Light Bicycle Wheels
#1226
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
I know that you're thrilled with your wheels, and that's cool, but until they explain a little better, I think that it's silly to waive this away as a non-concern for a potential buyer.
#1227
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
I haven't waived it away as a non-concern for a potential buyer, I'm just saying I wouldn't worry about it. I also wouldn't buy any of the 25mm inner width hoops if I was using a 28-32mm tire. Yes I understand the 105% rule, I just don't follow the rule strictly.
#1228
Senior Member
Going back to your original post on the subject, this is kinda the key bit of info that we don't know.. as apparently this incident caused them to change their PSI rating. If someone was running a 38mm tire at 80psi and it blew off.. then it's not a relevant reason for providing a new 50/60psi PSI recommendation, since as we've noted, it depends on tire width.
So, is it that running a 38 at that pressure, is too high for a 38? Does that mean you think the same rim with a 28 would be better at 80?
#1229
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Just so you're clear, this was just a hypothetical example, but yes, 80psi would be too high for any 38mm tire, while a 28mm tire at 80psi could be right for someone of a certain (heavier side of things) weight. And likewise, the 38mm tire at 80psi would be putting a lot more strain on the rim and tire bead than they might be designed to withstand. I wouldn't know though what the actual rim is that you're referring to, but evidently it might be possible that some rims can't even handle 80psi with a 28mm tire, but you'd definitely be better off than with a 38mm tire at the same pressure.
Likes For Sy Reene:
#1231
Senior Member
#1232
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Actually, I dont think it is that high a pressure. 60-70psi is pretty much the range recommended by Silca, Zipp AND Enve, for riding 32mms on tarmac.
I know i can accomplish this with a 28mm or 30mm OD rim as well - it is mostly OCD that is pushing me for a rim width that is at the very least equal to the tire width.
#1234
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Zipp/SRAMs calculator asks for nominal sized tire, and with hooked rims (is Guad thinking hooks or hookless??), so with a 28mm labelled tire, the result is 61/65psi. With a 30mm tire, result is 58/62. A bit OT, but I'm curious what 'science' is behind a SRAM's calculator indicating to use less air pressure (~5psi) with a hookless rim than with hooked -- does a tire mounted on hookless inflate to that much larger size?
Silca's calculator, which relies on WAM, provides a result of ~63/64psi. There is no entry needed for rim width or whether hooked/hookless, since this calculator is based on the actual tire width once inflated anyway.
Last edited by Sy Reene; 08-28-20 at 08:24 AM.
#1235
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
I was looking at WR45/65. Plan was to run them with a tire with a WAM of 32mm, to make the rim OD - for riding on all sorts of tarmac, on endurance-focused weekend group rides (where there are some attacks and sustained hard efforts but nothing too crazy) and generally as my all-road wheelset that I can take with me when i go on cycling trips.
#1237
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Realize that he's talking about actual inflated 32mm width. I/we don't know what nominally-sized tire he thinks will end up at 32mm. The rims he's talking about are 25mm internal.
Zipp/SRAMs calculator asks for nominal sized tire, and with hooked rims (is Guad thinking hooks or hookless??), so with a 28mm labelled tire, the result is 61/65psi. With a 30mm tire, result is 58/62. A bit OT, but I'm curious what 'science' is behind a SRAM's calculator indicating to use less air pressure (~5psi) with a hookless rim than with hooked -- does a tire mounted on hookless inflate to that much larger size?
Silca's calculator, which relies on WAM, provides a result of ~63/64psi. There is no entry needed for rim width or whether hooked/hookless, since this calculator is based on the actual tire width once inflated anyway.
Zipp/SRAMs calculator asks for nominal sized tire, and with hooked rims (is Guad thinking hooks or hookless??), so with a 28mm labelled tire, the result is 61/65psi. With a 30mm tire, result is 58/62. A bit OT, but I'm curious what 'science' is behind a SRAM's calculator indicating to use less air pressure (~5psi) with a hookless rim than with hooked -- does a tire mounted on hookless inflate to that much larger size?
Silca's calculator, which relies on WAM, provides a result of ~63/64psi. There is no entry needed for rim width or whether hooked/hookless, since this calculator is based on the actual tire width once inflated anyway.
I plan to run hooked rims - I really see no value whatsoever in going hookless. Someone from Challenge Tires was reaming all the wheel manufacturers a new one on WW for basically abandoning ERTRO and making up their own standards as they want along. And i agree that it seems to be nothing but a cost-cutting move: do they really believe that that hook is what is going to make a massive difference in aero for the wheel? Enough to warrant the risk of the tire blowing off and requiring an entire page of tire compatibility nonsense?
Also, the WR50 is a "Pro" rim, which is made differently. The finishing is also different.
https://www.lightbicycle.com/series/...rim/falcon-pro
#1238
Full Member
Does anyone have a recommendation for a frame with 38mm measured width clearance: WR50 or AR45? The bike is a 2020 Scott Addict RC. I'm currently running Schwalbe ONE TLE 28s which measure at 29mm. This chart shows that those tires will measure at 31.2mm on the WR50s or 30.0mm on the AR45s.
