Hunt carbon rim exploded while inflating
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,514
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1636 Post(s)
Liked 1,842 Times
in
1,025 Posts
At least the OP wasn't just calling out Hunt for a bad wheel when it does appear the OP blew it...literally and figuratively.
Glad that Hunt send the OP a replacement rim...they just could have said 'sucks for you, next time read the owners manual' or some such wording.
Love the stories about 'asplosions'...keep them coming.
Glad that Hunt send the OP a replacement rim...they just could have said 'sucks for you, next time read the owners manual' or some such wording.
Love the stories about 'asplosions'...keep them coming.
My guess is that Hunt has to make the shelf area tighter than normal, because there is no bead to keep the tire from lifting off. That bead has to be tight against the rim shelf to prevent air pressure from prying underneath the tire bead. This tight construction, in turn means you need much higher pressure to seat the bead. But the weak hookless sidewall cannot stand the higher pressure. So now you have a death spiral.
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,488
Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1516 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times
in
456 Posts
Yep, hoop stresses. I spread a double-walled aluminum rim that way once.
Likes For BlazingPedals:
#78
Senior Member
Not all of us are luddites.
I ride all three types of bikes - carbon, aluminum and steel.
I have aluminum and CF wheels.
I have rim and disc brakes, and I like the discs better.
Assploding CF is the only thing that’s put me in the hospital.
So I’m cautious about what parts and the type of parts I ride, pain will do that to you.
Oh and yes, my high end steel bike is awesome.
I ride all three types of bikes - carbon, aluminum and steel.
I have aluminum and CF wheels.
I have rim and disc brakes, and I like the discs better.
Assploding CF is the only thing that’s put me in the hospital.
So I’m cautious about what parts and the type of parts I ride, pain will do that to you.
Oh and yes, my high end steel bike is awesome.
Some people have a tendency to go to extremes in their hope to substantiate their argument but end up comparing proverbial oranges and apples. Use of CF in jets produced for our war department was thrown in by someone as the proof of material’s reliability - I’m not sure that the level of testing and quality control applied by bicycle companies will approach that of leading aerospace and war industry, such as Lockheed Martin etc. Of course, this is just a guess, may be bicycle industry perfected the technology and Lockheed Martin copied it. 😉
I have good quality frames made from steel, titanium, aluminum, and yes CF. They all work satisfactorily and admirably well for the purpose they were made and built up.
#79
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,480
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2705 Post(s)
Liked 5,982 Times
in
3,068 Posts
A quick defense of Hunt carbon rims since they all don’t explode. Have had a pair of 60 mms for two years and have put on three sets of tires - using a compressor to seat the them. Don’t know the pressure used, but enough to get them in place, and never an issue.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#80
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,698
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4795 Post(s)
Liked 1,547 Times
in
1,014 Posts
#81
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,491 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Improper spoke tension is the main cause of metal fatigue on alloy rims...A properly built wheel especially if it's a disc wheel where brake track wear isn't an issue will last forever, unless it is crashed badly or seriously abused.
#82
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,278
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3576 Post(s)
Liked 3,758 Times
in
1,875 Posts
Everything we know about material science says that is untrue. Use an aluminum rim long enough, it will eventually fail from fatigue.
#83
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,655
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1130 Post(s)
Liked 922 Times
in
521 Posts
So there is that.
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,009
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4876 Post(s)
Liked 4,042 Times
in
2,621 Posts
My experience agrees with this with the exception of several 20" (406) aluminum rims on the rear wheel of my folding commuter bike which failed along the center plane. I originally thought these were brake track wear failures which propagated into the rim. Eventually I showed these to Bill Mould, and was told these were more likely caused by high pressure (60psi) in wide (47mm) tires on relatively narrow rims. These were Kinetix rims, and while I can't say the rims were the problem, I did solve the problem by changing to Sun Ringle rims which are slightly wider.
For reference, I weigh about 215 pounds.
Rim failure from hoop stress. Brake tracks were about 1mm thick.
Rear brake was thumping when applied.
Another rim with hoop stress failure.
For reference, I weigh about 215 pounds.
Rim failure from hoop stress. Brake tracks were about 1mm thick.
Rear brake was thumping when applied.
Another rim with hoop stress failure.
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,577
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 996 Post(s)
Liked 592 Times
in
406 Posts
Brake tracks were at least 1.0mm thick, and spoke tensions were all within 20% of the mean tension (at the time of building). I initially thought this was brake track wear that spread inward, but the rims weren't very worn and Bill Mould knows more about rims than I do, so I'm willing to accept that interpretation. In any case, the problem is licked.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,009
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4876 Post(s)
Liked 4,042 Times
in
2,621 Posts
Brake tracks were at least 1.0mm thick, and spoke tensions were all within 20% of the mean tension (at the time of building). I initially thought this was brake track wear that spread inward, but the rims weren't very worn and Bill Mould knows more about rims than I do, so I'm willing to accept that interpretation. In any case, the problem is licked.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#87
Senior Member
Well, folks - it’s really not rocket-surgery (=rocket science + neurosurgery). All materials yield to pressure/force. The thinner the material, greater likelihood of failure, all else being equal.
