Weight lifting issue
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times
in
740 Posts
Weight lifting issue
I'm faced with a conundrum. But first a little background.....I am 68, down to 5'9" from 5'10 1/2" and up until about a couple weeks ago weighed around 180 lbs. Several months ago I got back into the gym to lift since it's too cold to ride around here. I have one of those bodies that responds quickly to lifting. I seem to get cut fast. I've never really been into lifting until about 10 yrs. ago and even then it's only in the winter. So, this winter I decided to lift with more reps rather than progressing to higher weights. For example, instead of doing curls with high weights (per arm) I do 25 reps with a 20 lb dumbbell for each arm. I'm keeping my leg lifts to 3 sets of 10 with 130 lbs. (machine weight) and I do a couple other things like machine flys, etc. with moderate weight. Result? I am now up to 190 lbs! Same 36-37" waist and my jeans (34s) fit ever so slightly more snug. I want to be strong but I don't want to lug an extra 10 lbs around. Is this typical when lifting? Can I keep lifting moderately and get back down to 180? Just looking for wisdom from those who actually know this stuff. TIA
#4
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1391 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times
in
835 Posts
I have the opposite problem, in the sense that I am not able to build much muscle strength or bulk. For me, any gains are modest and a long time coming.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 239
Bikes: GT Carbon Grade, Jamis Nova Pro, Giant Sedona
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No way you gained 10 lbs of muscle in 2 months. I'm sure your bf% has increased a bit as well. That's not necessarily a bad thing. Losing weight and gaining muscle at the same time is very difficult. That's why body builders bulk and then cut. Building muscle takes food. I lift year round but strength training is a bigger focus in the winter. I can generally plan on gaining 5-10 lbs. Some is muscle but certainly not all. In the warmer months I lean out. It's a tricky balance. I firmly believe that as we get older strength training is hugely important. Many of what are considered the normal infirmities of ageing are really a loss of lean muscle. Keep lifting, tweak your diet, and go by what you see in the mirror instead of what you see on the scale.
Last edited by Blanchje; 01-22-15 at 11:45 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times
in
740 Posts
I should have been more precise. It's been 3 months of lifting with regularity. I spoke to one of the trainers at the gym this morning and she thinks it's all about the muscle gain. She seemed to think my routine was reasonable and suggested doing more cardio. And, actually I had started doing that last week. Doing 45-60 min. a day on one of those video spin bikes. Might cut back from 3 days/wk to 2 days/wk for weights just to see what happens.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nags Head NC
Posts: 359
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Weight isn't necessarily a bad thing. I could only imagine that if weight is muscle mass, your power might be significantly higher than before. Also think 2 weeks might be to short a trial to already make adjustments. A lot of things could affect your weight. Don't make the assumption that the weights are the culprits.
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi Bruce, I will share a few resources that you will find useful. First, bodybuilding.com has wonderful articles and forums. Next on youtube Athlean X channel is the best I have found. I'm 56 myself and super fit so I know about the challenges of adding muscle and cycling as an older chap. Anyway, I will give you a short answer to your question but I strongly suggest reading a lot about this subject and for God's sake don't listen to that female at your gym (not being sexist, I have found that there is no way she has any idea about older males). So, the answer is that your diet is almost certainly the issue here. Lifting lighter weights with more reps is a reasonable thing to do as you get older just because the joints are fragile. My suggestion would be to increase weight up to the point when you feel uncomfortable. That will get you results and still be relatively safe. Cardio is fine, but it is #4 on the list. #1 Diet, #2 Lifting #3 proper stretching #4 Cardio. I'm not a fanatic about counting and weighing my food but lots of people benefit from it. I have found that folks eat poorly and have no idea about total calories they take in or how much protein and good fats they need.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 20
Bikes: Old school single speed Peugeot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If I can give you piece of advice avoid machine. Specially for lower body. You will never get as much stamina and strength as with free weights.
Squats with a bar on your back (or front squat) are very complex but best body exercice you can have. So avoid machines.
Squats with a bar on your back (or front squat) are very complex but best body exercice you can have. So avoid machines.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
I'm faced with a conundrum. But first a little background.....I am 68, down to 5'9" from 5'10 1/2" and up until about a couple weeks ago weighed around 180 lbs. Several months ago I got back into the gym to lift since it's too cold to ride around here. I have one of those bodies that responds quickly to lifting. I seem to get cut fast. I've never really been into lifting until about 10 yrs. ago and even then it's only in the winter. So, this winter I decided to lift with more reps rather than progressing to higher weights. For example, instead of doing curls with high weights (per arm) I do 25 reps with a 20 lb dumbbell for each arm. I'm keeping my leg lifts to 3 sets of 10 with 130 lbs. (machine weight) and I do a couple other things like machine flys, etc. with moderate weight. Result? I am now up to 190 lbs! Same 36-37" waist and my jeans (34s) fit ever so slightly more snug. I want to be strong but I don't want to lug an extra 10 lbs around. Is this typical when lifting? Can I keep lifting moderately and get back down to 180? Just looking for wisdom from those who actually know this stuff. TIA
I'm right back into my powerlifting routine after a 4yr layoff. Like you mentioned, my body responds quickly and now with a good 6wks back the poundages are rising nicely. Bodyweight is holding steady, arms and legs getting big once again.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
I agree with the freeweights vs machines. Squats when performed low enough begin to engage what will seem to be an entirely different set of muscles. I set up a milk crate with two weight plates on top (2 25lb olympic size) and only touch them with the hind end, no sitting or bouncing, just use for a depth guage.
