Strava Changes
#176
Senior Member
Likes For Fiery:
#177
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,436 Times
in
4,663 Posts
wut. They could provide a means of bulk uploading of the raw data. This is incredibly straightforward.
Let's just agree to disagree while also agreeing that you're wrong. I'm glad that this settles the matter. Take care.
Likes For WhyFi:
Likes For Fiery:
#179
Member
I have been paying for 18 months. I guess I like having the additional analysis data. It's no that expensive, and I just started using the Live Segments feature, which I think is cool. I do compare myself to others. Right now it's not pretty--I didn't ride much the last few years. So I like seeing where I'm at from a fitness perspective. I have also created some segments, which is fun.
The app could be better, but they seem to be more responsive about making changes. I need to learn all it can do and use more of the features. A good deal for $5 per month. So for now I plan to keep paying...
(FWIW: I don't buy coffee at Starbucks very often. When I do, it's coffee, not the ice cream drinks. I don't order soda at restaurants or buy soda at the grocery store. I have eliminated a lot of items that just cost money and don't improve my life.)
The app could be better, but they seem to be more responsive about making changes. I need to learn all it can do and use more of the features. A good deal for $5 per month. So for now I plan to keep paying...
(FWIW: I don't buy coffee at Starbucks very often. When I do, it's coffee, not the ice cream drinks. I don't order soda at restaurants or buy soda at the grocery store. I have eliminated a lot of items that just cost money and don't improve my life.)
#180
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been a paying member, $60/yr, for a few years now. It's been so long since I started paying, I'm not sure what the benefit is and I don't really care. I'm of the mindset that if I get a worthwhile service from a website that I consistently use that I don't mind paying. I get annoyed on occasion with a couple things but as a payer, I think I have a right to ***** now and then. Those electing to not pay, IMHO, don't. Simply as that.
#181
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TACOMA, WA
Posts: 11
Bikes: Davidson Discovery, Trek 7500 FX W/Bafang Mid-Drive
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The FAD called Strava
I use a little Cateye Strada W/cadence I bought for $20
For distance XC Hang Gliding a Variometer and GPS a must.
And there are some cool devices like Flytec Sensbox.
- Jim Steel 40+ year cyclist and Hang Glider Pilot
#183
Member
I use Strava and like it, so I pay for it. I like live segments and Beacon tracking so my wife can tell I’m still moving. I also use and pay for VeloViewer which interfaces with Strava. While it’s importing rides it reports Strava’s API usage percentage. Over the past couple of months I’ve notice a significant extra load on their servers. If people who are not paying stop using Strava, that’s probably a win for them, and for paid users if it keeps things working.
#184
Member
I'm mixed on this. Strava is certainly a "luxury" application, in the sense that it is not food, water, shelter, utilities, or telecom. As well, the functionality that has been "promoted" to premium is not really something critical to the nature of today's world.
That being said, you're right, the structure change could have waited and Strava could have just positioned it accordingly.
That being said, you're right, the structure change could have waited and Strava could have just positioned it accordingly.
#185
Newbie
I understand the need to push more people to subscription, or to otherwise monetize the info they collect. If you don’t help them achieve that, then they don’t much care what you think.
But I think it’s a very poor tactic to take something away from the free level; even if you don’t care about the particular feature. It just causes resentment. Far better to simply add every new feature to the paid level. OTOH, if I’m not going to switch to a pay level, and likely never will, then why should they care if I’m put off by their decision?
But I think it’s a very poor tactic to take something away from the free level; even if you don’t care about the particular feature. It just causes resentment. Far better to simply add every new feature to the paid level. OTOH, if I’m not going to switch to a pay level, and likely never will, then why should they care if I’m put off by their decision?
Likes For CaliTexan:
#186
Member
I've been Premium since 2014. 17 cents per day is a relatively small price to pay considering that "they/we" say that cycling costs about 13 cents per mile, all costs considered. Analyzing my power curve (power meter required) for low spots, and then on a future ride making a small incremental increase in watts for that time interval, is how I train. I could (and do) use other tools to do this, typically Garmin Connect or Golden Cheetah, but the social motivation and inspiration (photos of local scenery, viewing the big rides of hardcore local riders/friends, and learning new routes) that Strava currently provides puts everything I like in one convenient place, without bouncing around from app to app, just to save 17 cents. When another tool pops up that does all of this (for free), I may jump, but for now Strava owns this space.
#187
Member
Could it be that Strava gave too many features at first? The free account should have been what it is now, and Premium contained the leaderboards and other, more advanced features?
I don't have a problem with what they did. Time will tell if it remains the dominant ride tracking/social media site.
I don't have a problem with what they did. Time will tell if it remains the dominant ride tracking/social media site.
Likes For ridinginjeans:
#188
Junior Member
Strava, Elite version
Strava's new pricing will discourage new users as well chase off existing non-paying users.
Users quitting Strava is the worst consequence of the new pricing.
I can easily afford a Strava subscription now adays, but for most of
my life I was frugal even though I was solidly middle class.
Paying for apps and websites was something I did not do, still rarely do.
The best part of Strava for me was being to see other people riding in my area and looking at their routes,
their performance relative to mine, pictures and profiles. Segments were fun also.
Lots of regular folks use the app, mixed in with super athletes.
Strava is not worth downloading with the current/new non-paid feature set.
Strava is going to lose the middle class. That's a shame.
Users quitting Strava is the worst consequence of the new pricing.
I can easily afford a Strava subscription now adays, but for most of
my life I was frugal even though I was solidly middle class.
Paying for apps and websites was something I did not do, still rarely do.
The best part of Strava for me was being to see other people riding in my area and looking at their routes,
their performance relative to mine, pictures and profiles. Segments were fun also.
Lots of regular folks use the app, mixed in with super athletes.
Strava is not worth downloading with the current/new non-paid feature set.
Strava is going to lose the middle class. That's a shame.
Likes For wafranklin:
#189
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,207
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
But why quit? Quitters are cutting off their nose to spite their face. They're already paying $0. They've lost the ability to pay nothing to compare their best time on a segment to their friends' best times (unless they're all in the top 10). But they're paying nothing and still getting something. There's a lot of Strava left at no cost. If someone started a service tomorrow that did all that Strava does for free, and had all the social networking strength that Strava already has, that would be a big deal. Well, it's already there, and all non-paying users have to do to keep it is to do nothing.
#190
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Redmond, WA & Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 554
Bikes: 1999 Giant ATX MTB, 2002 Lemond Zurich, 2018 Fuji Transonic 2.3, 2019 Specialized Tarmac Disc Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 387 Times
in
223 Posts
I have never had Strava or any other similar product. I don't really see the need for it. Will it make me go faster? Will it make me climb hills better? You should have added a question to the poll, "Do you have Strava".
#191
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
Faster? Possibly. Better climber? Possibly. It all depends on how you use the data, such as HR, cadence, estimated (or actual) Watts on a given segment of your ride. Being able to easily compare an exact part of a ride that you do several times per season (or week, month, however often) makes it very easy to tell if you are making progress or holding the line. So, yeah... possibly make you faster and a better climber. The one thing I can promise everyone here that Strava absolutely will NOT do, though, is pedal your bike for you. You have to put in the effort.
Likes For AdkMtnMonster:
#192
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times
in
6,054 Posts
It depends what you want and get out of Strava. The free version is still useful to a lot of people, and those people should keep their noses. But if the only things you find useful are "gone" and you're unwilling to pay $5 a month for them, then you're not doing any cutting that hasn't already been done.
I feel like I'm coming off as down on Strava. They have every right to do this, they came up with a very cool concept, unique at the time, and not easy to program. Kudos to them, I hope they stick around for the long term.
I don't think this move will help them long term, on the other hand if it drives more business to other services, well, competition is good for everyone. 🙂
#193
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times
in
6,054 Posts
What if it doesn't do any of that, but you enjoy using it? I think that's what they're really all about.
#194
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Faster? Possibly. Better climber? Possibly. It all depends on how you use the data, such as HR, cadence, estimated (or actual) Watts on a given segment of your ride. Being able to easily compare an exact part of a ride that you do several times per season (or week, month, however often) makes it very easy to tell if you are making progress or holding the line. So, yeah... possibly make you faster and a better climber. The one thing I can promise everyone here that Strava absolutely will NOT do, though, is pedal your bike for you. You have to put in the effort.
#195
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
306 Posts
Just be aware that people wind up finding what they're looking for. Meaning: do you want to be faster overall, or faster on certain segments? (Either one is ok.) I have a couple of private segments in my Garmin, they're short sprints, I really need to be improving my 60-180 minute power. But that's my fault not the segment's.
GC does everything I need. I don't have the time, or the patience for that matter, to compile trip reports in both locations. I started entering data in to GC before Strava was around and I'm too lazy to change my ways now. For users who like the social aspect of Strava, and are invested in racing their buddies and maintaining friends lists, then the $5 a month seems like a small price to pay. Just my random thoughts.
Likes For NoWhammies:
#196
Member
It is the cheapest, effective motivator/training tool I have and absolutely will continue to pay for it. Strava helps motivate me and my riding buddies to get smoother (faster), become stronger climbers, challenge each other and (against ourselves) constantly, etc. Being able to see where I lose or gain time. Use it a lot for planning rides in new areas when exploring/travelling, track my riding stats and connect socially to other riders all in one place.
#197
Senior Member
I will continue to pay for it. To me, I find it funny with a community that will sink in large amounts of cash for all the various aspects of our hobby is freaking out over $5/month for a service that was providing capabilities that should have been covered by ads or subscription fees long ago. I think the free option is still pretty fair and useable for casual users. Strava's mistake was not getting their act together and doing this long ago.
#198
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Queens, NY for now...
Posts: 1,533
Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
113 Posts
Also, as others have mentioned, they need free users to make the leaderboards interesting. It reminds me of free to play video games, where people who play like to complain about "free" players, meanwhile the games generally need a lot of players online to make them viable, so the free players are absolutely essential.
#199
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Entertainment for the very bored, a botched "what is Strava" article. Published today, still taking about Summit.
Users can record their exercise, and choose from a wide variety of exercise options like running, e-bike riding and canoeing, including things like distance, pace and details about how you felt about the experience.
https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-strava?amp
I mean I guess that's technically not inaccurate, but what a bizarre way to describe it.
And why no e-canoeing?
Users can record their exercise, and choose from a wide variety of exercise options like running, e-bike riding and canoeing, including things like distance, pace and details about how you felt about the experience.
https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-strava?amp
I mean I guess that's technically not inaccurate, but what a bizarre way to describe it.
And why no e-canoeing?
#200
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,033
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
205 Posts
I hope they make a subscription model work, but I'm personally not signing up any time soon.
Likes For Leinster: