What side/spoke lighting/reflectors do you like?
#27
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,691
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 510 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7287 Post(s)
Liked 2,362 Times
in
1,381 Posts
Good job, @BobbyG! I'm not willing to put reflective clothing on, beyond things on my ankles. It's too much trouble for me. The other exception is that I do wear a reflective vest when I ride the e-trike, which is my part-time job. I do it not only for visibility but also to mark me as "I'm workin' here!"
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#28
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,443
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 783 Post(s)
Liked 1,215 Times
in
677 Posts
Likes For JaccoW:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
I don't do a lot on the wheels, but try to find at least taillights that have some lateral visibility. I do like my shoe lights (https://www.nighttechgear.com/products/night-runner-270).
I have been looking for better rear cuff lights. I found some spurs which may be OK with some shoes, but my cycling shoes don't have very big heels.
For wheels, some brands of tires have reflective strips. I think Schwalbe Marathons and Panaracer TourGuard both have reflective strips. Probably other brands with commuter tires.
I have been looking for better rear cuff lights. I found some spurs which may be OK with some shoes, but my cycling shoes don't have very big heels.
For wheels, some brands of tires have reflective strips. I think Schwalbe Marathons and Panaracer TourGuard both have reflective strips. Probably other brands with commuter tires.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Southeast US
Posts: 937
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 318 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
104 Posts
Same here, my exact reaction. If they're still bright enough, I'd much rather have a black appearance that reflects when shone on. Based on the pictures, I think I want this now.
Likes For FiftySix:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston Roads
Posts: 978
Bikes: 2012 Canondale Synapse 105, 2017 REI Co-Op ADV 3.1
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 507 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
133 Posts
I had some leftover retro-reflective tape from when I outfitted my daughter's stroller, so I cut 4 pieces of it and placed it on the opposing side of the rim, like this, but not all the way around:
As a driver I find that reflectors moving up and down attract more attention than a fully-reflective sidewall (although that's pretty good as well). Plus I don't really want to be a moving light show, that is actually quite distracting. You can get all kinds of retro-reflective tape off Amazon, in all kinds of colors, including gray/black.
As a driver I find that reflectors moving up and down attract more attention than a fully-reflective sidewall (although that's pretty good as well). Plus I don't really want to be a moving light show, that is actually quite distracting. You can get all kinds of retro-reflective tape off Amazon, in all kinds of colors, including gray/black.
#33
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have reflective sidewalls on my bike (Continental Contact II), as well as several FLECTR products I have picked up via their Kickstarter campaigns (FLECTR 360 OMNI on the rims, FLECTR VORTEX on my cranks). I have hit the bike with the beam of a flash light several times while camping, and the light reflected back is blinding, even from ~100 meters away.
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: London, UK
Posts: 10
Bikes: Surly, Genesis, Colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have to declare an interest here, but I had such a problem with side-visibility whilst commuting in London that I designed my own light, The Orb.
It's a bike light and bidon, with USB charged LEDs in the lid which illuminate the bottle (you can also drink from it as normal).
By being in the centre of the bike, it also highlights the pedalling motion of your legs, so drivers see that biological movement and recognise you as a cyclist.
www.orb.bike/about-the-orb/
It's a bike light and bidon, with USB charged LEDs in the lid which illuminate the bottle (you can also drink from it as normal).
By being in the centre of the bike, it also highlights the pedalling motion of your legs, so drivers see that biological movement and recognise you as a cyclist.
www.orb.bike/about-the-orb/
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,115
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 451 Post(s)
Liked 364 Times
in
227 Posts
Have to declare an interest here, but I had such a problem with side-visibility whilst commuting in London that I designed my own light, The Orb.
It's a bike light and bidon, with USB charged LEDs in the lid which illuminate the bottle (you can also drink from it as normal).
By being in the centre of the bike, it also highlights the pedalling motion of your legs, so drivers see that biological movement and recognise you as a cyclist.
www.orb.bike/about-the-orb/
It's a bike light and bidon, with USB charged LEDs in the lid which illuminate the bottle (you can also drink from it as normal).
By being in the centre of the bike, it also highlights the pedalling motion of your legs, so drivers see that biological movement and recognise you as a cyclist.
www.orb.bike/about-the-orb/
#36
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,691
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 510 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7287 Post(s)
Liked 2,362 Times
in
1,381 Posts
I got some ankle bands with lights in them for something like $2 on ebay. Each band uses two CR2032 cells. The ankle motion should be a good attention grabber.
