Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Tubeless road tires

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Tubeless road tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-19, 03:49 PM
  #1  
Broctoon
Super-duper Genius
Thread Starter
 
Broctoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 984 Times in 508 Posts
Tubeless road tires

I have zero experience with tubulars, quite a bit with clinchers of various types and sizes, and just a little with tubeless. My one bike that I’ve set up tubeless is for general kicking around, commuting, chasing my wife and kids down the MUP. I went with a 35mm width on it, because speed and weight aren’t big concerns, but smooth ride on a variety of surfaces is. Most importantly, I don’t want to deal with punctures, and it’s been great for that.

Now I’m thinking about going tubeless on my next road bike. I’ll probably choose a 25mm something. Not interested in running low pressure, but weight savings from foregoing tubes sounds nice, and again, self sealing punctures: big plus.

How much pressure are guys puttting in 25mm tubeless? Any recommendations on tire models? (For general fitness riding/training on smooth pavement)

The rim I’m considering is the Pacenti Brevet 700C. It seems to check all my boxes.

I understand it may be ill advised to pump up any tubeless tire beyond ~60 to 80 lbs. Will this moderately low pressure negate any performance advantage gained by the lack of tubes?

Does a tubeless setup make sense for amateur, performance oriented road biking?
Broctoon is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 04:11 PM
  #2  
Lrdchaos
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
I’m getting ready to setup my tires and wheels tubeless with Schwalbe Pro ones. My goal is to run 80-85 psi as a starting point. It’s my understanding that wheels and tires that are made to run tubeless are fine running the higher pressures. It was the wheels that didn’t have the correct lip to grab the lip on the tire that caused blow outs at higher pressures. But all my info comes from reading forums.

i do know that I love tubeless on my mtb, I’m able to run 22-24psi and have massive amounts of grip.
Lrdchaos is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 04:36 PM
  #3  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times in 1,002 Posts
Originally Posted by Broctoon

I understand it may be ill advised to pump up any tubeless tire beyond ~60 to 80 lbs. Will this moderately low pressure negate any performance advantage gained by the lack of tubes?
Couple things I believe worth reviewing. The first is a chart off of Mavic's "Engineers Talk" blog. Your Pacenti is a 19c rim, and shows a max advisable of 6.7bar which is roughly 95psi. That said, I'd always err on side of using the rim and/or tire manufacturers' rating for maximum if it's less than Mavic's theoretical chart.

The second thing worth looking at is the info at Bicycle Rolling resistance, you'll note if you compare an eg. Conti GP5K in tubed vs tubeless, the rolling resistance differences at various PSIs. You'll note that the tubeless version, run at 80psi, has about the same rolling-resistance as the tubed version at 120psi. YMMV. Conti 5K tubed Vs tubeless



Sy Reene is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 07:53 PM
  #4  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by Broctoon
I understand it may be ill advised to pump up any tubeless tire beyond ~60 to 80 lbs.
What gave you that (wrong) idea?

Originally Posted by Broctoon
Does a tubeless setup make sense for amateur, performance oriented road biking?
Sure.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 06-04-19, 08:23 PM
  #5  
DOS
Senior Member
 
DOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arlington, VA USA
Posts: 2,108
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 253 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 56 Posts
The info about staying below 80 psi is wrong. I am running Schwalbe Pro Ones (23s) on HED Belgium Plus rims (21mm internal width). I go 85-90 psi in the rear, 80 or so in the front (I weigh 215). I find the lower pressure as compared to running 110psi in clinchers is actually the main benefit of tubeless as it makes a significant difference in ride quality. Puncture resistance is nice as well, but I never really has a huge problem with flats even with clinchers.

I had been running 25s but recently went back to 23s for the slight aero benefit and because they were cheaper. But even at 23, the tires blow up to almost 27mm (25s blew up to almost 30mm) so I probably could go with lower pressure, but my ride is quite plush as is so I haven’t felt the need to go lower.
DOS is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Broctoon
Super-duper Genius
Thread Starter
 
Broctoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 984 Times in 508 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
What gave you that (wrong) idea?
Something I read online, saying much more pressure than that puts you at risk of blowouts. It may have been from early days of tubeless tires. I knew if I came here I’d get the real low-down. 👍

@Sy Reene, thanks a bunch! That’s exactly what I was after.
Broctoon is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 08:40 PM
  #7  
Broctoon
Super-duper Genius
Thread Starter
 
Broctoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 984 Times in 508 Posts
Originally Posted by DOS
I go 85-90 psi in the rear, 80 or so in the front (I weigh 215). I find the lower pressure as compared to running 110psi in clinchers is actually the main benefit of tubeless as it makes a significant difference in ride quality. Puncture resistance is nice as well, but I never really has a huge problem with flats even with clinchers.
I do has a problem with punctures—lots of goat head thorns in my area. 😡

I’m hearing same rolling resistance at lower pressures, better ride quality, less weight, and of course flats fix themselves... what’s not to love?
Broctoon is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 08:43 PM
  #8  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by Broctoon
Something I read online, saying much more pressure than that puts you at risk of blowouts. It may have been from early days of tubeless tires. I knew if I came here I’d get the real low-down. ��
There are some rims, particularly hookless ones, that have lower max pressures, but these kinds of wheels generally have very wide internal widths and are primarily aimed at gravel and/or wide, low pressure road set-ups (28mm+ nominal tire widths). Rims in the ~25mm external width region and less will typically support way more pressure than you'd want to use. Then it's just a matter of double-checking your tires of choice; I would bet that most 25mm tires would, again, be rated for a max pressure much higher than you would want to use.

edited to add: one thing to consider with road tubeless is that some sealants are better suited to road pressures than others. I haven't used it myself, but Stan's seems to get a lot of flack at higher than MTB pressures. The only sealant that I've used, and I have no need to try another, is Orange Seal - closes pretty quickly, seals permanently and I've had no issues with it working at ~100psi.

Last edited by WhyFi; 06-04-19 at 08:48 PM.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 11:10 PM
  #9  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Broctoon
I do has a problem with punctures—lots of goat head thorns in my area. 😡

I’m hearing same rolling resistance at lower pressures, better ride quality, less weight, and of course flats fix themselves... what’s not to love?
Not sure about that one, depends how much sealant you use and what tubes I guess. I use a bunch of the stuff, give me a better chance.

IRC makes excellent road tubeless tires. Pro Ones are recommended a lot because they're great, but they're very fragile. IRCs roll and grip very well too.

I run 28s (on wide rims, so they measure 33). I run 60 for gravel and 65 for pavement, 5 less in the front. I'm faster than I used to be on 23s, but a lot has changed since then too.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 11:10 PM
  #10  
robbyville
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times in 156 Posts
I’ve been on tubeless since 2013 and exclusively tubeless since early 2016. Won’t go back. In my case it’s mostly puncture resistance and comfort. I don’t honestly think there’s much of a weight savings over tubes given the tires tend to be heavier and then you’re adding between 1-2oz of sealant. Any savings if at all are pretty negligeable.

I weigh between 152-160 and generally run about 80lbs in my tires.

ive had success with both Bontrager and Orange Seal sealant. I haven’t had any true problems with stan’s But when I did have cuts in tires it seemed to ooze more but I could be totally wrong on that.

ive used a lot of tires. I think my favorites are the Schwalbe Pro One TL Easy, kinda on the fence with my current Continental 5000 TL’s. Had good success with Bontrager R3’s as well but they were on the lower end of the durability scale, they felt fast and light though. Again purely anecdotal and could be completely wrong from a data perspective. I do have a pair of Specialized Turbo’s that have a few weeks of use in them that I’ll probably throw back on once the Conti’s are done.

enjoy and experiment with what works for you! Forgot to mention, all my tires have been either 23 or 25mm haven’t gone wider yet
robbyville is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 11:12 PM
  #11  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
edited to add: one thing to consider with road tubeless is that some sealants are better suited to road pressures than others. I haven't used it myself, but Stan's seems to get a lot of flack at higher than MTB pressures. The only sealant that I've used, and I have no need to try another, is Orange Seal - closes pretty quickly, seals permanently and I've had no issues with it working at ~100psi.
This pretty much sums up my experience too. I've had cuts OS wouldn't seal, but it wasn't the OS's fault.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 06-05-19, 11:10 AM
  #12  
Broctoon
Super-duper Genius
Thread Starter
 
Broctoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 984 Times in 508 Posts
Lots of good insights here. Thanks for the replies. I'm seeing multiple confirmations of what I'd hoped would be the case but wasn't sure.

@Seattle Forrest, comparing apples to apples there might not be much weight difference, but I believe I will see a significant savings when comparing tubeless apples to the tubed oranges I usually ride. Because we have a big problem with goat head thorns in our area (and not just when mountain biking), I often have to choose puncture resistant tires. Gatorskins have worked pretty well for me. I haven't looked up the specs yet, but I believe even the tubeless version of something like a GP 5000 will be a bit lighter. And then I sometimes choose heavy duty tubes as well. Compared to a 100 gram race tube, 1.5 ounces of tubeless sealant isn't much lighter, but compared to the tubes I typically use in an effort to keep the thorns from penetrating, it's a real difference.

I'm not a weight weenie. In fact, each of my bikes is at least ~18 lbs. But I believe wheels/tires are one area where it can really make a difference to count the grams.

So my desire for a tubeless road setup stems from the following priorities:

1- Self-sealing punctures
2- Less weight, even if only by a small margin
3- Better comfort/ride quality
Distant 4th- Ability to air way down/no risk of pinch flats

I have been using Stan's sealant, with 35mm Gravel King SKs on WTB KOM rims, and filling them to about 40 PSI. Based on recommendations here, I think I'll go with Orange Seal for the road bike, in 25mm tires @ about 80 PSI. Still have to pull together all the pieces. I'll build the bike myself, including the wheels.
Broctoon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crank_addict
Classic & Vintage
24
03-02-19 11:43 PM
DarKris
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
22
11-21-17 05:41 PM
wthensler
General Cycling Discussion
4
08-06-17 01:42 PM
Barrettscv
Road Cycling
90
02-27-17 10:36 AM
Monstermash
Bicycle Mechanics
6
01-12-15 05:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.