10 speed cassettes.
Range on a 22-32-42 triple will be greater than a 1x12 if you want a top end comparable with a 42-11. You would have run a 38t chainring and the 38:51 is not as low as a 22:32.
John
Range on a 22-32-42 triple will be greater than a 1x12 if you want a top end comparable with a 42-11. You would have run a 38t chainring and the 38:51 is not as low as a 22:32.
John
#33
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
I thought I'd written this earlier... anyhow.
The 10t-12t shift is a big one, 20%, but that's a very high gear and likely not the cause of complaint. The 16t-18t-21t sequence puts a really short shift next to a tall one, right in the middle of your gears, that sort of thing is pretty noticeable.
If you nerd out on these things you can see the designers are always trying to put the tooth-jump transition in the most benign place they can and also retain already-designed shift sequences (especially the ones around 28t,32t) that date back decades to avoid having to design new ramps. On the 11 speed cassettes SRAM and Sunrace both hung onto the 36t and added 42. Shimano kindly gave us a 37t. The Shimano 11-46 was really ugly, the Sunrace one was ok. The smoothest 11-46 would have started with the Shimano 9x11-34 sequence with 39, 46 added on, but no one made that.
The 10t-12t shift is a big one, 20%, but that's a very high gear and likely not the cause of complaint. The 16t-18t-21t sequence puts a really short shift next to a tall one, right in the middle of your gears, that sort of thing is pretty noticeable.
If you nerd out on these things you can see the designers are always trying to put the tooth-jump transition in the most benign place they can and also retain already-designed shift sequences (especially the ones around 28t,32t) that date back decades to avoid having to design new ramps. On the 11 speed cassettes SRAM and Sunrace both hung onto the 36t and added 42. Shimano kindly gave us a 37t. The Shimano 11-46 was really ugly, the Sunrace one was ok. The smoothest 11-46 would have started with the Shimano 9x11-34 sequence with 39, 46 added on, but no one made that.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#34
Constant tinkerer
Thread Starter
I think the weight savings being quoted here are way too optomistic if comparing similar levels of components. Lets look at XT 2x10 and 1x11
You will gain weight in the cassettes:
---11-36 10sp ~330g
---11-46 11 sp ~439g
So you gain ~ 110g there
You will lose weight at the crank:
---FC-M7100-1 (32t, 175mm): 631g
---FC-M7100-2 (26-36t, 175mm): 674g
You lose 43g there
Things that go away:
---XT front der: 146g
---XT front shifter 122g
---Cable and housing: guessing ~70g
So you lose 338g of stuff
So this has you netting a ~271g weight loss. So this back-of-the-napkin estimate is around 0.6 lbs.
These weights are taken from a variety of sources that I have not completely vetted. If someone has better number to plug in here, have at.
You will gain weight in the cassettes:
---11-36 10sp ~330g
---11-46 11 sp ~439g
So you gain ~ 110g there
You will lose weight at the crank:
---FC-M7100-1 (32t, 175mm): 631g
---FC-M7100-2 (26-36t, 175mm): 674g
You lose 43g there
Things that go away:
---XT front der: 146g
---XT front shifter 122g
---Cable and housing: guessing ~70g
So you lose 338g of stuff
So this has you netting a ~271g weight loss. So this back-of-the-napkin estimate is around 0.6 lbs.
These weights are taken from a variety of sources that I have not completely vetted. If someone has better number to plug in here, have at.
#35
Senior Member
If you want the 22-32 equivalent on 26" wheels on a 29" 1x12 bike, you need a 30 chainring coupled with a 51 sprocket. That means that when it's flattish, I'm constantly debating between a too fast cadence on the 12t, or too slow on the 10.
Moreover, pedalling at 40+ km/h with a 30t chainring is uncomfortable. Over that speed is pointless. My max speed on my 26" on most rides was always near or slightly above 60kph. I simply can't reach that speeds with my 1x12 bike unless it can be done without pedalling.
My old 3x9 bike didn't have any of these issues. And don't get me started on the big sprocket jump on SRAM cassettes.
#36
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I'm complaining about the 10t-12t jump, mainly, and the lack of range.
