Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

New Road Bikes Less Aggressive?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

New Road Bikes Less Aggressive?

Old 09-06-19, 07:56 AM
  #1  
spinconn
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: SC
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 23 Posts
New Road Bikes Less Aggressive?

I truly love my Roubaix in all ways, but my eye does stray on occasion when I see the slim lines of a steel bike. It seems I need to get one, my last being a 1980's Pinarello.

Not being so flush as to consider a custom bespoke bike I have been looking at factory steel bikes and only saw cheap models, or with Pinarello and Colnago, bikes that were not true road bikes. Then I saw the Colnago Master Light. Elegant and beautiful.

I have been reading up on it and read in reviews that it, an 80's bike, is more aggressive in geometry than modern road bikes. I am no expert on it but I assume modern bikes are more evolved so I would think they are faster. I understand more aggressive means less comfort but we are talking about racing bikes.

So, why would modern designs be less aggressive than an 80's road bike?
spinconn is offline  
Old 09-06-19, 08:06 AM
  #2  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,613

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times in 997 Posts
Are you reading that 80's steel racing road bikes are more aggressive than today's steel road bikes? Or any material frames made today for racing? If the former, this wouldn't surprise me as I can't imagine there's a large market for actual racers looking for a steel solution. Steel is generally marketed today as a 'comfortable' frame material.
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 09-06-19, 08:55 AM
  #3  
eduskator
Senior Member
 
eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,064

Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 957 Post(s)
Liked 562 Times in 423 Posts
Mainly because the sport has evolved, like everything else. Reseach is crucial when it comes to technology. The ultimate goal is to win that race & cut off seconds. The geometry being one of the way to reach that goal, today's specs are most likely a lot better than 40 years ago.
eduskator is offline  
Old 09-06-19, 09:27 AM
  #4  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Because aggressive= harsh= feels faster but turns out not to actually be faster same as tires?
woodcraft is offline  
Old 09-06-19, 10:01 AM
  #5  
colnago62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by woodcraft
Because aggressive= harsh= feels faster but turns out not to actually be faster same as tires?
I remember when Cannondale began supplying bikes for their world team Saeco, the team complained that the frames were way too harsh riding. I owned one of the 3.0 frames and that frame was built like a track frame. It would beat me up so bad that 50 miles felt like 90.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 09-06-19, 10:11 AM
  #6  
Chi_Z
Senior Member
 
Chi_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 507

Bikes: Niner RLT 9 RDO

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 50 Posts
bike fit has changed too, in the 80s the pros all sit way behind the BB, nowadays they are all sitting forward to get that extra aero gain

Last edited by Chi_Z; 09-06-19 at 10:40 AM.
Chi_Z is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 09:38 AM
  #7  
mcours2006
Senior Member
 
mcours2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,198

Bikes: ...a few.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2009 Post(s)
Liked 405 Times in 231 Posts
I've got one of these 80s steel framed bikes with the traditional level TT. I don't find it to be any more uncomfortable than my Spec Roubaix. Granted I've got modern STI shifters on it as well as a Brooks B17 saddle. But, to be fair, the reason for the chance was that it wasn't comfortable with old brake levers and the original saddle.😄
mcours2006 is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 03:32 PM
  #8  
SundayNiagara
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Jamis make 2 steel bikes that are surprisingly lightweight. A 105 & Ultegra.
SundayNiagara is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 03:39 PM
  #9  
sumgy
Senior Member
 
sumgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 58 Posts
If you want a harsh riding frame, from my experience the Master will be perfect for you
Mine was the harshest riding bike I have ever owned.
My Concorde feels lower at the front than my Moots, but much of that is to do with the stem angle I think.
sumgy is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 04:35 PM
  #10  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,936

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,368 Times in 1,916 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
Steel is generally marketed today as a 'comfortable' frame material.
Maybe that's why they can get away with more aggressive geometry?
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 07:03 PM
  #11  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,340
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2429 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times in 1,646 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Maybe that's why they can get away with more aggressive geometry?
The OP was saying that the '80s Colnago was described as having a more aggressive geometry than comparable modern road bikes, not the other way around.

There was a period in the '80s when some Italian bikes were built with a shorter wheelbase (i.e., a more aggressive geometry) than the standard road racing geometry of, say, French bikes or earlier Italian bikes, the idea presumably being that some Italian sprinters had asked for road frames that handled and accelerated more like track sprint frames.

At about the same time, Cannondale must have had similar requests from American sprinters, which would have been why they produced their Criterium series for a few years alongside their standard geometry road racing frames.

Speaking of Italians and Cannondale, Mario Cipollini's team was sponsored by Cannondale for a few years. Here's his spontaneous, on-road tribute:

Trakhak is online now  
Old 09-07-19, 09:17 PM
  #12  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,936

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,368 Times in 1,916 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
The OP was saying that the '80s Colnago was described as having a more aggressive geometry than comparable modern road bikes, not the other way around.that some Italian sprinters had asked for road frames that handled and accelerated more like track sprint frames.
Which was exactly my point: an aggressive geometry built on a more forgiving material may be easier to control and more comfortable than an aggressive geometry on an unforgiving material.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 10:14 PM
  #13  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,538

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10902 Post(s)
Liked 7,393 Times in 4,148 Posts
Originally Posted by spinconn
So, why would modern designs be less aggressive than an 80's road bike?
Road bikes in the 80s varied greatly. They cant be grouped into a single style.

In general, road bikes in the first few years had more tire clearance than similar level road bikes in the closing years of the decade.
Some were 73/73 frames. Some were more relaxed and others were more aggressive.
Then you have the general approach of brands where models closer to entry level were more relaxed than top comp models.

