Are there any real product reviews out there?
#1
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
Are there any real product reviews out there?
I'm sure we all have our favorite online and / or magazine product reviewers. Sadly, more and more, it appears that all the reviewers now have their reviews written by the manufacturers' marketing departments. Why do I say that? Well . . . perhaps because 95% of the text of the various reviews is precisely the same as everybody else's reviews. It comes out on pretty much the same day. And, no matter where the reviewer is located, the perceptions and conclusions are exactly the same. You can easily read / watch a half dozen reviews and find that they all convey exactly the same information in pretty much identical words.
And it's not unusual to have ALL the initial reviewers "miss" some glaring issue with a product at its introduction only to ALL bring it up when the next year's new-and-improved products come out.
Is anyone else weary of advertising posing as "reviews?" Is there anyone out there who gives honest reviews these days?
And it's not unusual to have ALL the initial reviewers "miss" some glaring issue with a product at its introduction only to ALL bring it up when the next year's new-and-improved products come out.
Is anyone else weary of advertising posing as "reviews?" Is there anyone out there who gives honest reviews these days?
#2
Senior Member
cyclingtips.com is one of the few that gives honest reviews.
bloggers/vloggers nowadays don't even give bad reviews because the goal is to sellout and get sponsored.
bloggers/vloggers nowadays don't even give bad reviews because the goal is to sellout and get sponsored.
#3
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
The problem with bikes/gear...is that for the most part stuff is designed and implemented well enough that there's not much to gripe about.
#4
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
I wanna live wherever bicyclerollingresistance lives.. every tire, no matter the brand, was bought in a store. I wish I could find that selection around NYC.
#5
Senior Member
There are many factors I consider to all my cycling purchases. Much of it is personal preference, like clothing and shoes, but they give a lot of good honest feedback that is really helpful in purchasing decisions.
Stuff nowadays is marketed well but there is plenty that is not worth the money, or has some faults or issues that could be a real problem for some.
They are really good at being honest if it works as advertised, and where it doesnt. Unfortunately, that is rare.
I like DCRainmaker. And of all the bike stuff you can buy, the electronics are the ones that have a very short shelf life and are considered crap within a very short time.
For electronics, I watch DCR but also find independent youtube reviews helpful because they will point stuff out that is really "on the ground". You have to go through a lot of junk, but there are a lot of guys that take the time to run through computers and powermeters, etc
Sometimes DCR is like many car reivews... in depth but not really putting out a genuine opinion. I get it, there is a whole video industry built around pseudo-reviews (GCN is another).
Stuff nowadays is marketed well but there is plenty that is not worth the money, or has some faults or issues that could be a real problem for some.
They are really good at being honest if it works as advertised, and where it doesnt. Unfortunately, that is rare.
I like DCRainmaker. And of all the bike stuff you can buy, the electronics are the ones that have a very short shelf life and are considered crap within a very short time.
For electronics, I watch DCR but also find independent youtube reviews helpful because they will point stuff out that is really "on the ground". You have to go through a lot of junk, but there are a lot of guys that take the time to run through computers and powermeters, etc
Sometimes DCR is like many car reivews... in depth but not really putting out a genuine opinion. I get it, there is a whole video industry built around pseudo-reviews (GCN is another).
Generally with bikes/gear...yes...although when it comes to workout electronics, DCRainmaker is one I trust to be in depth and call out annoyances.
The problem with bikes/gear...is that for the most part stuff is designed and implemented well enough that there's not much to gripe about.
The problem with bikes/gear...is that for the most part stuff is designed and implemented well enough that there's not much to gripe about.
#7
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
#8
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,213
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10147 Post(s)
Liked 5,840 Times
in
3,144 Posts
Even impartial reviews are worse than useless if they consist of someone riding around on some piece of equipment and describing it in meaningless, subjective terms. The usual descriptions of how frames and wheels feel are simply laughable. No technical testing, no data, no benchmarks, no comparisons. The rolling resistance site is an illustrative counter-example.
Last edited by MoAlpha; 11-12-18 at 08:38 PM.
#9
Senior Member
All of the wingless' topics in the linked forum are my product evaluations, written by me, of products I purchased with cash from my pocket.
#11
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
For the products he covers, I would agree. But his range is really limited to electronics / trainers and related products. And when he treads lightly around a subject, he at least acknowledges that he's giving the manufacturer a lot of the benefit of the doubt. [I don't blame him. I used to write golf product reviews. And when you tell the truth about an inferior product, it becomes extremely difficult to get information and advance products from that manufacturer ever again. If you tick them off, they can put you out of the review business -- so I understand that it's a difficult balance.]
