Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Bike Fit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-19, 03:43 PM
  #26  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,032

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22579 Post(s)
Liked 8,919 Times in 4,153 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n
When test riding bikes, what should I be feeling for in the torso to know if the reach is good for me? I read that the handlebars should block your view of the front hub. Is that true? If I'm not particularly flexible, does that push me to a smaller frame?
It’s WAY more complicated than that. Rules of thumb like KOPS or have bar obscure front hub may give you a reasonable starting point but may not really apply to you based on your flexibility and other factors. It’s gotta feel comfortable on the road. Talk to the best fitter at your LBS and find a time when you and they have spare time for you to test ride a few.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is online now  
Old 08-31-19, 03:47 PM
  #27  
sumgy
Senior Member
 
sumgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n
When test riding bikes, what should I be feeling for in the torso to know if the reach is good for me? I read that the handlebars should block your view of the front hub. Is that true? If I'm not particularly flexible, does that push me to a smaller frame?
As I said earlier, I would suggest a 58cm effective top tube is your starting point. I run a 120mm stem on both my 58s.
Stand bent over with your hands on your knees. That is about the position.
sumgy is offline  
Old 08-31-19, 04:24 PM
  #28  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,257
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8264 Post(s)
Liked 9,000 Times in 4,456 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n
The numbers seem low as in the calculator did a bad job fitting, or you think I put in the wrong numbers?

How does that work? I did try out a 61 cm diverge at a shop, but is it normal to walk in and ask to try it a few sizes of the same bike, i.e. a 58, 60 and 62 synapse, roubaix or domane? Or will the shop just get fed up with me? Is the handlebars should block the hub valid for reach? What should I be feeling for?

I assume the uncut tube would require buying a fresh tube. Do you just put a bunch of spacers? How do you feel about the 9 cm stem and the impact on handling?

If you don't have a bike maybe you could rent one or borrow one? That way you would at least have a starting point.

So far the only frame I've found that has a TT less than the seat tube is the CAAD12, but finding that used may be difficult since it is newer.
I just thought the top tube length seemed a bit short, but I could be wrong.

I think any shop should be happy to let you try different sizes, but what feels good riding around the parking lot might not feel good 40 miles into a ride, or 6 months down the road. It takes time to find out what works and as you get more fit or flexible your fit may change, or, like me, when you get older.

Another thing is bikes from different companies will fit different even if they are the same "size".

The seat tube length is actually the least concerning of the measurements (within reason). Top tube, reach, and stack are more important. Again, 2 bikes that have the same seat tube size may fit completely different. I have a 62cm Gunnar and a 65cm Seven and the Seven has a shorter top tube.

Most forks are made with a 300mm steer tube. Big frames sometimes come with these steer tubes uncut. I like a frame with 230mm head tube so I don't have to use a ton of spacers to get the stem up as high as it will go. This gives me a drop of about 1 inch from the saddle to the bars on my Gunnar and more on the Seven because the bottom bracket is higher.

As I said earlier, the best thing to do is put some miles in and see what you like and don't like in your fit and adjust from there.
If you don't have a bike maybe you could rent or borrow one to get a starting point?

Last edited by big john; 08-31-19 at 04:41 PM.
big john is offline  
Old 08-31-19, 06:16 PM
  #29  
sumgy
Senior Member
 
sumgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
I do the same. But “serious” size/fit experts say stack and reach is best.
Yes, it is only a good ballpark starting point.
SERIOUS bikefitting gets much more involved than stack and reach.
Then again I have had "serious" bikefitters who ultimately proved to me that they had NFI what they were doing.
sumgy is offline  
Likes For sumgy:
Old 08-31-19, 08:27 PM
  #30  
diff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Definitely buy used. You will want a new bike right away in either case.

But go to shops and test ride.

Are you certain you want a road bike? Get a used hybrid with risers for like $250 (like a used sirrus) and go riding. If dead set on a road bike, still spend around that.

That calculator is a bit funky. I am shorter, but have a similar body type. The calculator recommends bike sizes that don't exist. Yours are a bit more extreme, though.

The best I can recommend would be a 58, shop cheap and smart, ride for a bit, then plan the next bike if you like cycling.
diff is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 11:54 AM
  #31  
am0n
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
It’s WAY more complicated than that. Rules of thumb like KOPS or have bar obscure front hub may give you a reasonable starting point but may not really apply to you based on your flexibility and other factors. It’s gotta feel comfortable on the road. Talk to the best fitter at your LBS and find a time when you and they have spare time for you to test ride a few.
Originally Posted by sumgy
As I said earlier, I would suggest a 58cm effective top tube is your starting point. I run a 120mm stem on both my 58s.
Stand bent over with your hands on your knees. That is about the position.
Originally Posted by big john
I think any shop should be happy to let you try different sizes, but what feels good riding around the parking lot might not feel good 40 miles into a ride, or 6 months down the road. It takes time to find out what works and as you get more fit or flexible your fit may change, or, like me, when you get older.