I also put reflective tape all around my pedals. My pedals didn't come with reflectors.
One of these days, I want someone to ride my bike with all my gadgets so I can observe it myself.
I also put reflective tape all around my pedals. My pedals didn't come with reflectors.
One of these days, I want someone to ride my bike with all my gadgets so I can observe it myself.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#37
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,092 Times
in
2,325 Posts
I'm looking to brigten up my profile view now that it's getting dark during the commutes. I currently have front and rear blinkies, another brighter constant front light, and a rear helmet light that slowly pulses or is steady. I also wear a hiviz yellow jacket.
Should i just throw the stock reflectors back on the wheels? I know there's all sorts of spoke lights, tape, leg bands, etc. What's good?
Should i just throw the stock reflectors back on the wheels? I know there's all sorts of spoke lights, tape, leg bands, etc. What's good?
They are mostly useless.
That said, I do have them on my bikes but only because it is required by my state's traffic laws...as it is in all other US states. But, in terms of effectiveness, they are very ineffective. The angle of an automobile light that will illuminate them is too shallow. Even a CPSC study agrees. I came to my conclusions before reading the study but they reach much the same conclusion which is backed up by data. From their conclusion (see page 18 of the report which is on page 21 on the link), there is no side treatment that could be detected in less than 200 feet by an approaching vehicle. Most of the side reflectors had closer to 150 feet of detection. To give some indication of what that means, at 30mph, a car covers about 150 feet in 3 seconds (44 feet/second).
And the time of detection is greatly reduced if the sight lines aren't clear. Many of the streets that I commute on at night have fences, plantings, or other landscaping obstructions right up to the corner. The clear line of sight for a car is about the size of a sidewalk and a parking strip. The total distance is roughly 12 feet before the car's lights can illuminate any kind of side reflector.
The CPSC study was done in the late 90s. Things haven't improved any since then either. If anything, the angle of the light from a car's headlamps is more constrained given the more highly focused beams that have become prevalent today. With the lower angle of light, the beam from a headlamp doesn't illuminate as high anymore so any obstruction at a corner is blocking even more light than it did 20 years ago.
Active lighting might be better but, again, the distance at which they can be seen is rather small and would also be impacted by obstructions at intersections. A bright front light and/or one that can be moved to aim at the drivers (i.e. a helmet light) is more effective than any kind of side reflector or side light.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,115
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 451 Post(s)
Liked 364 Times
in
227 Posts
I'm currently slipping into my asbestos undies because I can hear the flame throwers lighting up right now but I take a very different tack on side reflectors...
They are mostly useless.
That said, I do have them on my bikes but only because it is required by my state's traffic laws...as it is in all other US states. But, in terms of effectiveness, they are very ineffective. The angle of an automobile light that will illuminate them is too shallow. Even a CPSC study agrees. I came to my conclusions before reading the study but they reach much the same conclusion which is backed up by data. From their conclusion (see page 18 of the report which is on page 21 on the link), there is no side treatment that could be detected in less than 200 feet by an approaching vehicle. Most of the side reflectors had closer to 150 feet of detection. To give some indication of what that means, at 30mph, a car covers about 150 feet in 3 seconds (44 feet/second).
And the time of detection is greatly reduced if the sight lines aren't clear. Many of the streets that I commute on at night have fences, plantings, or other landscaping obstructions right up to the corner. The clear line of sight for a car is about the size of a sidewalk and a parking strip. The total distance is roughly 12 feet before the car's lights can illuminate any kind of side reflector.
The CPSC study was done in the late 90s. Things haven't improved any since then either. If anything, the angle of the light from a car's headlamps is more constrained given the more highly focused beams that have become prevalent today. With the lower angle of light, the beam from a headlamp doesn't illuminate as high anymore so any obstruction at a corner is blocking even more light than it did 20 years ago.
Active lighting might be better but, again, the distance at which they can be seen is rather small and would also be impacted by obstructions at intersections. A bright front light and/or one that can be moved to aim at the drivers (i.e. a helmet light) is more effective than any kind of side reflector or side light.
They are mostly useless.