#1239
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 7
Bikes: '70s Eisentraut, Gary Fisher mtn, Scott carbon road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Depends on use and what clearance you’re comfortable with. Sounds right for a 32mm Rim to me. I’m running new 28c Pro One TLEs on WR50s and they measure 31.5mm. On my RoadMachine tires and rims both have 4mm chainstay clearance each side (so 40mm total width at the rim), which to me is minimum. By the way I had to measure clearance more than once to get a real number at the rim diameter, since the RM chain stays angle into the bottom bracket.
#1240
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have decided to get a set of AR56's to go on my new Tarmac SL7 Expert. I am going to go with the DT240 hubs and with those I have the option of going for 24 or 28 hole rear wheel. I weigh around 90kg, Would people recommend going with the 24H or 28H or rear?
#1241
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
Did you get 10% off for choosing DT240S hubs? If you "like" Light Bicycle on Facebook, they give 3% off.
Likes For noodle soup:
#1242
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#1243
Full Member
Depends on use and what clearance you’re comfortable with. Sounds right for a 32mm Rim to me. I’m running new 28c Pro One TLEs on WR50s and they measure 31.5mm. On my RoadMachine tires and rims both have 4mm chainstay clearance each side (so 40mm total width at the rim), which to me is minimum. By the way I had to measure clearance more than once to get a real number at the rim diameter, since the RM chain stays angle into the bottom bracket.
#1244
Senior Member
Sounds like you're looking at a very similar wheelset to the one I received last month (and posted above). AR56 (disc), DT 240 EXP, CX-Ray spokes with brass nipples. My 24/24 set weighed 1518g, so a 24/28 setup would likely be ~1540g. Sounds like cheap insurance to me. I went with 24/24 hole as I weigh a good 25kg less than you.
And since everyone likes pics:
And since everyone likes pics:
#1245
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 7
Bikes: '70s Eisentraut, Gary Fisher mtn, Scott carbon road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Standard weight Hooked rim — keeps all tire options open — not that I plan on using anything but tubeless tires.
By the way, what the web site says about stiff, believe it — I’m on the lighter side at 152 lbs and I never feel any give in these wheels, even with J bend spokes. Comfy they are not. -Dan
By the way, what the web site says about stiff, believe it — I’m on the lighter side at 152 lbs and I never feel any give in these wheels, even with J bend spokes. Comfy they are not. -Dan
#1246
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sounds like you're looking at a very similar wheelset to the one I received last month (and posted above). AR56 (disc), DT 240 EXP, CX-Ray spokes with brass nipples. My 24/24 set weighed 1518g, so a 24/28 setup would likely be ~1540g. Sounds like cheap insurance to me. I went with 24/24 hole as I weigh a good 25kg less than you.
And since everyone likes pics:
And since everyone likes pics:
#1247
Senior Member
I ordered them with hooked beads and no holes in the rim beds. Mounting Conti GP5ks was challenging, but I still got them both on in a half hour or so (warmed the tires up in a toaster oven and used plastic levers). This setup of wheels/tires really transforms the feel of my gravel bike into a legit endurance geo road bike. Very pleased with the split personality option I've got now.
Also for reference, I got the gloss, UD carbon finish with no logos.
Likes For dur4ce:
#1248
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
On 8/26 I ordered a wheelset from the NA distributor, and today they emailed the UPS shipping information.
on 7/11 I ordered a wheelset from there Asian facility, and received shipping info 8/17. These wheels still haven't moved according to the tracking #.
on 7/11 I ordered a wheelset from there Asian facility, and received shipping info 8/17. These wheels still haven't moved according to the tracking #.
#1249
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 322
Bikes: 2014 Focus Mares AX 2.0, 2019 Cube Litening C:62 Race Disc Teamline
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 140 Times
in
68 Posts
I ride 28/28 AR46 with DT 350 hubs and CX-Ray spokes. They are straight as an arrow after about 1500km.
#1250
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
So LB has released tire pressure charts and also edited their pressure recommendations:
https://www.lightbicycle.com/newslet...re-Charts.html
Back to 110psi for the hooked rims- which makes sense. I suspect they just got conservative as an automatic reaction when the blowout happened and till they could figure out why.
Not sure i agree with their tire pressure recommendations. IMO, they are about 10-20psi too low - based on both my personal experiences as well as what Silca, ENVE and Zipp all have to say. But that's a relatively minor issue. The main thing is that these wheels should work at relatively higher pressures too.
https://www.lightbicycle.com/newslet...re-Charts.html
Back to 110psi for the hooked rims- which makes sense. I suspect they just got conservative as an automatic reaction when the blowout happened and till they could figure out why.
Not sure i agree with their tire pressure recommendations. IMO, they are about 10-20psi too low - based on both my personal experiences as well as what Silca, ENVE and Zipp all have to say. But that's a relatively minor issue. The main thing is that these wheels should work at relatively higher pressures too.
Likes For guadzilla: