Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Strava Changes

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Strava Changes

Old 05-24-20, 07:20 AM
  #176  
Fiery
Senior Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
You didn't answer the question: do you really believe that they anything less than connecting to and syncing with every competing service is a knock against them? 'cause that's just ridiculous.
Let me go back to the original post I responded to: that your new provider of choice doesn't have their act together is no fault of Strava's. All I'm saying is that there is not much another service can do to get "their act together" based on what Strava provides. And there's a few things Strava could to make migration a lot easier that still wouldn't require them actively connecting and pushing data to every competing service there is. The fact that Strava readily accepts these alternative approaches when it comes to receiving data from other services makes this shortcoming even more obvious.
Fiery is offline  
Likes For Fiery:
Old 05-24-20, 09:40 AM
  #177  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,436 Times in 4,663 Posts
Originally Posted by Fiery
All I'm saying is that there is not much another service can do to get "their act together" based on what Strava provides.


wut. They could provide a means of bulk uploading of the raw data. This is incredibly straightforward.


Originally Posted by Fiery
And there's a few things Strava could to make migration a lot easier that still wouldn't require them actively connecting and pushing data to every competing service there is.
wut. They provide an easy means of bulk downloading of the raw data. This is incredibly straightforward.

Originally Posted by Fiery
The fact that Strava readily accepts these alternative approaches when it comes to receiving data from other services makes this shortcoming even more obvious.
No, it doesn't. Each of these "alternative approaches" requires a lot more work and coordination.

Let's just agree to disagree while also agreeing that you're wrong. I'm glad that this settles the matter. Take care.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 05-24-20, 11:00 AM
  #178  
Fiery
Senior Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Glad if I was able to make you feel a bit better about yourself. I'm sure every little bit helps.
Fiery is offline  
Likes For Fiery:
Old 05-25-20, 11:51 AM
  #179  
ridinginjeans
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 35

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Concorde PRX, Scott Scale 29er, Santa Cruz Tall Boy, Blue Norcross EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
I have been paying for 18 months. I guess I like having the additional analysis data. It's no that expensive, and I just started using the Live Segments feature, which I think is cool. I do compare myself to others. Right now it's not pretty--I didn't ride much the last few years. So I like seeing where I'm at from a fitness perspective. I have also created some segments, which is fun.

The app could be better, but they seem to be more responsive about making changes. I need to learn all it can do and use more of the features. A good deal for $5 per month. So for now I plan to keep paying...

(FWIW: I don't buy coffee at Starbucks very often. When I do, it's coffee, not the ice cream drinks. I don't order soda at restaurants or buy soda at the grocery store. I have eliminated a lot of items that just cost money and don't improve my life.)
ridinginjeans is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 12:00 PM
  #180  
greyfox47
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've been a paying member, $60/yr, for a few years now. It's been so long since I started paying, I'm not sure what the benefit is and I don't really care. I'm of the mindset that if I get a worthwhile service from a website that I consistently use that I don't mind paying. I get annoyed on occasion with a couple things but as a payer, I think I have a right to ***** now and then. Those electing to not pay, IMHO, don't. Simply as that.
greyfox47 is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 01:09 PM
  #181  
thermalfinder
Junior Member
 
thermalfinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TACOMA, WA
Posts: 11

Bikes: Davidson Discovery, Trek 7500 FX W/Bafang Mid-Drive

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The FAD called Strava

Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
Not me. They seem to be horribly managed; maybe someone else can emerge to do it better.
I haven't used Strava and just now know what it is. Sounds like fun but also a FAD kinda thing.
I use a little Cateye Strada W/cadence I bought for $20
For distance XC Hang Gliding a Variometer and GPS a must.
And there are some cool devices like Flytec Sensbox.