The only reason my Al wheels seem indestructible is because I start with a slightly heavier rim of high quality, build it myself quite well using a sturdy set of hubs, 32H laced 2-cross with double butted SS spokes - and most importantly, even (very close to equal) tension on all spokes. One can easily true a wheel without equal tension on spokes but they will not stay true for very long.
I’m sure that if I have someone weighing twice as much as I do, the bike and the wheels will survive… for a while, but wouldn’t prove indestructible in the long-run.
Im sure very similar principles apply to CF rims/wheels.
Given enough time, everything gets weaker and eventually fails. Things that built well will last a life-time of a person but it doesn’t mean they will never fail.
The only reason my Al wheels seem indestructible is because I start with a slightly heavier rim of high quality, build it myself quite well using a sturdy set of hubs, 32H laced 2-cross with double butted SS spokes - and most importantly, even (very close to equal) tension on all spokes. One can easily true a wheel without equal tension on spokes but they will not stay true for very long.
I’m sure that if I have someone weighing twice as much as I do, the bike and the wheels will survive… for a while, but wouldn’t prove indestructible in the long-run.
Im sure very similar principles apply to CF rims/wheels.
Given enough time, everything gets weaker and eventually fails. Things that built well will last a life-time of a person but it doesn’t mean they will never fail.
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,089
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3420 Post(s)
Liked 5,617 Times
in
2,912 Posts
Some years back I learned the hard way that a larger cross-section on a tire increases stress on the rim,
when I cracked the sidewall of an aluminum rim...twice.
I broke the first rim, moved the hub & spokes to a new rim, then that one broke a couple months later.
Failure was where the bead of the rim met the inner rim wall, pressure was at max rating of a 1.9" tire.
So I did some digging. (PDF)
Understanding the Influence of Pressure and Radial Loads on Stress and Displacement Response of a Rotating Body: The Automobile Wheel
See page 3, Section "2.2. Influence of tire air pressure".
when I cracked the sidewall of an aluminum rim...twice.
I broke the first rim, moved the hub & spokes to a new rim, then that one broke a couple months later.
Failure was where the bead of the rim met the inner rim wall, pressure was at max rating of a 1.9" tire.
So I did some digging. (PDF)
Understanding the Influence of Pressure and Radial Loads on Stress and Displacement Response of a Rotating Body: The Automobile Wheel
See page 3, Section "2.2. Influence of tire air pressure".
Likes For Shimagnolo:
#90
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,655
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1130 Post(s)
Liked 922 Times
in
521 Posts
So I find this thread enlightening.
Ive been on bikes in a semi serious to way too serious capacity since the early 90’s.
In that time, this simply has never come up for me. To be fair, my super serious years were spent on 20 and 23c tires, often glued on. So a totally different story.
Still, I’ve got a load of gravel and mountain bikes now. All tubeless. I would have never thought that the lower of either the rim max pressure or tire max pressure could destroy a rim, based on tire size. Seems like a more detailed rim sticker would be an easy fix.
I think I’m probably like most of us, it’s never happened to me before only because my tires feel pretty firm around 40-45psi. Not because I knew any better.
Ive been on bikes in a semi serious to way too serious capacity since the early 90’s.
In that time, this simply has never come up for me. To be fair, my super serious years were spent on 20 and 23c tires, often glued on. So a totally different story.
Still, I’ve got a load of gravel and mountain bikes now. All tubeless. I would have never thought that the lower of either the rim max pressure or tire max pressure could destroy a rim, based on tire size. Seems like a more detailed rim sticker would be an easy fix.
I think I’m probably like most of us, it’s never happened to me before only because my tires feel pretty firm around 40-45psi. Not because I knew any better.
Likes For rosefarts:
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,606
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18572 Post(s)
Liked 16,018 Times
in
7,519 Posts
Either that, or he’s clueless.
Likes For indyfabz:
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,072
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4021 Post(s)
Liked 7,546 Times
in
3,036 Posts
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 11,334
Bikes: Madone, Emonda, 5500, Ritchey Breakaway
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10301 Post(s)
Liked 5,273 Times
in
2,256 Posts
Damn, I mounted my hunt wheels the other day. I have never set up tubeless before and watched a bunch of youtube videos on it. The one thing I never saw was how to install the valve stem correctly. The videos just showed inserting and hand tight the little nut. So that’s what I did. 6 co2 cartridges later I couldn’t get the bead to set fully. Gave up and took it to the shop to install.
Something that took me hours, took my buddy 5 mins.
Something that took me hours, took my buddy 5 mins.
