What gear spacing do you prefer?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
What gear spacing do you prefer?
What percentage change between gears do your legs like?
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
--Shannon
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
--Shannon
Likes For ShannonM:
#3
Senior Member
What percentage change between gears do your legs like?
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: North Florida
Posts: 562
Bikes: 2019 Specialized Diverge, 2021 Cervelo Caledonia
Likes: 0
Liked 400 Times
in
211 Posts
The smallest gaps possible given the range you need. My bikes came with 11-34 cassettes, but I wasn't using the big gears so I changed to 11-28. I like the closer spacing.... but if I needed 34 at the low end, I'd be using 11-34.
Likes For Random11:
#5
I think you meant you werent using the low gears/big cogs.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 6,006
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Liked 2,277 Times
in
1,393 Posts
What percentage change between gears do your legs like?
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
--Shannon
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
--Shannon
48/38/28 with 14-16-18-20-23-26-30-36.
I had to search to find a 14t 1st position HG cog. It is for an 11 speed junior cassette that I modded to work. Circle of life lol!
I sometimes wish I had a 13t since my max is 24/25mph, but I can live with it. The 36t rarely gets used, but for those times Im happy its there.
John
#8
Cantilever believer
I prefer to not have my cadence change more than 8-10 rpm per shift. On all but my fastest bike, I got rid of most of my 21+ mph gears, as I hardly use them. Instead, I go for tighter middle-range spacing and more low climbing gears. On my _ x 7 speed drivetrains, I run mostly 2-tooth jumps (14-16-18-20-22-24-28). On the half-step on the recumbent, it's 41-38-24 front, 14-17-20-24-28-32 rear.
Although it's close, note that a 40-year-old half-step can give slightly closer ratios than most newer drivetrains with 2-tooth steps, at the cost of double shifts.
Although it's close, note that a 40-year-old half-step can give slightly closer ratios than most newer drivetrains with 2-tooth steps, at the cost of double shifts.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Last edited by RCMoeur; 05-05-24 at 10:47 PM.
#9
I have 2x7 gearing so I'm limited. I don't split shifts, just upshift on cassette then at some point upshift chainring and resume. I run between 14-20% jumps, 25% to the lowest cog (although I just noticed the next jump is 14%, I should go up one tooth so have 19 and 20% jumps instead of 14 and 25%). I would not want any larger jumps than that, this is minimums now. However, being 20"/406 wheels, each jump in ratio means about 2/3 the jump in gear-inches at the road, versus 700c wheels, so the jumps shown above are actually not as high as they seem. EDIT: No, that's not right, that only applies at higher ranges; If I lower the chainrings to get the same gear inches, the percent range is the same. So yeah, I'd like a bit smaller jumps on the cogs, no more than 15%, perhaps closer to 12%.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 05-06-24 at 04:28 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,886
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Liked 555 Times
in
381 Posts
Ideally, single tooth jumps from 12t-18t, then 4t jumps from 20t-36t, but I'm on 10 speed so I accept the compromise with what's commonly available (12-13-14-15-17-19-21-24-28-32, or 12-13-15-17-19-21-24-28-32-36). I've got some single cogs to play around with to make a custom cassette but I'm still stuck with whatever large-3 clusters I have and I have too many bikes to customize the cassette on each one.
#11
Senior Member
Preferably under 10% for shallow-gradient small shifts, although I'll tolerate a bit higher in a shift or two if it's part of an arrangement that otherwise doesn't suck.
During climbing I can tolerate somewhat larger jumps, although this is partly due to the volatility of force demands on most high-gradient right-of-ways: it's less worth trying to shift out every slight change.
During climbing I can tolerate somewhat larger jumps, although this is partly due to the volatility of force demands on most high-gradient right-of-ways: it's less worth trying to shift out every slight change.
#12
Preferably under 10% for shallow-gradient small shifts, although I'll tolerate a bit higher in a shift or two if it's part of an arrangement that otherwise doesn't suck.
During climbing I can tolerate somewhat larger jumps, although this is partly due to the volatility of force demands on most high-gradient right-of-ways: it's less worth trying to shift out every slight change.
During climbing I can tolerate somewhat larger jumps, although this is partly due to the volatility of force demands on most high-gradient right-of-ways: it's less worth trying to shift out every slight change.
Or as I read once in an article in Backpacking I think, about different approaches to how much stuff you bring, one person said, "If I need it and I don't have it, I don't need it."
#13
Senior Member
12-27 for everything. I don't know % and don't care.
#14
OM boy
not a 'tourer/packer', this would not be my shopping/errands bike (which is now an e-bike...) very 'sport'/ performance oriented, sometimes/often just cruising around.
This is my daily ride ,10 speed mech Spec Tarmac Expert which was converted from 53-39 to 50-34. My preferred cadence range is 70-100, which usually averages out around 85-87 at this time.
I am working to get back to my preferred cadence of 90-94... But quite ok with up to 110 and down to 68 for short periods
Climbing cadence of 68-75...
Spend majority of my riding in the 50x15 thru 18 and for most hills/climbing 34x16 thru 24, the 28 gets used on double digit percent climbs.
When on faster Group rides, I use a bike which has same rear cluster and 52/34 (recent conversion from 36).
I do measure my exact rollout for wheel circumference.
almost 75 & not getting any faster... LOL!
Daily ride - 10 spd Tarmac
This is my daily ride ,10 speed mech Spec Tarmac Expert which was converted from 53-39 to 50-34. My preferred cadence range is 70-100, which usually averages out around 85-87 at this time.
I am working to get back to my preferred cadence of 90-94... But quite ok with up to 110 and down to 68 for short periods
Climbing cadence of 68-75...
Spend majority of my riding in the 50x15 thru 18 and for most hills/climbing 34x16 thru 24, the 28 gets used on double digit percent climbs.
When on faster Group rides, I use a bike which has same rear cluster and 52/34 (recent conversion from 36).
I do measure my exact rollout for wheel circumference.
almost 75 & not getting any faster... LOL!
Daily ride - 10 spd Tarmac
Likes For cyclezen:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,317
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,397 Times
in
1,353 Posts
I live in flat Long Island. I’ve always preferred one tooth jumps between gears, helps deal with all the wind we get. My last road bike had a 34/50 crank and an 11 spd. 14-28 cassette. I lived in the 50 and had perfect gearing from the 14 up to the 21. I had enough of a low for the hills on the north shore, with a 32 inch low, which was adequate. If I took a bike on vacation where it was hilly, I used my gravel bike with a 11-34 11 spd. And a 30/46. My recent Emonda purchase got me a 11/30 12 spd with a 36/52 crank, still pretty good, I live in the 36 and use 13 to 16 cogs a lot.
#16
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,699 Times
in
1,166 Posts
11-speed road, with 50 | 34 chain rings: Hated the mid-range gaps (14T, 16T, 18T) in the 11-32 my bike came with, tried to Frankenstein a 12-28 from a 11-28 and a 12-25 but shifting at the transition was inconsistent. Tried the 11-28 but missed the 16T cog on many rides. Rode the 12-25 until the Prestacycle monoblock 12-28 went on sale, which is perfect for my regular routes.
11-speed gravel, with 48 | 31 chain rings: 11-34 works well for now but I have a 11-40 for more challenging terrain.
12-speed road, with 50 | 34 chain rings: Bike came with a 11-34 cassette, which lacks the 16T cog. Based on my experience on 11-speed road, I ordered a 11-30 cassette, which omits the 34T cog for the 16T cog.
11-speed gravel, with 48 | 31 chain rings: 11-34 works well for now but I have a 11-40 for more challenging terrain.
12-speed road, with 50 | 34 chain rings: Bike came with a 11-34 cassette, which lacks the 16T cog. Based on my experience on 11-speed road, I ordered a 11-30 cassette, which omits the 34T cog for the 16T cog.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right where I'm supposed to be
Posts: 1,703
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Liked 241 Times
in
149 Posts
For the last 25 years it's been 6 or 7 speeds, with 13-15-17-20-24-28 for the 6sp, add the 32 for the 7sp. Sachs FW's. Now I use 36/46 rings, but have also used 24/36/50 and 26/44/48. The progression is relativley even, and it does lend it's to half-steps quite well. I have one bike I use a 9sp 12-36, but really only use the 14-16-18-21-24-28-32. With 24/36/44 rings. I'm not much of a fan of it though, I prefer a 15-17-20-24 step. Cassette selction really sucks big time, not really much variation in cog selection or progression. Lots of the same ol' same 'ol from brand to brand. I have no use for an 11t, let alone 12t. I know of only one 7sp cassette that begins with a 13t but has a stupid 15-18-21-24 progression rather than 15-17-20-24 which is to me perfect. If I lived in a flatter area I'd be happy with a 13-15-17-19-21-24-28 7sp FW.
#18
Hack
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,299
Bikes: TrueNorth CX bike, 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), Yess World Cup race BMX, Pure Cruiser race BMX, RSD Mayor v3 Fatbike
Liked 208 Times
in
144 Posts
What percentage change between gears do your legs like?
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
--Shannon
I'm wondering this, because I've got a bike that I set up with a half-step + granny, (45/42/30 x 14-16-18-20-23-26), which gives me a ~7% step between gears. (The high gear is a bit low, if I went 7 speed on this bike, I'd probably add a 12, but spinning out a bit early on a descent isn't much of a problem for me, and I built it with the freewheel I had. On anything other than a steep downhill, it's money.)
I've read a lot of posts that say that the gaps I have are "too small to be noticed." Often in defense of 1x drivetrains, where the jumps are in the same 14-15% range that I had when I was running that same freewheel with a 42T single front chainring. (Obviously with less range, being a 6-speed, but that's not what I'm thinking about.) And I hated it, especially on the flats, with variable winds. One gear too high, the next one too low.
For me, and my old and weak legs, 7% is a really nice change. Goldilocks zone. Makes the difference between "shoving the pedals" and "floating feet."
What do y'all like best?
--Shannon
#19
Senior Member
I like 2.3mm between my gears.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
around 10% or less for 'highway' & about 20% or more for 'city' .
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#21
Full Member
I like my 14-28 6sp freewheels. Relatively even spacing, large gaps so I don't have to double or triple shift, while also enough top speed with a vintage road crank. On my modern bikes I end up double or triple shifting frequently or wondering why I have an 11th cog which is just unnecessary for me.
#23
don't try this at home.
I've been riding an 11-32 11-speed. My updated derailleur can handle 11-34, so I tried it -- it's normally on my other bike, an "adventure all-day" bike with triple front chainrings.
The 11-34 gear spacing was a bit annoying to me, so I switched back to 11-32.
Some years ago, I was doing some fairly flat, fast-for-me group rides. I wanted close shifts in the 18-23 mph range, and a 34-32 low for the hills.
So I made a custom combination 14-32 cassette! including a 14-20 straight block.
It was fantastic in the 50 chainring, with a little over 1 mph change between shifts around 20 mph. Perfect.
But in the 34 chainring, the shifts were way too close together. I have Di2, so I just clicked twice and shifted two cogs as needed.
It's interesting that the gear differences are mostly 5-6% or so:
shift 14 to 15: 7%
shift 17 to 18: 5.8%
shift 19 to 20: 5%
I would spin out around 28-29 mph, so I coasted downhills more often -- a reasonable tradeoff for me.
The 14-32 at typical flat road cadences:
The 11-34 gear spacing was a bit annoying to me, so I switched back to 11-32.
Some years ago, I was doing some fairly flat, fast-for-me group rides. I wanted close shifts in the 18-23 mph range, and a 34-32 low for the hills.
So I made a custom combination 14-32 cassette! including a 14-20 straight block.
It was fantastic in the 50 chainring, with a little over 1 mph change between shifts around 20 mph. Perfect.
But in the 34 chainring, the shifts were way too close together. I have Di2, so I just clicked twice and shifted two cogs as needed.
It's interesting that the gear differences are mostly 5-6% or so:
shift 14 to 15: 7%
shift 17 to 18: 5.8%
shift 19 to 20: 5%
I would spin out around 28-29 mph, so I coasted downhills more often -- a reasonable tradeoff for me.
The 14-32 at typical flat road cadences:
Last edited by rm -rf; 05-11-24 at 08:45 PM.
#24
The Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Espaņola, NM
Posts: 1,266
Bikes: 1976 Fredo Speciale, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr., Libertas mixte
Liked 1,140 Times
in
542 Posts
Usually, two-tooth gaps are fine for me in back, but I appreciate bigger jumps on the last cog or two. I like smaller chainrings better than larger rear cogs, and have tried to get along with smaller than 28T rears for appearances sake, but have concluded I'll need 1:1 or less until I get fitter. I have triple cranks on my riders, 49-42-28 with a 14-24 6-speed currently on Fredo, a 48-36-26 with a 11-34 9-speed rear on Clem, and a 48-34-24 with a 13-26 7-speed on Blue Bella.
I will also say that I was impressed that the Tourney rear derailleur on my Jamis Citizen 1 handled a ten-tooth jump (24T to the 34T granny gear) with just one more click, like any other. I liked that bailout option.
I will also say that I was impressed that the Tourney rear derailleur on my Jamis Citizen 1 handled a ten-tooth jump (24T to the 34T granny gear) with just one more click, like any other. I liked that bailout option.
__________________
Beneath the valley of the underbikers.
Beneath the valley of the underbikers.