Curiosity question about crank sets, for everyone over 50
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Curiosity question about crank sets, for everyone over 50
Just a random curiosity question...
Let's say you are in the market for a nice road bike. Would you opt for one with a triple crank or keep it traditional with a double crank? Since we're all well seasoned and have aged gracefully, would a triple crank be more efficient and easier on hills?
Let's say you are in the market for a nice road bike. Would you opt for one with a triple crank or keep it traditional with a double crank? Since we're all well seasoned and have aged gracefully, would a triple crank be more efficient and easier on hills?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,654
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,221 Posts
And there is the compact double.
#3
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4337 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,616 Posts
I'd wait until the Di2 triple version comes out.
#4
Seat Sniffer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,626
Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 944 Post(s)
Liked 1,980 Times
in
566 Posts
Ah, the endless debate between three and two.
Make mine three, please.
Make mine three, please.
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
#5
Senior Member
I'll vote triple. But it may limit your choices.
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 182
Bikes: Dream Ti bike to celebrate turning 70 - frame by Seven; Cannondale Synapse carbon Ultegra 3 (2015 model), Cannondale Quick SL-1 (2012 model- donated to a friend); Bianchi touring bike (1985 - Sold); Raleigh Super Course (1975 - donated to friend)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I chose a triple last year [albeit a 'flat-bar' performance-type hybrid rather than a true road bike] - but I think the triple is now getting quite rare (especially as one goes upmarket, which I assume you are referring to when you state 'nice')
#7
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Just a random curiosity question...
Let's say you are in the market for a nice road bike. Would you opt for one with a triple crank or keep it traditional with a double crank? Since we're all well seasoned and have aged gracefully, would a triple crank be more efficient and easier on hills?
Let's say you are in the market for a nice road bike. Would you opt for one with a triple crank or keep it traditional with a double crank? Since we're all well seasoned and have aged gracefully, would a triple crank be more efficient and easier on hills?
I chose a triple 50/39/30 with a 12-25 cassette. I'm well aware that I could have got as great or greater a range of gearing with a compact double and a big cassette. However, I like close ratios, and dislike the bigger jumps when shifting up to 30 and 32 at the back. In addition, one of the compromises involved in a compact double is a lot of shifting at the front. The overlaps between ratios means, for me, that I am often shifting at the front to find precisely the right gear. With the triple I spend much more than half my time in the middle ring, going up and down the nice tight cassette. And Shimano 105 and Ultegra triples shift like butter, there's no downside in that respect.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks everyone....
It's puzzling to me, if you really want to know. See, go online to Amazon or BD or Nashbar. 90% of the bikes online (assembly required) are all triple crank. But yet go to your LBS and all the Cannondale's, Specialized, Trek, Giant, etc... are all pretty much the standard compact double crank 50-34.
It's puzzling to me, if you really want to know. See, go online to Amazon or BD or Nashbar. 90% of the bikes online (assembly required) are all triple crank. But yet go to your LBS and all the Cannondale's, Specialized, Trek, Giant, etc... are all pretty much the standard compact double crank 50-34.
#9
Seat Sniffer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,626
Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 944 Post(s)
Liked 1,980 Times
in
566 Posts
Let's say I had a custom steel bike built for me last year, and had to decide what sort of groupset to choose?
I chose a triple 50/39/30 with a 12-25 cassette. I'm well aware that I could have got as great or greater a range of gearing with a compact double and a big cassette. However, I like close ratios, and dislike the bigger jumps when shifting up to 30 and 32 at the back. In addition, one of the compromises involved in a compact double is a lot of shifting at the front. The overlaps between ratios means, for me, that I am often shifting at the front to find precisely the right gear. With the triple I spend much more than half my time in the middle ring, going up and down the nice tight cassette. And Shimano 105 and Ultegra triples shift like butter, there's no downside in that respect.
I chose a triple 50/39/30 with a 12-25 cassette. I'm well aware that I could have got as great or greater a range of gearing with a compact double and a big cassette. However, I like close ratios, and dislike the bigger jumps when shifting up to 30 and 32 at the back. In addition, one of the compromises involved in a compact double is a lot of shifting at the front. The overlaps between ratios means, for me, that I am often shifting at the front to find precisely the right gear. With the triple I spend much more than half my time in the middle ring, going up and down the nice tight cassette. And Shimano 105 and Ultegra triples shift like butter, there's no downside in that respect.
You can also specify the gearing to half step between gears on a triple. Not really possible on a compact.
OP: Try playing around with this gear calculator with some of the triple and compact double configurations you're considering. Find one that gives you a wide range, yet allows narrow spacing between gears if you want it (helpful when pedaling into the wind for me). Not hard to do with a triple. Really hard to do with a compact double.
https://www.gear-calculator.com/#KB=3...UF=2099&SL=2.5
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
#10
Life is good
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not far from the Withlacoochee Trail. 🚴🏻
Posts: 18,209
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey Helix Pro
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Triples are for big, long hills. If you don't have those them go for a double -- standard=53/39 or compact=50/34.
__________________
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
#11
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Really, this is nonsense. Obviously, if one lives in Florida, gearing scarcely matters - in fact I'm not sure I'd bother with anything other than a 48/16 singlespeed, it would be fine. But to suggest that a triple is only useful for big long hills is just wrong.
#12
Seat Sniffer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,626
Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 944 Post(s)
Liked 1,980 Times
in
566 Posts
^+1
I honestly think one of the key advantages with triples over a compact double isn't the hills, but the flats on windy days or when racing ... that's where the narrower gear spacing comes in handy.
I honestly think one of the key advantages with triples over a compact double isn't the hills, but the flats on windy days or when racing ... that's where the narrower gear spacing comes in handy.
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
#13
Life is good
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not far from the Withlacoochee Trail. 🚴🏻
Posts: 18,209
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey Helix Pro
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
We moved to FL because my wife didn't like me riding in ATL traffic.
__________________
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
#14
Trek 500 Kid
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,562
Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2904 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times
in
307 Posts
+1
You can also specify the gearing to half step between gears on a triple. Not really possible on a compact.
OP: Try playing around with this gear calculator with some of the triple and compact double configurations you're considering. Find one that gives you a wide range, yet allows narrow spacing between gears if you want it (helpful when pedaling into the wind for me). Not hard to do with a triple. Really hard to do with a compact double.
https://www.gear-calculator.com/#KB=3...UF=2099&SL=2.5
You can also specify the gearing to half step between gears on a triple. Not really possible on a compact.
OP: Try playing around with this gear calculator with some of the triple and compact double configurations you're considering. Find one that gives you a wide range, yet allows narrow spacing between gears if you want it (helpful when pedaling into the wind for me). Not hard to do with a triple. Really hard to do with a compact double.
https://www.gear-calculator.com/#KB=3...UF=2099&SL=2.5
Another good calculator with some speed estimates at the bottom:
Mike Sherman's Bicycle Gear Calculator
Last edited by Zinger; 09-18-14 at 05:23 PM.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 182
Bikes: Dream Ti bike to celebrate turning 70 - frame by Seven; Cannondale Synapse carbon Ultegra 3 (2015 model), Cannondale Quick SL-1 (2012 model- donated to a friend); Bianchi touring bike (1985 - Sold); Raleigh Super Course (1975 - donated to friend)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
#16
Seat Sniffer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,626
Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 944 Post(s)
Liked 1,980 Times
in
566 Posts
I get the kind of steps I want, and avoid cross-chaining, using different than stock chainrings on 110 BC doubles but I'm giving up my top end (such as it ever was anyway) on one bike and pretty much any hill bailout below about 40 gear inches on the other.....depending on freewheels (or cassettes) used.
Another good calculator with some speed estimates at the bottom:
Mike Sherman's Bicycle Gear Calculator
Another good calculator with some speed estimates at the bottom:
Mike Sherman's Bicycle Gear Calculator
I was able to get a nice set up with a quirky compact double combination ... good spacing and decent range. I'll have to play around with it again, but the combo was something that no body offered and would get a sideways look if they ever asked for it.
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
#17
Trek 500 Kid
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,562
Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2904 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times
in
307 Posts
My combinations are both with 46-36s and with 14-28 and 13-24 freewheels. Obviously lacking the range of triples but well within what I can push for very long but not for any seriously long climbing that I don't yet see in my future. Some folks will need more range both ways.