As I said earlier, the best thing to do is put some miles in and see what you like and don't like in your fit and adjust from there.
If you don't have a bike maybe you could rent or borrow one to get a starting point?
Originally Posted by sumgy
Yes, it is only a good ballpark starting point.
SERIOUS bikefitting gets much more involved than stack and reach.
Then again I have had "serious" bikefitters who ultimately proved to me that they had NFI what they were doing.
Thanks for the replies. I ask about those little rough ballpark things because since this will be my first road bike, and I'm looking to buy used, I'm trying to figure out how to quickly figure out if a bike would fit me. Not looking for a perfect fit on this bike, but I don't want a bad fit if that makes sense. And since I don't know exactly what I need, trying to figure out how to get close enough that if six months down the road I need to adjust it, I have the flexibility to do that.

My current plan is to hit the bike shop and try out some 56, 58 and 60 cm endurance bikes (roubaix, domane and synapse). From looking at geometry charts, the 60 cm domane has a 58 cm ETT and the other two have a 58 cm ETT on their 58 cm bikes. The synapse also seems to have the smallest stack to reach ratio (lower than the Trek Emonda). None of the rides will be long. I don't know anyone I can borrow from and the bikes they rent are a specific fleet of bikes, not necessarily what you want to try out.

I did see a 2013 Specialized Secteur Sport(everysingle.bike | 2013 Specialized Secteur Sport Compact) for sale. Claims to be endurance geometry. Lower ratio than the Domane and Roubaix, but higher than the Synapse. It's a 58 cm, so 58.2 cm TT. Seems promising, but given the shop isn't open tomorrow I won't get the chance to ride some others first, so doesn't seem wise to pursue it sadly. Other concern I have is the 51 cm ST and only 35 cm seat post length. Concerned that would be too short for me ( the fit calculator said a 82 cm seat to bb, and that bike would only have about 4 cm of post on the tube at that length).

What is considered a lot of miles on a bike? More curiosity. That one said like 2.5k miles, so not sure if that is well ridden and mech will need replaced or if that is still young.

Last edited by am0n; 09-01-19 at 12:20 PM.
am0n is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 01:30 PM
  #32  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,934

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times in 145 Posts
The Secteur is a nice bike. I chose mine over a carbon Synapse after comparing the two. Its ride qualities, to me, were on par with the Roubaix of that vintage (2011). My oldest son now rides it. Surely there's an aftermarket seat tube long enough to suffice.

And fit you get a longer seat post, make sure it's a two-bolt version. You can really dial in the perfect tilt with those.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports


horatio is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 01:55 PM
  #33  
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times in 153 Posts
Check that the seat post is long enough but if it isn't as long as it is a standard round post you can get longer.
Also make sure the steerer hasn't been cut short.
Dean V is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 02:04 PM
  #34  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,257
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8264 Post(s)
Liked 9,000 Times in 4,456 Posts
What is considered a lot of miles on a bike? More curiosity. That one said like 2.5k miles, so not sure if that is well ridden and mech will need replaced or if that is still young.
Like cars, the way a bike has been taken care of is more important than miles (within reason), and whether or not it has been crashed or abused.
Unlike cars,, bikes don't have an odometer so you can check the miles.

If you're looking at used bikes there are no guarantees, but look it over carefully. Are the teeth on the chainrings shaped like a sharktooth? If so you may need a new drivetrain. Spin the wheels and see if they wobble.

I have put 30,000 miles or more on several bikes and the frames were still ok. I also had a bike crack at the bottom bracket with 15,000 miles. Wheels, on the other hand, usually fail at about 8-10,000 miles (rear wheel).

The reason I suggested renting a bike is so you can get a baseline on your fit. If you rent a bike, it doesn't matter what brand, you can take a tape measure to it and discover things about what you like and don't like.

That Secteur looks like a nice bike but a 58 would be too small for me, the bars would be too low.

Last edited by big john; 09-01-19 at 02:12 PM.
big john is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 02:21 PM
  #35  
am0n
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by horatio
The Secteur is a nice bike. I chose mine over a carbon Synapse after comparing the two. Its ride qualities, to me, were on par with the Roubaix of that vintage (2011). My oldest son now rides it. Surely there's an aftermarket seat tube long enough to suffice.

And fit you get a longer seat post, make sure it's a two-bolt version. You can really dial in the perfect tilt with those.
Thanks for the feedback. Two bolt seems standard from my quick look.

Originally Posted by Dean V
Check that the seat post is long enough but if it isn't as long as it is a standard round post you can get longer.
Also make sure the steerer hasn't been cut short.
Seems 35 and 40 cm are standard. I've seen one 45 cm, but it was $200 carbon. I'll have to research brands to figure out who is trusted. As for steerer tube, I'll look. It's definitely not slammed from the photo, looks like 1 or 2 inches between stem and tube, but the stem already looks as high as it'll go.

Originally Posted by big john
Like cars, the way a bike has been taken care of is more important than miles (within reason), and whether or not it has been crashed or abused.
Unlike cars,, bikes don't have an odometer so you can check the miles.

If you're looking at used bikes there are no guarantees, but look it over carefully. Are the teeth on the chainrings shaped like a sharktooth? If so you may need a new drivetrain. Spin the wheels and see if they wobble.

I have put 30,000 miles or more on several bikes and the frames were still ok. I also had a bike crack at the bottom bracket with 15,000 miles. Wheels, on the other hand, usually fail at about 8-10,000 miles (rear wheel).

The reason I suggested renting a bike is so you can get a baseline on your fit. If you rent a bike, it doesn't matter what brand, you can take a tape measure to it and discover things about what you like and don't like.

That Secteur looks like a nice bike but a 58 would be too small for me, the bars would be too low.
Thanks. How do your measurements compare to mine? And what dimensions make you feel the bars would be too low?
am0n is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 04:49 PM
  #36  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,257
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8264 Post(s)
Liked 9,000 Times in 4,456 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n
Thanks. How do your measurements compare to mine? And what dimensions make you feel the bars would be too low?
I actually don't know my body measurements except my cycling inseam is 38", I think. I could probably ride that bike if the steer tube was uncut so I could get the bars high enough. I looked at a geometry chart and I think that bike has a 194mm head tube for the 58 frame so with an uncut steerer (300mm) I would need 36mm more spacers than I have with my 230mm headtube. I don't like a huge stack of spacers or a super long seatpost so I use frames from 62 up.
big john is offline  
Likes For big john:
Old 09-01-19, 06:24 PM
  #37  
am0n
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
I actually don't know my body measurements except my cycling inseam is 38", I think. I could probably ride that bike if the steer tube was uncut so I could get the bars high enough. I looked at a geometry chart and I think that bike has a 194mm head tube for the 58 frame so with an uncut steerer (300mm) I would need 36mm more spacers than I have with my 230mm headtube. I don't like a huge stack of spacers or a super long seatpost so I use frames from 62 up.
The geometry chart I linked said 22.5 cm head tube for the 58 cm bike. There is also something between the tube and the stem. The zertz inserts? Not sure if that is part of the head tube length or not.
am0n is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 07:23 PM
  #38  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,032

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22579 Post(s)
Liked 8,919 Times in 4,153 Posts
If you are really looking for used, see if you can find a classic Italian or Italian style steel road bike. They typically run short top tubes.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is online now  
Likes For datlas:
Old 09-01-19, 07:30 PM
  #39  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,032

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22579 Post(s)
Liked 8,919 Times in 4,153 Posts
BTW you can go nuts with fit and geometry charts, so realize you will have to compromise and use your comfort as a guide. In case you, or anyone else with wacky body types like ours is interested, I am posting the schematic of my custom Habanero. Even this is a compromise, the head tube and seat tube should be slightly longer, but a longer HT would have severely limited my choices of forks as the streerer tube would be too short.

__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is online now  
Likes For datlas:
Old 09-01-19, 09:36 PM
  #40  
am0n
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Took some measurements of my hybrid. Some eyeballing involved, but this was just to get a rough feel.

BB to ST top: 21 inches (53.3 cm)
BB to Saddle Top: 31.625 inches (80.3 cm, pretty much what the calculator said)
ST top to Saddle Top: 10.625 inches (27 cm)
I estimated the thickness from top of saddle to top of seat post was about 2 inches, leaving the seat post extending about 8.625 inches (21.9 cm)

Assuming that's not too far off, and the Secteur is indeed only 51 cm ST on the 58 cm size and to get the same height (both cranks are 17.5), I'd need an extra 2.3 cm to the seat post for a total of about 24.2 cm. If the post is indeed 35 cm, would leave about 10.8 cm on the tube, which seems fine? Only source I found said 15 cm or at least 9 cm as long as you are 2.5 cm below the bottom of the top tube.