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 11,334
Bikes: Madone, Emonda, 5500, Ritchey Breakaway
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10301 Post(s)
Liked 5,273 Times
in
2,256 Posts
Should clarify, I did not push the valve stem in place while tightening the nut. I got 70 percent the tire to set but couldn’t get the rest of it.
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,514
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1636 Post(s)
Liked 1,842 Times
in
1,025 Posts
the valve stem should definitely be pushed down firmly while you tighten the ring nut.
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 11,334
Bikes: Madone, Emonda, 5500, Ritchey Breakaway
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10301 Post(s)
Liked 5,273 Times
in
2,256 Posts
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,606
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18572 Post(s)
Liked 16,018 Times
in
7,519 Posts
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,837
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,050 Times
in
740 Posts
I find this conversation to be very informative as I'd always assumed that 100psi is a 100psi and if that's what a rim is rated for than why would the tire matter. Still not fully getting it as the amount of material in contact with the rim would seem to be the same regardless of the tire size, either way its the same amount of tire contact at the bead as well as the same amount of pressure contained within the system, So is it ultimately a leverage situation? The way the tire expands pushes out on the rim differently effecting how the stress of holding the tire is placed on the rim? Cause I read the amount of area being an issue but I don't see how a larger tire has any more area in contact with the rim. The larger tire has a larger cross section obviously but it would seem to me that there can't be any additional amount air in contact with the rim as the bigger tire does nothing to change the amount of surface area of the rim the tire/tube/air can act upon. How can any size tire with a 100psi apply more pressure than 100psi onto the rim other than by increasing the load on the tire?
I've seen aluminum rims in cross races shattered, a lady walked off the course with her rim cracked into 4 separate pieces and rims split width wise from trick riding, so there's plenty of ways an alloy rim could fail.
I've seen aluminum rims in cross races shattered, a lady walked off the course with her rim cracked into 4 separate pieces and rims split width wise from trick riding, so there's plenty of ways an alloy rim could fail.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#99
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,859
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2063 Post(s)
Liked 1,557 Times
in
1,078 Posts
I find this conversation to be very informative as I'd always assumed that 100psi is a 100psi and if that's what a rim is rated for than why would the tire matter. Still not fully getting it as the amount of material in contact with the rim would seem to be the same regardless of the tire size, either way its the same amount of tire contact at the bead as well as the same amount of pressure contained within the system, So is it ultimately a leverage situation? The way the tire expands pushes out on the rim differently effecting how the stress of holding the tire is placed on the rim? Cause I read the amount of area being an issue but I don't see how a larger tire has any more area in contact with the rim. The larger tire has a larger cross section obviously but it would seem to me that there can't be any additional amount air in contact with the rim as the bigger tire does nothing to change the amount of surface area of the rim the tire/tube/air can act upon. How can any size tire with a 100psi apply more pressure than 100psi onto the rim other than by increasing the load on the tire?
What is the ideal gas law? (article) | Khan Academy
A wider tire has greater Volume (than a narrower tire). Thus, at the same Pressure and Temperature, the wider tire also contains a greater number of moles (i.e., amount) of air than a narrower tire.
All of the air within the tire exerts a force against the sidewalls of the wheel via the tire, not just the air at the boundary of the tire and wheel. If you don't believe me, you can do this experiment: Mount a 700x25c tire and a 700x32c tire to the same wheel and inflate each to the same pressure, and see which tire feels firmer?
This is confirmed by the Hoop Stress formula: Pressure Vessel, Thin Wall Hoop and Longitudinal Stresses Equation and Calculator (engineersedge.com)
... which shows that at the same Pressure, Hoop Stress increases with the cross-sectional diameter of the tire, which is proportional to Volume.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#100
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,089
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3420 Post(s)
Liked 5,617 Times
in
2,912 Posts
IStill not fully getting it as the amount of material in contact with the rim would seem to be the same regardless of the tire size, either way its the same amount of tire contact at the bead as well as the same amount of pressure contained within the system, So is it ultimately a leverage situation? The way the tire expands pushes out on the rim differently effecting how the stress of holding the tire is placed on the rim? Cause I read the amount of area being an issue but I don't see how a larger tire has any more area in contact with the rim. The larger tire has a larger cross section obviously but it would seem to me that there can't be any additional amount air in contact with the rim as the bigger tire does nothing to change the amount of surface area of the rim the tire/tube/air can act upon. How can any size tire with a 100psi apply more pressure than 100psi onto the rim other than by increasing the load on the tire?
.
.
All explained on page 3 of that document.
Look at Figure 4 and Equation 5.
"a" is the overall radius of the tread of the inflated tire.
"rf" is the radius of the rim at the inner surface of the bead.
Assuming the tire has a round cross-section when inflated: a - rf = <width of tire>
Now think about varying "a" by changing tire width;
As "a" becomes closer to "rf" (narrower tire), the lateral force on the rim decreases.
As "a" becomes further from "rf" (wider tire), the lateral force on the rim increases.