Carbon v Aluminum Debate- Any Different in 2020?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: 2017 GT Grade Carbon Sram Force, 2014 Globe Roll 8 (w riser bars), 2015 All City Space Horse (cantilever)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbon v Aluminum Debate- Any Different in 2020?
As much as I'd like to go in on a sweet carbon bike, this article seems annoyingly biased to me:
https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/exper...s-the-showdown
Despite all the benefits illuminated here, this article still fails to acknowledge the fact that as carbon fatigues over time, it is fairly difficult to tell how much fatigue a frame has amassed without special expensive equipment. Therefore the risk remains quite high for sudden catastrophic failure, as opposed to other materials where frame damage can be more easily identified, providing you with a layer of security in knowing that you should tread lightly if riding a compromised frame, if you're even going to ride it at all.
Also, in the 3rd to last paragraph entitled "Lifespan" it states that a carbon frame will be in as good condition in 20 years as it was the day you bought it. There is no way that is true!! Right?! I feel like this article should be titled "Why You Should Buy Carbon", not "The Showdown", which it clearly is not.
Call me paranoid but until there is readily available technology that can tell you just how worn or strong any given carbon frame is, I'm prob still gonna be riding the aluminum train.
https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/exper...s-the-showdown
Despite all the benefits illuminated here, this article still fails to acknowledge the fact that as carbon fatigues over time, it is fairly difficult to tell how much fatigue a frame has amassed without special expensive equipment. Therefore the risk remains quite high for sudden catastrophic failure, as opposed to other materials where frame damage can be more easily identified, providing you with a layer of security in knowing that you should tread lightly if riding a compromised frame, if you're even going to ride it at all.
Also, in the 3rd to last paragraph entitled "Lifespan" it states that a carbon frame will be in as good condition in 20 years as it was the day you bought it. There is no way that is true!! Right?! I feel like this article should be titled "Why You Should Buy Carbon", not "The Showdown", which it clearly is not.
Call me paranoid but until there is readily available technology that can tell you just how worn or strong any given carbon frame is, I'm prob still gonna be riding the aluminum train.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times
in
1,181 Posts
As much as I'd like to go in on a sweet carbon bike, this article seems annoyingly biased to me:
https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/exper...s-the-showdown
Despite all the benefits illuminated here, this article still fails to acknowledge the fact that as carbon fatigues over time, it is fairly difficult to tell how much fatigue a frame has amassed without special expensive equipment. Therefore the risk remains quite high for sudden catastrophic failure,
.
https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/exper...s-the-showdown
Despite all the benefits illuminated here, this article still fails to acknowledge the fact that as carbon fatigues over time, it is fairly difficult to tell how much fatigue a frame has amassed without special expensive equipment. Therefore the risk remains quite high for sudden catastrophic failure,
.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: 2017 GT Grade Carbon Sram Force, 2014 Globe Roll 8 (w riser bars), 2015 All City Space Horse (cantilever)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.outsideonline.com/231181...dents-lawsuits
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: 2017 GT Grade Carbon Sram Force, 2014 Globe Roll 8 (w riser bars), 2015 All City Space Horse (cantilever)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
And besides, it's not that I'm necessarily arguing about the number of failures that occur anyhow, I'm trying to point out that in the debate of carbon vs aluminum frames, a major pro of aluminum is that when it fatigues, you know it, and can therefore act accordingly in response, as opposed to carbon where you'll be none the wiser and will inevitably end up riding a compromised frame without any idea of the risk you're taking until suddenly one day CRACK! your face is completely burried into a rock garden without a second's notice..
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times
in
1,181 Posts
There’s a beating the dead horse graphic around here someplace.....
#6
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I read the article in my original post after I read this article:
https://www.outsideonline.com/231181...dents-lawsuits
https://www.outsideonline.com/231181...dents-lawsuits
Likes For qclabrat:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: 2017 GT Grade Carbon Sram Force, 2014 Globe Roll 8 (w riser bars), 2015 All City Space Horse (cantilever)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: 2017 GT Grade Carbon Sram Force, 2014 Globe Roll 8 (w riser bars), 2015 All City Space Horse (cantilever)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yup definitely me who came up with all of it. Researched and wrote the article for Outside mag, spoke with all the lawyers at all the firms specializing in carbon frame failure, interviewed all the folks who'd suffered injuries from said failures, then cited my own work in a random post on bikeforums just to see if I could get a rise out of you all! Me and my loony hair brain head! Must have too much hair in my brain or something! LOL!!
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: 2017 GT Grade Carbon Sram Force, 2014 Globe Roll 8 (w riser bars), 2015 All City Space Horse (cantilever)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Yup definitely me who came up with all of it. Researched and wrote the article for Outside mag, spoke with all the lawyers at all the firms specializing in carbon frame failure, interviewed all the folks who'd suffered injuries from said failures, then cited my own work in a random post on bikeforums just to see if I could get a rise out of you all! Me and my loony hair brain head! Must have too much hair in my brain or something! LOL!!
Does not matter who wrote the article. All is says is that some lawyers are suing over CF. There is no research presented in that article.
I am curious why you posted thaf link. Exactly what point of yours do you think that article is backing up?
The articles presents no evidence or research that older frames are failing due to fatigue. It presents no evidence or research regarding how common this is. It presents no evidence or research that CF is on the whole more of less dangerous than Al or Steel.
All it presents is a story about lawyers with a business model of blaming others for their clients misfortunes in order to receive monetary compensation. And the arguments they are using are no more flushed out or backed up than any of the typical navel-gazing and armchair engineering that one can find in a BF thread.
Last edited by Kapusta; 05-28-20 at 06:37 AM.
#13
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
So in conclusion, no, the argument has not changed.