If you want the 22-32 equivalent on 26" wheels on a 29" 1x12 bike, you need a 30 chainring coupled with a 51 sprocket. That means that when it's flattish, I'm constantly debating between a too fast cadence on the 12t, or too slow on the 10.
Moreover, pedalling at 40+ km/h with a 30t chainring is uncomfortable. Over that speed is pointless. My max speed on my 26" on most rides was always near or slightly above 60kph. I simply can't reach that speeds with my 1x12 bike unless it can be done without pedalling.
My old 3x9 bike didn't have any of these issues. And don't get me started on the big sprocket jump on SRAM cassettes.
If you want the 22-32 equivalent on 26" wheels on a 29" 1x12 bike, you need a 30 chainring coupled with a 51 sprocket. That means that when it's flattish, I'm constantly debating between a too fast cadence on the 12t, or too slow on the 10.
Moreover, pedalling at 40+ km/h with a 30t chainring is uncomfortable. Over that speed is pointless. My max speed on my 26" on most rides was always near or slightly above 60kph. I simply can't reach that speeds with my 1x12 bike unless it can be done without pedalling.
My old 3x9 bike didn't have any of these issues. And don't get me started on the big sprocket jump on SRAM cassettes.
The issues you describe are why I would not go 1x on my gravel or road bike. At least not until they get to around 14 gears in the back.
But for trail riding I have little need for the tighter gear spacing, in fact I prefer the wider spacing. Tighter spacing just means I am often shifting a more gears at a time when i do shift.
As far as the high end.... I started dropping the big ring off my 3x cranks on my MTBs 20 years ago. The only time I spin out 32/11 is on pavement or a dirt road. And in those cases I really don’t care. Between the fat meaty tires at low pressures and the aerodynamics of a barn door, I just assume coast at that point rather than killing myself for an extra 2 mph for a 30 second stretch.
On single track, the times I COULD spin out 32/11 are when the trail is steep enough that I don’t need to pedal anyway. It is my brakes that decide how fast I am going.
If I were to set up an MTB that also needs to spend a long time on pavement/gravel, I’d be looking at 2x.
#37
Senior Member
I am guessing you spent more time on the road with your bike than what most MTBs are designed for. More than I do at least.
The issues you describe are why I would not go 1x on my gravel or road bike. At least not until they get to around 14 gears in the back.
But for trail riding I have little need for the tighter gear spacing, in fact I prefer the wider spacing. Tighter spacing just means I am often shifting a more gears at a time when i do shift.
As far as the high end.... I started dropping the big ring off my 3x cranks on my MTBs 20 years ago. The only time I spin out 32/11 is on pavement or a dirt road. And in those cases I really don’t care. Between the fat meaty tires at low pressures and the aerodynamics of a barn door, I just assume coast at that point rather than killing myself for an extra 2 mph for a 30 second stretch.
On single track, the times I COULD spin out 32/11 are when the trail is steep enough that I don’t need to pedal anyway. It is my brakes that decide how fast I am going.
If I were to set up an MTB that also needs to spend a long time on pavement/gravel, I’d be looking at 2x.
The issues you describe are why I would not go 1x on my gravel or road bike. At least not until they get to around 14 gears in the back.
But for trail riding I have little need for the tighter gear spacing, in fact I prefer the wider spacing. Tighter spacing just means I am often shifting a more gears at a time when i do shift.
As far as the high end.... I started dropping the big ring off my 3x cranks on my MTBs 20 years ago. The only time I spin out 32/11 is on pavement or a dirt road. And in those cases I really don’t care. Between the fat meaty tires at low pressures and the aerodynamics of a barn door, I just assume coast at that point rather than killing myself for an extra 2 mph for a 30 second stretch.
On single track, the times I COULD spin out 32/11 are when the trail is steep enough that I don’t need to pedal anyway. It is my brakes that decide how fast I am going.
If I were to set up an MTB that also needs to spend a long time on pavement/gravel, I’d be looking at 2x.
I agree that its a minor issue that affects a small part of my rides. Nontheless, it's an issue that 20 year old tramsissions didn't have, and it bothers me.