Are new road bikes less aggressive? Compare a trek Emonda with an 87 Schwinn Circuit or Super Sport. Head tube angle, seat tube angle, wheelbase, fork offset...are the differences really significant?

But that's just one example and to categorize an entire decade off an example would be a mistake...
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 10:19 PM
  #14  
eja_ bottecchia
Senior Member
 
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,793
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 462 Times in 292 Posts
Originally Posted by sumgy
If you want a harsh riding frame, from my experience the Master will be perfect for you
Mine was the harshest riding bike I have ever owned.
My Concorde feels lower at the front than my Moots, but much of that is to do with the stem angle I think.
I don’t feel any distinguishable ride difference between my 1989 Bottecchia and my “re-imagined” Colnago Master.


eja_ bottecchia is offline  
Likes For eja_ bottecchia:
Old 09-07-19, 10:36 PM
  #15  
sumgy
Senior Member
 
sumgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by eja_ bottecchia
I don’t feel any distinguishable ride difference between my 1989 Bottecchia and my “re-imagined” Colnago Master.
Did your Master have the Gilco crimped tubing?
My Master Olympic did and it rode harsh.
I felt every bump on it.
Maybe our roads have gotten better?
sumgy is offline  
Old 09-07-19, 10:44 PM
  #16  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,107
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8191 Post(s)
Liked 8,851 Times in 4,396 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Which was exactly my point: an aggressive geometry built on a more forgiving material may be easier to control and more comfortable than an aggressive geometry on an unforgiving material.
The best handling bike I ever had was also the stiffest with the steepest head angle. It was a 1990 Tesch s22. Amazing turning and absolutely instinctive road handling. It did what it was supposed to do better than any motorcycle or bicycle I ever rode. It also beat the crap out of me. A friend has it now, he's 250 pounds and does short rides on it.
big john is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 12:01 AM
  #17  
colnago62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak

At about the same time, Cannondale must have had similar requests from American sprinters, which would have been why they produced their Criterium series for a few years alongside their standard geometry road racing frames.
At that time, the vast majority of races in the US where criteriums. I also believe that Cannondale did not take much rider input when designing the bike. It was the worst bike they ever built. ‘If some stiffness is good, more must be better’ is not necessarily the right approach to road fame design
colnago62 is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 12:13 AM
  #18  
Darth Lefty 
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,775

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times in 1,366 Posts
Next year's bike is always more "aggressive" because the customers are male
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Darth Lefty is offline  
Likes For Darth Lefty:
Old 09-08-19, 04:14 AM
  #19  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1103 Post(s)
Liked 1,824 Times in 878 Posts
Originally Posted by sumgy
Did your Master have the Gilco crimped tubing?
My Master Olympic did and it rode harsh.
I felt every bump on it.
Maybe our roads have gotten better?
I guess it's all a matter of personal perception and taste. My mid 80s Colnago Master (Gilco tubing) is more compliant (read less harsh) and doesn't corner as well as my Merckx Corsa Extra.

nomadmax is offline  
Likes For nomadmax:
Old 09-08-19, 04:24 AM
  #20  
sumgy
Senior Member
 
sumgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by nomadmax
I guess it's all a matter of personal perception and taste. My mid 80s Colnago Master (Gilco tubing) is more compliant (read less harsh) and doesn't corner as well as my Merckx Corsa Extra.
Same wheels?
I am comparing mine against my Concorde Prelude with PRX tubing, both on 32hole Open Pro's.
But then again, I think the Prelude rides smoother than my Moots on 32 hole rims.

sumgy is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 04:48 AM
  #21  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1103 Post(s)
Liked 1,824 Times in 878 Posts
Originally Posted by sumgy
Same wheels?
I am comparing mine against my Concorde Prelude with PRX tubing, both on 32hole Open Pro's.
But then again, I think the Prelude rides smoother than my Moots on 32 hole rims.

Yes, same wheels. Both are shod with Zondas or a custom build of Campy Record Hubs & DT 411 rims, same exact build down to the spoke nipples. That's ^ a nice bike.
nomadmax is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 05:22 AM
  #22  
spinconn
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: SC
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 23 Posts
As the OP I am appreciating all of this information but the pictures are just as enjoyable. My goodness those are beautiful bikes. Somebody should make a calendar of bikes of this style.
spinconn is offline  
Likes For spinconn:
Old 09-08-19, 01:30 PM
  #23  
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times in 153 Posts
Some of them could be nice looking bikes but I must say that the modern bulky looking cranksets and threadless headset / handlebar stem combos don't do much for the aesthetics.
Dean V is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 03:55 PM
  #24  
sumgy
Senior Member
 
sumgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by Dean V
Some of them could be nice looking bikes but I must say that the modern bulky looking cranksets and threadless headset / handlebar stem combos don't do much for the aesthetics.
Yep, but some people cannot get their bars in the position they want with a quill stem I guess?
I definitely prefer the look of quill stem and more period correct parts with my skinny steel tubes, and am lucky enough to be able to get a comfortable position using them.
sumgy is offline  
Likes For sumgy:
Old 09-10-19, 07:00 PM
  #25  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1103 Post(s)
Liked 1,824 Times in 878 Posts
In my opinion, there's nothing more beautiful than an old steel frame going down the road at speed. If I have to put pink handlebar streamers on my bike to make that happen, I will.

Besides, they all look the same when all you can see is the chainstays and rear dropouts

Last edited by nomadmax; 09-10-19 at 07:12 PM.
nomadmax is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.