Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

spokes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-10, 11:01 AM
  #1  
walterz54
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
spokes

will a 24 straight spoke wheel be as stronge as a 32 spoke wheel(with the bend at the hub)?
walterz54 is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 11:09 AM
  #2  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
simple answer: no.

detailed answer: there's more to it than the amount of spokes, including build quality, rim strength, cross pattern and wheel size.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 11:22 AM
  #3  
walterz54
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AEO
simple answer: no.

detailed answer: there's more to it than the amount of spokes, including build quality, rim strength, cross pattern and wheel size.
ok, same quality rim, build and spokes. only difference will be the spoke count. all the spokes that have broken on me has been at the bend. so I was wondering if the straight spokes(though fewer)would make a difference.
walterz54 is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 11:38 AM
  #4  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
the answer would be 'maybe'. straight pull spokes can still break spokes from the exact same causes that gave your other wheel problems.
spokes breaking at the bends or not depends mostly on build quality and age of the wheel.

search for metal fatigue and spoke tension.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 11:41 AM
  #5  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
If you are breaking spokes, learn how to properly tension spokes before investing in any new wheelset in an attempt to cure the problem, or find someone who does know how to properly tension spokes. Proper tension is the cure to probably 99% of all wheel problems.

Straight pull spokes rely on the strength of the head of the spoke versus the j-bend in the spoke. In my opinion, the benefits are slim to non-existent. Getting a replacement j-bend spoke is also much easier than a straight pull spoke, and you don't have to combat spoke twist during the build.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 11:44 AM
  #6  
walterz54
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thank you all for the info
walterz54 is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 11:53 AM
  #7  
Steev
Senior Member
 
Steev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Backwoods of Ontario
Posts: 2,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If your wheel has broken several spokes, it's likely the rest are going to breaking soon. The same under-tensioning that the broken spokes saw has happened to all the rest so they are likely just as fatigued. A re-build with new spokes is a better idea at this time.
Steev is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 01:04 PM
  #8  
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
It's the low tension ones that break in the "J" bend at the hub. Need more tension.
This is a common problem with 8, 9, and 10-speed rear wheels due to the extreme dish needed to make room for the cassette. It takes maximum tension (or more) on the drive side in order to get enough tension in the non-drive side spokes and still have a centered rim.

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 01:30 PM
  #9  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943
It's the low tension ones that break in the "J" bend at the hub. Need more tension.
This is a common problem with 8, 9, and 10-speed rear wheels due to the extreme dish needed to make room for the cassette. It takes maximum tension (or more) on the drive side in order to get enough tension in the non-drive side spokes and still have a centered rim.

Al
Or use an off center rim or smaller cross section spokes on the non-drive side or radial lacing on the non-drive side or some combination of those three options. But only after you've tried a properly tensioned wheel or if you have money to spend and want something better than you'll (typically) find off the shelf.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 03:15 PM
  #10  
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
Or use an off center rim or smaller cross section spokes on the non-drive side or radial lacing on the non-drive side or some combination of those three options. But only after you've tried a properly tensioned wheel or if you have money to spend and want something better than you'll (typically) find off the shelf.
Those things help but there will still be a big tension differential from left to right on a modern rear wheel.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 09:52 PM
  #11  
Kimmo
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
First things first - what do you weigh?

That aside, Sheldon disagrees with this other bloke over which side to put the radial spokes...

A spoked wheel relies on having all of the spokes in constant tension. A highly dished rear wheel starts with very light tension on the left side spokes. The torque of hard pedaling combined with cyclical weight loading can cause the left side "leading" spokes to occasionally go completely slack momentarily.

Repeated cycles of tension and slackness cause these spokes to fatigue at the bends, and ultimately break.

With half-radial spoking, the amount of dish is very slightly less to begin with if you run the radial spokes up along the inside of its flange ("heads out.") In addition, since there are no "leading" spokes, no amount of torque on the hub can reduce the tension on any of the spokes. In fact, if you have an old wheel that has been breaking left side spokes, "half rebuilding" the wheel into a half radial will solve the problem once and for all.

Wrong-way Half Radial

Sometimes, rear wheels are spoked half-radial with the radial spokes on the right. This is generally done for reasons of improving derailer clearance, particularly on wheels with unusually thick spokes or unusual flange designs. Such wheels require hubs with greater torsional stiffness since most of the driving torque must then be transferred by the left side spokes.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html#half-radial

A radial lacing has the highest lateral strength of any lacing pattern. This is covered in the RADIAL LACING INFORMATION chapter. A multi-speed rear wheel that is half radially laced, with the non drive side being the side with the radial lacing, can only have increased imbalance in the lateral strengths of the two sides of the wheel. The radial spokes on the non drive side will also need a lower build tension when compared to a standard wheel. Since radial lacing has the highest lateral strength, the spokes do not need to be as tight to counter the lateral forces from the drive side in order to achieve a true wheel. Also, with the non drive side spokes even looser than normal, the likelihood that the wheel will go out of true from road shock is increased.

A properly built half radial rear wheel will be radially laced on the drive side. It would also be best to lace the drive side so the spoke heads are on the inside of the flange.
https://spokeanwheel.110mb.com/lacingsr.htm#hr

He also reckons there's a better way to balance a rear wheel...
A mixed lacing pattern I discovered that works very well for balancing rear wheel lateral strengths is the 2-cross/3-cross lacing. This pattern uses 2-cross lacing on the non drive side and 3-cross lacing on the drive side. The non drive side spokes end up being shorter than the drive side spokes, a condition that causes theoretical force vector triangles that counteracts the dish offset of the wheel. This theoretical triangle is comprised of the real force vectors of the spokes and a theoretical force vector across the hub.

The figure to the right is a simplified version of the theoretical force vector triangles created by this lacing. The RED lines represent the force vectors of the spokes, and the BLUE line represents the force vector of the theoretical third side of the triangle. The location of a 3-cross length spoke on the non drive side is indicated by the GREEN spoke head for your reference. The PURPLE line, which is perpendicular to the BLUE force vector, indicates that the rim is closer to the non drive side of this theoretical force vector triangle.

Having a theoretical force vector triangle with the opposite circumstances of the actual triangles formed by drive and non drive spoke pairs works against the imbalance caused by the dish offset. A wheel built like this still has the drive side spokes under greater tension, but the difference in the tensions is not as great as they would be if the wheel was laced conventionally. Since the spoke tensions do not vary as much, the wheel has lateral strength characteristics that are more balanced than typical. It has been my experience that these wheels do hold true much better than conventionally laced (all 3-cross) multi-speed rear wheels.

https://spokeanwheel.110mb.com/lacingsr.htm#23

If you're not racing on this bike and it's a steel frame, another good way to strengthen your rear wheel is to go to 135mm OLD. If you use an off-centre rim as well, and employ the 2-cross/3-cross pattern, it should be possible to really minimise the tension difference.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 08:46 AM
  #12  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943
This is a common problem with 8, 9, and 10-speed rear wheels due to the extreme dish needed to make room for the cassette.
I've never done the calculation but is this correct? When the change from 6/7-speed freewheel/cassettes to 8/9/10-speed cassettes was made, the hubs were widened from 126 to 130 mm OLD and I thought this pretty much compensated for the increased freehub body width so the dish remained about the same.
HillRider is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 08:53 AM
  #13  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
I've never done the calculation but is this correct? When the change from 6/7-speed freewheel/cassettes to 8/9/10-speed cassettes was made, the hubs were widened from 126 to 130 mm OLD and I thought this pretty much compensated for the increased freehub body width so the dish remained about the same.
the 4mm extra in a 130mm hub is all in the drive side.
at least, that's what I got when I did a 7sp freehub to 8/9/10sp freehub swap.
not that a 1mm spacer can't be put on the opposite side to make it 3mm extra on the drive side.

the 5mm extra in a 135mm hub is all in the NDS side.
from the measurements taken when converting an XT hub for 130mm.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 12:28 PM
  #14  
dabac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times in 222 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
First things first - what do you weigh?

That aside, Sheldon disagrees with this other bloke over which side to put the radial spokes...

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html#half-radial

https://spokeanwheel.110mb.com/lacingsr.htm#hr

He also reckons there's a better way to balance a rear wheel...
https://spokeanwheel.110mb.com/lacingsr.htm#23

If you're not racing on this bike and it's a steel frame, another good way to strengthen your rear wheel is to go to 135mm OLD. If you use an off-centre rim as well, and employ the 2-cross/3-cross pattern, it should be possible to really minimise the tension difference.
The spokeandwheel guy doesn't quite know what he's talking about, his theory and illustration about the 2X/3X benefits are quite wrong and has a minimal impact on tension differences.

Which side to put the radial lace can be debated. NDS, heads-out does two things: first the clearly pointed out benefit of not having half the spokes go slack due to drive torque, then the less clearly advertised of doing the same thing for the spke brace angle as moving the hub flange half a thickness closer to mid axle.
If you put the radial lace on the DS, heads-in you lose the never going slack feature, but you get the geometric advantage comparabe to moving that hub flange half a thickness further out from mid axle.
And admittedly I haven't done the exact math, but moving the DS a half flange width out will probably do more to improve the geometry than moving the NDS a half flange in.
dabac is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stevel610
Bicycle Mechanics
11
11-21-19 07:47 AM
TiHabanero
Bicycle Mechanics
58
08-12-19 05:53 PM
ClarkinHawaii
Bicycle Mechanics
11
02-06-15 02:36 PM
nazran
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
3
07-25-11 04:54 PM
deacon mark
Bicycle Mechanics
18
02-06-11 06:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.