Old carbon - How safe?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Q: If carbon frames are spontaneously asploding everywhere, where are the class action lawsuits?
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
There would be a tremendous advantage. The primary limiter of span length is the dead weight of the structure. If you could maintain strength while keeping weight down bridges could have longer unsupported spans. The centuries old progress in bridge spans owes more to improvements in available materials than any other factor. CF may be the next logical step in that progression.
CF is relatively new, and unfortunately, in the bicycle world is used to build race bike clones. However if those same materials were used from design forward to build bikes best suited for touring or commuting, you'd see bikes a bit heavy by CF standards, but lighter and stronger than the steel bikes they replace.
The issues with CF aren't the CF, but how the builders use it.
CF is relatively new, and unfortunately, in the bicycle world is used to build race bike clones. However if those same materials were used from design forward to build bikes best suited for touring or commuting, you'd see bikes a bit heavy by CF standards, but lighter and stronger than the steel bikes they replace.
The issues with CF aren't the CF, but how the builders use it.
#55
*
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Bottom line. What will 'break' first. Carbon or steel...
I've seen carbon break a bunch of times. Steel? One time I helped a buddy bend his fork straight on the side of the road after him touching a wheel at high speed in a group and hitting the deck hard at 50 km/h.
I don't dislike carbon, but the delusion factor runs pretty high when materials are discussed....mostly from people who
just put 5k + into a carbon bike...or 3 (and don't have a team paying for it).
I've seen carbon break a bunch of times. Steel? One time I helped a buddy bend his fork straight on the side of the road after him touching a wheel at high speed in a group and hitting the deck hard at 50 km/h.
I don't dislike carbon, but the delusion factor runs pretty high when materials are discussed....mostly from people who
just put 5k + into a carbon bike...or 3 (and don't have a team paying for it).
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Well, I've seen broken frames of every material. And I am pretty well convinced that many carbon frames are stronger than many steel frames.* I am just not happy with the way a carbon frame can hide serious flaws. Steel tends to give warning before failure. I find that comforting.
*I have seen a lot of broken carbon steerer tubes. I have never seen a broken steel steerer tube. I think steerers are a bad place for carbon fiber.
*I have seen a lot of broken carbon steerer tubes. I have never seen a broken steel steerer tube. I think steerers are a bad place for carbon fiber.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
The longest suspension main span seems to around 6,500 feet. Suspension bridges also are some of the longest bridges in the world, not including pontoon bridges.I wonder if the cost of carbon beams out weigh the limiters of using cheaper material. In Washington State, we just finished building a suspension bridge right next to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. The cost was considerable.
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,064
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3017 Post(s)
Liked 3,814 Times
in
1,412 Posts
#61
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,099
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22643 Post(s)
Liked 8,958 Times
in
4,175 Posts
See me personally to collect your prize.
#62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cherry Hill,NJ
Posts: 1,176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting discussion and some good suggestions. I didn't realize this was a hot topic. I 'm not disparaging carbon by posting it. Only asking a question. I'm going to inspect the bike and go from there.
As for details, sorry only additional info i can offer is that the husband was riding with his wife and witnessed her go down.
Lastly, as far as the airplanes are made of carbon fiber debate I'll offer two points. First, apples and oranges. The material, process, and corresponding strengths used by each industry are totally non correlated. Second, for those who point to the Boeing 787 I say, I hope it keeps flying without problems. One need to look no further than the Airbus A300, Boeing 737, and most notably, the Lockheed Electra 188, to find hidden catastrophic flaws in the realm of we don't know what we don't know leaving engineers scratching their heads saying "We didn't know that could happen!" Only time will tell if the 787 along with the new gen planes will prove to be safe over time.
As for details, sorry only additional info i can offer is that the husband was riding with his wife and witnessed her go down.
Lastly, as far as the airplanes are made of carbon fiber debate I'll offer two points. First, apples and oranges. The material, process, and corresponding strengths used by each industry are totally non correlated. Second, for those who point to the Boeing 787 I say, I hope it keeps flying without problems. One need to look no further than the Airbus A300, Boeing 737, and most notably, the Lockheed Electra 188, to find hidden catastrophic flaws in the realm of we don't know what we don't know leaving engineers scratching their heads saying "We didn't know that could happen!" Only time will tell if the 787 along with the new gen planes will prove to be safe over time.
#63
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,311
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1457 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times
in
376 Posts
Hey now, post 17, fully 34 posts ahead. This is my formal protest of the results.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 269
Bikes: Trekalized 7.Sequoia Elite+
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I hear carbon fiber is so strong they might some day make make race cars and grand prix motorcycles out of it.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 386
Bikes: Vitus 979 x 2, Vitus 992, Colnago C40, Colnago C60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
After reading this whole thread, I believe fashion and marketing has overrated the bicycle frame way beyond reality. The legs are what is important, even though we all ride carbon frames to be in fashion.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
And there's nothing wrong with that.
#67
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
I thought you realized that when you started your thread about modern carbon being an over rated fashion statement. Holy delayed reaction, Batman!
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#70
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,816
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3599 Post(s)
Liked 3,424 Times
in
1,947 Posts
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#72
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
Bottom line. What will 'break' first. Carbon or steel...
I've seen carbon break a bunch of times. Steel? One time I helped a buddy bend his fork straight on the side of the road after him touching a wheel at high speed in a group and hitting the deck hard at 50 km/h.
I don't dislike carbon, but the delusion factor runs pretty high when materials are discussed....mostly from people who
just put 5k + into a carbon bike...or 3 (and don't have a team paying for it).
I've seen carbon break a bunch of times. Steel? One time I helped a buddy bend his fork straight on the side of the road after him touching a wheel at high speed in a group and hitting the deck hard at 50 km/h.
I don't dislike carbon, but the delusion factor runs pretty high when materials are discussed....mostly from people who
just put 5k + into a carbon bike...or 3 (and don't have a team paying for it).
There is a myriad of published test results that address this very issue available on line. There are almost as many uTube videos dedicated to the same thing.
Carbon outperforms all materials every time, by a lot. Hands down.
Last edited by Bob Dopolina; 10-02-14 at 08:25 AM.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
The "riding a bike lighter than the UCI minimum" is a complete strawman - if the bikes that the pros are riding are heavier, it's overwhelmingly because their bike is weighed down, not because there's more structural material.
#74
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
Carbon isn't used to construct girders for bridges but the cost would be ASTRONIMCAL and one large bridge would consume a large portion of the global supply.