Also tried to measure some of the reach dimensions, but since this is a hybrid not sure it is very applicable.

23.375 inch ETT (59.4 cm)
3.5 inch Stem (9 cm)
3.75 inch BB to Saddle setback (9.4 cm)
22 inch Saddle to Handlebar (55.9 cm)

Only, those dimensions aren't far off (recommended 2 cm longer stem and 1.5 cm longer setback, but that'd reduce the ETT by 3.5 cm to 56 which is almost spot on) even the Saddle to Handlebar is only off by about 1 cm.

Obviously, though, hoods on a drop bar are going to stretch me more. Roughly how much will the hoods stretch me out over flat bars?
am0n is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 09:47 PM
  #41  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
@am0n, have you tried a 60cm Domane yet?

We have very similar measurements(though flexibility might differ), so I understand what might work well for you.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 09:50 PM
  #42  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,257
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8264 Post(s)
Liked 9,000 Times in 4,456 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n
The geometry chart I linked said 22.5 cm head tube for the 58 cm bike. There is also something between the tube and the stem. The zertz inserts? Not sure if that is part of the head tube length or not.
I did not see that, I looked up a Secteur on a different chart. In that case I wouldn't have a problem with that frame. Very unusual for a 58 to have that length head tube, must be including Zertz. The question then is do you want the bars high like that? If you want them really low that could be an issue.
There are lots of different bar shapes and sizes as well as stems.
big john is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 09:54 PM
  #43  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,257
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8264 Post(s)
Liked 9,000 Times in 4,456 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n

Obviously, though, hoods on a drop bar are going to stretch me more. Roughly how much will the hoods stretch me out over flat bars?
Depends on the bars. They come in different shapes and sizes.
big john is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 10:01 PM
  #44  
am0n
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
I did not see that, I looked up a Secteur on a different chart. In that case I wouldn't have a problem with that frame. Very unusual for a 58 to have that length head tube, must be including Zertz. The question then is do you want the bars high like that? If you want them really low that could be an issue.
There are lots of different bar shapes and sizes as well as stems.
This is a starter road bike. If I decide down the road that I want lower, I'll factor that into the next one.

Originally Posted by noodle soup
@am0n, have you tried a 60cm Domane yet?

We have very similar measurements(though flexibility might differ), so I understand what might work well for you.
I was waiting for you to come yell at me. I have not. I was going to tomorrow, but they are closed. I did do a side by side on the 60 cm domane with the other bike over been taking about and it seems comparable. The smart move would be to wait and try out the 60 cm domane.

Edit: quick check of both bike shops websites and they don't have any 60 cm in stock.

Last edited by am0n; 09-01-19 at 10:21 PM.
am0n is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 10:22 PM
  #45  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n

I was waiting for you to come yell at me. I have not. I was going to tomorrow, but they are closed. I did do a side by side on the 60 cm domane with the other bike over been taking about and it seems comparable. The smart move would be to wait and try out the 60 cm domane.


I'm not yelling at you.

Our flexibility might be different, but I know what works for our dimensions. I never wanted to own a Trek bicycle when I bought the Domane, but it was the only stock frame that fit like my custom.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 10:28 PM
  #46  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
BTW you can go nuts with fit and geometry charts, so realize you will have to compromise and use your comfort as a guide. In case you, or anyone else with wacky body types like ours is interested, I am posting the schematic of my custom Habanero. Even this is a compromise, the head tube and seat tube should be slightly longer, but a longer HT would have severely limited my choices of forks as the streerer tube would be too short.

if you ever want to sell that frame, I got dibs.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 10:32 PM
  #47  
am0n
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Here is the side by side. What in particular would be concerning different between the two, besides the seat tube length.

am0n is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 11:13 PM
  #48  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n
Here is the side by side. What in particular would be concerning different between the two, besides the seat tube length.

add 5mm to the Trek's stack to compensate for the lower BB.

Go ride a 58 cm Secteur, and a 60cm Domane. Then tell us what you think fits better ,taking into account that the fit can be adjusted slightly

Last edited by noodle soup; 09-01-19 at 11:21 PM.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 11:46 PM
  #49  
am0n
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
add 5mm to the Trek's stack to compensate for the lower BB.

Go ride a 58 cm Secteur, and a 60cm Domane. Then tell us what you think fits better ,taking into account that the fit can be adjusted slightly
I thought stack was measured from BB? Wouldn't that take into account the difference in the drop already?
am0n is offline  
Likes For am0n:
Old 09-02-19, 08:31 AM
  #50  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by am0n
I thought stack was measured from BB? Wouldn't that take into account the difference in the drop already?
my mistake
noodle soup is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.