#38
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
My mountain bike rides rarely end up with less than 1000m climbed and I avoid asphalt at all costs. I only ride on the road to get to the trails, a couple of km from where I live at most. I just like being able to pedall downhill if needed, and I like to pedal at a comforatble cadence when it's flat. If I want to ride on the road I have a road bike for that.
I agree that its a minor issue that affects a small part of my rides. Nontheless, it's an issue that 20 year old tramsissions didn't have, and it bothers me.
I agree that its a minor issue that affects a small part of my rides. Nontheless, it's an issue that 20 year old tramsissions didn't have, and it bothers me.
In my case, 20 years ago I was pulling off the big ring to convert 3x to 2x and wishing they made wider range 9 sp cassettes so I could go 1X.
I see Microshift now has an 11-46t 9 speed cassette. I’d have been all over that 20 years ago.
#39
Senior Member
Different strokes I guess. We all have our preferences. Hopefully they keep making 2x options for folks like you, because like you say, range or spacing still has to give going to 1x. 12sp has reduced the compromise somewhat, but it is still there.
In my case, 20 years ago I was pulling off the big ring to convert 3x to 2x and wishing they made wider range 9 sp cassettes so I could go 1X.
I see Microshift now has an 11-46t 9 speed cassette. I’d have been all over that 20 years ago.
In my case, 20 years ago I was pulling off the big ring to convert 3x to 2x and wishing they made wider range 9 sp cassettes so I could go 1X.
I see Microshift now has an 11-46t 9 speed cassette. I’d have been all over that 20 years ago.
#40
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
But even before the frame design improvements were realized a lot of riders were coming to the same conclusion that I was: bigger gaps were fine, 44/11 was an unnecessarily high ratio, and fewer rings had advantages.
As I said, different strokes. And I know it kind of sucks when the trends go in a way that you’re not crazy about.
#42
Senior Member
I've been riding for a year with a 1x system and my opinion has not changed so far.
It works well for singletrack. That's it.
As soon as you ride the bike out of singletrack, it has lots of weakneses.
And I'm not sure if you have ever ridden a mountain bike in Europe, but here not everything are singletracks and purpose-built trails unless you go to a bike park (which most mountain bikers don't anyway). Most of us don't bring the bike to the trailhead with our car. We just ride out of our front door.
You have to ride lots of dirt roads whenever you want it or not, and in some of them you can easily reach 50km/h + if you dare and are willing to pedal. There are also some really steep dirt roads (some simply unclimbable unless you know bike trial and don't run out of breath), which means losing my 30T is not an option.
It works well for singletrack. That's it.
As soon as you ride the bike out of singletrack, it has lots of weakneses.
And I'm not sure if you have ever ridden a mountain bike in Europe, but here not everything are singletracks and purpose-built trails unless you go to a bike park (which most mountain bikers don't anyway). Most of us don't bring the bike to the trailhead with our car. We just ride out of our front door.
You have to ride lots of dirt roads whenever you want it or not, and in some of them you can easily reach 50km/h + if you dare and are willing to pedal. There are also some really steep dirt roads (some simply unclimbable unless you know bike trial and don't run out of breath), which means losing my 30T is not an option.
Last edited by Amt0571; 03-01-21 at 08:50 AM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
I The only time I spin out 32/11 is on pavement or a dirt road. And in those cases I really don’t care. Between the fat meaty tires at low pressures and the aerodynamics of a barn door, I just assume coast at that point rather than killing myself for an extra 2 mph for a 30 second stretch.
On single track, the times I COULD spin out 32/11 are when the trail is steep enough that I don’t need to pedal anyway. It is my brakes that decide how fast I am going.
.
On single track, the times I COULD spin out 32/11 are when the trail is steep enough that I don’t need to pedal anyway. It is my brakes that decide how fast I am going.
.
Ive been preaching this to my riding buddies for years when they would say ---- "XTR only has an 11 tooth at the big end -- SRAM is superior because they have a 10 tooth ! " (before microspline ) --- Talk about a cog that just doesnt matter.