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
165 Posts
I used to love Bicycling Magazine when Geoff Drake was an editor. They actually Tested bikes. Measured flex. Weighed them, etc. Now the mag tells you how to get sexy legs. I agree with DCR for electronics. I also love Cycling Plus Magazine from Britain. I believe they have the best reviews of bikes and equipment. Well worth it to me for the extra money to get it here in the states. (and they have awesome photos!)
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
I know magazines are dead but I still like to sit and read them. I get Cyclist Magazine, a UK publication. Reviews are alright but I don't buy it for that.
#14
Senior Member
I read a lot of Apple product reviews and inevitably 98% of them absolutely fawn over every product. Hey, never mind that that $7,000 loaded Macbook Pro has a defective keyboard, we will just keep pretending it's fine.
Reviews are all garbage because reviewers don't want to get blackballed by manufacturers.
Reviews are all garbage because reviewers don't want to get blackballed by manufacturers.
#15
Senior Member
Bicycle Quarterly often rides a bike for months to figure out what does and doesn't work and shake loose anything not on tight. Their reviews can sometimes seem harsh and nit-picky but they'll acknowledge that most of the bikes they choose for review are well designed, well made and often expensive to begin with so they hold them to a higher standard.
After riding it awhile they also change out the OEM tires that are usually cheaper to meet a price point and replace them with better tires that often allows a bike's performance to improve. Tires are often the first thing to wear out and get replaced so it more closely matches a user's ownership experience.
After riding it awhile they also change out the OEM tires that are usually cheaper to meet a price point and replace them with better tires that often allows a bike's performance to improve. Tires are often the first thing to wear out and get replaced so it more closely matches a user's ownership experience.
#17
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,526
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3883 Post(s)
Liked 1,936 Times
in
1,382 Posts
I believe so, yes. As differentiated from supplied by manufacturer, i.e. may not be the same as "bought in store" meaning randomly chosen from stock.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Even impartial reviews are worse than useless if they consist of someone riding around on some piece of equipment and describing it in meaningless, subjective terms. The usual descriptions of how frames and wheels feel are simply laughable. No technical testing, no data, no benchmarks, no comparisons. The rolling resistance site is an illustrative counter-example.
The other problem is really the big one: that being that manufacturers have found out that user reviews are the most-convincing advertising that they can control themselves (astroturfing).
#19
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,213
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10147 Post(s)
Liked 5,840 Times
in
3,144 Posts
One problem you have is that there is still a lot of debate about what qualities should be tested, and about how the testing should be done. "Industrial-grade testing" almost always requires an "industrial-grade budget", but they want to see the results for free, thanks.
The other problem is really the big one: that being that manufacturers have found out that user reviews are the most-convincing advertising that they can control themselves (astroturfing).
The other problem is really the big one: that being that manufacturers have found out that user reviews are the most-convincing advertising that they can control themselves (astroturfing).
In the sailing world, which is only slightly less full of hype, nonsense, and astroturf, we have Practical Sailor, who put out an ad-free, paper monthly, for about 40 bucks a year. They seem to have the budget for bench and on-water testing of products, generically and comparatively, and routinely push and pull stuff to failure. Of course, big boat sailing is a lot higher budget and less casual than cycling and a lot more sailors die or suffer big money losses from gear failures, so they're more willing to pay for good info.
#20
Stratiotika ktemata
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 286
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
And when he treads lightly around a subject, he at least acknowledges that he's giving the manufacturer a lot of the benefit of the doubt. [I don't blame him. I used to write golf product reviews. And when you tell the truth about an inferior product, it becomes extremely difficult to get information and advance products from that manufacturer ever again. If you tick them off, they can put you out of the review business -- so I understand that it's a difficult balance.]
#22
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
I reviewed some prototype lights a few years back. The reviewers who "missed" some of the more obvious flaws got repeat business.
#23
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times
in
508 Posts
__________________
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
#24
☢
I've written over a dozen reviews to Amazon so I can vouch that theirs are authentic. Of course that doesn't mean that it is 100%, but at least it give you some place to start from. The best way is to visit a number of sites, both professional and user reviews.
That's what I do, especially when the purchase is really important/expensive. I rarely get a product that doesn't measure up to what I expected.
That's what I do, especially when the purchase is really important/expensive. I rarely get a product that doesn't measure up to what I expected.
#25
Interocitor Command
Hi-fi and stereo reviews are equally as bad. They've all become fluff pieces.