Last edited by Zinger; 09-18-14 at 06:11 PM.
#18
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
Triples are the most versatile. I use 50, 39 & 26 chainrings with a 12-27 ten speed cassette with a tighter 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 24, 27 cogset. The middle chainring does it all on flatter routes unless I'm enjoying a tailwind or I'm in a paceline. The large chainring is perfect for fast conditions, above 22 mph. The granny gear helps with steeper climbs, but is very rarely used.
Compact doubles require the use of both chainrings in the 15 to 20 mph speed range. I'd rather just shift across the cassette while riding on flat routes and then use the big or small chainrings when the riding becomes very fast or when the route is very steep.
I also use triples on my vintage bikes. I'll use 48, 36 and 26 chainings with a 13-24 freewheel.
Compact doubles require the use of both chainrings in the 15 to 20 mph speed range. I'd rather just shift across the cassette while riding on flat routes and then use the big or small chainrings when the riding becomes very fast or when the route is very steep.
I also use triples on my vintage bikes. I'll use 48, 36 and 26 chainings with a 13-24 freewheel.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Last edited by Barrettscv; 09-18-14 at 07:01 PM.
#19
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
Everyone talks about either end of the range, but I spend 90-95% of my time in the mid-range. So all my bikes have gearing optimized for that 16-20 mph range on the flats. For me, that means either a standard double or a triple (both have a 39 ring) and a 12-23 out back. Gives me around six gears in that range on the 39--19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14. I loves me my 18t cog in the wind.
With a compact, I'm cross-chained in both rings in that range.
Last edited by tsl; 09-18-14 at 06:55 PM.
#20
Uber Goober
My current bike has a triple. I don't know of a single hill on the routes I commonly do that requires it. (I have a 34-tooth rear cog, so I'm geared pretty low anyway). I can climb at 5 mph in the middle ring okay. But, if I thought I needed it, I'd get it. On the tandem, we have a couple of hills that we always go up in the little ring.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#21
Legs; OK! Lungs; not!
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 2,096
Bikes: ''09 Motobecane Immortal Pro (Yellow), '02 Diamondback Hybrid, '09 Lamborghini Viaggio, ''11 Cervelo P2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
4 Posts
Well, it's clear that there is not RIGHT answer for this question that meets the needs of every rider. Indeed, the very reason that triples, doubles, and compact doubles exist is that there is a huge range of variables to contend with. And to further complicate the matter, the cassette choice is a very important factor in the question.
We all have out own opinion for what is right, but I dare say I don't think anyone has asked the OP about his typical riding conditions. Is it flat, rolling, or really hilly? Is he a solo or group rider? Is he a masher or spinner? The point is, the only thing we know for sure is that he is over 50 and wants to know if there is a "best" choice for a crank. TMI is "Too Much Information." I think we are dealing with TLI. But even given all the information, there would be some differing opinions since there is "more than one way to skin this cat" (sorry if I offended cat lovers!)
So I think the best way to answer this question is to provide the pros and cons of each choice. I'll start with my 2 cents.
Without knowing your typical terrain and riding habits and goals, it's difficult to discuss possible cassette choices. Regarding cranks, IMHO a compact crank is a great choice for most terrain. If you are in a very hilly/mountainous area, a standard triple would seem to make sense. But here again, I'm just "jumping to conclusions" based on some assumptions. It's best to go to the source and get input.
What are your concerns? Where are you having problems? On the climbs? How often?
While there is no "single right answer" I think with more input from the OP, the collective BF brain can provide some valuable insight as to his alternatives.
We all have out own opinion for what is right, but I dare say I don't think anyone has asked the OP about his typical riding conditions. Is it flat, rolling, or really hilly? Is he a solo or group rider? Is he a masher or spinner? The point is, the only thing we know for sure is that he is over 50 and wants to know if there is a "best" choice for a crank. TMI is "Too Much Information." I think we are dealing with TLI. But even given all the information, there would be some differing opinions since there is "more than one way to skin this cat" (sorry if I offended cat lovers!)
So I think the best way to answer this question is to provide the pros and cons of each choice. I'll start with my 2 cents.