#12
Senior Member
There was a time when I did a lot of weight lifting, mostly free weights and dumbells at that. At that time about 7 years ago I was 5'11 180. Over time I had a few orthopedic issues so out of necessity I had to change up my workouts. Now at age 62 I focus more on bodyweight and light dumbells that focuses of strength and flexibility with compound movements emphasizing functional strength. I do a kettle bell circuit twice a week and some yoga. So these days I'm 5'10 and weigh in at 165 with, according to the Tanita, 5% body fat which does me more good on the bike than the added weight.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,546
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5223 Post(s)
Liked 3,579 Times
in
2,341 Posts
got a picture?
#14
Junior Member
I tend to agree with MrWonderful, I'm 59 and been do'in the whole package for over 40+ now.
I used to pack on muscle real easy as well, but now I feel that my metabolism has slowed and the lifting ( great benefits) don't burn off the calories it used to.
But it does stimulate my appetite. If I stop focusing on hours of exercise at one session. I build it around the waistline.
I find that hockey does the same thing. Great cardio. But when you look at an hour of pick up hockey. Which is actually 50min after they clean the ice. You'll only play 20-25 minutes with enough substitutes. And out of that you only really skate ball to the wall 4-5 times. So, 4-5 6-8 second intervals.
Makes me real hungry after , but not a lot of work. "Plus the beers after don't help either "
I used to pack on muscle real easy as well, but now I feel that my metabolism has slowed and the lifting ( great benefits) don't burn off the calories it used to.
But it does stimulate my appetite. If I stop focusing on hours of exercise at one session. I build it around the waistline.
I find that hockey does the same thing. Great cardio. But when you look at an hour of pick up hockey. Which is actually 50min after they clean the ice. You'll only play 20-25 minutes with enough substitutes. And out of that you only really skate ball to the wall 4-5 times. So, 4-5 6-8 second intervals.
Makes me real hungry after , but not a lot of work. "Plus the beers after don't help either "
#15
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
You're just eating too much. Cut back on the food. Smaller meals, more frequently. As you get used to it, much smaller meals. Ride a lot more. 8 hours riding and 2 hours lifting per week is a good proportional allocation for winter. Eat by the scale.
I don't get what you're using for leg weights. I weigh 152 and am doing 3 sets of 12, one-legged, on the horizontal press machine with 110. I should be up to ~140 in a few weeks. My legs are 21" right now. If you're using the leg sled, 2-legged, you should be using at least 500#.
You could cut back to 4 sets of 4 if you think you have enough size and want to focus on strength. I'm still working size for a few weeks and then will start going heavy and try to drop a few more pounds.
The debate about machine vs. free weights is silly. For some things free weights are better, for other things, machines. Your bicycle is a machine.
I don't get what you're using for leg weights. I weigh 152 and am doing 3 sets of 12, one-legged, on the horizontal press machine with 110. I should be up to ~140 in a few weeks. My legs are 21" right now. If you're using the leg sled, 2-legged, you should be using at least 500#.
You could cut back to 4 sets of 4 if you think you have enough size and want to focus on strength. I'm still working size for a few weeks and then will start going heavy and try to drop a few more pounds.
The debate about machine vs. free weights is silly. For some things free weights are better, for other things, machines. Your bicycle is a machine.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times
in
740 Posts
I don't get what you're using for leg weights. I weigh 152 and am doing 3 sets of 12, one-legged, on the horizontal press machine with 110. I should be up to ~140 in a few weeks. My legs are 21" right now. If you're using the leg sled, 2-legged, you should be using at least 500#.
I use the max of 400 lbs. on the sled/machine. I usually do one set of 10 at 300 lbs. Then one set at 350 lbs and finally one set of 20-30 reps at the max. I also do 3X10 with 130 lbs. for leg (quads) raises/extensions and 3x10 of hamstring curls with 70 lbs. I have a very old college football injury (torn hamstring) that rears it's ugly head so I don't push it. I have no idea if any of this is good for my age. I just sort of made this up as I went along.
Last edited by Mark Stone; 01-24-15 at 01:44 PM. Reason: Repaired quote tags
#17
Semper Fi
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,942
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 358 Times
in
241 Posts
Bruce, when you need something like the deletion hit the "report post" icon and ask a moderator for their help. I asked for them to help you on this one, hope this helps you out.
Bill
Bill
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
#18
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,171 Times
in
1,462 Posts
Do you know your body fat? You may need to your cut back your food intake especially fats and probably carbos. It's easy to gain weight over get winter and the increase in lifting combined with less aerobic stuff likely hurts at the same time.
#19
Senior Member
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times
in
740 Posts
Before I gained the weight I was running at 21%for the past year. Haven't been able to check it lately though.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 314
Bikes: early 80's steel 12speed, CAAD10-3 2013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lots of reps with lighter weights shouldn't give you bulk, that's more for toning so I would be a bit surprised if you gain a lot of muscle that way (unless you have very little muscle to begin with).
Unless you know what you are doing with free weights for squats I'd stick with the machines. Some lifters distain machines but generally they are built so that you are unlikely to hurt your back etc by using them. Free weights OTOH can do a lot of harm. You might not get as great a workout on machines as free weights but it wouldn't be completely useless either and is likely safer unless you have good technique
Unless you know what you are doing with free weights for squats I'd stick with the machines. Some lifters distain machines but generally they are built so that you are unlikely to hurt your back etc by using them. Free weights OTOH can do a lot of harm. You might not get as great a workout on machines as free weights but it wouldn't be completely useless either and is likely safer unless you have good technique
#25
Senior Member
You may want to read up on lifting.
Focus on what is actually supported by double blind studies not "Bro-science"...
25 rep schemes, that's cardio...