That said, I do have them on my bikes but only because it is required by my state's traffic laws...as it is in all other US states. But, in terms of effectiveness, they are very ineffective. The angle of an automobile light that will illuminate them is too shallow. Even a CPSC study agrees. I came to my conclusions before reading the study but they reach much the same conclusion which is backed up by data. From their conclusion (see page 18 of the report which is on page 21 on the link), there is no side treatment that could be detected in less than 200 feet by an approaching vehicle. Most of the side reflectors had closer to 150 feet of detection. To give some indication of what that means, at 30mph, a car covers about 150 feet in 3 seconds (44 feet/second).
And the time of detection is greatly reduced if the sight lines aren't clear. Many of the streets that I commute on at night have fences, plantings, or other landscaping obstructions right up to the corner. The clear line of sight for a car is about the size of a sidewalk and a parking strip. The total distance is roughly 12 feet before the car's lights can illuminate any kind of side reflector.
The CPSC study was done in the late 90s. Things haven't improved any since then either. If anything, the angle of the light from a car's headlamps is more constrained given the more highly focused beams that have become prevalent today. With the lower angle of light, the beam from a headlamp doesn't illuminate as high anymore so any obstruction at a corner is blocking even more light than it did 20 years ago.
Active lighting might be better but, again, the distance at which they can be seen is rather small and would also be impacted by obstructions at intersections. A bright front light and/or one that can be moved to aim at the drivers (i.e. a helmet light) is more effective than any kind of side reflector or side light.
Likes For bpcyclist:
#39
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,691
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 510 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7287 Post(s)
Liked 2,362 Times
in
1,381 Posts
@cyccommute is right that reflectors don't do much. I use them anyway because they can't hurt. By saying that, I back it up by also using lights. My spoke light is dim, but it's a big attention grabber. I get compliments on it. It uses two CR2016 cells.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,960
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1359 Post(s)
Liked 1,658 Times
in
822 Posts
@cyccommute is right that reflectors don't do much. I use them anyway because they can't hurt. By saying that, I back it up by also using lights. My spoke light is dim, but it's a big attention grabber. I get compliments on it. It uses two CR2016 cells.
#41
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,092 Times
in
2,325 Posts
Sorry but if lights aren’t bright they can’t “be seen”...especially in an urban environment where they have to compete will lots and lots of other light sources.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#42
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,584
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 711 Times
in
392 Posts
I'm currently slipping into my asbestos undies because I can hear the flame throwers lighting up right now but I take a very different tack on side reflectors...
They are mostly useless.
That said, I do have them on my bikes but only because it is required by my state's traffic laws...as it is in all other US states. But, in terms of effectiveness, they are very ineffective. The angle of an automobile light that will illuminate them is too shallow. Even a CPSC study agrees. I came to my conclusions before reading the study but they reach much the same conclusion which is backed up by data. From their conclusion (see page 18 of the report which is on page 21 on the link), there is no side treatment that could be detected in less than 200 feet by an approaching vehicle. Most of the side reflectors had closer to 150 feet of detection. To give some indication of what that means, at 30mph, a car covers about 150 feet in 3 seconds (44 feet/second).
And the time of detection is greatly reduced if the sight lines aren't clear. Many of the streets that I commute on at night have fences, plantings, or other landscaping obstructions right up to the corner. The clear line of sight for a car is about the size of a sidewalk and a parking strip. The total distance is roughly 12 feet before the car's lights can illuminate any kind of side reflector.
The CPSC study was done in the late 90s. Things haven't improved any since then either. If anything, the angle of the light from a car's headlamps is more constrained given the more highly focused beams that have become prevalent today. With the lower angle of light, the beam from a headlamp doesn't illuminate as high anymore so any obstruction at a corner is blocking even more light than it did 20 years ago.
Active lighting might be better but, again, the distance at which they can be seen is rather small and would also be impacted by obstructions at intersections. A bright front light and/or one that can be moved to aim at the drivers (i.e. a helmet light) is more effective than any kind of side reflector or side light.
They are mostly useless.
That said, I do have them on my bikes but only because it is required by my state's traffic laws...as it is in all other US states. But, in terms of effectiveness, they are very ineffective. The angle of an automobile light that will illuminate them is too shallow. Even a CPSC study agrees. I came to my conclusions before reading the study but they reach much the same conclusion which is backed up by data. From their conclusion (see page 18 of the report which is on page 21 on the link), there is no side treatment that could be detected in less than 200 feet by an approaching vehicle. Most of the side reflectors had closer to 150 feet of detection. To give some indication of what that means, at 30mph, a car covers about 150 feet in 3 seconds (44 feet/second).
And the time of detection is greatly reduced if the sight lines aren't clear. Many of the streets that I commute on at night have fences, plantings, or other landscaping obstructions right up to the corner. The clear line of sight for a car is about the size of a sidewalk and a parking strip. The total distance is roughly 12 feet before the car's lights can illuminate any kind of side reflector.
The CPSC study was done in the late 90s. Things haven't improved any since then either. If anything, the angle of the light from a car's headlamps is more constrained given the more highly focused beams that have become prevalent today. With the lower angle of light, the beam from a headlamp doesn't illuminate as high anymore so any obstruction at a corner is blocking even more light than it did 20 years ago.
Active lighting might be better but, again, the distance at which they can be seen is rather small and would also be impacted by obstructions at intersections. A bright front light and/or one that can be moved to aim at the drivers (i.e. a helmet light) is more effective than any kind of side reflector or side light.
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: London, UK
Posts: 10
Bikes: Surly, Genesis, Colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It all started because I thought it would be something I'd be able to buy and couldn't believe it didn't exist, so here we are about 4 years later...
#44
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,691
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 510 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7287 Post(s)
Liked 2,362 Times
in
1,381 Posts
Maybe it depends on what "seen" means. As I said, I have received compliments on my spoke-mounted light. That means people see it. It is dim. It is dim, and people see it. What does this mean?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#45
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 9,991
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4311 Post(s)
Liked 2,954 Times
in
1,601 Posts
SpokLits
Lots of folks tell me they're eye-catching. I'm lit up pretty well all around though.
https://vimeo.com/76819233
Lots of folks tell me they're eye-catching. I'm lit up pretty well all around though.
https://vimeo.com/76819233
#46
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
For me, I like the Flectr Zero for the fitment to the spokes. Really is lighter and brighter than the stock ones on my B'twin Tilt 500. Only problem is, I haven't installed them yet, since I am still figuring out what pattern to use for a 28 spoke wheel design.
#47
Senior Member
I like reflective sidewalls, but bits of tape obviously show up also.
Marc
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,022
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 424 Post(s)
Liked 272 Times
in
200 Posts
These seem to make a big difference on my bike.
BV 3M Scotchlite Bicycle Spoke Reflector Bicycle Spoke Clips Bike Reflectors - 36 Pack
( would not let post the amazon link :/ )
#49
Rod & Judy
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montrose, CO
Posts: 567
Bikes: Specialized S-works E-5, Davinci joint venture , CoMotion Pangea
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
For side lighting, I second Secret Squirrel recommendation, planet bikes :bottle blinky" . I have been using niteeze spoke lights, for a while, but tired of the battery consumption mine have. Bottle blinky is bright, also use bigger batteries.
I also agree with "mad scientist", if the corner is blocked so is visibility.
Rod
I also agree with "mad scientist", if the corner is blocked so is visibility.
Rod
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,875
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2350 Post(s)
Liked 1,727 Times
in
1,179 Posts
My most effective device is a MonkeyLights M210, 5 LEDs per side, two brightness options, a whole slew of color/pattern options. It's definitely eye-catching, esp. to cross traffic as I approach intersections.
I'm sitting the fence on an actual recommendation, however. It's a few months out of warranty, and the wire between the battery pack and light failed, right at the connector. I have a temporary fix in place, but don't have an answer back yet from MonkeyLectric about how to buy a replacement connector.
Nite-Ize SpokeLits (or however it's spelled...) on my weekend/other bikes, and those 3M snap-on-the-spoke reflectors scattered among several bikes.
I'm also experimenting with a white pair of those Knog beetle knock-offs mounted on the stem, pointed forward-left and forward-right, just to get a seat-of-the-pants feel for whether it gets attention from cross traffic.
I'm sitting the fence on an actual recommendation, however. It's a few months out of warranty, and the wire between the battery pack and light failed, right at the connector. I have a temporary fix in place, but don't have an answer back yet from MonkeyLectric about how to buy a replacement connector.
Nite-Ize SpokeLits (or however it's spelled...) on my weekend/other bikes, and those 3M snap-on-the-spoke reflectors scattered among several bikes.
I'm also experimenting with a white pair of those Knog beetle knock-offs mounted on the stem, pointed forward-left and forward-right, just to get a seat-of-the-pants feel for whether it gets attention from cross traffic.