Cracks around spoke nipples on e-bike rim
#1
Half way there
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times
in
527 Posts
Cracks around spoke nipples on e-bike rim
A friend asked me to look at the rear wheel on his e-bike because he noticed some cracks around the spoke nipples. Sure enough, on almost all of the drive side spokes there were cracks with a few on the non-drive side as well. I measured the tension on the drive side, which averaged 100-110 kgf - nothing that would alarm me. The dish on the wheel is not much, about 5 mm offset. The wheel has a pretty big direct drive hub motor with a spoke circle diameter of 233 mm laced with 36 short 2.6 mm straight gauge spokes laced 1X with all of the spoke heads to the inside of the flanges. The rim is a 26" Weinmann Goliath with no eyelets. 4,500 miles on the wheel. He has contacted the manufacturer and is getting a complete new wheel at a discount so his issue will be resolved soon, but since he wants to replace the damaged rim and have a spare wheel, he asked me for advice about how to choose a stronger rim.
I have a lot of opinions about why, but none that I feel comfortable with:
1. The wheel should be plenty strong with 12 gauge spokes at a lower tension; however after about 6 months of use he felt that they were loosening up so he gave them all a half-turn. It seems that they need a lot of tension to overcome the loosening.
2. Perhaps thinner spokes would be better, though I think the spoke holes on the hub motor are designed with 12g in mind.
3. I like rims with eyelets, though I do hear reasonable arguments about why they are not necessary.
4. Can the torque of this 750W direct drive motor be too much for this rim? Since the torque is applied equally to both flanges why wouldn't the non-drive side show little effect. Some spoke tension is added by the rotation of the hub when accelerating and braking but can this be as much as would be needed to over stress the hub? He tells me that he uses mostly pedal assist and doesn't accelerate quickly.
5. There are no signs that the spokes are pulling through the rim. Could the cracks be a product of cyclical stress?
Here's a picture:
I have a lot of opinions about why, but none that I feel comfortable with:
1. The wheel should be plenty strong with 12 gauge spokes at a lower tension; however after about 6 months of use he felt that they were loosening up so he gave them all a half-turn. It seems that they need a lot of tension to overcome the loosening.
2. Perhaps thinner spokes would be better, though I think the spoke holes on the hub motor are designed with 12g in mind.
3. I like rims with eyelets, though I do hear reasonable arguments about why they are not necessary.
4. Can the torque of this 750W direct drive motor be too much for this rim? Since the torque is applied equally to both flanges why wouldn't the non-drive side show little effect. Some spoke tension is added by the rotation of the hub when accelerating and braking but can this be as much as would be needed to over stress the hub? He tells me that he uses mostly pedal assist and doesn't accelerate quickly.
5. There are no signs that the spokes are pulling through the rim. Could the cracks be a product of cyclical stress?
Here's a picture:
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
So you were seeing 32-33 on the Park Tool gauge?
FB would have argued it was "too much spoke for the rim." 12g/2.6mm spokes probably don't elongate much, if at all, at 100-110kgf.
But I don't know what the solution is, besides exercising the warranty.
FB would have argued it was "too much spoke for the rim." 12g/2.6mm spokes probably don't elongate much, if at all, at 100-110kgf.
But I don't know what the solution is, besides exercising the warranty.
__________________
RUSA #7498
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 08-18-19 at 07:23 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,546
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
DT Alpines, and hope the hub flange doesn't mind 2.3mm elbows?
Probably struggle to find them in a short enough length, though...
Probably struggle to find them in a short enough length, though...
#4
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
Even with a large hub, 1-cross lacing is pretty far from tangential - a good torque by the e-drive is gonna put a lot more force than 110kgf on the spokes, yes?
I'm guessing the low cross, the very stiff, short spoke, and (probably) a rim that is more made for a bicycle than an e-bike. Although the obsolete Goliath looks a lot like the E-Dyno.
I'm guessing the low cross, the very stiff, short spoke, and (probably) a rim that is more made for a bicycle than an e-bike. Although the obsolete Goliath looks a lot like the E-Dyno.
#6
Half way there
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times
in
527 Posts
Yes 32-33. The manufacturer is offering him a complete new back wheel for half-price. They claim that they have had no reports of this from other customers. Could be a fib, but it is likely that only 20% of their customers have as many miles and of them, maybe half would notice the cracks.
Even with a large hub, 1-cross lacing is pretty far from tangential - a good torque by the e-drive is gonna put a lot more force than 110kgf on the spokes, yes?
I'm guessing the low cross, the very stiff, short spoke, and (probably) a rim that is more made for a bicycle than an e-bike. Although the obsolete Goliath looks a lot like the E-Dyno.
I'm guessing the low cross, the very stiff, short spoke, and (probably) a rim that is more made for a bicycle than an e-bike. Although the obsolete Goliath looks a lot like the E-Dyno.
The more I think about, the more convinced I am that 12g spokes are trouble. I'm thinking that a higher quality rim, with smaller diameter spokes (DB if available), and careful attention to proper tensioning is the way to go.
