Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

VTG Stronglight 99 with smaller chainrings

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

VTG Stronglight 99 with smaller chainrings

Old 03-11-20, 09:03 AM
  #1  
breezwhey
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 28

Bikes: 1972 Super Mondia Special, 1989 Gazelle Champion Mondial AB, 1972 and 1977 Peugeot PX 10, 1981 Peugeot PFN 10, 1984 Peugeot PGN 10, 1981 Peugeot PH 40, 1984 Peugeot Pipeline 1, 1995 Schwinn Searcher Range, 1990 Trek 930 MTB, 1995 Trek 730

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
VTG Stronglight 99 with smaller chainrings

Long story short, has anyone ever run, or know for sure if you can run a Stronglight 99 crankset double with a 40T or 42T outer chainring and a 30T or 32T inside chainring? In other words, use what is normally the inner chainring as the outer? I don't know why it wouldn't work, since the on the 99, the outer chainrings use the same 86 BCD to mount as the inner, but there may be something I'm not considering. I realize there are many other alternatives, but this is my cheapest solution to my problem.
breezwhey is offline  
Old 03-11-20, 09:12 AM
  #2  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times in 2,066 Posts
I don't think there is any reason why this should not work. 86 bcd chainrings are available from Spa cycles in the UK.
bikemig is offline  
Likes For bikemig:
Old 03-11-20, 09:16 AM
  #3  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
The inner rings are usually not as nicely finished as the outers.

There may be an issue about counterboring of bolt holes, too.
Bad Lag is offline  
Likes For Bad Lag:
Old 03-11-20, 09:32 AM
  #4  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by breezwhey
Long story short, has anyone ever run, or know for sure if you can run a Stronglight 99 crankset double with a 40T or 42T outer chainring and a 30T or 32T inside chainring? In other words, use what is normally the inner chainring as the outer? I don't know why it wouldn't work, since the on the 99, the outer chainrings use the same 86 BCD to mount as the inner, but there may be something I'm not considering. I realize there are many other alternatives, but this is my cheapest solution to my problem.
As ​​​bikemig points out, Spa Cycles sells 86 BCD chainrings. That includes 40/42T outers and 30/32T inners, so you don't even have to think about using an inner as an outer: https://www.spacycles.co.uk/m2b0s149...l-40-50t-outer

(But even if you swapped rings between inner and outer, it ought to work fine. Not having the counterbore on the outer face just means the head of the crank bolt will sit proud of the chainring. EDIT: I wouldn't flip a ring around to use the counterbores, for the potential issues John calls out in following posts.)
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 03-11-20 at 12:23 PM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 03-11-20, 09:36 AM
  #5  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,755
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3190 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times in 1,489 Posts
Sakae/SR and Takagi also made 86BCD cranks/chainrings. Check the Bay. They are usually cheaper than the Stronglights.
seypat is online now  
Likes For seypat:
Old 03-11-20, 11:18 AM
  #6  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,934

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times in 1,915 Posts
Originally Posted by seypat
Sakae/SR and Takagi also made 86BCD cranks/chainrings. Check the Bay. They are usually cheaper than the Stronglights.
The teeth on Stronglight rings are centered with respect to the thickness of the ring, while those on Sakae Ringyo rings are offset slightly, with a ramp on what is intended to be the inner face of the ring. If you use what is designed to be a middle ring on a Sakae Ringyo crank as the outer ring instead, that ramp will be on the outside (unless you ignore the counterbore for the bolts and let the bolts stand pround of the ring face), and shifting will suffer.

Been there, done that.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Likes For JohnDThompson:
Old 03-11-20, 11:32 AM
  #7  
breezwhey
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 28

Bikes: 1972 Super Mondia Special, 1989 Gazelle Champion Mondial AB, 1972 and 1977 Peugeot PX 10, 1981 Peugeot PFN 10, 1984 Peugeot PGN 10, 1981 Peugeot PH 40, 1984 Peugeot Pipeline 1, 1995 Schwinn Searcher Range, 1990 Trek 930 MTB, 1995 Trek 730

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Bad Lag
The inner rings are usually not as nicely finished as the outers.

There may be an issue about counterboring of bolt holes, too.
Both very good points. I hadn't taken either into account. Appearance is very important on this particular build, so these may be a deal breakers. I am planning on just adding a 30T Stronglight from a triple to the existing Stronglight 40T, so I believe that would eliminate some of the other potential pitfalls.

Last edited by breezwhey; 03-11-20 at 11:35 AM.
breezwhey is offline  
Old 03-11-20, 11:45 AM
  #8  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times in 2,066 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
The teeth on Stronglight rings are centered with respect to the thickness of the ring, while those on Sakae Ringyo rings are offset slightly, with a ramp on what is intended to be the inner face of the ring. If you use what is designed to be a middle ring on a Sakae Ringyo crank as the outer ring instead, that ramp will be on the outside (unless you ignore the counterbore for the bolts and let the bolts stand pround of the ring face), and shifting will suffer.

Been there, done that.
But shifting won't be an issue if running a stronglight inner as an outer even if the bolts stick out, right? This is a problem with SR rings as they are offset? Or am I missing something?
bikemig is offline  
Old 03-11-20, 11:58 AM
  #9  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,934

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times in 1,915 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig
But shifting won't be an issue if running a stronglight inner as an outer even if the bolts stick out, right? This is a problem with SR rings as they are offset? Or am I missing something?
The teeth are centered with Stronglight rings, so they can work as either outer or middle/inner rings. If you turn a middle/inner Sakae Ringyo ring to use as an outer, with the counterbore facing out for the bolts, the chain has a hard time climbing up to the outer ring.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 03-11-20, 12:00 PM
  #10  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times in 2,066 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
The teeth are centered with Stronglight rings, so they can work as either outer or middle/inner rings. If you turn a middle/inner Sakae Ringyo ring to use as an outer, with the counterbore facing out for the bolts, the chain has a hard time climbing up to the outer ring.
I thought that was what you were saying but I just wanted to be clear.
bikemig is offline  
Old 03-11-20, 12:47 PM
  #11  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,755
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3190 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times in 1,489 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
The teeth on Stronglight rings are centered with respect to the thickness of the ring, while those on Sakae Ringyo rings are offset slightly, with a ramp on what is intended to be the inner face of the ring. If you use what is designed to be a middle ring on a Sakae Ringyo crank as the outer ring instead, that ramp will be on the outside (unless you ignore the counterbore for the bolts and let the bolts stand pround of the ring face), and shifting will suffer.

Been there, done that.
Great info! Between you and T-mar and others, we have a wealth of knowledge at our disposal.
seypat is online now  
Old 03-11-20, 01:30 PM
  #12  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
I have run a 99 with 28t inner ring and 44t or 45t outer. No problems, and I don't remember know whether the inner rings we're Stronglight or Sakae.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Likes For rhm:
Old 03-13-20, 09:27 AM
  #13  
breezwhey
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 28

Bikes: 1972 Super Mondia Special, 1989 Gazelle Champion Mondial AB, 1972 and 1977 Peugeot PX 10, 1981 Peugeot PFN 10, 1984 Peugeot PGN 10, 1981 Peugeot PH 40, 1984 Peugeot Pipeline 1, 1995 Schwinn Searcher Range, 1990 Trek 930 MTB, 1995 Trek 730

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Sounds like it will definately fine work with Stronglight Chainrings, which is what I was planning on using anyway. I just need to see what it will actually look like before I decide this is the route I want to go, although I'm the only one who would ever notice the bolts. That or just build a another new-old bike just for hill climbing
breezwhey is offline  
Old 03-13-20, 09:39 AM
  #14  
thumpism 
Bikes are okay, I guess.
 
thumpism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 9,128

Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT

Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,445 Times in 1,557 Posts
Stronglight 99 with 28/40/45.
thumpism is offline  
Likes For thumpism:
Old 03-13-20, 09:48 AM
  #15  
breezwhey
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 28

Bikes: 1972 Super Mondia Special, 1989 Gazelle Champion Mondial AB, 1972 and 1977 Peugeot PX 10, 1981 Peugeot PFN 10, 1984 Peugeot PGN 10, 1981 Peugeot PH 40, 1984 Peugeot Pipeline 1, 1995 Schwinn Searcher Range, 1990 Trek 930 MTB, 1995 Trek 730

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Thumpism, I like the way it looks without the unused outer holes on the outer ring.
breezwhey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.