Without knowing your typical terrain and riding habits and goals, it's difficult to discuss possible cassette choices. Regarding cranks, IMHO a compact crank is a great choice for most terrain. If you are in a very hilly/mountainous area, a standard triple would seem to make sense. But here again, I'm just "jumping to conclusions" based on some assumptions. It's best to go to the source and get input.
What are your concerns? Where are you having problems? On the climbs? How often?
While there is no "single right answer" I think with more input from the OP, the collective BF brain can provide some valuable insight as to his alternatives.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Oakmont, PA
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got one road bike with a triple and one with a compact double. I really like the compact double. Possibly it's that I've turned into a bit of a weight weenie, possibly that I've gotten into decent enough shape that I don't really need a smaller gear than 34/27 around here, where it is very hilly but most of the climbs are sharp but short. I used to feel I needed the triple for a bailout, but now I find it convenient to shift up and stand and just get it over with. There's very little finding just the right gear for pounding along on a flat at 20mph, so I'm shifting from a small ring on the climb to the big ring for the descent regardless. Or maybe I'm just a weight weenie.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
So far all of my road bikes have traditional doubles.
My commuter road bike is 53/42 x 13-26 seven speed. This gearing works for all my commuting and around-town errand riding.
My aluminum road bike is 53/39 x 13-21 seven speed. This gearing works for all the weekend rides I do. On 10% grades I have to stand. I can't really climb a 15% grade of any distance - fortunately, those are not common here.
My steel road road bike is 53/42 x 12-17 six speed. This is limiting, great on flats but 10% is a struggle. So I'm building a second rear wheel with 14-26 six speed, that will be my climbing wheel.
However, I am slowly building a (partly) carbon road bike and it will have a triple! 53/42/30 x 12-23 ten speed. I am hopeful it will be my Swiss Army knife bike, able to do anything. It will have a cassette so I'll be able to tinker with gearing more easily.
My commuter road bike is 53/42 x 13-26 seven speed. This gearing works for all my commuting and around-town errand riding.
My aluminum road bike is 53/39 x 13-21 seven speed. This gearing works for all the weekend rides I do. On 10% grades I have to stand. I can't really climb a 15% grade of any distance - fortunately, those are not common here.
My steel road road bike is 53/42 x 12-17 six speed. This is limiting, great on flats but 10% is a struggle. So I'm building a second rear wheel with 14-26 six speed, that will be my climbing wheel.
However, I am slowly building a (partly) carbon road bike and it will have a triple! 53/42/30 x 12-23 ten speed. I am hopeful it will be my Swiss Army knife bike, able to do anything. It will have a cassette so I'll be able to tinker with gearing more easily.
Last edited by jyl; 09-18-14 at 10:31 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,478
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
245 Posts
ALL deraillers SUCK. Crooked chainlines at cruise speed, loopy double shifts, poor shifting on uphills, etc etc
I bought a ROHLOFF 14 for my heavyweight. Now 48/16T ... 23 to 120 GI. It has 2000 miles, 5 century days.
My direct gear is at 81.5 GI, which makes 19/ 21 mph cruising rather nice. On 2 of my centuries I had tailwinds for 20/ 30
miles where I was rolling 24/ 27 mph, no peloton required. Actually on one of them I was where the TdF pros were racing and I stopped to wait for them to go by twice. I went 3 miles farther. ha
Rohloff gears have absolutely perfect jumps. Hills are easier than with my old bikes also.
They don't fit on CF bikes so tooo bad.
I bought a ROHLOFF 14 for my heavyweight. Now 48/16T ... 23 to 120 GI. It has 2000 miles, 5 century days.
My direct gear is at 81.5 GI, which makes 19/ 21 mph cruising rather nice. On 2 of my centuries I had tailwinds for 20/ 30
miles where I was rolling 24/ 27 mph, no peloton required. Actually on one of them I was where the TdF pros were racing and I stopped to wait for them to go by twice. I went 3 miles farther. ha
Rohloff gears have absolutely perfect jumps. Hills are easier than with my old bikes also.
They don't fit on CF bikes so tooo bad.
#25
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Triples. We have longish to long climbs. I like having just the right gear without a lot of fooling around shifting. Tight spacing is good, too. My fave single bike gearing is 52-39-26 and 12-25.