Thanks to all.
#7
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
This is the hub motor. It's huge. I'd estimate that the spokes leave the hub at 30 degrees from radial so 2-cross is probably doable.
The more I think about, the more convinced I am that 12g spokes are trouble. I'm thinking that a higher quality rim, with smaller diameter spokes (DB if available), and careful attention to proper tensioning is the way to go.
The more I think about, the more convinced I am that 12g spokes are trouble. I'm thinking that a higher quality rim, with smaller diameter spokes (DB if available), and careful attention to proper tensioning is the way to go.
The spoke theory appeals to me, too. The large hub makes for shorter spokes. Short, very thick spokes would seem to directly translate motor torque to stress at the spoke nipple. I was trying to quickly calculate how torque at the hub translates to torque and compressive forces at the rim. Suffice for now to say that 1 cross translates to more compressive force.
That said, I see a lot of these things laced up 1-cross with short, thick, straight gauge spokes. Why aren't there more rim breakages?
#8
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
This is the hub motor. It's huge. I'd estimate that the spokes leave the hub at 30 degrees from radial so 2-cross is probably doable.
The more I think about, the more convinced I am that 12g spokes are trouble. I'm thinking that a higher quality rim, with smaller diameter spokes (DB if available), and careful attention to proper tensioning is the way to go.
Thanks to all.
The more I think about, the more convinced I am that 12g spokes are trouble. I'm thinking that a higher quality rim, with smaller diameter spokes (DB if available), and careful attention to proper tensioning is the way to go.
Thanks to all.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
A friend asked me to look at the rear wheel on his e-bike because he noticed some cracks around the spoke nipples. Sure enough, on almost all of the drive side spokes there were cracks with a few on the non-drive side as well. I measured the tension on the drive side, which averaged 100-110 kgf - nothing that would alarm me. The dish on the wheel is not much, about 5 mm offset. The wheel has a pretty big direct drive hub motor with a spoke circle diameter of 233 mm laced with 36 short 2.6 mm straight gauge spokes laced 1X with all of the spoke heads to the inside of the flanges. The rim is a 26" Weinmann Goliath with no eyelets. 4,500 miles on the wheel. He has contacted the manufacturer and is getting a complete new wheel at a discount so his issue will be resolved soon, but since he wants to replace the damaged rim and have a spare wheel, he asked me for advice about how to choose a stronger rim.
I have a lot of opinions about why, but none that I feel comfortable with:
1. The wheel should be plenty strong with 12 gauge spokes at a lower tension; however after about 6 months of use he felt that they were loosening up so he gave them all a half-turn. It seems that they need a lot of tension to overcome the loosening.
2. Perhaps thinner spokes would be better, though I think the spoke holes on the hub motor are designed with 12g in mind.
3. I like rims with eyelets, though I do hear reasonable arguments about why they are not necessary.
4. Can the torque of this 750W direct drive motor be too much for this rim? Since the torque is applied equally to both flanges why wouldn't the non-drive side show little effect. Some spoke tension is added by the rotation of the hub when accelerating and braking but can this be as much as would be needed to over stress the hub? He tells me that he uses mostly pedal assist and doesn't accelerate quickly.
5. There are no signs that the spokes are pulling through the rim. Could the cracks be a product of cyclical stress?
Here's a picture:
I have a lot of opinions about why, but none that I feel comfortable with:
1. The wheel should be plenty strong with 12 gauge spokes at a lower tension; however after about 6 months of use he felt that they were loosening up so he gave them all a half-turn. It seems that they need a lot of tension to overcome the loosening.
2. Perhaps thinner spokes would be better, though I think the spoke holes on the hub motor are designed with 12g in mind.
3. I like rims with eyelets, though I do hear reasonable arguments about why they are not necessary.
4. Can the torque of this 750W direct drive motor be too much for this rim? Since the torque is applied equally to both flanges why wouldn't the non-drive side show little effect. Some spoke tension is added by the rotation of the hub when accelerating and braking but can this be as much as would be needed to over stress the hub? He tells me that he uses mostly pedal assist and doesn't accelerate quickly.
5. There are no signs that the spokes are pulling through the rim. Could the cracks be a product of cyclical stress?
Here's a picture:
JetSet CH-300A
Kruzer King
Basically double wall 26 x 1.75 with a 2.5mm to 3.0mm thick inner wall.
Most e-Bikes are supplied with cheap rims that simply aren't up to the job.
=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#10
Half way there
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times
in
527 Posts
Here's my graphic depiction of 2 cross. Look doable? The angle of the spoke exit from the rim looks too much to me. All of his spokes route to the outside of the hub flange, which makes sense with only 32 mm interflange width, so that may be an issue. I admit to being more curious about this wheel than he probably is, so I'll see if I can talk him into tearing it down and trying a few things.
Thanks again, all.
Last edited by Moe Zhoost; 08-21-19 at 12:40 PM.