How much difference does a bike make on speed?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
How much difference does a bike make on speed?
Hi everyone, I ride a Kona Sutra steel touring bicycle. Recently, my friend gifted me his old carbon fiber Specialized Roubaix. I pick it up tomorrow. I've never owned a road bike but I'm pretty excited to get my hands on this bike. My bike is a tank and anytime I've lifted a carbon fiber bike, it feels like I could toss them across the parking lot. I'm just curious if you think I will be faster because it's so much lighter?
#2
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Hi everyone, I ride a Kona Sutra steel touring bicycle. Recently, my friend gifted me his old carbon fiber Specialized Roubaix. I pick it up tomorrow. I've never owned a road bike but I'm pretty excited to get my hands on this bike. My bike is a tank and anytime I've lifted a carbon fiber bike, it feels like I could toss them across the parking lot. I'm just curious if you think I will be faster because it's so much lighter?
Otto
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Or if it fits you differently. Fit - not talked about a lot, but the difference between really good fit and mediocre fit could be real percentage points in power which translates to speed.
I did my first ride on the true race bike easy since it was mid-season and I was changing crank lengths. That "easy" matched my season's best. Two days later, two minutes came off that. On the same training wheels I'd been riding. All-up weight was maybe two pounds different. But the fit! I never knew my old fit was poor but I felt stronger, better, more both stretched out and relaxed on that race bike. Better in every way.
Not saying you are going to see this. But that fit bit is the intangible that makes a huge difference. Always keep your eyes open. When you find it, document - seat height above bottom bracket, distance back from the bottom bracket and the same for handlebar height and distance. These are "your" numbers. The good bikes for you won't make you jump through hoops to set up to get them.
I did my first ride on the true race bike easy since it was mid-season and I was changing crank lengths. That "easy" matched my season's best. Two days later, two minutes came off that. On the same training wheels I'd been riding. All-up weight was maybe two pounds different. But the fit! I never knew my old fit was poor but I felt stronger, better, more both stretched out and relaxed on that race bike. Better in every way.
Not saying you are going to see this. But that fit bit is the intangible that makes a huge difference. Always keep your eyes open. When you find it, document - seat height above bottom bracket, distance back from the bottom bracket and the same for handlebar height and distance. These are "your" numbers. The good bikes for you won't make you jump through hoops to set up to get them.
#4
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
Hi everyone, I ride a Kona Sutra steel touring bicycle. Recently, my friend gifted me his old carbon fiber Specialized Roubaix. I pick it up tomorrow. I've never owned a road bike but I'm pretty excited to get my hands on this bike. My bike is a tank and anytime I've lifted a carbon fiber bike, it feels like I could toss them across the parking lot. I'm just curious if you think I will be faster because it's so much lighter?
Rolling resistance is all about the tires.
Frontal area is (almost) all about your position on the bike. If your chest is lower, you lave less resistance.
The weight of the bike is not very important, unless you're climbing.
Likes For terrymorse:
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: New Canaan, CT
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times
in
17 Posts
For high performance there is a considerable difference as in this video: Cheap Bike Vs. Super Bike | What's The Difference? - Bing video
For most uses the high quality feel of a quality higher level bike is noticeable but not time-wise much especially on flat lands.
For most uses the high quality feel of a quality higher level bike is noticeable but not time-wise much especially on flat lands.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
How much difference? Depends on who you believe.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,254
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18424 Post(s)
Liked 15,579 Times
in
7,337 Posts
Try it out and report back.
#8
Senior Member
All the other factors, especially fit, are most certainly still relevant. I just think too many people are dismissing the weight disadvantage too quickly.
#9
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
I don't know if I totally agree with this. Yes, acceleration or uphill, the CF bike will always be faster than a sled. But even on flat ground, speed is relative to distance. Sure, you can pedal your sled at an 18mph pace, but surely you're getting more fatigued faster than you would be on a lighter road bike. In that regard, when you factor in distances, I don't think there's really any comparison. Will it make a difference on a 4-5 mile ride? Maybe not. Will it make a difference on a 25-30 mile ride? Almost certainly.
All the other factors, especially fit, are most certainly still relevant. I just think too many people are dismissing the weight disadvantage too quickly.
All the other factors, especially fit, are most certainly still relevant. I just think too many people are dismissing the weight disadvantage too quickly.
Bear in mind. This is a south Florida answer where getting worn out by added weight on big climbs is not an issue.
Otto
Last edited by ofajen; 07-09-22 at 08:31 PM.
#10
The Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Española, NM
Posts: 1,059
Bikes: 1976 Fredo Speciale, Jamis Citizen 1, Ellis-Briggs FAVORI, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 414 Post(s)
Liked 922 Times
in
447 Posts
Riding steadily against the wind the difference will be proportional to the difference in frontal area, which may not be much if you ride drops now, although a good fit may allow a lower position without discomfort. The other difference will be in acceleration, which can be more of a difference than people assume. On a ten mile ride with ten 90 degree turns, some with stop signs, I would expect you to average 1 to 2 kph faster. Now just watch someone try to model this!
Do let us know your impressions, thanks.
Do let us know your impressions, thanks.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
It should feel a bit racier. Little steeper head/seat angles and a shorter wheelbase. Probably feel more nimble.
With the right tires it should be faster through the corners; no one only rides in a straight line.
I find wheel/tire weight impacts acceleration more that static frame weight.
John
With the right tires it should be faster through the corners; no one only rides in a straight line.
I find wheel/tire weight impacts acceleration more that static frame weight.
John
#12
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,984
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10440 Post(s)
Liked 11,914 Times
in
6,101 Posts
I have 10 bikes that I have ridden on the same route, at the same time of day, under similar weather conditions. The route is about 25 miles. The difference in time between the slowest and fastest bikes is about 3 minutes. The lightest bike is the fastest, but the heaviest bike ties for second fastest. So, what's the difference? I dunno. But it's pretty consistent.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,970 Times
in
4,692 Posts
I don't know if I totally agree with this. Yes, acceleration or uphill, the CF bike will always be faster than a sled. But even on flat ground, speed is relative to distance. Sure, you can pedal your sled at an 18mph pace, but surely you're getting more fatigued faster than you would be on a lighter road bike. In that regard, when you factor in distances, I don't think there's really any comparison. Will it make a difference on a 4-5 mile ride? Maybe not. Will it make a difference on a 25-30 mile ride? Almost certainly.
All the other factors, especially fit, are most certainly still relevant. I just think too many people are dismissing the weight disadvantage too quickly.
All the other factors, especially fit, are most certainly still relevant. I just think too many people are dismissing the weight disadvantage too quickly.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Thank you everyone for the replies. The answer was as clear as mud. I guess I will ride the bicycle and report back what I think!
Likes For SoFloGirl68:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
I do a 37 mile route a lot. It's bumpy with a lot of turns. There's only a few places that you can really settle down and just get in a tuck and put the power down for top speed.
aero bike (2019) system six) / carbon wheels / fast road tires 19mph
gravel bike ( several ) with same carbon wheels and tires 18 to 18.3 mph
gravel bike with 35mm ish gravel tires 17 to 17.5 ish
mnt bike ( 2022 blur ) full suspension 29 inch tire / 2.4 inches wide 15mph
At my power level / speed I found the aero bike and gravel bike to be close enough in speed with the same wheels & tires I sold my aero bike. Riding by myself the gravel bike felt every bit as fast. When checking against the clock or when riding with my road buddies there's a difference. A much stronger/faster person
that rides more like 25mph avg would notice a much bigger difference on the aero bike vs gravel bike.
aero bike (2019) system six) / carbon wheels / fast road tires 19mph
gravel bike ( several ) with same carbon wheels and tires 18 to 18.3 mph
gravel bike with 35mm ish gravel tires 17 to 17.5 ish
mnt bike ( 2022 blur ) full suspension 29 inch tire / 2.4 inches wide 15mph
At my power level / speed I found the aero bike and gravel bike to be close enough in speed with the same wheels & tires I sold my aero bike. Riding by myself the gravel bike felt every bit as fast. When checking against the clock or when riding with my road buddies there's a difference. A much stronger/faster person
that rides more like 25mph avg would notice a much bigger difference on the aero bike vs gravel bike.
#17
Senior Member
That's an interesting question. When I changed from a 20 year old steel bike to a new carbon fibre bike, I noticed a lot of improvements in a number of areas but I can't really say I was any faster. The overall size and fit between the bikes was very similar. Changing my 2009 Giant XTC mountain bike for a 2022 Sonder XT seems to have made a lot of difference. But then, the bikes are very different: 29" wheels vs 26", tubless vs tubed tyres, a large frame that fits me vs a medium frame that was a tad on the small side, and some really good air sprung forks vs a lower end coil sprung fork. It's been quite fun suddenly scoring a lot of PRs on Strava.
#18
VFM biker
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Cali
Posts: 4
Bikes: Specialized S-Works Aethos
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Steel bike versus carbon bike,If you can couple with some other carbon components or light aluminum parts,you will feel like flying when you riding compare to your old steel bike
#19
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Sorry but mass does not appear in the steady state power equation for cycling except in the gravity term, which includes the incline as a factor, so it vanishes on flat ground. I suppose there is a very small second order effect on rolling resistance due to increased mass, but really that would be trivial in terms of total of bike and rider on what is generally not that big of a term.
Bear in mind. This is a south Florida answer where getting worn out by added weight on big climbs is not an issue.
Otto
Bear in mind. This is a south Florida answer where getting worn out by added weight on big climbs is not an issue.
Otto
Weight matters on acceleration as well as climbing, so if there's a lot of starting and stopping, or slowing and restoring speed, there could be a time/fatigue effect.
Last edited by livedarklions; 07-11-22 at 05:11 AM.
Likes For livedarklions:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Rolling resistance increases with weight as does Crr, a double whammy albeit a small one.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
248 Posts
Sorry, but the answer is "as clear as mud" because this is real life, and real life is complicated. The short answer to your question, "... if you think I will be faster because it's so much lighter," is: maybe, depending on the circumstances, but probably not much. The reasons why are complex, and the posters above have tried to explain to you some of those reasons.
I changed from a touring bike to a much lighter (weight difference of ~10 lb/4.5 kg) steel "racing" bike. The lighter bike definitely felt faster: it was easier to accelerate from a stop; it was a little faster on climbs (mainly noticeable in that I could climb at the same level of effort in a higher gear); it felt much lighter and more responsive when riding out of the saddle; it was easier to corner; etc. The actual difference in speed was difficult to quantify, because speed is dependent on so many other factors as well as the weight of the bike, some of those factors others above have mentioned, but also: weather, road conditions, traffic, traffic lights; how the engine (myself) was performing that day; etc.
For a professional rider, I'm sure the difference in speed would be meaningful. However, for someone like me who tootles along at maybe 18 mph/30 kph on the flat, the actual difference in speed is not meaningful. I enjoy riding the lighter bike and I do feel much faster, which to me is not unimportant - it definitely increases the "fun" factor of a ride. However, the absolute difference in speed over a 2 hr moderately hilly ride would be less than 0.5 mph/0.8 kph, in my experience.
I changed from a touring bike to a much lighter (weight difference of ~10 lb/4.5 kg) steel "racing" bike. The lighter bike definitely felt faster: it was easier to accelerate from a stop; it was a little faster on climbs (mainly noticeable in that I could climb at the same level of effort in a higher gear); it felt much lighter and more responsive when riding out of the saddle; it was easier to corner; etc. The actual difference in speed was difficult to quantify, because speed is dependent on so many other factors as well as the weight of the bike, some of those factors others above have mentioned, but also: weather, road conditions, traffic, traffic lights; how the engine (myself) was performing that day; etc.
For a professional rider, I'm sure the difference in speed would be meaningful. However, for someone like me who tootles along at maybe 18 mph/30 kph on the flat, the actual difference in speed is not meaningful. I enjoy riding the lighter bike and I do feel much faster, which to me is not unimportant - it definitely increases the "fun" factor of a ride. However, the absolute difference in speed over a 2 hr moderately hilly ride would be less than 0.5 mph/0.8 kph, in my experience.
Likes For noimagination:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,970 Times
in
4,692 Posts
The most interesting aspect of this thread is in the different approaches to the question: some posters think in terms of personal experience, and some think in terms of actual science.
Likes For Koyote:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
For high performance there is a considerable difference as in this video: Cheap Bike Vs. Super Bike | What's The Difference? - Bing video
For most uses the high quality feel of a quality higher level bike is noticeable but not time-wise much especially on flat lands.
For most uses the high quality feel of a quality higher level bike is noticeable but not time-wise much especially on flat lands.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times
in
1,213 Posts
My light bike feels more responsive or twitchier when I move over to it. And yet, the fastest I've ridden was on the Fuji Touring; but that had something to do with the long downhill with new pavement, little wind, few curves, and no traffic. How's the pavement and stop signs where you'll be riding?
BTW, make sure you add the Roubaix to your bike list if you keep it!
#25
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Our motors vary so much individually that general principles of science really only get you so far in predicting how things are going to work out in the real world.
Likes For livedarklions: