Help me understand what gravel biking is.
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,092
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times
in
119 Posts
If the claims allowed include gravel bikes that weren't called "Gravel Bikes" the Salsa Vaya deserves a rightful place - early 2010:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100226...om/bikes/vaya/
Very nice geometry, a tad long in the CS but good overall.
The point is, the lineage is continual and historic.
https://web.archive.org/web/20100226...om/bikes/vaya/
Very nice geometry, a tad long in the CS but good overall.
The point is, the lineage is continual and historic.
Likes For Spoonrobot:
#27
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,738
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1999 Post(s)
Liked 1,506 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,935
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2614 Post(s)
Liked 1,958 Times
in
1,227 Posts
Non illegitimi carborundum. Some people, for an unknown reason, feel they need to respond to every thread, regardless of whether or not they have anything to contribute.
Gravel biking is what you do on a gravel bike. See also: Curious: what is a gravel bike? - Bike Forums
Gravel biking is what you do on a gravel bike. See also: Curious: what is a gravel bike? - Bike Forums
#29
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,482
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3195 Post(s)
Liked 1,727 Times
in
1,045 Posts
While Kinesis had been making tubing and OEM frames prior to the establishment of Kinesis UK, they didn’t market their own brand frames in the consumer segment. I don’t know if they flipped the Kinesis UK designs into other markets under other brands, but in any case, the Kinesis UK bikes were original designs of Kinesis UK, not rebadges.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,092
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times
in
119 Posts
As a small point of clarity, neither Tripster ATR nor any of the Kinesis UK bikes were rebadges; they were all in-house designs of Kinesis UK (by Dom Mason, now of Mason Cycles), a separate company from Kinesis in Taiwan, although Kinesis does make the Kinesis UK frames.
While Kinesis had been making tubing and OEM frames prior to the establishment of Kinesis UK, they didn’t market their own brand frames in the consumer segment. I don’t know if they flipped the Kinesis UK designs into other markets under other brands, but in any case, the Kinesis UK bikes were original designs of Kinesis UK, not rebadges.
While Kinesis had been making tubing and OEM frames prior to the establishment of Kinesis UK, they didn’t market their own brand frames in the consumer segment. I don’t know if they flipped the Kinesis UK designs into other markets under other brands, but in any case, the Kinesis UK bikes were original designs of Kinesis UK, not rebadges.
The Tripster ATR metamorphized into a gravel bike well after the first USA gravel bike(s).
Unfortunately, a "Gravel Bike" has to be called a gravel bike to count, the Tripster ATR was like a lot of precursor bikes that were named something else - it was a Kinesis mainline badged bike of designs they were already making and selling for other companies. Performance Bike was selling CX bikes in 2011/12 with the same geometry including the leading indicator BB drop greater than the CX standard 60-65mm. Their Scattante bikes for recreational cyclocross had BB drop 70-72mm, similar HTA 72° and so on.
Unfortunately, a "Gravel Bike" has to be called a gravel bike to count, the Tripster ATR was like a lot of precursor bikes that were named something else - it was a Kinesis mainline badged bike of designs they were already making and selling for other companies. Performance Bike was selling CX bikes in 2011/12 with the same geometry including the leading indicator BB drop greater than the CX standard 60-65mm. Their Scattante bikes for recreational cyclocross had BB drop 70-72mm, similar HTA 72° and so on.
#31
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,482
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3195 Post(s)
Liked 1,727 Times
in
1,045 Posts
In any case, it’s not an accurate statement, and the truth as Kinesis UK say it is that their frames were original designs, not Kinesis-badged designs they were already making for others.
You’re correct that your comment needed no additional clarity, because it was clearly wrong.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,092
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times
in
119 Posts
I’m sorry you feel that way, but “badging designs they were already making and selling for other companies” looks like the definition of rebadging to me.
In any case, it’s not an accurate statement, and the truth as Kinesis UK say it is that their frames were original designs, not Kinesis-badged designs they were already making for others.
You’re correct that your comment needed no additional clarity, because it was clearly wrong.
In any case, it’s not an accurate statement, and the truth as Kinesis UK say it is that their frames were original designs, not Kinesis-badged designs they were already making for others.
You’re correct that your comment needed no additional clarity, because it was clearly wrong.
#33
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,482
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3195 Post(s)
Liked 1,727 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#34
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 793
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 404 Post(s)
Liked 822 Times
in
390 Posts
Gravel bikes became a thing as road and mountain bikes became more specialized and less good at being do-it-all machines. It was started by hobbyists and small builders that recognized the growing divide and adopted by the major manufacturers, and it coincided with larger demographic trends - aging cyclists no longer able to maintain a deep, aero road position, exurban sprawl that pushed good riding roads further and further away, an increase in road fatalities spurred on be ever-larger vehicles, and the loss of good mountain bike trails.
__________________
--------------------------------------
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
--------------------------------------
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
Likes For john m flores:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,092
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times
in
119 Posts
Bianchigirll uploaded a bunch of 80s-90s Bianchi Catalogs a couple years ago and reading through them I was struck immediately by how well the Cross-Terrain descriptions fit with my idea of "Gravel Biking".
This one more than anything hits me square. I remember riding on a busy road with cars and trucks, high on the ridgeline, a break in the trees gave view to a wonderful vista and showed a narrow dirt path descending down into the forest. I wanted so bad to hop the curb and rip down the descent but there was no way it was going to happen on my narrow high pressure tired road bike.
Gravel Biking, to me more than anything - is seeking top performance over a variety of terrain. My regular weekday ride includes 4-15 miles of gravel, 4-15 miles of singletrack, and 4-30 miles of road. I want to have a good time on all those surfaces, and with today's tires (and bikes) it's simple and easy. I have no issue with riding the extremes - unpaved roads so rough they barely resemble roads or dirt so smooth it's faster than pavement - but the heart is always going to be multi-surface, just because.
This one more than anything hits me square. I remember riding on a busy road with cars and trucks, high on the ridgeline, a break in the trees gave view to a wonderful vista and showed a narrow dirt path descending down into the forest. I wanted so bad to hop the curb and rip down the descent but there was no way it was going to happen on my narrow high pressure tired road bike.
Gravel Biking, to me more than anything - is seeking top performance over a variety of terrain. My regular weekday ride includes 4-15 miles of gravel, 4-15 miles of singletrack, and 4-30 miles of road. I want to have a good time on all those surfaces, and with today's tires (and bikes) it's simple and easy. I have no issue with riding the extremes - unpaved roads so rough they barely resemble roads or dirt so smooth it's faster than pavement - but the heart is always going to be multi-surface, just because.
Likes For Spoonrobot:
#36
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,109
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5035 Post(s)
Liked 8,234 Times
in
3,892 Posts
I say "I'm going for a gravel bike ride", simply indicating which bike I'm riding. For me, that's likely to be a ride that includes some pavement, some dirt roads, and some singletrack. In my area, actual gravel roads aren't a thing, but a gravel bike is a fun and useful machine for handling a much wider variety of terrain than I would ride with any of my other bikes.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 701
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 406 Post(s)
Liked 389 Times
in
219 Posts
Le gravel est la forme originelle du cyclisme.
Likes For vespasianus:
#38
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,109
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5035 Post(s)
Liked 8,234 Times
in
3,892 Posts
Gravel Biking, to me more than anything - is seeking top performance over a variety of terrain. My regular weekday ride includes 4-15 miles of gravel, 4-15 miles of singletrack, and 4-30 miles of road. I want to have a good time on all those surfaces, and with today's tires (and bikes) it's simple and easy. I have no issue with riding the extremes - unpaved roads so rough they barely resemble roads or dirt so smooth it's faster than pavement - but the heart is always going to be multi-surface, just because.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#39
Newbie
It actually originated in Bedrock by an engineer for the world famous cyclist by the name of Fred (the king) Flintstone. He was needing something comfortable to ride the rocks and still fast enough to go deep into the rock valleys to avoid predator dinosaurs. He was the first to ride the first true gravel bike. It is my understanding that there is no carbon in this bike. However, they did confirm this through carbon dating!
rfd37
Last edited by rdf37; 04-10-24 at 08:30 PM.
Likes For rdf37:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,182
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4475 Post(s)
Liked 1,619 Times
in
1,064 Posts
Bianchigirll uploaded a bunch of 80s-90s Bianchi Catalogs a couple years ago and reading through them I was struck immediately by how well the Cross-Terrain descriptions fit with my idea of "Gravel Biking".
This one more than anything hits me square. I remember riding on a busy road with cars and trucks, high on the ridgeline, a break in the trees gave view to a wonderful vista and showed a narrow dirt path descending down into the forest. I wanted so bad to hop the curb and rip down the descent but there was no way it was going to happen on my narrow high pressure tired road bike.
Gravel Biking, to me more than anything - is seeking top performance over a variety of terrain. My regular weekday ride includes 4-15 miles of gravel, 4-15 miles of singletrack, and 4-30 miles of road. I want to have a good time on all those surfaces, and with today's tires (and bikes) it's simple and easy. I have no issue with riding the extremes - unpaved roads so rough they barely resemble roads or dirt so smooth it's faster than pavement - but the heart is always going to be multi-surface, just because.
This one more than anything hits me square. I remember riding on a busy road with cars and trucks, high on the ridgeline, a break in the trees gave view to a wonderful vista and showed a narrow dirt path descending down into the forest. I wanted so bad to hop the curb and rip down the descent but there was no way it was going to happen on my narrow high pressure tired road bike.
Gravel Biking, to me more than anything - is seeking top performance over a variety of terrain. My regular weekday ride includes 4-15 miles of gravel, 4-15 miles of singletrack, and 4-30 miles of road. I want to have a good time on all those surfaces, and with today's tires (and bikes) it's simple and easy. I have no issue with riding the extremes - unpaved roads so rough they barely resemble roads or dirt so smooth it's faster than pavement - but the heart is always going to be multi-surface, just because.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,092
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times
in
119 Posts
Bianchi was attempting to capture a bigger market for the third bike (and differentiate from the changing sentiment behind the hybrid moniker) when they created their full feature Cross Terrain line in 1989 and then expanded in 1990. It didn't work and the (drop-bar) Cross Terrain models were limited the next year and completely gone by 1994 when they were replaced by flat bar bikes. I suspect there were some internal politics occurring as well - the spread in the 1995 magazine makes romantic mention of Paris-Roubaix, road riding, etc - but all the bikes are flat bar with low-end components.
Drop-bar 26" wheel bikes remained ATBs/MTBs for whatever reason. I haven't seen a reference for a drop-bar 26" Hybrid until the later-1990s after the category had already changed. I suspect as a mistake in import/design planning.
The messaging for the Volpe in 1986 was a little more convoluted:
By 1989/90 the industry had it down pretty good:
The American cycling consumer didn't seem to be interested in "Cyclocross" as a marketing term in the 80s and early 90s and apparently took a while to warm up to "Hyrbrid" as well. For as much consternation about what "Gravel" marketing category means, it's been adopted and internalized quicker than the Hybrid/Cross/Road/MTB distinctions in the 80s/90s.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...chi-volpe.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ck-n-road.html
https://waterfordbikes.com/SchwinnCa...ad_Cat_26.html
https://waterfordbikes.com/SchwinnCa...Fitness_1.html
Likes For Spoonrobot:
#42
Noob Bee
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Da Yoop (northern Michigan)
Posts: 140
Bikes: Specialized Crux, Winspace SLC 2.0, Giant TCR Alliance
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
48 Posts
People ask me this question more or less, typically those of an older vintage, and I've already decided the next time I'm going to say this:
Take whatever bike you want that's not a gravel bike (MTB, touring bike, endurance bike, road bike, etc...) and start coming out on gravel training rides with me. If at the end you feel like you didn't need something a bit different than what you had, then it doesn't matter what anyone else says either way, the distinctions won't matter to you, and you've answered your own question. If you do feel like you could have benefited from something different, then the distinctions might actually matter, and you've answered your own question.
Either way, you've answered your own question. So give it a shot.
See you Saturday at 6AM then?
Take whatever bike you want that's not a gravel bike (MTB, touring bike, endurance bike, road bike, etc...) and start coming out on gravel training rides with me. If at the end you feel like you didn't need something a bit different than what you had, then it doesn't matter what anyone else says either way, the distinctions won't matter to you, and you've answered your own question. If you do feel like you could have benefited from something different, then the distinctions might actually matter, and you've answered your own question.
Either way, you've answered your own question. So give it a shot.
See you Saturday at 6AM then?
Likes For sir_crash_alot:
#43
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,652
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3711 Post(s)
Liked 5,557 Times
in
2,812 Posts
Someone must have dissed OP's bike. Otherwise I can't see this causing him so much agitation.