700 front, 27 rear
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
700 front, 27 rear
Hello, I have a 27 inch tandem that will get an electric upgrade shortly that uses a front hub system (swytch). One reason for buying the e-system was to switch it between the tandem and my wife's bike. Her bike rims are 700c. If I go 700c in the front for the tandem will it ride ok if I keep the 27 inch rear wheel?
Based on what I have read it would mean the front would ride about 4mm lower? Doesn't seem major but want some feedback. Thanks.
Based on what I have read it would mean the front would ride about 4mm lower? Doesn't seem major but want some feedback. Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
I expect that she will adjust to any differences within a few hundred feet.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,051
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4192 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times
in
2,295 Posts
Yes. the radius difference, for the same tire profile is 4mm. On a tandem this results in about half the very small head angle change as the wheelbase is much longer. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
Thanks everyone for the quick replies. Andy great point on the angle being even less significant because the frame is longer.
#5
Really Old Senior Member
Will the rim brake pads (if equipped) adjust 4-5mm lower?
Identical sized tires? If you are running 27-1-1/4" tires, that's a 32mm tire. On paper at least, a 36mm tire would "level" you out.
Or put the heavy person on back.
Identical sized tires? If you are running 27-1-1/4" tires, that's a 32mm tire. On paper at least, a 36mm tire would "level" you out.
Or put the heavy person on back.
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 05-24-20 at 07:19 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,051
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4192 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times
in
2,295 Posts
Just like Sport, Paul Bunyan's dog. The childhood story I recall had Paul feeding Sport under the kitchen cabinets so the dog, gifted with bigger then real life size like Paul, grew it's hind quarters but it's front stayed the "normal" size. This way Sport was always "walking" down hill. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#8
Senior Member
You will not notice the difference in feel. The only real issue is whether you have rim brakes, and whether they can accomodate the difference.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,831
Bikes: Trek Domane SL6 Gen 3, Soma Fog Cutter, Focus Mares AL, Detroit Bikes Sparrow FG, Volae Team, Nimbus MUni
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 890 Post(s)
Liked 2,048 Times
in
1,072 Posts
For years I rode a 26" rear 20" front recumbent. The downside was what to carry on long self supporting rides. A folding 26" tire, 20" tire, neither, or both?
#10
tcarl
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 561
Bikes: Roark, Waterford 1100, 1987 Schwinn Paramount, Nishiki Professional, Bottecchia, 2 Scattantes, 3 Cannondale touring bikes, mtn. bike, cyclocross, hybrid, 1940's era Schwinn
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
For years my old Cannondale touring bike has had a 700x23 front and 27x1 1/4 rear. I don't notice a thing.
#11
Industry guy
IMO, electric motors on any bicycle front wheel are a bit of a gamble.
With the overall weight and resulting strength demands of a front wheel on a tandem, even more so.
A powered front wheel on a loose surface, or wet/slippery spot is a bit un-nerving.
A front wheel motor is strictly a throttle actuated and can easily be in an overpowered mode in a turn.
Not certain, but I believe most front motors are 250 watt designs. The added weight of a tandem use might cause the
motor undo stress/torque requirements and premature burnout.
On background, I have sold electric bicycles as a factory rep.
rusty
With the overall weight and resulting strength demands of a front wheel on a tandem, even more so.
A powered front wheel on a loose surface, or wet/slippery spot is a bit un-nerving.
A front wheel motor is strictly a throttle actuated and can easily be in an overpowered mode in a turn.
Not certain, but I believe most front motors are 250 watt designs. The added weight of a tandem use might cause the
motor undo stress/torque requirements and premature burnout.
On background, I have sold electric bicycles as a factory rep.
rusty
Last edited by 100bikes; 05-25-20 at 02:01 AM.
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
IMO, electric motors on any bicycle front wheel are a bit of a gamble.
With the overall weight and resulting strength demands of a front wheel on a tandem, even more so.
A powered front wheel on a loose surface, or wet/slippery spot is a bit un-nerving.
A front wheel motor is strictly a throttle actuated and can easily be in an overpowered mode in a turn.
Not certain, but I believe most front motors are 250 watt designs. The added weight of a tandem use might cause the
motor undo stress/torque requirements and premature burnout.
On background, I have sold electric bicycles as a factory rep.
rusty
With the overall weight and resulting strength demands of a front wheel on a tandem, even more so.
A powered front wheel on a loose surface, or wet/slippery spot is a bit un-nerving.
A front wheel motor is strictly a throttle actuated and can easily be in an overpowered mode in a turn.
Not certain, but I believe most front motors are 250 watt designs. The added weight of a tandem use might cause the
motor undo stress/torque requirements and premature burnout.
On background, I have sold electric bicycles as a factory rep.
rusty
I plan to only use the motor sparingly when on the tandem, only for really hard climbing and once we are past the 20-25 mile mark as a slight assist. This first kit is mainly to help the wife when riding solo close the gap with my pace. I'm more an 18mph average and she is 14. Telling her to get in better shape seems like a bad option 🙄
I do have adjustable brakes to compensate.
Last edited by kayakindude; 05-25-20 at 06:50 AM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,051
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4192 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times
in
2,295 Posts
Thanks Rusty,
I plan to only use the motor sparingly when on the tandem, only for really hard climbing and once we are past the 20-25 mile mark as a slight assist. This first kit is mainly to help the wife when riding solo close the gap with my pace. I'm more an 18mph average and she is 14. Telling her to get in better shape seems like a bad option 🙄
I do have adjustable brakes to compensate.
I plan to only use the motor sparingly when on the tandem, only for really hard climbing and once we are past the 20-25 mile mark as a slight assist. This first kit is mainly to help the wife when riding solo close the gap with my pace. I'm more an 18mph average and she is 14. Telling her to get in better shape seems like a bad option 🙄
I do have adjustable brakes to compensate.
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#14
Full Member
Thread Starter
Why Andy thanks for the advice 😁 that's what I currently do...we actually average 16 on the tandem. I was being sarcastic earlier, but no harm if a little e-assist can close the gap on longer solo rides as we head into our 50s. Agreed that whatever keeps us riding together works.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 519
Bikes: Konas: Jake the Snake-Fire Mountain-Zing Supreme, Dew Deluxe,Zone Ltd. (frame, needs parts), Surly Long Haul Trucker, Santana Arriva tandem, Montagues: Paratrooper-Fit, Trek 1200, Bianchi Ocelot, Fantom Cross Uno, Bridgestone 200
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
122 Posts
Up front, worst case, you can get a new 700c fork. Go the cheapest (effective) route first, but on a decent tandem frame, I'd be willing to spend a bit more.
The size difference, insofar as handling is concerned, will be negligible, and easily compensated for with a slightly bigger tire, if you even bother at all.
The size difference, insofar as handling is concerned, will be negligible, and easily compensated for with a slightly bigger tire, if you even bother at all.
#16
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
Agree with folks. Unless you're wife is a Princess (as in "The Princess and the Pea"), it will be hard for her to notice the 4mm diameter difference.