That said, i have switched to SRAM because it was the only way i could get 12 speed GripShift. The monster gear ratios are nice, but then again i am rarely using the 50 tooth out back either. A 12 speed 11-(or even 12) 46 would be perfect for me but i havent seen one yet
#44
Senior Member
You have to ride lots of dirt roads whenever you want it or not, and in some of them you can easily reach 50km/h + if you dare and are willing to pedal. There are also some really steep dirt roads (some simply unclimbable unless you know bike trial and don't run out of breath), which means losing my 30T is not an option.
Last edited by gsa103; 03-01-21 at 06:27 PM.
#45
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Run wider mountain bike tires. Running standard trail pressure on flat ground, I tend to top out at at 35kph. If you're hitting 50 kph, it's because you're going downhill, and you'd probably hit 45 kph without pedaling. Spinning out on a downhill, especially on a mountain bike, doesn't really matter. Low end is definitely an issue with 1x, especially on conversions. I currently have a 22/32 crank with 11-32 9speed cassette. If you're restricted to a 11t cog due to HG hubs, it basically means you need a 50t rear to get a reasonable range. The new Deore 11-51t cassette is basically the ONLY cassette that means that requirement.
Here is the difference in the low end:
22 ring / 32 cog = 0.6875
32 ring / 46 cog = 0.6957
That is a difference of about 1.2%, or about an 1/8 or 1/10 of a typical gear change.
#46
Senior Member
Run wider mountain bike tires. Running standard trail pressure on flat ground, I tend to top out at at 35kph. If you're hitting 50 kph, it's because you're going downhill, and you'd probably hit 45 kph without pedaling. Spinning out on a downhill, especially on a mountain bike, doesn't really matter. Low end is definitely an issue with 1x, especially on conversions. I currently have a 22/32 crank with 11-32 9speed cassette. If you're restricted to a 11t cog due to HG hubs, it basically means you need a 50t rear to get a reasonable range. The new Deore 11-51t cassette is basically the ONLY cassette that means that requirement.
I'm sorry, but there's no excuse. 1x has a few drawbacks that 20y/o transmissions didn't have. And that's a fact.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,181 Times
in
771 Posts
I've been riding for a year with a 1x system and my opinion has not changed so far.
It works well for singletrack. That's it.
As soon as you ride the bike out of singletrack, it has lots of weakneses.
And I'm not sure if you have ever ridden a mountain bike in Europe, but here not everything are singletracks and purpose-built trails unless you go to a bike park (which most mountain bikers don't anyway). Most of us don't bring the bike to the trailhead with our car. We just ride out of our front door.
You have to ride lots of dirt roads whenever you want it or not, and in some of them you can easily reach 50km/h + if you dare and are willing to pedal. There are also some really steep dirt roads (some simply unclimbable unless you know bike trial and don't run out of breath), which means losing my 30T is not an option.
It works well for singletrack. That's it.
As soon as you ride the bike out of singletrack, it has lots of weakneses.
And I'm not sure if you have ever ridden a mountain bike in Europe, but here not everything are singletracks and purpose-built trails unless you go to a bike park (which most mountain bikers don't anyway). Most of us don't bring the bike to the trailhead with our car. We just ride out of our front door.
You have to ride lots of dirt roads whenever you want it or not, and in some of them you can easily reach 50km/h + if you dare and are willing to pedal. There are also some really steep dirt roads (some simply unclimbable unless you know bike trial and don't run out of breath), which means losing my 30T is not an option.
What you describe I've done numerous times. A few times a year a few of us get together and ride gravel roads to a single track trail, then we hop on some more gravel roads and head over to another single track trail and then return back to where we started. About a 50 mile ride when done. It's not a big deal and I'm not expecting my 1x bike (32t Chainring/11-46 cassette) to maintain road bike speeds.
And why don't you bring your bike to the trailhead with a car?
I guess if it bugs you enough you can just get a cheap mountain bike where 2x/3x is offered.
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/bikes-talon-29
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/atx-2021
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I do have to say that this is the only thread I can recall where someone actually gave advice on how to ride slower to be able to fit into the limitations of the gearing.
John
John
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,181 Times
in
771 Posts
All of that stuff goes away with a 1x system.
https://www.wolftoothcomponents.com/...1x-drivetrains
#50
Senior Member