- Jim Steel 40+ year cyclist and Hang Glider Pilot
thermalfinder is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 01:14 PM
  #182  
johnd01
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
Not me. They seem to be horribly managed; maybe someone else can emerge to do it better.
Other than they are not making money, what evidence do you have? What would you do differently

I have been paying for several years.
johnd01 is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 02:10 PM
  #183  
ridinginjeans
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 35

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Concorde PRX, Scott Scale 29er, Santa Cruz Tall Boy, Blue Norcross EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by MattTheHat
I use Strava and like it, so I pay for it. I like live segments and Beacon tracking so my wife can tell I’m still moving. I also use and pay for VeloViewer which interfaces with Strava. While it’s importing rides it reports Strava’s API usage percentage. Over the past couple of months I’ve notice a significant extra load on their servers. If people who are not paying stop using Strava, that’s probably a win for them, and for paid users if it keeps things working.
Interesting point.
ridinginjeans is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 02:15 PM
  #184  
ridinginjeans
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 35

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Concorde PRX, Scott Scale 29er, Santa Cruz Tall Boy, Blue Norcross EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by WorldIRC
I'm mixed on this. Strava is certainly a "luxury" application, in the sense that it is not food, water, shelter, utilities, or telecom. As well, the functionality that has been "promoted" to premium is not really something critical to the nature of today's world.

That being said, you're right, the structure change could have waited and Strava could have just positioned it accordingly.
I have a feeling Strava was planning this for awhile. I don't blame them, and $5 a month is really not very much. Maybe they needed to do this to save their business? Plus, if you can't pay right now, wait. You don't NEED the features of Strava. The free version still serves a purpose.
ridinginjeans is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 02:35 PM
  #185  
CaliTexan
Newbie
 
CaliTexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 43

Bikes: 2019 Co-Motion Carrera (S&S) / 1998 Litespeed Tuscany / 2014 Wilier Zero 7

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
I understand the need to push more people to subscription, or to otherwise monetize the info they collect. If you don’t help them achieve that, then they don’t much care what you think.

But I think it’s a very poor tactic to take something away from the free level; even if you don’t care about the particular feature. It just causes resentment. Far better to simply add every new feature to the paid level. OTOH, if I’m not going to switch to a pay level, and likely never will, then why should they care if I’m put off by their decision?
CaliTexan is offline  
Likes For CaliTexan:
Old 05-25-20, 02:45 PM
  #186  
ridinginjeans
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 35

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Concorde PRX, Scott Scale 29er, Santa Cruz Tall Boy, Blue Norcross EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Riveting
I've been Premium since 2014. 17 cents per day is a relatively small price to pay considering that "they/we" say that cycling costs about 13 cents per mile, all costs considered. Analyzing my power curve (power meter required) for low spots, and then on a future ride making a small incremental increase in watts for that time interval, is how I train. I could (and do) use other tools to do this, typically Garmin Connect or Golden Cheetah, but the social motivation and inspiration (photos of local scenery, viewing the big rides of hardcore local riders/friends, and learning new routes) that Strava currently provides puts everything I like in one convenient place, without bouncing around from app to app, just to save 17 cents. When another tool pops up that does all of this (for free), I may jump, but for now Strava owns this space.
Good points. I do think Strava is vulnerable in that they move slowly and I'm not convinced the features placement of their app is as intuitive as it could be.
ridinginjeans is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 02:52 PM
  #187  
ridinginjeans
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 35

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Concorde PRX, Scott Scale 29er, Santa Cruz Tall Boy, Blue Norcross EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Could it be that Strava gave too many features at first? The free account should have been what it is now, and Premium contained the leaderboards and other, more advanced features?

I don't have a problem with what they did. Time will tell if it remains the dominant ride tracking/social media site.
ridinginjeans is offline  
Likes For ridinginjeans:
Old 05-25-20, 06:12 PM
  #188  
wafranklin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Strava, Elite version

Strava's new pricing will discourage new users as well chase off existing non-paying users.
Users quitting Strava is the worst consequence of the new pricing.
I can easily afford a Strava subscription now adays, but for most of
my life I was frugal even though I was solidly middle class.
Paying for apps and websites was something I did not do, still rarely do.
The best part of Strava for me was being to see other people riding in my area and looking at their routes,
their performance relative to mine, pictures and profiles. Segments were fun also.
Lots of regular folks use the app, mixed in with super athletes.
Strava is not worth downloading with the current/new non-paid feature set.
Strava is going to lose the middle class. That's a shame.
wafranklin is offline  
Likes For wafranklin:
Old 05-25-20, 07:06 PM
  #189  
Athens80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,207
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by wafranklin
...Users quitting Strava is the worst consequence of the new pricing....
But why quit? Quitters are cutting off their nose to spite their face. They're already paying $0. They've lost the ability to pay nothing to compare their best time on a segment to their friends' best times (unless they're all in the top 10). But they're paying nothing and still getting something. There's a lot of Strava left at no cost. If someone started a service tomorrow that did all that Strava does for free, and had all the social networking strength that Strava already has, that would be a big deal. Well, it's already there, and all non-paying users have to do to keep it is to do nothing.
Athens80 is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 07:32 PM
  #190  
SpeedyBlueBiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Redmond, WA & Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 554

Bikes: 1999 Giant ATX MTB, 2002 Lemond Zurich, 2018 Fuji Transonic 2.3, 2019 Specialized Tarmac Disc Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 387 Times in 223 Posts
I have never had Strava or any other similar product. I don't really see the need for it. Will it make me go faster? Will it make me climb hills better? You should have added a question to the poll, "Do you have Strava".
SpeedyBlueBiker is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 07:47 PM
  #191  
AdkMtnMonster
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763

Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedyBlueBiker
I have never had Strava or any other similar product. I don't really see the need for it. Will it make me go faster? Will it make me climb hills better? You should have added a question to the poll, "Do you have Strava".
Faster? Possibly. Better climber? Possibly. It all depends on how you use the data, such as HR, cadence, estimated (or actual) Watts on a given segment of your ride. Being able to easily compare an exact part of a ride that you do several times per season (or week, month, however often) makes it very easy to tell if you are making progress or holding the line. So, yeah... possibly make you faster and a better climber. The one thing I can promise everyone here that Strava absolutely will NOT do, though, is pedal your bike for you. You have to put in the effort.
AdkMtnMonster is offline  
Likes For AdkMtnMonster:
Old 05-25-20, 07:50 PM
  #192  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Athens80
But why quit? Quitters are cutting off their nose to spite their face. They're already paying $0.
Except time and data. Only the time really "costs" you anything in a meaningful way, but the data does have value.

It depends what you want and get out of Strava. The free version is still useful to a lot of people, and those people should keep their noses. But if the only things you find useful are "gone" and you're unwilling to pay $5 a month for them, then you're not doing any cutting that hasn't already been done.

I feel like I'm coming off as down on Strava. They have every right to do this, they came up with a very cool concept, unique at the time, and not easy to program. Kudos to them, I hope they stick around for the long term.

I don't think this move will help them long term, on the other hand if it drives more business to other services, well, competition is good for everyone. 🙂
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 07:51 PM
  #193  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedyBlueBiker
I have never had Strava or any other similar product. I don't really see the need for it. Will it make me go faster? Will it make me climb hills better? You should have added a question to the poll, "Do you have Strava".
What if it doesn't do any of that, but you enjoy using it? I think that's what they're really all about.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-25-20, 07:55 PM
  #194  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by AdkMtnMonster
Faster? Possibly. Better climber? Possibly. It all depends on how you use the data, such as HR, cadence, estimated (or actual) Watts on a given segment of your ride. Being able to easily compare an exact part of a ride that you do several times per season (or week, month, however often) makes it very easy to tell if you are making progress or holding the line. So, yeah... possibly make you faster and a better climber. The one thing I can promise everyone here that Strava absolutely will NOT do, though, is pedal your bike for you. You have to put in the effort.
​​​​​​Just be aware that people wind up finding what they're looking for. Meaning: do you want to be faster overall, or faster on certain segments? (Either one is ok.) I have a couple of private segments in my Garmin, they're short sprints, I really need to be improving my 60-180 minute power. But that's my fault not the segment's.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-26-20, 08:30 AM
  #195  
NoWhammies
Senior Member
 
NoWhammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993

Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
​​​​​​Just be aware that people wind up finding what they're looking for. Meaning: do you want to be faster overall, or faster on certain segments? (Either one is ok.) I have a couple of private segments in my Garmin, they're short sprints, I really need to be improving my 60-180 minute power. But that's my fault not the segment's.
I'm in the same boat. I have a couple of private segments in GC that I use to compete against myself. I find it interesting to see where I've set PRs and where I've dogged it.

GC does everything I need. I don't have the time, or the patience for that matter, to compile trip reports in both locations. I started entering data in to GC before Strava was around and I'm too lazy to change my ways now. For users who like the social aspect of Strava, and are invested in racing their buddies and maintaining friends lists, then the $5 a month seems like a small price to pay. Just my random thoughts.
NoWhammies is offline  
Likes For NoWhammies:
Old 05-26-20, 08:35 AM
  #196  
goaheadjump
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It is the cheapest, effective motivator/training tool I have and absolutely will continue to pay for it. Strava helps motivate me and my riding buddies to get smoother (faster), become stronger climbers, challenge each other and (against ourselves) constantly, etc. Being able to see where I lose or gain time. Use it a lot for planning rides in new areas when exploring/travelling, track my riding stats and connect socially to other riders all in one place.
goaheadjump is offline  
Old 05-26-20, 11:34 AM
  #197  
Steeler_fanatic
Senior Member
 
Steeler_fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 80

Bikes: 2022 Trek Émonda SLR 6 eTap, 2018 Trek Domane ALR 5, 1974 Batavis Tour de l’Europe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Metallifan33
I was just reading their email and was surprised to find out that they as a company have yet to make money.
Anyway, I was wondering how many of you pay for their subscription and why... also if any of you plan to pay for it now at $5 a month.
I will continue to pay for it. To me, I find it funny with a community that will sink in large amounts of cash for all the various aspects of our hobby is freaking out over $5/month for a service that was providing capabilities that should have been covered by ads or subscription fees long ago. I think the free option is still pretty fair and useable for casual users. Strava's mistake was not getting their act together and doing this long ago.
Steeler_fanatic is offline  
Old 05-26-20, 07:21 PM
  #198  
robertorolfo
Senior Member
 
robertorolfo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Queens, NY for now...
Posts: 1,533

Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times in 113 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
Only the top 10 care about the leaderboard, right? That leaves lots of users unaccounted for that still use Strava anyway.
The top 10 leaderboard is completely useless in a lot of places. Most of the segments I ride have way more than the top 10 (so flagging is a waste of time) made up of people averaging 45mph uphill...

Originally Posted by johnd01
Other than they are not making money, what evidence do you have? What would you do differently
I have been paying for several years.
As others have said, why not give the option of watching ads while still getting it for free? Why not make it $1 a month, instead?

Also, as others have mentioned, they need free users to make the leaderboards interesting. It reminds me of free to play video games, where people who play like to complain about "free" players, meanwhile the games generally need a lot of players online to make them viable, so the free players are absolutely essential.
robertorolfo is offline  
Old 05-27-20, 12:24 AM
  #199  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Entertainment for the very bored, a botched "what is Strava" article. Published today, still taking about Summit.

Users can record their exercise, and choose from a wide variety of exercise options like running, e-bike riding and canoeing, including things like distance, pace and details about how you felt about the experience.

https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-strava?amp


I mean I guess that's technically not inaccurate, but what a bizarre way to describe it.

And why no e-canoeing?
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-27-20, 07:36 AM
  #200  
Leinster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,033

Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 205 Posts
Originally Posted by robertorolfo
As others have said, why not give the option of watching ads while still getting it for free? Why not make it $1 a month, instead?
The Strava guys addressed that in their statement, I think. They said that they've tried ads in the feed and product promotions, and got pushback from users each time. You have to give tehm credit for maintaining such an ad-free social media platform in this day and age; compared to my Bookface or instagram feeds the lack of people trying to sell me stuff is quite refreshing on Strava.

I hope they make a subscription model work, but I'm personally not signing up any time soon.
Leinster is offline  
Likes For Leinster:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.