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 05-29-20 at 01:06 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times
in
1,181 Posts
Here it is:
Likes For Steve B.:
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: 2017 GT Grade Carbon Sram Force, 2014 Globe Roll 8 (w riser bars), 2015 All City Space Horse (cantilever)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
According to a quick Wikepedia search, she had her first child at 16, then 17, then 20 and 22, then waited 10 years to have last batch and was a grandmother at age 34.
None of these would be issues that would be prohibitive to me under the right (or wrong) circumstances were I of age
Likes For cityfeet:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times
in
1,181 Posts
#19
Senior Member
hoovbikes, it looks like you're pretending to ask a question, but have already made up your mind. So what are you posting here you for? Confirmation that carbon is a deadly material?
I've owned a ton of carbon bikes, including an Orbea road bike where the chain got dropped behind the small chainring, and it gashed the chainstay pretty bad. Everyone said don't ride it, but I went on to ride it 15,000 more miles, and never had any issues.
I just experienced my first cracked carbon frame, it's on my mountain bike, and It's along the top of the bottom bracket shell, and I'm waiting on the warranty frame to ship. Here's a picture: https://i.imgur.com/t5SgVi1.png
I've actually ridden the bike a half dozen times since finding the crack (while I wait for the warranty process), the crack is not getting bigger, and if it does fail, I don't expect it to be 'catastropic' like you describe.
The only catastrophic bike failure I've ever witnessed in 30 years of riding was a buddy who's head tube snapped clean off his frame in the Ouchuita Challenge Race in 2009.. and it was an aluminum frame. Luckily he wasn't hurt, I still have a pic of him arms out, holding half of his bike in one hand, and the rest of the bike in the other.
Finally... I put a Cannondale Si fork in a vice (came off a crashed CAAD), donned my safety glasses and gloves, and set out to do some heinous damage. That fork was tough as hell. Hearty swing with a sledge did absolutely nothing. It's not like carbon is some super delicate material that needs to be treated like your granny's china.
I've owned a ton of carbon bikes, including an Orbea road bike where the chain got dropped behind the small chainring, and it gashed the chainstay pretty bad. Everyone said don't ride it, but I went on to ride it 15,000 more miles, and never had any issues.
I just experienced my first cracked carbon frame, it's on my mountain bike, and It's along the top of the bottom bracket shell, and I'm waiting on the warranty frame to ship. Here's a picture: https://i.imgur.com/t5SgVi1.png
I've actually ridden the bike a half dozen times since finding the crack (while I wait for the warranty process), the crack is not getting bigger, and if it does fail, I don't expect it to be 'catastropic' like you describe.
The only catastrophic bike failure I've ever witnessed in 30 years of riding was a buddy who's head tube snapped clean off his frame in the Ouchuita Challenge Race in 2009.. and it was an aluminum frame. Luckily he wasn't hurt, I still have a pic of him arms out, holding half of his bike in one hand, and the rest of the bike in the other.
Finally... I put a Cannondale Si fork in a vice (came off a crashed CAAD), donned my safety glasses and gloves, and set out to do some heinous damage. That fork was tough as hell. Hearty swing with a sledge did absolutely nothing. It's not like carbon is some super delicate material that needs to be treated like your granny's china.
Last edited by Wooderson; 06-25-20 at 02:11 PM.
#20
Senior Member
I think both materials are perfectly safe. With carbon however it's difficult to detect damage that could lead to a failure. This doesn't mean that aluminium can't fail, but usually, it's visually obvious that something is wrong before catastrophic failure.
Ride quality difference is a myth IMHO. Tires, wheels, seatposts, handlebars and saddles flex way more than any decent frame. Carbon frames are usually lighter though.
I personally prefer aluminium frames as I tend to keep bikes for a long time and I consider it a more durable material. I wouldn't mind riding a carbon frame, but I prefer aluminium, especially on mountain bikes.
If I found a mountain bike I liked a lot and it was carbon I'd probably buy it though. In any case, I would prefer to spend my money on a better equipped aluminium bike than on a carbon bike with worse components.
Ride quality difference is a myth IMHO. Tires, wheels, seatposts, handlebars and saddles flex way more than any decent frame. Carbon frames are usually lighter though.
I personally prefer aluminium frames as I tend to keep bikes for a long time and I consider it a more durable material. I wouldn't mind riding a carbon frame, but I prefer aluminium, especially on mountain bikes.
If I found a mountain bike I liked a lot and it was carbon I'd probably buy it though. In any case, I would prefer to spend my money on a better equipped aluminium bike than on a carbon bike with worse components.
#21
Full Member
#22
Senior Member
#23
Senior Member
Its been an interesting read to find this thread tonight as I've been looking into carbon vs aluminum for a new bike.. I'm looking at the Giant Trance 3 vs Trance Advanced 2 - Components are fairly identical, the difference in cost is primarily the frame and wheelset.
I've only ridden aluminum before, so I don't know the benefits of carbon (or I should say, have never benefitted from carbon), even on my road bikes.. I found an Advanced 2 in stock (somewhat) locally, but it'll be weeks or more for a Trance 3 to show up. While the money always matters, I don't necessarily want the decision to be about cost as both are within my budget. Its roughly a $1000 difference, Its just so hard to justify it for something I've never used before. In some ways I feel like I'd be paying the extra to not have to wait for the Trance 3 to become available.
I've only ridden aluminum before, so I don't know the benefits of carbon (or I should say, have never benefitted from carbon), even on my road bikes.. I found an Advanced 2 in stock (somewhat) locally, but it'll be weeks or more for a Trance 3 to show up. While the money always matters, I don't necessarily want the decision to be about cost as both are within my budget. Its roughly a $1000 difference, Its just so hard to justify it for something I've never used before. In some ways I feel like I'd be paying the extra to not have to wait for the Trance 3 to become available.