Where does bike stiffness come from?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Where does bike stiffness come from?
My favorite (wheel-on) trainer bike was an aluminum track bike (a Giant Omnium). The lack of gear choice, the straight chainline--there was nothing to do but grunt and pedal. I actually did a couple of Zwift centuries on that thing. But the thing I REALLY loved about it was that it was so noticeably stiff. I don't put out a lot of watts, objectively (I don't think I ever got far past 800ish, which is VERY far from people who are actually good at cycling), but it always felt like everything I put into the pedals made it straight to the wheel. It would have been terrible for riding along cobblestones, but for a trainer or a track, that bike was fantastic for the money.
I've long since donated that bike (I moved away from a velodrome and the Juniors team there needed bikes), but I think the time has come to get another trainer bike I might take out on the track (in a velodrome near my new place). It got me wondering where all that stiffness came from, though.
Possibilities:
Kierin racers put out gobs of watts on steel lugged frames, though, so I imagine those are plenty stiff.
Thanks!
I've long since donated that bike (I moved away from a velodrome and the Juniors team there needed bikes), but I think the time has come to get another trainer bike I might take out on the track (in a velodrome near my new place). It got me wondering where all that stiffness came from, though.
Possibilities:
- Aluminum frame
- Crankset (SRAM Omnium) -- it's not the BB, because that's a standard BSA
- Shortish chainstays (400mm, so not as short as more aggressive track frames, but a bit shorter than road bikes)
- Straight aluminum fork
Kierin racers put out gobs of watts on steel lugged frames, though, so I imagine those are plenty stiff.
Thanks!
Last edited by cormacf; 11-13-23 at 02:31 PM.
#2
Senior Member
My favorite (wheel-on) trainer bike was an aluminum track bike (a Giant Omnium). The lack of gear choice, the straight chainline--there was nothing to do but grunt and pedal. I actually did a couple of Zwift centuries on that thing. But the thing I REALLY loved about it was that it was so noticeably stiff. I don't put out a lot of watts, objectively (I don't think I ever got far past 800ish, which is VERY far from people who are actually good at cycling), but it always felt like everything I put into the pedals made it straight to the wheel. It would have been terrible for riding along cobblestones, but for a trainer or a track, that bike was fantastic for the money.
I've long since donated that bike (I moved away from a velodrome and the Juniors team there needed bikes), but I think the time has come to get another trainer bike I might take out on the track (in a velodrome near my new place). It got me wondering what all that stiffness came from, though.
Possibilities:
Kierin racers put out gobs of watts on steel lugged frames, though, so I imagine those are plenty stiff.
Thanks!
I've long since donated that bike (I moved away from a velodrome and the Juniors team there needed bikes), but I think the time has come to get another trainer bike I might take out on the track (in a velodrome near my new place). It got me wondering what all that stiffness came from, though.
Possibilities:
- Aluminum frame
- Crankset (SRAM Omnium) -- it's not the BB, because that's a standard BSA
- Shortish chainstays (400mm, so not as short as more aggressive track frames, but a bit shorter than road bikes)
- Straight aluminum fork
Kierin racers put out gobs of watts on steel lugged frames, though, so I imagine those are plenty stiff.
Thanks!
Since the frames are all identical, the frame material is unimportant. Switching to another material would be costly for the racers or sponsors, would require rewriting of the standards, and would be pointless, since the riders would again be on matching bikes.
That said, for your use case, aluminum frames (and forks) are great for torsional stiffness, which is what you want for sprinting. Add the short wheelbase of a sprint (or even pursuit) track frame, and you're in business. (The short wheelbase is an important factor in the frame's stiffness that's often overlooked.)
There are a few fairly inexpensive aluminum track frames and bikes around, although not as many as there were after track bikes became fashionable but before steel versions became even more fashionable. AliExpress has incredibly cheap aluminum track frames available, for instance.
Likes For Trakhak:
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Keirin are raced on bikes that are certified to be identical by the NKS (Japan Keirin Association) according to rules that were formulated decades ago. That's why they're still steel.
Since the frames are all identical, the frame material is unimportant. Switching to another material would be costly for the racers or sponsors, would require rewriting of the standards, and would be pointless, since the riders would again be on matching bikes.
Since the frames are all identical, the frame material is unimportant. Switching to another material would be costly for the racers or sponsors, would require rewriting of the standards, and would be pointless, since the riders would again be on matching bikes.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,188 Times
in
2,471 Posts
Perception can be rather different from measurable qualities. The geometry and rider positioning are two huge factors which influence the rider's ability to apply power and to maneuver the bike. Many riders think a quick handling bike is also faster, a bike that moves off line easier will also travel a longer distance than a bike which is more directionally stable. But so much of human performance is motivationally based...
Having said that most current Al frames are designed to be measurably stiffer, compared to steel, as to not suffer from fatigue limits too soon. Forks and especially the steerer is a big contributor to overall stiffness but so few people mention this. Perhaps because few builders, brands, make their own. Then there's the wheels and that true track wheels often have better spoke bracing angles which make the wheels feel stiffer laterally. Andy
Having said that most current Al frames are designed to be measurably stiffer, compared to steel, as to not suffer from fatigue limits too soon. Forks and especially the steerer is a big contributor to overall stiffness but so few people mention this. Perhaps because few builders, brands, make their own. Then there's the wheels and that true track wheels often have better spoke bracing angles which make the wheels feel stiffer laterally. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,768
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,844 Times
in
1,182 Posts
I was talking to a guy not long ago. He had gone from an old Motobecane to a new Bikesdirect Carbon. It was a gift from his kids. Any way, he said he did not have too much problems adjusting to it. He said the hardest thing was getting used to the Brifters. Oh... and that he needed to paint it light blue.
What? I asked him.
Yep... He said the dam thing was so stiff it had to be on permanent Viagra...
What? I asked him.
Yep... He said the dam thing was so stiff it had to be on permanent Viagra...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Likes For zandoval:
#7
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,873
Liked 4,042 Times
in
2,753 Posts
From what I have seen on bikeforums, you do not want one of those keirin bikes used. I think the biggest improvement they would get from carbon is aero. I don't think stiffness is particularly important property of a bike, as long as the front derailleur doesn't shift itself.
Likes For unterhausen:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,188 Times
in
2,471 Posts
From what I have seen on bikeforums, you do not want one of those keirin bikes used. I think the biggest improvement they would get from carbon is aero. I don't think stiffness is particularly important property of a bike, as long as the front derailleur doesn't shift itself.
Someone smarter than I am said something like "a frame only needs to be as stiff as needed to keep the other parts in their right relationships and allows the rider to balance and steer". It has been my view that factors of a bike have that can be measured and thus have a specific number attached to that aspect will be used by the marketing departments as a benefit, much along "the bigger the better". I do find it interesting that nearly parallel to the stiffening up of frames, wheels, handlebars/stems is the number of suspending and vibration damping attempts that are so cool right now. As though the super stiff bits are too stiff for the riders to suffer with. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#9
When nearly all the bike frames were made from Reynolds 531 steel tubing the variations in frame stiffness was in the chain stays and seat stays securing the rear wheel in position. Changes in materials as well as tubing profiles has resulted often in stiffer frames overall but there is always the trade-off with frame weight.
I think of what may be absorbing the power from my pushing on the pedals and result in less energy driving the bike forward. On some bikes I would feel the initial flex or when climbing a very steep grade and could hear the crank arms creaking.
I think of what may be absorbing the power from my pushing on the pedals and result in less energy driving the bike forward. On some bikes I would feel the initial flex or when climbing a very steep grade and could hear the crank arms creaking.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,188 Times
in
2,471 Posts
Framers don't "absorb" pedaling power, I had thought that by now most would understand a frame is a spring with essentially 100% return of the bending forces (pedaling pressure). Now the timing of this return to the system energy can easily not be when it benefits the rider. This is called "not planning"
When I was taking Eisentraut's frame building class way back in 1979 he was asked about frame stiffness. He's the one who mentioned that frames need to be stiff enough to support the rider and keep the other parts located properly and in a good enough alignment to safely steer and balance the bike. He also asked if we ever felt our frames warming up from all that energy they absorbed (well, not in those words but that was the meaning). Of course we didn't. Andy
When I was taking Eisentraut's frame building class way back in 1979 he was asked about frame stiffness. He's the one who mentioned that frames need to be stiff enough to support the rider and keep the other parts located properly and in a good enough alignment to safely steer and balance the bike. He also asked if we ever felt our frames warming up from all that energy they absorbed (well, not in those words but that was the meaning). Of course we didn't. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#11
The point he was making isn't wrong, but the evidence used in support was not accurate.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,188 Times
in
2,471 Posts
And I agree. My point was the understanding of frame stiffness was understood by some long before the current hype. Even if their way of explaining it wasn't the best. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#13
Senior Member
EDIT: Not sure why HT ended up there. I meant front triangles.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54319503@N05/
https://www.draper-cycles.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54319503@N05/
https://www.draper-cycles.com
Last edited by duanedr; 11-20-23 at 07:37 PM.
#14
Full Member
Thread Starter
From what I have seen on bikeforums, you do not want one of those keirin bikes used. I think the biggest improvement they would get from carbon is aero. I don't think stiffness is particularly important property of a bike, as long as the front derailleur doesn't shift itself.